Cover not available
Article published In:
Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 24:1 (2021) ► pp.4–35

Phonological priming in German Sign Language

An eye tracking study using the Visual World Paradigm

| University of Hamburg
| Johann Wolfgang Goethe University
| Georg-August-University
| University of Hamburg
| Georg-August-University

A number of studies provide evidence for a phonological priming effect in the recognition of single signs based on phonological parameters and that the specific phonological parameters modulated in the priming effect can influence the robustness of this effect. This eye tracking study on German Sign Language examined phonological priming effects at the sentence level, while varying the phonological relationship between prime-target sign pairs. We recorded participants’ eye movements while presenting videos of sentences containing either related or unrelated prime-target sign pairs, and pictures of the target and an unrelated distractor. We observed a phonological priming effect for sign pairs sharing handshape and movement while differing in location parameter. Taken together, the data suggest a difference in the contribution of sign parameters to sign recognition and that sub-lexical features influence sign language processing.

Keywords: German Sign Language, eye tracking, Visual World Paradigm, sentence processing, phonological priming
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Effects of phonological parameters
    • 1.2Eye tracking studies in sign languages
    • 1.3The present study
  • 2.Methods
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Material
    • 2.3Procedure
  • 3.Results
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 15 December 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.19011.wie
References
Battison, Robbin
1974 Phonological deletion in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 5(1). 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baus, Cristina, Eva Gutiérrez & Manuel Carreiras
2014 The role of syllables in sign language production. Frontiers in Psychology 5(1254). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baus, Cristina, Eva Gutiérrez-Sigut, Josep Quer & Manuel Carreiras
2008 Lexical access in Catalan Sign Language (LSC) production. Cognition 108(3). 856–865. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brentari, Diane
2006 Effects of language modality on word segmentation: An experimental study of phonological factors in a sign language. In Louis Goldstein, Douglas H. Whalen & Catherine T. Best (eds.), Laboratory Phonology, vol. 81, 155–164. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Carreiras, Manuel
2010 Sign language processing. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(7). 430–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carreiras, Manuel, Eva Gutiérrez-Sigut, Silvia Baquero & David P. Corina
2008 Lexical processing in Spanish Sign Language (LSE). Journal of Memory and Language 58(1). 100–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caselli, Naomi K. & Ariel M. Cohen-Goldberg
2014 Lexical access in sign language: a computational model. Frontiers in Psychology 5(428). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Qi & Daniel Mirman
2012 Competition and cooperation among similar representations: toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors. Psychological Review 119(2). 417–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Lorene E. & François Grosjean
1982 Sign recognition processes in American Sign Language: The effect of context. Language and Speech 25(4). 325–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Roger M.
1974 The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology 6(1). 84–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corina, David P. & Ursula C. Hildebrandt
2002 Psycholinguistic investigations of phonological structure in ASL. In Richard P. Meier, Kearsy Cormier & David Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 88–111. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crasborn, Onno & Els van der Kooij
1997 Relative orientation in sign language phonology. In Jane Coerts & Heleen de Hoop (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1997, 37–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David
2008 Dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (6th ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dink, Jacob W. & Brock Ferguson
2015 eyetrackingR: An R library for eye-tracking data analysis. [URL]
Dye, Matthew W. G. & Shui-I. Shih
2006 Phonological priming in British Sign Language. In Louis Goldstein, Douglas H. Whalen & Catherine T. Best (eds.), Laboratory Phonology, vol. 81, 243–263. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen & David P. Corina
1990 Lexical recognition in sign language: Effects of phonetic structure and morphology. Perceptual and Motor Skills 71(3). 1227–1252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emmorey, Karen, Robin L. Thompson & Rachael Colvin
2009 Eye gaze during comprehension of American Sign Language by native and beginning signers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 14(2). 237–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, François
1980 Sign and word recognition: a first comparison. Sign Language Studies 321. 195–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, Eva, Oliver Müller, Cristina Baus & Manuel Carreiras
2012 Electrophysiological evidence for phonological priming in Spanish Sign Language lexical access. Neuropsychologia 50(7). 1335–1346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, Eva, Deborah Williams, Michael Grosvald & David P. Corina
2012 Lexical access in American Sign Language: An ERP investigation of effects of semantics and phonology. Brain Research 14681. 63–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanna, Joy E. & Michael K. Tanenhaus
2004 Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a collaborative task: evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Science 28(1). 105–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Happ, Daniela & Marc-Oliver Vorköper
2006 Deutsche Gebärdensprache: Ein Lehr-und Arbeitsbuch. Frankfurt/Main: Fachhochschulverlag.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, Ursula & David P. Corina
2002 Phonological similarity in American Sign Language. Language and Cognitive Processes 17(6). 593–612. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hillinger, Michael L.
1980 Priming effects with phonemically similar words. Memory & Cognition 8(2). 115–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hosemann, Jana
2011 Eye gaze and verb agreement in German Sign Language: A first glance. Sign Language & Linguistics 14(1). 76–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hosemann, Jana, Annika Herrmann, Markus Steinbach, Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky & Matthias Schlesewsky
2013 Lexical prediction via forward models: N400 evidence from German Sign Language. Neuropsychologia 51(11). 2224–2237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hosemann, Jana, Nivedita Mani, Annika Herrmann, Markus Steinbach & Nicole Altvater-Mackensen
