Article published In:
Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 19:1 (2016) ► pp.82123
References
Anderson, Diane & Judy Reilly
1997The puzzle of negation: How children move from communicative to grammatical negation in ASL. Applied Psycholinguistics 18(4). 411–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir & Wendy Sandler
2005The paradox of sign language morphology. Language 811. 301–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker-Shenk, Charlotte & Dennis Cokely
1980American Sign Language: A teacher’s resource text on grammar and culture. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Battison, Robbin
1974Phonological deletion in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 51. 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Alan, Jason Brenier, Michelle Gregory, Cynthia Girand & Dan Jurafsky
2009Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. Journal of Memory and Language 60(1). 92–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2001Phonology and language use. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Paul Hopper
2001Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carreiras, Manuel, Eva Gutiérrez-Sigut, Silvia Baquero & David Corina
2008Lexical processing in Spanish Sign Language (LSE). Journal of Memory and Language 581. 100–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crasborn, Onno & Anne de Meijer
2012From corpus to lexicon: The creation of ID-glosses for the Corpus NGT. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Interactions between Corpus and Lexicon . Istanbul, Turkey 2012.
Croft, William
2001Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emmorey, Karen
2002Language, cognition, and the brain: Insights from sign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2007Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 111. 119–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1987Emergent grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 131. 139–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991On some principles of grammaticization. In Elizabeth Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization 11. 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Humphries, Tom, Carol Padden & Terrence J. O’Rourke
1994A basic course in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: T.J. Publishers.Google Scholar
Janzen, Terry
1995The polygrammaticalization of finish in ASL. Winnipeg, Manitoba: University of Manitoba MA thesis.Google Scholar
Johnston, Trevor
2012Lexical frequency in sign languages. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 17(2). 163–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keane, Jonathon, Diane Brentari & Jason Riggle
2012Coarticulation in ASL fingerspelling. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 421. North East Linguistic Society.
Konrad, Reiner, Thomas Hanke, Susanne König, Gabriele Langer, Silke Matthes, Rie Nishio & Anja Regen
2012From form to function. A database approach to handle lexicon building and spotting token forms in sign languages. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Interactions between Corpus and Lexicon , Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) Istanbul, May 2012, 87–94.
Langacker, Ronald M
1987Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K
1980American Sign Language syntax. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
McKee, David & Graeme Kennedy
2006The distribution of signs in New Zealand Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 6(4). 372–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morford, Jill P. & James MacFarlane
2003Frequency characteristics of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 3(2). 213–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Benjamin Bahan & Robert G. Lee
2000The syntax of American Sign Language: Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Padden, Carol & Darline Clark Gunsauls
2003How the alphabet came to be used in a sign language. Sign Language Studies 41. 10–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petronio, Karen & Valerie Dively
2006Yes, no, visibility, and variation in ASL and tactile ASL. Sign Language Studies 7(1). 57–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
2011Grammaticalization in sign languages. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 683–695. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer
2007On the syntax of negation and modals in Catalan Sign Language and German Sign Language. In Pamela Perniss, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Visible variation: Comparative studies on sign language structure, 129–161. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quer, Josep
2012Negation. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 316–339. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy
