Cover not available
Article published In:
Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 18:1 (2015) ► pp.41–89

Head movements in Finnish Sign Language on the basis of Motion Capture data

A study of the form and function of nods, nodding, head thrusts, and head pulls

| Department of Languages (Sign Language Centre), University of Jyväskylä
| Department of Music, University of Jyväskylä

This paper reports a study of the forms and functions of head movements produced in the dimension of depth in Finnish Sign Language (FinSL). Specifically, the paper describes and analyzes the phonetic forms and prosodic, grammatical, communicative, and textual functions of nods, head thrusts, nodding, and head pulls occurring in FinSL data consisting of a continuous dialogue recorded with motion capture technology. The analysis yields a novel classification of the kinematic characteristics and functional properties of the four types of head movement. However, it also reveals that there is no perfect correspondence between form and function in the head movements investigated.

Keywords: non-manuals, head movements, prosody, Finnish Sign Language, Motion Capture
Published online: 29 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.18.1.02puu
References
Aarons, Debra
1994 Aspects of the syntax of American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Boston University.Google Scholar
Aboh, Enoch O., Roland Pfau & Ulrike Zeshan
2005 When a wh-word is not a wh-word: The case of Indian Sign Language. In Tanmoy Bhattacharya (ed.), The yearbook of South Asian languages and linguistics 2005, 11–43. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Anderson, Diane S. & Judy S. Reilly
1997 The puzzle of negation: How children move from communicative to grammatical negation in ASL. Applied Psycholinguistics 181. 411–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aoki, Hiromi
2014 Some functions of speaker head nods. In Jürgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin & Curtis LeBaron (eds.), Embodied interaction. Language and body in the material world, 93–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bahan, Benjamin
1996 Non-manual realization of agreement in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Boston University.Google Scholar
Baker, Charlotte & Carol A. Padden
1978 Focusing on the nonmanual components of American Sign Language. In Patricia Siple (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, 27–57. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baker-Shenk, Charlotte
1983 A micro-analysis of the nonmanual components of American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Burger, Birgitta & Petri Toiviainen
2013 MoCap Toolbox – A Matlab toolbox for computational analysis of movement data. In Roberto Bresin (ed.), Proceedings of the 10th Sound and Music Computing Conference (SMC10), 172–178. Stockholm, Sweden: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Crasborn, Onno
2012 Phonetics. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 4–20. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crasborn, Onno & Els van der Kooij
2013 The phonology of focus in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Journal of Linguistics 49(3). 515–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulter, Geoffrey R
1979 American Sign Language typology. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W
2009 Basic linguistic theory volume 1. Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Vos, Connie, Els van der Kooij & Onno Crasborn
2009 Mixed signals: Combining linguistic and affective functions of eyebrows in questions in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Language and Speech 52(2). 315–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S
2006 Descriptive theories, explanatory theories and basic linguistic theory. In Felix K. Ameka, Alan Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds.), Catching language: Issues in grammar writing, 207–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Duarte, Kyle & Sylvie Gibet
2010a Reading between the signs: How are transitions built in signed languages? Paper presented at 10th Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research Conference (TISLR 10) , West Lafayette, IN, September 2010.
2010b Heterogeneous data sources for signed language analysis and synthesis: The signcom project. In Proceedings of the LREC 2010 , 461–468. Paris: ELRA.
Emmorey, Karen & Judy S. Reilly
1998 The development of quotation and reported action: Conveying perspective in ASL. In Eve V. Clark (ed.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Stanford Child Language Research Forum, 81–90. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen
1999 Do signers gesture? In Lynn S. Messing & Ruth Campbell (eds.), Gesture, speech, and sign, 133–159. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth
1993 Space in Danish Sign Language. The semantics and morphosyntax of the use of space in a visual language. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
1995 Point of view expressed through shifters. In Karen Emmorey & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 133–154. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susan D
2006 Questions and negation in American Sign Language. In Ulrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 165–197. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Geraci, Carlo
2005 Negation in LIS (Italian Sign Language). In Leah Bateman & Cheron Ussery (eds.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 351, 217–230. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K
1994 An introduction to functional grammar (2nd edition). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Annika & Markus Steinbach
2011 Nonmanuals in sign languages. Sign Language & Linguistics 14(1). 3–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jantunen, Tommi
2007 The equative sentence in Finnish Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 10(2). 113–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Ellipsis in Finnish Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36(3). 303–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. Submitted. Clausal coordination and subordinate complement clauses in Finnish Sign Language. Manuscript, April 2014.
