This study explores the L2M2 acquisition of Norwegian Sign Language by hearing adults, with a focus on the production and use of
depicting signs. A group of students and their instructors were asked to respond to prompt questions about directions and
locations in Norwegian Sign Language, and their responses were then compared. An examination of the students’ depicting signs
shows that they struggled more with the phonological parameters orientation and movement, rather than with handshape. In addition,
they used fewer depicting signs than their instructors, and instead relied more on lexical signs. Finally, students were found to
struggle with the coordination of depicting signs within the signing space and in relation to their own bodies. It is hoped that
the findings from this study can be used to inform future research as well as curricula development and pedagogy.
2013Learning outcomes for graduates of a three-year interpreting training programme. Bedfordshire, Great Britain: European Forum of Sign Language Interpreters & EU Lifelong Learning Programme. [URL] [accessed 23 February 2017].
Baus, Cristina, Manuel Carreiras & Karen Emmorey
2013When does iconicity in sign language matter?Language and Cognitive Processes 28(3). 261–271.
Beuzeville, Louise de
2006Visual and linguistic representation in the acquisition of depicting verbs: a study of native signing deaf children of Auslan (Australian Sign Language). Newcastle, Australia: University of Newcastle PhD dissertation.
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad
2011Corpus linguistics and grammar teaching. Available from [URL] [accessed 23 February 2017].
Bochner, Joseph H., Karen Christie, Peter C. Hauser & J. Matt Searls
2011When is a difference really different? Learners’ discrimination of linguistic contrasts in American Sign Language. Language Learning 61(4). 1302–1327.
Boers-Visker, Eveline & Beppie van den Bogaerde
2015Use of space in five L2 learners of Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT). Paper presented at the
2nd International Conference on Sign Language Acquisition
, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
1990Acquisition of the handshape in American Sign Language: A preliminary analysis. In Virginia Volterra & Carol Erting (eds.), From gesture to language in hearing and deaf children, 107–127. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Chen Pichler, Deborah
2011Sources of handshape error in first-time signers of ASL. In Donna Jo Napoli & Gaurav Mathur (eds.), Deaf around the world, 96–121. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cormier, Kearsy, David Quinto-Pozos, Zed Sevcikova & Adam Schembri
2012Lexicalisation and de-lexicalisation processes in sign languages: Comparing depicting constructions and viewpoint gestures. Language and Communication 32(4). 329–348.
Crasborn, Onno & Han Sloetjes
2008Enhanced ELAN functionality for sign language corpora. In Onno Crasborn, Eleni Efthimiou, Thomas Hanke, Ernst D. Thoutenhoofd & Inge Zwitserlood (eds.), The third workshop on the representation and processing of sign languages: Construction and exploitation of sign language corpora [a workshop given at the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 26 May – 1 June 2008, Marrakech, Morocco], 39–43. Paris: European Language Resources Association. Retrieved from [URL] [accessed 23 February 2017].
Cresdee, Donovan & Trevor Johnston
2014Using corpus-based research to inform the teaching of Auslan (Australian Sign Language) as a second language. In David McKee, Russell S. Rosen & Rachel McKee (eds.), Teaching and learning signed languages: International perspectives and practices, 85–110. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
2007Australian Sign Language: An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnston, Trevor & Adam Schembri
2010Variation, lexicalization and grammaticalization in signed languages. Langage et Société 1311(March). 19–35.
Klima, Edward & Ursula Bellugi
1979The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Leeson, Lorraine, Lourdes Calle Alberdi & Sarah Brown
2013Assessment guidelines for sign language interpreting training programmes. Madrid, Spain: European Forum of Sign Language Interpreters & EU Lifelong Learning Programme. [URL] [accessed 23 February 2017].
Liddell, Scott K.
2003Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lupton, Linda K. & Macalyne Fristoe
1992Sign vocabulary recognition in students of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 761(Fall). 215–232.
Marshall, Chloë R. & Gary Morgan
2014From gesture to sign language: Conventionalization of classifier constructions by adult hearing learners of British Sign Language. Topics in Cognitive Science. 1–20.
McIntire, Marina L. & Judy S. Reilly
1988Nonmanual behaviors in L1 & L2 learners of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 611(Winter). 351–375.
McKee, David, Russell S. Rosen & Rachel McKee
(eds.)2014Teaching and learning signed languages. International perspectives and practices. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mills, Carol Bergfeld
1984Factors influencing manual sign learning in hearing adults. Sign Language Studies 441(Fall). 261–278.
Mills, Carol Bergfeld & Linda J. Weldon
1983Effects of semantic and cheremic context on acquisition of manual signs. Memory & Cognition 11(1). 93–100. .
Mirus, Gene, Christian Rathmann & Richard Meier
2001Proximilization and distalization of sign movement in adult learners. In Valerie Dively, Melanie Metzger, Sarah Taub & Anne Marie Baer (eds.), Signed languages: Discoveries from international research, 103–119. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.
2015Depicting from experience: Learning to give directions in space. Paper presented at the
5th Conference of the Scandinavian Association for Language and Cognition (SALC V)
, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Nilsson, Anna-Lena & Lindsay Ferrara
2016Meaningful use of space: Easy or hard for hearing L2 learners? Poster presented at
Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research 12
, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Ortega, Gerardo & Gary Morgan
2015Phonological development in hearing learners of a sign language: The influence of phonological parameters, sign complexity, and iconicity. Language Learning 65(3). 660–688.
Perniss, Pamela, Inge Zwitserlood & Aslı Özyürek
2015Does space structure spatial language?: A comparison of spatial expression across sign languages. Language 91(3), 611–641.
Petitto, Laura Anne & Paula F. Marentette
1991Babbling in the manual mode: Evidence for the ontogeny of language. Science 2511. 1483–1496.
2005Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: Evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and nonsigners’ gestures without speech. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10(3). 272–290.
2003Revisiting visual analogy in ASL classifier predicates. In Emmorey, Karen (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages, 249–257. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.