1999Cliticization and prosodic words in a sign language. In Tracy A. Hall & Ursula Kleinhenz (eds.), Studies on the phonological word, 223–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Senghas, Richard, Ann Senghas & Jennie Pyers
2005The emergence of Nicaraguan Sign Language: Questions of development, acquisition, and evolution. In Jonas Langer, Sue T. Parker & Constance Milbrath (eds.), Biology and knowledge revisited: From neurogenesis to psychogenesis, 287–306. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schembri, Adam, David McKee, Rachel McKee, Sara Pivac, Trevor Johnston & Della Goswell
2009Phonological variation and change in Australian and New Zealand Sign Languages: The location variable. Language Variation and Change 211. 193–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, Barbara
2002can’t: The negation of modal notions in ASL. Sign Language Studies 3(1). 34–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1989On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 651. 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivization: Linguistic perspectives, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veinberg, Silvana & Ronnie Wilbur
1990A linguistic analysis of the negative headshake in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 681. 217–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, Sherman & Phyllis Wilcox
1995The gestural expression of modality in ASL. In Joan Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse, 135–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike
2004Hand, head, and face: Negative constructions in sign languages. Linguistic Typology 81. 1–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
An introduction to American Deaf Culture: Group norms
1988 Silver Spring, MD: Sign Media, Inc.Google Scholar
An introduction to American Deaf Culture: Identity
1988 Silver Spring, MD: Sign Media, Inc.Google Scholar
An introduction to American Deaf Culture: Language and traditions
1988 Silver Spring, MD: Sign Media, Inc.Google Scholar
An introduction to American Deaf Culture: Rules of social interaction
1988 Silver Spring, MD: Sign Media, Inc.Google Scholar
An introduction to American Deaf Culture: Values
1988 Silver Spring, MD: Sign Media, Inc.Google Scholar
Deaf culture: MJ Bienvenu
1989 Portland, OR: Sign Enhancers, Inc.Google Scholar
Deaf culture: Howie Seago
1990 Portland, OR: Sign Enhancers, Inc.Google Scholar
Deaf culture: Dennis Schemenaver
1990 Portland, OR: Sign Enhancers, Inc.Google Scholar
Deaf Mosaic #1102
: Final Episode 1995 Washington, DC: Department of Television, Film, and Photography, Gallaudet University.Google Scholar
Frog stories in American Sign Language
2001 Gallaudet University. Erin Wilkinson.Google Scholar
Frog stories in American Sign Language
2004 University of New Mexico. Erin Wilkinson.Google Scholar
Live at SMI
: Chalb (J. Charlie McKinney and Alan Barwiolek) 1993 Silver Spring, MD: Sign Media, Inc.Google Scholar
Live at SMI
: Patrick Graybill 1993 Silver Spring, MD: Sign Media, Inc.Google Scholar
Live at SMI
: Mary Beth Miller LIVE 1991 Silver Spring, MD: Sign Media, Inc.Google Scholar
Pear Stories in American Sign Language
2004 University of New Mexico. Gabriel Arellano and Wendy Severns.Google Scholar
See What I Mean: Differences between deaf and hearing cultures
2001 Portland, OR: Sign Enhancers, Inc.Google Scholar
Viewpoints: Deaf education
2000 Portland, OR: Sign Enhancers, Inc.Google Scholar
Baer, Joey
2006-2007Joey’s ASL VLOG: Best my, your, our opinion in ASL!. [URL]Google Scholar
Sentelle, Teri
2006-2007Deaf dish. [URL]Google Scholar
Hamlow, Eric
2006-2007Deaf eye. [URL]Google Scholar
Deaf Queer News
2006-2007[URL]Google Scholar
Save Gallaudet
2006-2007[URL]Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Börstell, Carl, Thomas Hörberg & Robert Östling
2016. Distribution and duration of signs and parts of speech in Swedish Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 19:2  pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Hou, Lynn
2022. LOOKing for multi-word expressions in American Sign Language. Cognitive Linguistics 33:2  pp. 291 ff. DOI logo
Hou, Lynn
2022. A Usage-Based Proposal for Argument Structure of Directional Verbs in American Sign Language. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Lepic, Ryan
2019. A usage-based alternative to “lexicalization” in sign language linguistics. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1 DOI logo
Makaroğlu, Bahtiyar
2021. What the frequency list can teach us about Turkish sign language?. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57:4  pp. 619 ff. DOI logo
Makaroğlu, Bahtiyar
2023. The next station: chunking of değİl ‘not’ collocations in Turkish Sign Language. Cognitive Linguistics 34:3-4  pp. 371 ff. DOI logo
Pleyer, Michael, Ryan Lepic & Stefan Hartmann
2022. Compositionality in Different Modalities: A View from Usage-Based Linguistics. International Journal of Primatology DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.