Traditionally in sign language research, the issue of whether a lexical sign is articulated with one hand or two has been treated as a strictly phonological matter. We argue that accounting for two-handed signs also requires considering meaning as a motivating factor. We report results from a Swadesh list comparison, an analysis of semantic patterns among two-handed signs, and a picture-naming task. Comparing four unrelated languages, we demonstrate that the two hands are recruited to encode various relationship types in sign language lexicons. We develop the general principle that inherently “plural” concepts are straightforwardly mapped onto our paired human hands, resulting in systematic use of the two hands across sign languages. In our analysis, “plurality” subsumes four primary relationship types — interaction, location, dimension, and composition — and we predict that signs with meanings that encompass these relationships — such as ‘meet’, ‘empty’, ‘large’, or ‘machine’ — will preferentially be two-handed in any sign language.
2008Lexical plurals. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Ahlgren, Inger & Brita Bergman
2006Det svenska teckenspråket. Teckenspråk och teckenspråkiga: Kunskaps- och forskningsöversikt (SOU 2006:291), 11–70. Statens offentliga utredningar.
Al-Fityani, Kinda & Carol Padden
2010Sign languages in the Arab world. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages: A Cambridge language survey, 433–450. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Aronoff, Mark
2007In the beginning was the word. Language 83(4). 803–830.
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Wendy Sandler
2005The paradox of sign language morphology. Language 811. 301–344.
Battison, Robbin
1978Lexical borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.
Benedicto, Elena & Diane Brentari
2004Where did all the arguments go?: Argument-changing properties of classifiers in ASL. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22(4). 743–810.
Bergen, Benjamin K
2004The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language 80(2). 290–311. .
Bergman, Brita
1979Signed Swedish. Stockholm: Liber.
Bergman, Brita
1982aTeckenspråkstranskription (Forskning om teckenspråk X). Stockholm: Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University.
Bergman, Brita
1982bSign typology (Forskning om teckenspråk XI). Stockholm: Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University.
Bergman, Brita
1983Verbs and adjectives: Morphological processes in Swedish Sign Language. In Jim Kyle & Bencie Woll (eds.), Language in sign: An international perspective on sign language, 3–9. London: Croom Helm.
Bergman, Brita & Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen
2010Transmission of sign languages in the Nordic countries. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages: A Cambridge language survey, 74–94. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Bergman, Brita & Johanna Mesch
2004ECHO data set for Swedish Sign Language (SSL). Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University.
Björkstrand, Thomas
2016Swedish Sign Language dictionary online. Stockholm: Sign Language Section, Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University. teckensprakslexikon.su.se.
Blevins, James P., Farrell Ackerman & Robert Malouf
2016. Morphology as an adaptive discriminative system. In Heidi Harley & Daniel Siddiqi (eds.) Morphological metatheory 271 302 Amsterdam John Benjamins
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933Language. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
Brennan, Mary
1990Word formation in British Sign Language. Stockholm University.
Brentari, Diane
1998A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brentari, Diane & John A. Goldsmith
1993Secondary licensing and the nondominant hand in ASL phonology. In Geoffrey R. Coulter (ed.), Current issues in ASL phonology: Phonetics and phonology 31, 19–41. New York, NY & San Francisco, CA: Academic Press.
Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Campbell, Lyle
2004Historical linguistics, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Corbett, Greville
2000Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crasborn, Onno
2011The other hand in sign language phonology. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, Vol. 11, 223–240. Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.
Crasborn, Onno, Johanna Mesch, Dafydd Waters, Els van der Kooij, Bencie Woll & Brita Bergman
1893Vergleichende Syntax der Indogermanischen Sprachen: Erster Teil. Strassburg: Trübner.
Dingemanse, Mark
2012Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Linguistics and Language Compass 6(10). 654–672. .
Emmorey, Karen
2002Language, cognition, and the brain: Insights from sign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Emmorey, Karen
(ed.)2003Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Emmorey, Karen
2014Iconicity as structure mapping. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 369(1651).
Fischer, Susan D
1973Two processes of reduplication in the American Sign Language. Foundations of Language 91. 469–480.
Friedman, Lynn A
1977On the other hand: New perspectives on American Sign Language. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Frishberg, Nancy
1975Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American Sign Language. Language 51(3). 696–719.
