Cover not available
Article published In:
Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 19:2 (2016) ► pp.197–231

A cross-linguistic preference for torso stability in the lexicon

Evidence from 24 sign languages

| Department of Linguistics, Haverford College
| Department of Linguistics, Swarthmore College

When the arms move in certain ways, they can cause the torso to twist or rock. Such extraneous torso movement is undesirable, especially during sign language communication, when torso position may carry linguistic significance, so we expend effort to resist it when it is not intended. This so-called “reactive effort” has only recently been identified by Sanders and Napoli (2016), but their preliminary work on three genetically unrelated languages suggests that the effects of reactive effort can be observed cross-linguistically by examination of sign language lexicons. In particular, the frequency of different kinds of manual movements in the lexicon correlates with the amount of reactive effort needed to resist movement of the torso. Following this line of research, we present evidence from 24 sign languages confirming that there is a cross-linguistic preference for minimizing the reactive effort needed to keep the torso stable.

Keywords: sign languages, phonetics, ease of articulation, lexical frequency, linguistic universals
Published online: 14 April 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.19.2.02san
References
Aarons, Debra, Benjamin Bahan, Judy Kegl & Carol Neidle
1992 Clausal structure and a tier for grammatical marking in American Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 15(2). 103–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Wendy Sandler
2008 The roots of linguistic organization in a new language. Interaction Studies 9(1). 133–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Avery, Gayle C. & Ross Henry Day
1969 Basis of the horizontal-vertical illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology 81(2). 376–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bellugi, Ursula
1980 How signs express complex meanings. In Charlotte Baker & Robbin Battison (eds.), Sign language and the Deaf community: Essays in honor of William Stokoe, 53–74. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf.Google Scholar
Boyes-Braem, Penny
1999 Rhythmic temporal patterns in the signing of deaf early and late learners of Swiss German Sign Language. Language and Speech 42(2-3). 177–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brentari, Diane
1998 A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane & Howard Poizner
1994 A phonological analysis of a deaf Parkinsonian signer. Language and Cognitive Processes 9(1). 69–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crasborn, Onno
2012 Phonetics. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 4–20. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Crasborn, Onno & Els van der Kooij
2003 Base joint configuration in Sign Language of the Netherlands: Phonetic variation and phonological specification. In Jeroen van de Weijer, Vincent J. van Heuven & Harry van der Hulst (eds.), The phonological spectrum. Volume 1: Segmental structure (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 233), 257–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dively, Valery
2001 Signs without hands: Nonhanded signs in American Sign Language. In Valery Dively, Melanie Metzger, Sarah Taub & Ann Marie Baer (eds.), Signed languages: Discoveries from international research, 62–73. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen
2002 Language, cognition, and the brain: Insights from sign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth
1995 Point of view expressed through shifters. In Karen Emmorey & Judy Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 133–154. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2003 From pointing to reference and predication: Pointing signs, eyegaze, and head and body orientation in Danish Sign Language. In Sotaro Kita (ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet, 269–292. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fenlon, Jordan, Kearsy Cormier & Adam Schembri
2015 Building BSL SignBank: The lemma dilemma revisited. International Journal of Lexicography 28(2). 169–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hooker, Christine I., Ken A. Paller, Darren R. Gitelman, Todd B. Parrish, M. Marsal Mesulam & Paul J. Reber
2003 Brain networks for analyzing eye gaze. Cognitive Brain Research 17(2). 406–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Trevor & Adam Schembri
1999 On defining lexeme in a signed language. Sign Language & Linguistics 2(2). 115–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kawashima, Ryuta, Motoaki Sugiura, Takashi Kato, Akinori Nakamura, Kentaro Hatano, Kengo Ito, Hiroshi Fukuda, Shozo Kojima & Katsuki Nakamura
1999 The human amygdala plays an important role in gaze monitoring. A PET study. Brain 122(4). 779–783. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimura, Tadanao
2002 Composition of psoas major muscle fibers compared among humans, orangutans, and monkeys. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie 83(2-3). 305–314.Google Scholar
Kirchner, Robert
1998 An effort-based approach to lenition. Los Angeles, CA: University of California dissertation.Google Scholar
2004 Consonant lenition. In Bruce Hayes, Robert Kirchner & Donca Steriade (eds.), Phonetically based phonology, 313–345. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klima, Edward & Ursula Bellugi,Robbin Battison, Penny Boyes-Braem, Susan Fischer, Nancy Frishberg, Harlan Lane, Ella Mae Lentz, Don Newkirk, Elisa Newport, Candy Pedersen & Patricia Siple
1979 The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, Hiromi & Shiro Kohshima
2001 Unique morphology of the human eye and its adaptive meaning: Comparative studies on external morphology of the primate eye. Journal of Human Evolution 40(5). 419–435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, C. Owen
1988 Evolution of human walking. Scientific American 259(5). 118–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mak, Joe & Gladys Tang
2011 Movement types, repetition, and feature organization in Hong Kong Sign Language. In Rachel Channon & Harry van der Hulst (eds.), Formational units in sign languages, 315–338. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandel, Mark
1979 Natural constraints in sign language phonology: Data from anatomy. Sign Language Studies 241. 215–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981 Phonotactics and morphophonology in American Sign Language. Berkeley, CA: University of California dissertation.Google Scholar
Mather, Susan A
1987 Eye gaze and communication in a deaf classroom. Sign Language Studies 541. 11–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauk, Claude E
2003 Undershoot in two modalities: Evidence from fast speech and fast signing. Austin: University of Texas at Austin PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
McKee, David & Graeme Kennedy
2000 Lexical comparison of signs from American, Australian, British, and New Zealand Sign Languages. In Karen Emmorey & Harlan Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 49–76. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Meier, Richard, Claude Mauk, Gene Mirus & Kimberly Conlin
1998 Motoric constraints on early sign acquisition. In Eve Clark (ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-ninth Annual Child Language Research Forum, 63–72. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Meier, Richard, Claude Mauk, Adrianne Cheek
& Christopher Moreland 2008 The form of children’s early signs: Iconic or motoric determinants? Language Learning and Development 4(1). 63–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mirus, Gene, Christian Rathmann & Richard Meier
2001 Proximalization and distalization of sign movement in adult learners. In Valerie Dively, Melanie Metzger, Sarah Taub & Anne Marie Baer (eds.), Signed languages: Discoveries from international research, 103–119. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, John S., Monique deBonis & Raymond J. Dolan
2002 Human amygdala responses to fearful eyes. Neuroimage 17(1). 214–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo, Mark Mai & Nicholas Gaw
2011 Primary movement in sign languages: A study of six languages. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo, Nathan Sanders & Becky Wright
2014 On the linguistic effects of articulatory ease, with a focus on sign languages. Language 90(2). 424–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Benjamin Bahan, Debra Aarons & Dawn MacLaughlin
1997 Rightward WH-movement in American Sign Language. In Dorothee Beermann, David LeBlanc & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.) Rightward movement (Linguistik Aktuell / Linguistics Today 17), 247–278. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Wendy Sandler
1999 Prosody in Israeli Sign Language. Language and Speech 42(2-3). 143–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, Gerardo & Gary Morgan
2010 Comparing child and adult development of a visual phonological system. Language, Interaction and Acquisition/Langage, Interaction et Acquisition 1(1). 67–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padden, Carol & David Perlmutter
1987 American Sign Language and the architecture of phonological theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5(3). 335–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer
2010 Nonmanuals: Their grammatical and prosodic roles. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages (Cambridge Language Surveys), 381–402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pichler, Deborah Chen
2011 Sources of handshape error in first-time signers of ASL. In Gaurav Mathur & Donna Jo Napoli (eds.), Deaf around the world: The impact of language, 96–121. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poizner, Howard, Diane Brentari, Martha E. Tyrone & Judy Kegl
2000 The structure of language as motor behavior: Clues from signers with Parkinson’s disease. In Karen Emmorey & Harlan Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 432–452. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Poulin, Christine & Christopher Miller