Jantunen, Tommi, Birgitta Burger, Danny De Weerdt, Irja Seilola & Tuija Wainio
2012 Experiences from collecting motion capture data on continuous signing. In Onno Crasborn, et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Interactions Between Corpus and Lexicon [organized as a part of LREC 2012 at Istanbul, Turkey], 75–82. Paris: ELRA.Google Scholar
Johnston, Trevor & Jane van Roekel
2014 Mouth-based non-manual coding schema used in the Auslan corpus: Explanation, application and preliminary results. In Onno Crasborn, et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Beyond the Manual Channel. [Organized as part of LREC 2014 in Reykjavik, Iceland.], 81–88. Paris: ELRA.Google Scholar
Kooij, Els van der, Onno Crasborn & Wim Emmerik
2006 Explaining prosodic body leans in Sign Language of the Netherlands: Pragmatics required. Journal of Pragmatics 381. 1598–1614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lautala, Saara
2012 Kieliopilliset sidoskeinot kahdessa suomalaisella viittomakielellä tuotetussa asiatekstissä [Grammatical cohesion devices in two text documents of Finnish Sign Language]. MA thesis in Finnish Sign Language, Department of Languages, University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K
1980 American Sign Language syntax. The Hague: Mouton PublishersGoogle Scholar
1986 Head thrust in ASL conditional sentences. Sign Language Studies 521. 243–262.Google Scholar
2003 Grammar, gesture and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane
1995 The point of view predicate in American Sign Language. In Karen Emmorey & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 155–170. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lukasczyk, Ulrika
2008 Sanottua, ajateltua ja tehtyä. Referointi kolmessa suomalaisella viittomakielellä tuotetussa fiktiivisessä kertomuksessa. [What is said, thought and done. The representation of speech, thought and action in three fictive narratives produced in FinSL]. MA thesis in Pedagogics, Department of Teacher Education, University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
McClave, Evelyn Z
2000 Linguistic functions of head movements in the context of speech. Journal of Pragmatics 321. 855–878. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McIntire, Marina L. & Judy S. Reilly
1988 Nonmanual behaviors in L1 and L2 learners of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 611. 351–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKee, Rachel
2006 Aspects of interrogatives and negation in New Zealand Sign Language. In Ulrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 70–90. Nijemegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Benjamin Bahan & Robert G. Lee
2000 The syntax of American Sign Language. Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Wendy Sandler
1999 Prosodic phonology in Israeli Sign Language. Language & Speech 42(2). 143–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel
1986 Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Okrent, Arika
2002 A modality-free notion of gesture and how it can help us with the morpheme vs. gesture question in sign language linguistics (or at least give us some criteria to work with). In Richard P. Meier, Kearsy Cormier & David Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 175–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padden, Carol
1990 The relation between space and grammar in ASL verb morphology. In Ceil Lucas (ed.), Sign language research: Theoretical issues, 118–132. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer
2010 Nonmanuals: Their grammatical and prosodic roles. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages: A Cambridge language survey, 381–402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pimiä, Päivi
1987 Suomalaisen viittomakielen suunliikkeistä. [On mouth movements in Finnish Sign Language.] In Päivi Pimiä & Terhi Rissanen (eds.), Kolme kirjoitusta viittomakielestä. Publications of the Department of General Linguistics 171, 25–47. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Puupponen, Anna
2012 Horisontaaliset ja vertikaaliset päänliikkeet suomalaisessa viittomakielessä [Horizontal and vertical head movements in FinSL], MA thesis, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland. [[URL]].Google Scholar
Puupponen, Anna, Tommi Jantunen, Tuija Wainio & Birgitta Burger
2013 Messing with the head: On the form and function of head movements in Finnish Sign Language. Presentation at the 11th Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research Conference (TISLR 11) , University College London, July 2013.