Greenberg, Joseph H
1957Essays in linguistics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Guerra Currie, Anne-Marie P., Richard P. Meier & Keith Walters
2002A crosslinguistic examination of the lexicons of four signed languages. In Richard P. Meier, Kearsy Cormier & David Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken language, 224–237. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hay, Jennifer B. & R. Harald Baayen
2005Shifting paradigms: Gradient structure in morphology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9(7). 342–348. .
Hellquist, Elof
1922Svensk etymologisk ordbok. Lund: C. W. K. Gleerups förlag.
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson
1980Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2). 251–299.
2014The emergence of embedded structure: Insights from Kafr Qasem Sign Language. Frontiers in Psychology 5(525). 1–15.
Kisch, Shifra
2008“Deaf discourse”: The social construction of deafness in a Bedouin community. Medical Anthropology 27(3). 283–313.
Kisch, Shifra
2012Demarcating generations of signers in the dynamic sociolinguistic landscape of a shared sign language: The case of the Al-Sayyid Bedouin. In Ulrike Zeshan & Connie de Vos (eds.), Sign languages in village communitites: Anthropological and linguistic insights, 87–126. Berlin & Nijmegen: Mouton de Gruyter & Ishara Press.
Klima, Edward S. & Ursula Bellugi
1979The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kooij, Els van der
2002Phonological categories in Sign Language of the Netherlands: The role of phonetic implementation and iconicity. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam PhD dissertation. Utrecht: LOT.
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria & Bernhard Wälchli
2001The Circum-Baltic languages. In Östen Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.), Circum-Baltic languages. Volume 2: Grammar and typology, vol. 551, 615–750. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kwon, Nahyun & Erich R. Round
2015Phonaesthemes in morphological theory. Morphology 25(1). 1–27.
Kyle, Jim G. & Bencie Woll
(eds.)1985Sign language: The study of deaf people and their language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Langacker, Ronald
1990Concept, image, symbol. Berlin: Mouton.
Lepic, Ryan
2015Motivation in morphology: Lexical patterns in ASL and English. San Diego, CA: University of California PhD dissertation. (Retrieved from [URL]).
Liddell, Scott K & Robert E. Johnson
1989American Sign Language: The phonological base. Sign Language Studies 641. 195–278.
Liddell, Scott K
2003Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Malkiel, Yakov
1967Each word has a history of its own. Glossa 11. 137–149.
Meir, Irit
2002A cross-modality perspective on verb agreement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 201. 413–450.
Meir, Irit
2010Iconicity and metaphor: Constraints on metaphorical extension of iconic forms. Language 86(4). 865–896.
Meir, Irit, Mark Aronoff, Wendy Sandler & Carol Padden
2004Sign languages and compounding. In Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding, 301–322. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Meir, Irit, Assaf Israel, Wendy Sandler, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff
Meir, Irit, Carol Padden, Mark Aronoff & Wendy Sandler
2013Competing iconicities in the structure of languages. Cognitive Linguistics 24(2). 309–343.
Meir, Irit & Wendy Sandler
2008A language in space: The story of Israeli Sign Language. New York, NY & London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Meir, Irit, Wendy Sandler, Carol A. Padden & Mark Aronoff
(eds.)2012Al-Sayyid Bedouin Sign Language: A dictionary. Haifa & San Diego, CA: Sign Language Research Lab, University of Haifa & Center for Research in Language, UCSD.
Meir, Irit, Wendy Sandler, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff
2010Emerging sign languages. In Mark Marschark & Patricia E. Spencer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language and education, 267–280. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Padden, Carol, Irit Meir, Wendy Sandler & Mark Aronoff
2010Against all expectations: Encoding subjects and objects in a new language. In Donna Gerdts, John Moore & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Hypothesis A/hypothesis B: Linguistic explorations in honor of David M. Perlmutter, 383–400. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Padden, Carol & David M. Perlmutter
1987American Sign Language and the architecture of phonological theory. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 51. 335–375.
Perniss, Pamela, Robin L. Thompson & Gabriella Vigliocco
2010Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology 11 (December 2010). 227.
Pfau, Roland & Enoch O. Aboh
2012On the syntax of spatial adpositions in sign languages. In Evan Cohen (ed.), Proceedings of IATL 27 (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 65), 83–104. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
2006Pluralization in sign and in speech: A cross-modal typological study. Linguistic Typology 10(2). 135–182.
Pizzuto, Elena & Serena Corazza
1996Noun morphology in Italian Sign Language (LIS). Lingua 98(1). 169–196.