1995 On narrative discourse and point of view in Quebec Sign Language. In Karen Emmorey & Judy Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 117–131. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
R Core Team
2016 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. [URL].Google Scholar
Regan, David, Casper J. Erkelens & Han Collewijn
1986 Necessary conditions for the perception of motion in depth. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 27(4). 584–597.Google Scholar
Regan, David & Suneeti Kaushal
1994 Monocular discrimination of the direction of motion in depth. Visual Research 34(2). 163–177.Google Scholar
Sallandre, Marie-Anne
2003 Les unités du discours en Langue des Signes Française. Tentative de catégorisation dans le cadre d’une grammaire de l’iconicité. Paris: University of Paris 8 PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
2007 Simultaneity in French Sign Language discourse. In Myriam Vermeerbergen, Lorraine Leeson & Onno Crasborn (eds.), Simultaneity in signed languages: Form and function, 103–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Nathan & Donna Jo Napoli
2016 Reactive effort as a factor that shapes sign language lexicons. Language 92(2). 275–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Signing Savvy
2016 [URL] (30 September, 2016.)
Smith, Marie L., Garrison W. Cottrell, Frederic Gosselin & Philippe G. Schyns
2005 Transmitting and decoding facial expressions. Nature Neuroscience 16(3). 184–189.Google Scholar
Spencer, Rebecca M.C., Richard B. Ivry, Daniel Cattaert & Andras Semjen
2005 Bimanual coordination during rhythmic movements in the absence of somatosensory feedback. Journal of Neurophysiology 94(4). 2901–2910. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spreadthesign
2012 [URL] (May–July, 2015). European Sign Language Centre.
Thompson, Robin, Karen Emmorey & Robert Kluender
2006 The relationship between eye gaze and verb agreement in American Sign Language: An eye-tracking study. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24(2). 571–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael, Brian Hare, Hagen Lehmann & Josep Call
2007 Reliance on head versus eyes in the gaze following of great apes and human infants: The cooperative eye hypothesis. Journal of Human Evolution 52(3). 314–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tyrone, Martha E
2012 Phonetics of sign location in ASL: Comments on papers by Russell, Wilkinson, & Janzen and by Grosvald & Corina. Journal of Laboratory Phonology 3(1). 61–70.Google Scholar
Tyrone, Martha E. & Claude E. Mauk
2010 Sign lowering and phonetic reduction in American Sign Language. Journal of Phonetics 38(2). 317–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 The phonetics of head and body movement in the realization of American Sign Language signs. Phonetica 73(2). 120–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whalen, Paul J., Jerome Kagan, Robert G. Cook, F. Caroline Davis, Hackjin Kim, Sara Polis, Donald G. McLaren, Leah H. Somerville, Ashly A. McLean, Jeffrey S. Maxwell & Tom Johnstone
2004 Human amygdala responsivity to masked fearful eye whites. Science 306(5704). 2061. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Witte, Hartmut F., Holger Preuschoft & Stephan Recknagel
1991 Human body proportions explained on the basis of biomechanical principles. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie 78(3). 407–423.Google Scholar
Woodward, James
1978 Historical bases of American Sign Language. In Patricia Siple (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, 333–348. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2011 Some observations on research methodology in lexicostatistical studies of sign languages. In Gaurav Mathur & Donna Jo Napoli (eds.), Deaf around the world: The impact of language, 38–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Brentari, Diane
2019. Sign Language Phonology, DOI logo
Ebling, Sarah, Katja Tissi, Sandra Sidler-Miserez, Cheryl Schlumpf & Penny Boyes Braem
2021. Single-parameter and parameter combination errors in L2 productions of Swiss German Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 24:2 ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Ferrara, Casey & Donna Jo Napoli
2019. Manual Movement in Sign Languages: One Hand Versus Two in Communicating Shapes. Cognitive Science 43:9 DOI logo
Loos, Cornelia & Donna Jo Napoli
2021. Expanding Echo: Coordinated Head Articulations as Nonmanual Enhancements in Sign Language Phonology. Cognitive Science 45:5 DOI logo
Napoli, Donna Jo & Rachel Sutton-Spence
2023. The nature of torso articulation in human expression: signing and dancing. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 7:3 ► pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Napoli, Donna Jo & Rachel Sutton-Spence
2024. Torso articulation in sign languages. Sign Language & Linguistics DOI logo
Tkachman, Oksana, Kathleen Currie Hall, Robert Fuhrman & Yurika Aonuki
2019. Visible amplitude: Towards quantifying prominence in sign language. Journal of Phonetics 77 ► pp. 100935 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Italian Sign Language from a Cognitive and Socio-semiotic Perspective [Gesture Studies, 9], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.