2020 Signs activate their written word translation in deaf adults: An ERP study on cross-modal co-activation in German Sign Language. Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics 5(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Just, Marcel A. & Patricia A. Carpenter
1980 A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review 87(4). 329–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael & Charles Kisseberth
1979 Generative phonology: Description and theory. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Klima, Edward S. & Ursula Bellugi
1979 The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kubus, Okan, Agnes Villwock, Jill P. Morford & Christian Rathmann
2015 Word recognition in deaf readers: Cross-language activation of German Sign Language and German. Applied Psycholinguistics 36(4). 831–854. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddell, Scott K.
1984  think and believe: Sequentiality in American Sign Language. Language 60(2). 372–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. & Robert E. Johnson
1989 American Sign Language: The phonological base. Sign Language Studies 64(1). 195–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Amy M., Arielle Borovsky, Marla Hatrak & Rachel I. Mayberry
2015 Real-time processing of ASL signs: Delayed first language acquisition affects organization of the mental lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 41(4). 1130–1139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Amy M., Arielle Borovsky & Rachel I. Mayberry
2017 Prediction in a visual language: real-time sentence processing in American Sign Language across development. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayberry, Rachel I. & Pamela Witcher
2005 What age of acquisition effects reveal about the nature of phonological processing. Center for Research in Language Technical Reports 17(3). 3–9.Google Scholar
Meade, Gabriela, Brittany Lee, Katherine J. Midgley, Phillip J. Holcomb & Karen Emmorey
2018 Phonological and semantic priming in American Sign Language: N300 and N400 effects. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 33(9). 1092–1106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meade, Gabriela, Katherine J. Midgley, Zed Sevcikova Sehyr, Phillip J. Holcomb & Karen Emmorey
2017 Implicit co-activation of American Sign Language in deaf readers: An ERP study. Brain and Language 1701. 50–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Melinger, Alissa & Andrea Weber
2006 Database of noun associations for German. [URL]
Morford, Jill P., Erin Wilkinson, Agnes Villwock, Pilar Piñar & Judith F. Kroll
2011 When deaf signers read English: Do written words activate their sign translations? Cognition 118(2). 286–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Gary, Sarah Barrett-Jones & Helen Stoneham
2007 The first signs of language: Phonological development in British Sign Language. Applied Psycholinguistics 28(01). 3–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orfanidou, Eleni, Robert Adam, James M. McQueen & Gary Morgan
2009 Making sense of nonsense in British Sign Language (BSL): The contribution of different phonological parameters to sign recognition. Memory & Cognition 37(3). 302–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ormel, Ellen, Daan Hermans, Harry Knoors & Ludo Verhoeven
2012 Cross-language effects in written word recognition: The case of bilingual deaf children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15(2). 288–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perniss, Pamela M.
2007 Space and iconicity in German Sign Language (DGS). Nijmegen, Netherlands: Radboud University PhD dissertation. [URL]
Pfau, Roland
1997 Zur phonologischen Komponente der Deutschen Gebärdensprache: Segmente und Silben. Frankfurter Linguistische Forschungen 201. 1–29.Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer
2010 Nonmanuals: their grammatical and prosodic roles. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages (Cambridge Language Surveys), 381–402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Radeau, Monique, José Morais & Juan Segui
1995 Phonological priming between monosyllabic spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21(6). 1297–1310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy
1986 The spreading hand autosegment of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 50(1). 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin
2006 Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siedlecki Jr, Theodore & John D. Bonvillian
1993 Location, handshape & movement: Young children’s acquisition of the formational aspects of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 78(1). 31–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slowiaczek, Louisa M. & MaryBeth Hamburger
1992 Prelexical facilitation and lexical interference in auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18(6). 1239–1250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slowiaczek, Louisa M., James M. McQueen, Emily G. Soltano & Michelle Lynch
2000 Phonological representations in prelexical speech processing: Evidence from form-based priming. Journal of Memory and Language 43(3). 530–560. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slowiaczek, Louisa M. & David B. Pisoni
1986 Effects of phonological similarity on priming in auditory lexical decision. Memory & Cognition 14(3). 230–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, William C.
1960 Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American Deaf (Studies in Linguistics. Occasional Papers 8). Buffalo, NY: University of Buffalo Press [Re-issued 2005, Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10(1), 3–37].Google Scholar
Stokoe, William C., Dorothy C. Casterline & Carl G. Croneberg
1965 A dictionary of American Sign Language on linguistic principles. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet College Press.Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, Michael K., Michael J. Spivey-Knowlton, Kathleen M. Eberhard & Julie C. Sedivy
1995 Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268(5217). 1632–1634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Robin L., Karen Emmorey & Tamar H. Gollan
2005 “Tip of the fingers” experiences by Deaf signers. Insights into the organization of a sign-based lexicon. Psychological Science 16(11). 856–860. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Robin L., Karen Emmorey & Robert Kluender
2006 The relationship between eye gaze and verb agreement in American Sign Language: an eye-tracking study. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24(2). 571–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Robin L., David Vinson, Neil Fox & Gabriella Vigliocco
2013 Is lexical access driven by temporal order or perceptual salience? Evidence from British Sign Language. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 35(35). 1450–1455.Google Scholar
Twilhaar, Jan N. & Beppie van den Bogaerde
2016 Concise lexicon for sign linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar