Article published in:
Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 19:2 (2016) ► pp. 285–291

Motivation in morphology

Lexical patterns in ASL and English

| University of California, San Diego
Published online: 14 April 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.19.2.08lep
References
Anderson, Stephen R
1992 A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arndt-Lappe, Sabine & Ingo Plag
2013 The role of prosodic structure in the formation of English blends. English Language and Linguistics 17(3). 537–563. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, James P., Farrell Ackerman & Robert Malouf
2016 Morphology as an adaptive discriminative system. In Heidi Harley & Daniel Siddiqi (eds.), Morphological metatheory, 271–302. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bochner, Harry
1993 Simplicity in generative morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert
2010 Construction morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2013 Morphology in construction grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 255–274. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Downing, Pamela
1977 On the creation and use of English compound nouns. Language 53(4). 810–842. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, Theodore & Donna Jo Napoli
2000 Exploitation of morphological possibilities in signed languages: Comparison of American Sign Language with English. Sign Language & Linguistics 3(1). 3–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
2013 Constructionist approaches. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 15–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P
2004 Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization?: A look from its fringes and its components, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1975 Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language 511. 639–671. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1987 Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne
2007 Blendalicious. In Judith Manat (ed.), Lexical creativity, texts and contexts, 115–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lepic, Ryan
2016a The great ASL compound hoax. In Aubrey Healey, Ricardo Napoleão de Souza, Pavlína Pešková & Moses Allen (eds.), Proceedings of the 11th High Desert Linguistics Society Conference, 227–250. Available online: http://​escholarship​.org​/uc​/item​/5sf8k4cx.Google Scholar
2016b Lexical blends and lexical patterns in English and in American Sign Language. In Jenny Audring, Francesca Masini & Wendy Sandler (eds.), Quo vadis morphology?: Online proceedings of the 10th Mediterranean Morphology Meeting, 98–111. Available online: http://​xantho​.lis​.upatras​.gr​/pasithee​/index​.php​/mmm​/article​/view​/2728.Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. & Robert E. Johnson
1989 American Sign Language: The phonological base. Sign Language Studies 1(64). 195–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Padden, Carol A
1998 The ASL lexicon. Sign Language & Linguistics 1(1). 39–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Padden, Carol A. & Tom L. Humphries
1988 Deaf in America: Voices from a culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stokoe, William
1960 Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. Studies in Linguistics Occasional Papers 8. Buffalo: University of Buffalo Press [Re-issued 2005, Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10(1), 3-37].Google Scholar
Supalla, Ted
1986 The classifier system in American Sign Language. In Colette Craig (ed.), Noun classes and categorization, 181–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tennant, Richard A. & Marianne Gluszak Brown
2010 The American Sign Language handshape dictionary (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Vercellotti, Mary Lou & David R. Mortensen
2012 A classification of compounds in American Sign Language: An evaluation of the Bisetto and Scalise framework. Morphology 221. 545–579. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, Phyllis
2000 Metaphor in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Morford, Jill P, Corrine Occhino, Megan Zirnstein, Judith F Kroll, Erin Wilkinson & Pilar Piñar
2019. What is the Source of Bilingual Cross-Language Activation in Deaf Bilinguals?. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 24:4 ► pp. 356 ff. Crossref logo
Tkachman, Oksana & Irit Meir
2018. Novel compounding and the emergence of structure in two young sign languages. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.