Article published In:Sign Language & Linguistics: Online-First Articles
Strategies for new word formation in NGT
A case for simultaneous morphology
How do new words arise in a sign language? We present an empirical study of newly formed words in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT). Five signers were asked to create new forms for known concepts for which word forms exist in NGT. Participants used sequential strategies for word formation, also found in spoken languages. More frequently, however, they used simultaneous strategies, some of which are unique for the visual-manual modality. We describe and discuss each strategy and focus on the most prominent of these, namely the simultaneous combination of meaningful form elements (Form-Meaning Units or FMUs). The abundance of simultaneous combinations of FMUs in our data cannot be explained in terms of concatenative morphology. We propose an account for word formation phenomena in NGT that uses the phonological segment as the template for simultaneous combinations of FMUs. This study shows that the FMUs function as basic building blocks for words and accordingly can be considered morphemes. Given the large set of FMUs in NGT and their frequent occurrence in the newly formed lexical words in our data, we argue for the acknowledgement of more morphological complexity within the lexicon of sign languages and for a re-evaluation of the relation between sign language phonology, morphology, and syntax.
Keywords: word formation, morphology, compounding, blending, lexicon, sign language, NGT, neologisms
- 2.2Word formation strategies in sign languages
- 2.2.3Loan translation
- 2.2.4Classifier constructions
- 2.2.5Other sources of lexicon expansion in sign languages
- 2.3The Dependency Model
- 2.4The present study
- 3.2Participants and procedure
- 4.2.1Combinations of existing words: Compounds and blends
- 4.2.2FMU combinations
- 4.2.3Combination of existing signs with one or more FMUs
- 4.2.4Semantic extension
- 4.2Distribution of the strategies
- 6.Summary and conclusions
Published online: 15 June 2023
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir, Carol A. Padden & Wendy Sandler
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir & Wendy Sandler
Benedicto, Elena & Diane Brentari
Brennan, Mary, Martin Colville, Lilian Lawson & Gerry Hughes
Brentari, Diane & Carol A. Padden
Bussemaker, Marlies C.
2000 Compounds in NGT. Utrecht: Utrecht University MA thesis.
Cates, Deborah, Eva Gutiérrez, Sarah Hafer, Ryan Barrett & David Corina
Crasborn, Onno & Els van der Kooij
Crasborn, Onno, Els van der Kooij & Johan Ros
2012 On the weight of phrase-final prosodic words in a sign language. Sign Language & Linguistics 15(1). 11–38.
Eccarius, Petra & Diane Brentari
Fernald, Theodore B. & Donna Jo Napoli
2000 Exploitation of morphological possibilities in signed languages: Comparison of American Sign Language with English. Sign Language & Linguistics 31. 3–58.
Grote, Klaudia A. E. & Erika Linz
2003 The influence of sign language iconicity on semantic conceptualization. In Wolfgang G. Müller & Olga Fischer (eds.), From sign to signing ( Iconicity in language and literature 3), 23–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jackendoff, Ray & Jenny Audring
Johnson, Robert & Scott K. Liddell
Johnston, Trevor & Lindsay Ferrara
Johnston, Trevor & Adam Schembri
1999 On defining lexeme in a signed language. Sign Language & Linguistics 2(2). 115–185.
Kegl, Judy A. & Sara Schley
Klima, Edward S. & Ursula Bellugi
Kristoffersen, Jette H. & Thomas Troelsgård
2012 Integrating corpora and dictionaries: problems and perspectives, with particular respect to the treatment of sign language. In Onno Crasborn, Eleni Efthimiou, Evita Fotinea, Thomas Hanke, Jette Kristoffersen & Johanna Mesch (eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Interactions between Corpus and Lexicon, 95–100.
Kubuş, Okan & Annette Hohenberger
Lepic, Ryan & Corinne Occhino
Liddell, Scott K.
Liddell, Scott K. & Robert E. Johnson
2016 A cognitive approach to phonology: Evidence from signed languages. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico PhD dissertation.
Padden, Carol A. & David M. Perlmutter
Pleyer, Michael, Ryan Lepic & Stefan Hartmann
1999 Cliticization and prosodic words in a sign language. In Tracy A. Hall & Ursula Kleinhenz (eds.), Studies on the phonological word, 223–255. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin
Supalla, Ted R.
Supalla, Ted R.
1986 The classifier system in American Sign Language. In Collette Craig (ed.), Noun classes and categorization, 181–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
1992 Compound nouns in American Sign Language: Which way are they headed? Paper presented at TISLR 4, San Diego.
Taub, Sara F.
Thompson, Robin L., David P. Vinson & Gabriella Vigliocco
van der Hulst, Harry & Els van der Kooij
van der Kooij, Els
2002 Phonological categories in Sign Language of the Netherlands. The role of phonetic implementation and iconicity. Leiden: University of Leiden PhD dissertation. Utrecht: LOT.
van der Kooij, Els & Onno Crasborn
van der Kooij, Els, Inge Zwitserlood & Onno Crasborn
1996 Polysynthetic signs in Swedish Sign Language. Stockholm: Stockholm University PhD dissertation.
2003 Classifying hand configurations in Nederlandse Gebarentaal (Sign Language of the Netherlands). Utrecht: Utrecht University PhD dissertation. Utrecht: LOT.
Zwitserlood, Inge, Els van der Kooij & Onno Crasborn
Zwitserlood, Inge, Jette H. Kristoffersen & Thomas Troelsgård