Rainò, Päivi
2001 Mouthings and mouth gestures in Finnish Sign Language (FinSL). In Penny Boyes Braem & Rachel Sutton-Spence (eds.), The hands are the head of the mouth. The mouth as articulator in sign languages, 41–29. Hamburg: Signum-Verlag.Google Scholar
Reilly, Judy S., Marina L. McIntire & Ursula Bellugi
1990 Faces: The relationship between language and affect. In Virginia Volterra & Carol J. Erting (eds.), From gesture to language in hearing and deaf children, 128–142. Berlin: Springer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reilly, Judy S. & Ursula Bellugi
1996 Competition on the face: Affect and language in ASL motherese. Journal of Child Language 23(1). 219–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rissanen, Terhi
1985 Viittomakielen perusrakenne. Publications of the Department of General Linguistics 12. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
1992 Näkökulman vaihtamisesta suomalaisessa viittomakielessä. In Esa Itkonen, Anneli Pajunen & Timo Haukioja (eds.), Kielitieteen kentän kartoitusta. Publications of the Department of Finnish and General Linguistics 121, 23–32. Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy
1999a Prosody in two natural language modalities. Language and Speech 421. 127–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999b The medium and the message: Prosodic interpretation of linguistic content in Israeli Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 2(2). 187–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Prosody and syntax in sign languages. Transactions of the Philological Society 108(3). 298–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Visual prosody. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 55–76. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Savolainen, Leena
2006 Interrogatives and negatives in Finnish Sign Language: An overview. In Ulrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 284–302. Nijemegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Sutton-Spence, Rachel & Bencie Woll
1999 The linguistics of British Sign Language. An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff
1996 Introducing functional grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Tyrone, Martha E., Hosung Nam, Elliot Saltzman, Gaurav Mathur & Louis Goldstein
2010 Prosody and movement in American Sign Language: A task-dynamics approach. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Chicago.Google Scholar
Van Herreweeghe, Mieke & Myriam Vermeerbergen
2006 Interrogatives and negatives in Flemish Sign Language. In Ulrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 225–226. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Velupillai, Viveka
2012 An introduction to linguistic typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B
1990 An experimental investigation of stressed sign production. International Journal of Sign Language 11. 41–59.Google Scholar
1991 Intonation and focus in American Sign Language. In Yongkyoon No & Mark Libucha (eds.), ESCOL ’90: Proceedings of the 7th Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, 320–331. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
2000 Phonological and prosodic layering of nonmanuals in American Sign Language. In Karen Emmorey & Harlan Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited, 215–244. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. & Cynthia Patschke
1998 Body leans and the marking of contrast in American Sign Language. Journal of Pragmatics 301. 275–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, Sherman
1992 The phonetics of fingerspelling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winston, Elizabeth A
1991 Spatial referencing and cohesion in an American Sign Language text. Sign Language Studies 731. 397–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woll, Bencie
2009 Do mouths sign? Do hands speak? Echo phonology as a window on language genesis. In Rudolf Botha & Henriette de Swart (eds.), Language evolution: The view from restricted linguistic systems, 203–224. Utrecht: LOT Occasional Series.Google Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike
2004 Hand, head and face: Negative constructions in sign languages. Linguistic Typology 8(1). 1–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages. Nijmegen: Ishara Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zucchi, Sandro
2009 Along the time line: Tense and time adverbs in Italian Sign Language. Natural Language Semantics 17(2). 99–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 45 other publications

Bauer, Anastasia, Anna Kuder, Marc Schulder, Job Schepens & Laura Morett
2024. Phonetic differences between affirmative and feedback head nods in German Sign Language (DGS): A pose estimation study. PLOS ONE 19:5 ► pp. e0304040 ff. DOI logo
