Cover not available
Article published In:
Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 19:2 (2016) ► pp.252–269

Sign language serial verb constructions fit into the bigger picture

Commentary on Bos (1996)

| BCBL (Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language)
Published online: 14 April 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.19.2.05cos
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y
2006 Serial verb constructions in typological perspective. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon (eds.), Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology, 1–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ameka, Felix K
2006 Ewe serial verb constructions in their grammatical context. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon (eds.), Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology, 144–159. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bellugi, Ursula, Karen van Hoek, Diane Lillo-Martin & Lucinda O’Grady
1989 The acquisition of syntax and space in young deaf signers. In Dorothy Bishop & Kay Mogford-Bevan (eds.), Language development in exceptional circumstances, 132–149. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Benedicto, Elena, Sandra Cvejanov & Josep Quer
2008 The morphosyntax of verbs of motion in serial constructions: A cross-linguistic study in three signed languages. In Josep Quer (ed.), Signs of the time: selected papers from TISLR 8, 111–132. Hamburg: Signum Press.Google Scholar
Bos, Heleen F
2016[1996] Serial verb constructions in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Sign Language & Linguistics 19(2) [this issue]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Susan D. & Bonnie Gough
1999 Some unfinished thoughts on finish. Sign Language & Linguistics 21. 66–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Susan D. & Wynne Janis
1990 Verb sandwiches in ASL. In Siegmund Prillwitz & Tomas Vollhaber (eds.), Current trends in European sign language research: Proceedings of the 3rd European Congress on Sign Language Research Hamburg July 26-29, 19891, 279–294. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Gijn, Ingeborg van
2004 The quest for syntactic dependency. Sentential complementation in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam PhD dissertation, Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2016 The serial verb construction: Comparative concept and cross-linguistic generalizations. Language and Linguistics 171. 291–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002 World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hong, Sung-Eun
2003 Empirical survey of animal classifiers in Korean Sign Language (KSL). Sign Language & Linguistics 61. 77–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janzen, Terry
2012 Lexicalization and grammaticalization. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook (HSK – Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science), 816–841. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Johnston, Trevor, Myriam Vermeerbergen, Adam Schembri & Lorraine Leeson
2007 ‘Real data are messy’: Considering cross-linguistic analysis of constituent ordering in Auslan, VGT, and ISL. In Pamela Perniss, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Visible variation. Comparative studies on sign language structure, 163–205. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lau, Prudence
2010 Serial verb constructions in Hong Kong Sign Language. Presentation given at the 10th International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR 10) . Purdue University, IN.
Lichtenberk, Frantisek
2006 Serial verb constructions in Toqabaquita. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon (eds.), Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology, 254–272. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane
1995 The point of view predicate in American Sign Language. In Karen Emmorey & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture and space, 155–170. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Matsuoka, Kazumi
1997 Verb raising in American Sign Language. Lingua 1031. 127–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Gary & Bencie Woll
2003 The development of reference switching encoded through body classifiers in British Sign Language. In Karen Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages, 297–310. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
2006 Modality-independent and modality-specific aspects of grammaticalization in sign languages (Linguistics in Potsdam 24). Potsdam: Universitäts-Verlag.Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll
2012 Tense, aspect, and modality. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook (HSK – Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science), 186–204. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quadros, Ronice Müller de & Josep Quer
2008 Back to back(wards) and moving on: On agreement, auxiliaries and verb classes in sign languages. In Ronice M. de Quadros (ed.), Sign languages: Spinning and unraveling the past, present and future. TISLR9, forty-five papers and three posters from the 9th Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research Conference, Florianópolis, Brazil, December 2006, 530–551. Petrópolis/RJ, Brazil: Editora Arara Azul.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan & Nini Hoiting
1994 Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 201. 487–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Supalla, Ted
1986 The classifier system in American Sign Language. In Colette G. Craig (ed.), Noun classes and categorization, 181–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990 Serial verbs of motion in ASL. In Susan D. Fischer & Patricia Siple (eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research, Vol. 1: Linguistics, 127–152. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tang, Gladys
2003 Verbs of motion and location in Hong Kong Sign Language: Conflation and lexicalization. In Karen Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages, 143–165. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tang, Gladys & Gu Yang
2006 Events of motion and causation in Hong Kong Sign Language. Lingua 117(7). 1216–1257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Herreweghe, Mieke & Myriam Vermeerbergen
2004 The semantics and grammatical status of three different realizations of geven (give): Directional verb, polymorphemic construction, and auxiliary/preposition/light verb. Poster presented at the 8th International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR 8) , Barcelona.
Zucchi, Sandro, Carol Neidle, Carlo Geraci, Quinn Duffy
& Carlo Cecchetto 2010 Functional markers in sign languages. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages (Cambridge Language Surveys), 197–224. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Couvee, Sascha & Roland Pfau
2018. Structure and Grammaticalization of Serial Verb Constructions in Sign Language of the Netherlands—A Corpus-Based Study. Frontiers in Psychology 9 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.