Prillwitz, Siegmund, Regina Leven, Heiko Zienert, Thomas Hanke & Jan Henning
1989HamNoSys: Version 2.0. Hamburg: Signum Verlag.
Rosch, Eleanor
1978Principles of categorization. In Eleanor Rosch & Barbara B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and categorization, 27–48. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sandler, Wendy
1989Phonological representation of the sign: Linearity and nonlinearity in sign language phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
Sandler, Wendy
1993Hand in hand: The roles of the nondominant hand in sign language phonology. The Linguistic Review 101. 337–390.
Sandler, Wendy
1995Markedness in the handshapes of sign language: A componential analysis. In Jeroen van der Weijer & Harry van der Hulst (eds.), Leiden in last: Holland Institute of Linguistics phonology papers, 369–399. The Hague: Holland Academie Graphics.
1999bProsody in two natural language modalities. Language and Speech 42(2-3). 127–142.
Sandler, Wendy
2006Phonology, phonetics, and the nondominant hand. In Louis Goldstein, D.H. Whalen & Catherine Best (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology: Varieties of phonological competence, 185–212. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sandler, Wendy
2012The phonological organization of sign languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(3). 162–182.
Sandler, Wendy, Mark Aronoff, Irit Meir & Carol Padden
2011The gradual emergence of phonological form in a new language. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29(2). 503–543.
Sandler, Wendy, Mark Aronoff, Carol Padden & Irit Meir
2014Language emergence: Al-Sayyid Bedouin Sign Language. In Nick Enfield, Paul Kockelman & Jack Sidnell (eds.), Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology, 250–284. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin
2006Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sandler, Wendy, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff
2005The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102(7). 2661–2665.
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1959Course in general linguistics. Translated, with an introduction and notes by Wade Baskin. (ed.) Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Savir, Hava
1992Gateway to Israeli Sign Language (First Version). Tel Aviv: The Association of the Deaf in Israel.
Scott, Daryl A., Rivka Carmi, Khalil Eldebour, Geoffrey M. Duyk, Edwin M. Stone & Val Sheffield
1995Nonsyndromic autosomal recessive deafness is linked to the DFNB1 locus in a large inbred Bedouin family from Israel. American Journal of Human Genetics 57(4). 965–968.
Siple, Patricia
1978Visual constraints for sign language communication. Sign Language Studies 191. 95–110.
Stokoe, William C
1960Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication system of the American Deaf (Studies in linguistics: Occasional papers 8). Buffalo, NY: Dept. of Anthropology and Linguistics, University of Buffalo.
1978Figure and Ground in complex sentences. In Joseph H Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language, vol. 4, Syntax, 625–649. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Talmy, Leonard
2000Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. I1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Talmy, Leonard
2003The representation of spatial structure in spoken and signed language. In Karen Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages, 169–195. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Taub, Sarah F
2001Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in ASL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tennant, Richard A. & Marianne Gluszak Brown
2010The American Sign Language handshape dictionary, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Valli, Clayton & Ceil Lucas
1995The linguistics of American Sign Language: A resource text for ASL users. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Van Cleve, John Vickrey & Barry A. Crouch
1989A place of their own: Creating the Deaf community in America. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
2008Complex predicates involving events, time and aspect: Is this why sign languages look so similar? In Josep Quer (ed.), Signs of the time: Selected papers from TISLR 2004, 217–250. Hamburg: Signum Verlag.
2004Cognitive iconicity: Conceptual spaces, meaning, and gesture in signed languages. Cognitive Linguistics 15(2). 119–147.
Wilson, Margaret
2002Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9(4). 625–636.
Wisniewski, Edward J
2010On using count nouns, mass nouns, and pluralia tantum: What counts? In Francis Jeffry Pelletier (ed.), Kinds, things, and stuff: Mass terms and generics, 1–24. Oxford Scholarship Online.
Woll, Bencie, Onno Crasborn, Els van der Kooij, Johanna Mesch & Brita Bergman
2010Extended Swadesh list for signed languages. [URL].
Woodward, James C
1976Signs of change: Historical variation in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 101. 81–94.
Zeshan, Ulrike & Connie de Vos
(eds.)2012Sign languages in village communities: Anthropological and linguistic insights. Berlin & Nijmegen: Mouton de Gruyter & Ishara Press.