Brentari, Diane
2019. Sign Language Phonology, DOI logo
Burkova, Svetlana, Evgeniia Khristoforova & Vadim Kimmelman
2023. Chapter 4. Syntactic functions of nonmanuals in Russian Sign Language. In Advances in Sign Language Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 108], ► pp. 90 ff. DOI logo
Capirci, Olga, Chiara Bonsignori & Alessio Di Renzo
2022. Signed Languages: A Triangular Semiotic Dimension. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Chonggao, Pang, Neal Wagner, Sundhararajan, Le Hoang Son & Meng Joo
2021. Simulation of student classroom behavior recognition based on cluster analysis and random forest algorithm. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 40:2 ► pp. 2421 ff. DOI logo
Dachkovsky, Svetlana, Rose Stamp & Wendy Sandler
2018. Constructing Complexity in a Young Sign Language. Frontiers in Psychology 9 DOI logo
Emmorey, Karen
2017. How to distinguish gesture from sign: New technology is not the answer. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40 DOI logo
Esselink, Lyke, Marloes Oomen & Floris Roelofsen
2023. 2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Workshops (ICASSPW), ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Han, Jiaonan & Mohamed Abdelaziz
2022. The Method for Identifying Employees’ Emotions in Adverse States Incorporating PSO-kNN Algorithm and Multiple Physiological Parameters. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2022 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hu, Liang, Qi Zeng, Xinli Wu, Zhaofang Lv, Anand Paul, Simon K.S. Cheung, Chiung Ching Ho & Sadia Din
2021. Simulation of English classroom effectiveness based on human-computer interaction and facial identification. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 40:4 ► pp. 7025 ff. DOI logo
Hu, Yan, QiangQiang Li & Shih-wei Hsu
2022. Interactive visual computer vision analysis based on artificial intelligence technology in intelligent education. Neural Computing and Applications 34:12 ► pp. 9315 ff. DOI logo
Huang, Hong, Risheng Deng & Chuan Lin
2020. Analysis Technology of Tennis Sports Match Based on Data Mining and Image Feature Retrieval. Complexity 2020 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Jantunen, Tommi
2016. Clausal coordination in Finnish Sign Language. Studies in Language 40:1 ► pp. 204 ff. DOI logo
Jantunen, Tommi, Danny De Weerdt, Birgitta Burger & Anna Puupponen
2020. The more you move, the more action you construct. Gesture 19:1 ► pp. 72 ff. DOI logo
Jianbang, Guo, Sun Changxin, Anand Paul, Simon K.S. Cheung, Chiung Ching Ho & Sadia Din
2021. Real-time monitoring of physical education classroom in colleges and universities based on open IoT and cloud computing. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 40:4 ► pp. 7397 ff. DOI logo
Jingchao, Hu, Haiying Zhang, Neal Wagner, Sundhararajan, Le Hoang Son & Meng Joo
2021. Recognition of classroom student state features based on deep learning algorithms and machine learning. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 40:2 ► pp. 2361 ff. DOI logo
Juan, Wan, Anand Paul, Simon K.S. Cheung, Chiung Ching Ho & Sadia Din
2021. Gesture recognition and information recommendation based on machine learning and virtual reality in distance education. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 40:4 ► pp. 7509 ff. DOI logo
Karabüklü, Serpil & Aslı Gürer
2024. Prosody of focus in Turkish Sign Language. Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Liang, Huai
2021. Evaluation of fitness state of sports training based on self-organizing neural network. Neural Computing and Applications 33:9 ► pp. 3953 ff. DOI logo
Lianzhen, Chen, Zhu Hua & Wei Wang
2021. Athlete Rehabilitation Evaluation System Based on Internet of Health Things and Human Gait Analysis Algorithm. Complexity 2021 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Qinqin
2022. Aerobics posture recognition based on neural network and sensors. Neural Computing and Applications 34:5 ► pp. 3337 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Yuzhong, Yuliang Ji, Neal Wagner, Sundhararajan, Le Hoang Son & Meng Joo
2021. Target recognition of sport athletes based on deep learning and convolutional neural network. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 40:2 ► pp. 2253 ff. DOI logo
Loos, Cornelia & Donna Jo Napoli
2021. Expanding Echo: Coordinated Head Articulations as Nonmanual Enhancements in Sign Language Phonology. Cognitive Science 45:5 DOI logo
Malaia, Evie
2017. Current and future methodologies for quantitative analysis of information transfer in sign language and gesture data. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40 DOI logo
Malaia, Evie, Joshua D. Borneman & Ronnie B. Wilbur
