A long tradition of psych-verb research in spoken languages has demonstrated that they constitute a class of their own, both semantically and syntactically. This study presents a description and analysis of psych-verbs in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT) in order to investigate whether this verb type displays comparable peculiarities in sign languages. The study is primarily based on data from the Corpus NGT (Crasborn et al. 2008). Firstly, the data indicate that all psych-verbs in NGT select a subject Experiencer. Secondly, it is shown that there is an iconic property of psych-verbs in NGT that lays bare a conceptual link between psychological states and locative relations: body-anchoring. The location singled out by the place of articulation of a psych-verb is associated with the metaphoric location of an emotion, or a type of behavior associated with the expression of an emotion. It is furthermore argued that the body as a whole iconically represents the container of a psychological state. The body is analyzed as a possessive determiner that may receive a first person specification as a consequence of body-anchoring. The data support such an analysis, as they suggest that sentences without an overt Experiencer yield a default first person interpretation. Thus, it is claimed that iconicity affects sentence structure and as such should be incorporated into the formal grammar system. Given that body-anchoring is the source of the effects mentioned above, it may be hypothesized that psych-verbs in NGT do not constitute a class of its own, but rather belong to a larger class of iconically motivated body-anchored verbs that share the properties mentioned above.
1978Focusing on the non-manual components of ASL. In Patricia Siple (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, 27–57. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi
1988Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 61. 291–352.
Benedicto, Elena & Diane Brentari
2004Where did all the arguments go?: Argument-changing properties of classifiers in ASL. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 221. 743–810.
2004Unergative adjectives and psych verbs. In Artemis Alexiadou & Martin Everaert (eds.), Studies in unaccusativity: The syntax-lexicon interface, 84–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1980On localization in the Swedish Sign Language. In Inger Ahlgren & Brita Bergman (eds.), Papers from the First International Symposium on Sign Language Research, 81–92. Stockholm: Swedish Deaf Association.
Bos, Heleen F.
1994An auxiliary verb in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Inger Ahlgren, Brita Bergman & Mary Brennan (eds.), Perspectives on sign language structure: Papers from the fifth international symposium on sign language research, 37–53. Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.
Bos, Heleen F.
1995Pronoun copy in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Heleen F. Bos & Trude Schermer (eds.), Research 1994: Proceedings of the Fourth European Congress on Sign Language Research, 121–147. Hamburg: Signum
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
1994Constituent order in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Mary Brennan & Graham H. Turner (eds.), Word-order issues in sign language, 47–70. Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.
2015Language and modality. Effects of the use of space in the agreement system of lengua de signos Española (Spanish Sign Language). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam PhD dissertation. Utrecht: LOT.
2015Construing affective events in ASL. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University PhD dissertation.
1995The distinctive character of psych-verbs as causatives. Linguistic Analysis 251. 95–120.
1972Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
1990Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
1990Predicate argument structure and verb-class organization in the ASL lexicon. In Ceil Lucas (ed.), Theoretical issues in ASL linguistics, 149–175. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
1996Severing the external argument from its verb. In Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109–137. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media.
Kuhn, Jeremy & Valentina Aristodemo
2015Iconicity in the grammar: Pluractionality in French Sign Language. Paper presented at Sinn und Bedeutung 20. University of Tübingen, Tübingen.
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson
1980Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George & Zoltán Kövecses
1987The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In Dorothy Holland & Naomi Quinn (eds.), Cultural models in language and thought, 195–221. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
2010The locative syntax of experiencers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
1993English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav
2005Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1995The point of view predicate in American Sign Language. In Karen Emmorey & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 155–170. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2012Utterance reports and constructed action. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 365–387. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Lillo-Martin, Diane & Edward S. Klima
1990Pointing out differences: ASL pronouns in syntactic theory. In Susan D. Fischer & Patricia Siple (eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research, volume 1: Linguistics, 175–190. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lillo-Martin, Diane & Richard P. Meier
2011On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign languages. Theoretical Linguistics 37(3/4). 95–141.
Lucas, Ceil, Robert Bayley & Clayton Valli
2001Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities, Vol. 7: Sociolinguistic variation in ASL. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
1995A cognitive model of anger in Japanese language. In John R. Taylor & Robert E. MacLaury (eds.), Language and the cognitive construal of the world, 137–152. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Meier, Richard P.