Cited by
Cited by 31 other publications
ANIBLE, BENJAMIN
2020. Iconicity in American Sign Language–English translation recognition. Language and Cognition 12:1 ► pp. 138 ff.
Bradley, Chuck, Evie A. Malaia, Jeffrey Mark Siskind, Ronnie B. Wilbur & Marcus Perlman
2022. Visual form of ASL verb signs predicts non-signer judgment of transitivity. PLOS ONE 17:2 ► pp. e0262098 ff.
Brentari, Diane
2019. Sign Language Phonology,
Brentari, Diane, Rabia Ergin, Ann Senghas, Pyeong Whan Cho, Eli Owens & Marie Coppola
2021. Community interactions and phonemic inventories in emerging sign languages. Phonology 38:4 ► pp. 571 ff.
HWANG, SO-ONE, NOZOMI TOMITA, HOPE MORGAN, RABIA ERGIN, DENIZ İLKBAŞARAN, SHARON SEEGERS, RYAN LEPIC & CAROL PADDEN
2017. Of the body and the hands: patterned iconicity for semantic categories. Language and Cognition 9:4 ► pp. 573 ff.
Krebs, Julia, Ronnie B. Wilbur, Phillip M. Alday & Dietmar Roehm
2019. The Impact of Transitional Movements and Non-Manual Markings on the Disambiguation of Locally Ambiguous Argument Structures in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS). Language and Speech 62:4 ► pp. 652 ff.
Kuhn, Jeremy
2019. Pluractionality and distributive numerals. Language and Linguistics Compass 13:2 ► pp. e12309 ff.
2018. A Construction Morphology Approach to Sign Language Analysis. In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology, 4], ► pp. 141 ff.
MAKAROĞLU, Bahtiyar
2020. Türk İşaret Dilinde Anlamsal Bağlantılığın ve Gösterimselliğin Sözlüksel Erişime Etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 37:2 ► pp. 276 ff.
Meir, Irit & Ariel Cohen
2018. Metaphor in Sign Languages. Frontiers in Psychology 9
Napoli, Donna Jo & Stephanie Liapis
2019. Effort reduction in articulation in sign languages and dance. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 3:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
OCCHINO, CORRINE, BENJAMIN ANIBLE & JILL P. MORFORD
2020. The role of iconicity, construal, and proficiency in the online processing of handshape. Language and Cognition 12:1 ► pp. 114 ff.
Perlman, Marcus, Hannah Little, Bill Thompson & Robin L. Thompson
2018. Iconicity in Signed and Spoken Vocabulary: A Comparison Between American Sign Language, British Sign Language, English, and Spanish. Frontiers in Psychology 9
Pleyer, Michael, Ryan Lepic & Stefan Hartmann
2022. Compositionality in Different Modalities: A View from Usage-Based Linguistics. International Journal of Primatology
Pouw, Wim, Mark Dingemanse, Yasamin Motamedi & Aslı Özyürek
2021. A Systematic Investigation of Gesture Kinematics in Evolving Manual Languages in the Lab. Cognitive Science 45:7
Sandler, Wendy
2017. The Challenge of Sign Language Phonology. Annual Review of Linguistics 3:1 ► pp. 43 ff.
Sandler, Wendy
2018. The Body as Evidence for the Nature of Language. Frontiers in Psychology 9
2022. Redefining Multimodality. Frontiers in Communication 6
Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo‐Martin
2017. Sign Languages. In The Handbook of Linguistics, ► pp. 371 ff.
SEVCIKOVA SEHYR, ZED & KAREN EMMOREY
2019. The perceived mapping between form and meaning in American Sign Language depends on linguistic knowledge and task: evidence from iconicity and transparency judgments. Language and Cognition 11:2 ► pp. 208 ff.
Tkachman, Oksana, Gracellia Purnomo & Bryan Gick
2021. Repetition Preferences in Two-Handed Balanced Signs: Vestigial Locomotor Central Pattern Generators Shape Sign Language Phonetics and Phonology. Frontiers in Communication 5
Östling, Robert, Carl Börstell & Servane Courtaux
2018. Visual Iconicity Across Sign Languages: Large-Scale Automated Video Analysis of Iconic Articulators and Locations. Frontiers in Psychology 9
Żywiczyński, Przemysław
2019. How research on language evolution contributes to linguistics. Yearbook of the Poznan Linguistic Meeting 5:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
2021. Pantomimic fossils in modern human communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376:1824
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.