2018. Information Transfer Capacity of Articulators in American Sign Language. Language and Speech 61:1 ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Mantovan, Lara, Beatrice Giustolisi & Francesca Panzeri
2019. Signing something while meaning its opposite: The expression of irony in Italian Sign Language (LIS). Journal of Pragmatics 142 ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Mao, Feng & ShiHao Han
2022. Visual analysis of action using machine learning and distributed expectation-maximization algorithm. Computers and Electrical Engineering 103 ► pp. 108293 ff. DOI logo
Puupponen, Anna
2019. Towards understanding nonmanuality: A semiotic treatment of signers’ head movements. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1 DOI logo
Sivunen, Nina & Elina Tapio
2022. “Do you understand (me)?” negotiating mutual understanding by using gaze and environmentally coupled gestures between two deaf signing participants. Applied Linguistics Review 13:6 ► pp. 983 ff. DOI logo
Sun, Changxin, Di Ma, Neal Wagner, Sundhararajan, Le Hoang Son & Meng Joo
2021. SVM-based global vision system of sports competition and action recognition. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 40:2 ► pp. 2265 ff. DOI logo
Sze, Felix
2022. From gestures to grammatical non-manuals in sign language: A case study of polar questions and negation in Hong Kong Sign Language. Lingua 267 ► pp. 103188 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Chenhang & Cong Du
2022. Optimization of physical education and training system based on machine learning and Internet of Things. Neural Computing and Applications 34:12 ► pp. 9273 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Linuo, Anand Paul, Simon K.S. Cheung, Chiung Ching Ho & Sadia Din
2021. Simulation of athlete gait recognition based on spectral features and machine learning. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 40:4 ► pp. 7459 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Linuo & Varatharajan Ramachandran
2021. Simulation of sports movement training based on machine learning and brain-computer interface. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 40:4 ► pp. 6409 ff. DOI logo
Wenyan, Nie, Anand Paul, Simon K.S. Cheung, Chiung Ching Ho & Sadia Din
2021. Construction of network open teaching platform of analytical chemistry based on facial recognition and artificial intelligence. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 40:4 ► pp. 7435 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Shilong, Anand Paul, Simon K.S. Cheung, Chiung Ching Ho & Sadia Din
2021. Simulation of classroom student behavior recognition based on PSO-kNN algorithm and emotional image processing. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 40:4 ► pp. 7273 ff. DOI logo
Xin, Liu
2022. Evaluation of factors affecting dance training effects based on reinforcement learning. Neural Computing and Applications 34:9 ► pp. 6773 ff. DOI logo
Xiong, Qianli, Wazid Michalak & Muhammad Arif
2022. IoT Networks and Digital Twin Technology-Based English Classroom Immersive Teaching. Security and Communication Networks 2022 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Xu, Shaofeng, Junmeng Chen & Qiangyi Li
2022. Application of Multiprocessing Technology of Motion Video Image Based on Sensor Technology in Track and Field Sports. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2022 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Yang
2021. Research on sports action training method based on generative confrontation network model and artificial intelligence. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Yu, Yue & Xiaopeng Chi
2021. Monitoring and management system for college students’ extracurricular physical exercise based on artificial intelligence. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Mei, Lijun Zhang, Anand Paul, Simon K.S. Cheung, Chiung Ching Ho & Sadia Din
2021. Cross-cultural O2O English teaching based on AI emotion recognition and neural network algorithm. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 40:4 ► pp. 7183 ff. DOI logo
Zhou, Hongzhi & Gan Yu
2021. Research on pedestrian detection technology based on the SVM classifier trained by HOG and LTP features. Future Generation Computer Systems 125 ► pp. 604 ff. DOI logo
Zhou, Hongzhi, Gan Yu & Wei Wang
2021. Research on Fast Pedestrian Detection Algorithm Based on Autoencoding Neural Network and AdaBoost. Complexity 2021 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Östling, Robert, Carl Börstell & Servane Courtaux
2018. Visual Iconicity Across Sign Languages: Large-Scale Automated Video Analysis of Iconic Articulators and Locations. Frontiers in Psychology 9 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.