1990Person deixis in American Sign Language. In Susan D. Fischer & Patricia Siple (eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research, volume 1: Linguistics, 191–210. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
1998Thematic structure and verb agreement in Israeli Sign Language. Jerusalem: Hebrew University of Jerusalem PhD dissertation.
Meir, Irit, Carol Padden, Mark Aronoff & Wendy Sandler
2007Body as subject. Journal of Linguistics 431. 531–563.
Meir, Irit, Wendy Sandler, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff
2013Competing iconicities in the structure of languages. Cognitive Linguistics 24(2). 309–343.
2016The marking of two aspectual distinctions in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT). Linguistics in Amsterdam 9(2), 30–55.
1986Verbs and role-shifting in American Sign Language. In Carol Padden (ed.), Proceedings of the fourth national symposium on sign language research and teaching, 44–57. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf.
1988Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. New York, NY: Garland.
1995Zero syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pfau, Roland & Heleen Bos
2008Enkelvoudige zinnen. In Anne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde, Roland Pfau & Trude Schermer (eds.), Gebarentaalwetenschap – een inleiding, 100–124. Deventer: Van Tricht.
Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer
2010Nonmanuals: Their prosodic and grammatical roles. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages (Cambridge Language Surveys), 381–402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2005Context shift and indexical variables in sign languages. In Effi Georgala & Jonathan Howell (eds.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory 151, 152–168. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
2009Agreement and argument structure in SLs: A case study in LSC psychological predications. Paper presented at the 21st European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information. Bordeaux, July 2009.
2011Reporting and quoting in signed discourse. In Elke Brendel, Jörg Meibauer & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Understanding quotation, 277–302. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Rathmann, Christian G.
2005Event structure in American Sign Language. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin PhD dissertation.
2001Experiencing derivations. In Rachel Hastings, Brandan Jackson & Zsofia Zvolenszky (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 11, 365–387. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin
2006Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2012Agreement auxiliaries. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 204–227. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
2004Phonological visibility of event structure in Austrian Sign Language: A comparison of ASL and ÖGS. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University MA thesis.
2014Iconic features. Natural Language Semantics 221. 299–356.
Schlenker, Philippe, Jonathan Lamberton & Mirko Santoro
2013Iconic variables. Linguistic and Philosophy 361. 91–149.
Sloetjes, Han & Peter Wittenburg
2008Annotation by category – ELAN and ISO DCR. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008).
Steinbach, Markus & Roland Pfau
2007Grammaticalization of auxiliaries in sign language. In Pamela Perniss, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Visible variation. Comparative studies on sign language structure, 303–339. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Sutton-Spence, Rachel & Bencie Woll
1999The linguistics of British Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taub, Sarah F.
2001Language from the body. Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr.
1990Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language 661. 221–260.
Wilbur, Ronnie B.
2003Representations of telicity in ASL. Chicago Linguistics Society 391. 354–368.
Wilbur, Ronnie B.
2010The semantics-phonology interface. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages, 355–380. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2015Arguments in syntax and semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2013Psychological verb constructions in American Sign Language. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University MA thesis.
Cited by 23 other publications
BOERS–VISKER, EVELINE & ROLAND PFAU
2020. Space Oddities: The Acquisition of Agreement Verbs by L2 Learners of Sign Language of the Netherlands. The Modern Language Journal 104:4 ► pp. 757 ff.
Bradley, Chuck, Evie A. Malaia, Jeffrey Mark Siskind, Ronnie B. Wilbur & Marcus Perlman
2022. Visual form of ASL verb signs predicts non-signer judgment of transitivity. PLOS ONE 17:2 ► pp. e0262098 ff.
Bradley, Chuck & Ronnie Wilbur
2023. Visual Form and Event Semantics Predict Transitivity in Silent Gestures: Evidence for Compositionality. Cognitive Science 47:8
Börstell, Carl, Tommi Jantunen, Vadim Kimmelman, Vanja de Lint, Johanna Mesch & Marloes Oomen
2019. Transitivity prominence within and across modalities. Open Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 666 ff.
Couvee, Sascha & Roland Pfau
2018. Structure and Grammaticalization of Serial Verb Constructions in Sign Language of the Netherlands—A Corpus-Based Study. Frontiers in Psychology 9
Ergin, Rabia, Ann Senghas, Ray Jackendoff & Lila Gleitman
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.