When the arms move in certain ways, they can cause the torso to twist or rock. Such extraneous torso movement is undesirable, especially during sign language communication, when torso position may carry linguistic significance, so we expend effort to resist it when it is not intended. This so-called “reactive effort” has only recently been identified by Sanders and Napoli (2016), but their preliminary work on three genetically unrelated languages suggests that the effects of reactive effort can be observed cross-linguistically by examination of sign language lexicons. In particular, the frequency of different kinds of manual movements in the lexicon correlates with the amount of reactive effort needed to resist movement of the torso. Following this line of research, we present evidence from 24 sign languages confirming that there is a cross-linguistic preference for minimizing the reactive effort needed to keep the torso stable.
1969Basis of the horizontal-vertical illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology 81(2). 376–380.
1980How signs express complex meanings. In Charlotte Baker & Robbin Battison (eds.), Sign language and the Deaf community: Essays in honor of William Stokoe, 53–74. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf.
1999Rhythmic temporal patterns in the signing of deaf early and late learners of Swiss German Sign Language. Language and Speech 42(2-3). 177–208.
1998A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brentari, Diane & Howard Poizner
1994A phonological analysis of a deaf Parkinsonian signer. Language and Cognitive Processes 9(1). 69–100.
2012Phonetics. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 4–20. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
2001Signs without hands: Nonhanded signs in American Sign Language. In Valery Dively, Melanie Metzger, Sarah Taub & Ann Marie Baer (eds.), Signed languages: Discoveries from international research, 62–73. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
2002Language, cognition, and the brain: Insights from sign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
1995Point of view expressed through shifters. In Karen Emmorey & Judy Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 133–154. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2003From pointing to reference and predication: Pointing signs, eyegaze, and head and body orientation in Danish Sign Language. In Sotaro Kita (ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet, 269–292. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fenlon, Jordan, Kearsy Cormier & Adam Schembri
2015Building BSL SignBank: The lemma dilemma revisited. International Journal of Lexicography 28(2). 169–206.
Hooker, Christine I., Ken A. Paller, Darren R. Gitelman, Todd B. Parrish, M. Marsal Mesulam & Paul J. Reber
2003Brain networks for analyzing eye gaze. Cognitive Brain Research 17(2). 406–418.
1999The human amygdala plays an important role in gaze monitoring. A PET study. Brain 122(4). 779–783.
2002Composition of psoas major muscle fibers compared among humans, orangutans, and monkeys. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie 83(2-3). 305–314.
1998An effort-based approach to lenition. Los Angeles, CA: University of California dissertation.
2004Consonant lenition. In Bruce Hayes, Robert Kirchner & Donca Steriade (eds.), Phonetically based phonology, 313–345. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Klima, Edward & Ursula Bellugi,Robbin Battison, Penny Boyes-Braem, Susan Fischer, Nancy Frishberg, Harlan Lane, Ella Mae Lentz, Don Newkirk, Elisa Newport, Candy Pedersen & Patricia Siple
1979The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kobayashi, Hiromi & Shiro Kohshima
2001Unique morphology of the human eye and its adaptive meaning: Comparative studies on external morphology of the primate eye. Journal of Human Evolution 40(5). 419–435.
Lovejoy, C. Owen
1988Evolution of human walking. Scientific American 259(5). 118–125.
Mak, Joe & Gladys Tang
2011Movement types, repetition, and feature organization in Hong Kong Sign Language. In Rachel Channon & Harry van der Hulst (eds.), Formational units in sign languages, 315–338. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
1979Natural constraints in sign language phonology: Data from anatomy. Sign Language Studies 241. 215–229.
1981Phonotactics and morphophonology in American Sign Language. Berkeley, CA: University of California dissertation.
Mather, Susan A
1987Eye gaze and communication in a deaf classroom. Sign Language Studies 541. 11–30.
Mauk, Claude E
2003Undershoot in two modalities: Evidence from fast speech and fast signing. Austin: University of Texas at Austin PhD dissertation.
McKee, David & Graeme Kennedy
2000Lexical comparison of signs from American, Australian, British, and New Zealand Sign Languages. In Karen Emmorey & Harlan Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 49–76. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Meier, Richard, Claude Mauk, Gene Mirus & Kimberly Conlin
1998Motoric constraints on early sign acquisition. In Eve Clark (ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-ninth Annual Child Language Research Forum, 63–72. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Meier, Richard, Claude Mauk, Adrianne Cheek
& Christopher Moreland2008The form of children’s early signs: Iconic or motoric determinants?Language Learning and Development 4(1). 63–98.
Mirus, Gene, Christian Rathmann & Richard Meier
2001Proximalization and distalization of sign movement in adult learners. In Valerie Dively, Melanie Metzger, Sarah Taub & Anne Marie Baer (eds.), Signed languages: Discoveries from international research, 103–119. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Morris, John S., Monique deBonis & Raymond J. Dolan
2002Human amygdala responses to fearful eyes. Neuroimage 17(1). 214–222.
Napoli, Donna Jo, Mark Mai & Nicholas Gaw
2011Primary movement in sign languages: A study of six languages. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Napoli, Donna Jo, Nathan Sanders & Becky Wright
2014On the linguistic effects of articulatory ease, with a focus on sign languages. Language 90(2). 424–456.
Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Benjamin Bahan, Debra Aarons & Dawn MacLaughlin
1987American Sign Language and the architecture of phonological theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5(3). 335–375.
Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer
2010Nonmanuals: Their grammatical and prosodic roles. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages (Cambridge Language Surveys), 381–402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pichler, Deborah Chen
2011Sources of handshape error in first-time signers of ASL. In Gaurav Mathur & Donna Jo Napoli (eds.), Deaf around the world: The impact of language, 96–121. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Poizner, Howard, Diane Brentari, Martha E. Tyrone & Judy Kegl
2000The structure of language as motor behavior: Clues from signers with Parkinson’s disease. In Karen Emmorey & Harlan Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 432–452. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Poulin, Christine & Christopher Miller
1995On narrative discourse and point of view in Quebec Sign Language. In Karen Emmorey & Judy Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 117–131. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
R Core Team
2016R: A language and environment for statistical computing. [URL].
Regan, David, Casper J. Erkelens & Han Collewijn
1986Necessary conditions for the perception of motion in depth. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 27(4). 584–597.
Regan, David & Suneeti Kaushal
1994Monocular discrimination of the direction of motion in depth. Visual Research 34(2). 163–177.
2003Les unités du discours en Langue des Signes Française. Tentative de catégorisation dans le cadre d’une grammaire de l’iconicité. Paris: University of Paris 8 PhD dissertation.
Witte, Hartmut F., Holger Preuschoft & Stephan Recknagel
1991Human body proportions explained on the basis of biomechanical principles. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie 78(3). 407–423.
1978Historical bases of American Sign Language. In Patricia Siple (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, 333–348. New York: Academic Press.
2011Some observations on research methodology in lexicostatistical studies of sign languages. In Gaurav Mathur & Donna Jo Napoli (eds.), Deaf around the world: The impact of language, 38–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.