Cover not available
Article published In:
Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 25:2 (2022) ► pp.135–162

ASL negative incorporation as negative suppletion

| York University

While there are several analyses of negation in American Sign Language (ASL), the phenomenon of negative incorporation has been overlooked in the generative literature, except for Sandler’s (1999) phonological analysis. The phonological approach makes several useful generalizations but is not without its drawbacks. We, therefore, situate our analysis in the Distributed Morphology framework and argue that negative incorporation is best analyzed as a case of negative suppletion. We motivate our approach based on the observations that (i) negative incorporation is sentential negation, (ii) negative incorporation blocks the occurrence of the canonical negation strategy for the affected verbs, and (iii) there is no verb-to-Neg movement in ASL. When taken together, these factors indicate that negative incorporation cannot be affixation. Suppletion, however, alleviates the problematic aspects of the phonological analysis while maintaining the relevant phonological generalizations.

Keywords: American Sign Language, negation, negative incorporation, Distributed Morphology
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Negation in ASL
  • 3.Negative incorporation as affixation
  • 4.A closer look at negative incorporation
    • 4.1Negative incorporation is clausal negation
    • 4.2A blocking effect
  • 5.No movement to Neg0
  • 6.Distributed morphology
    • 6.1Spanning
  • 7.Negative incorporation is negative suppletion
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 23 June 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.20012.bem
References (61)
Aarons, Debra
1994 Aspects of the syntax of American Sign Language. Boston, MA: Boston University PhD dissertation.
Aarons, Debra, Benjamin J. Bahan, Judy Kegl & Carol Neidle
1995 Lexical tense markers in American Sign Language. In Karen Emmorey & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 225–253. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Anderson, Diane E. & Judy S. Reilly
1997 The puzzle of negation: How children move from communicative to grammatical negation in ASL. Applied Psycholinguistics 181. 411–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, & Kirsten Fudeman
2011 What is morphology? Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1976 Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark
1985 The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 161. 373–415.Google Scholar
Bembridge, Gavin
2016 Negation in American Sign Language: The view from the interface. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 36(1). [URL]
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo
2013 The Spanish lexicon stores stems with theme vowels, not roots with inflectional class features. Probus 251. 3–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braze, David
2004 Aspectual inflection, verb raising and object fronting in American Sign Language. Lingua 1141. 29–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brentari, Diane
1998 A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin
2019 Doing away with post-syntactic operations: No need for lowering or local dislocation in a Minimal morphosyntax. Manuscript, University of Delaware.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. & Samuel J. Keyser
1983 CV phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Corina, David
1989 Recognition of affective and non-canonical linguistic facial expressions in Deaf and hearing subjects. Brain and Cognition 91. 227–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowper, Elizabeth & Daniel Currie Hall
2019 Scope variation in contrastive hierarchies of morphosyntactic features. In David W. Lightfoot & Jonathan Havenhill (eds.), Variable properties in language: Their nature and acquisition, 27–41. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2010 Typology of negation. In Laurence R. Horn (ed.), The expression of negation, 9–38. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Clercq, Karen
2013 A unified syntax of negation. Ghent: Universiteit Gent PhD dissertation.
Deuchar, Margaret
1987 Negative incorporation in three sign languages. In Jim Kyle (ed.), Sign and school: Using signs in Deaf children’s development, 35–43. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan
2009 The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durrleman-Tame, Stephanie
2008 The syntax of Jamaican Creole: A cartographic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, David
2015 The morpheme: A theoretical introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, David & Morris Halle
2005 On the status of stems in morphological theory. In Twan Geerts, Ivo van Ginneken & Haike Jacobs (eds), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2003, 37–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, David & Rolf Noyer
2001 Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 321. 555–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph
1978 The verbal complex V’ –V in French. Linguistic Inquiry 91. 151–175.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susan. D.
2006 Questions and negation in American Sign Language. In Ulrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 167–197. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John A.
1990 Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris
1997 Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and fission. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 301. 425–449.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz
1993 Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Ken Hale & Samuel. J. Keyser (eds.). The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honour of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hankamer, Jorge & Line Mikkelsen
2005 When movement must be blocked: A reply to Embick and Noyer. Linguistic Inquiry 361. 85–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Rolf Noyer
1999 Distributed Morphology. Glot International 41. 3–9.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Elizabeth Ritter
2002 Person and number in pronouns: A feature geometric analysis. Language 781. 482–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Mercedes Tubino Blanco
2013 Cycles, vocabulary items, and stem forms in Hiaki. In Ora Matushansky & Alec Marantz (eds.), Distributed Morphology today: Morphemes for Morris Halle, 117–134. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugen, Jason D.
2016 Readjustment: rejected? In Daniel Siddiqi & Heidi Harley (eds.), Morphological metatheory, 303–342. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugen, Jason D. & Daniel Siddiqi
2013 Roots and the derivation. Linguistic Inquiry 441. 493–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Towards a restricted realization theory: Multimorphemic monolistemicity, portmanteaux, and post-linearization spanning. In Daniel Siddiqi & Heidi Harley (eds.), Morphological metatheory, 343–386. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ivana, Adrian & Hiromu Sakai
2007 Honorification and light verbs in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 161. 171–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddell, Scott K.
1984  think and believe: Sequentiality in American Sign Language. Language 601. 372–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1980 American Sign Language syntax. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liskova, Elena I.
2012 Negation of know, want, like, have, and good in American Sign Language. Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin MA Thesis.
Marantz, Alec
1997 Stem suppletion, or the arbitrariness of the sign. Paper presented at the Université de Paris VIII.
Merchant, Jason
2015 How much context is enough? Two cases of span-conditioned stem allomorphy. Linguistic Inquiry 461. 273–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Gereon
2007 Extended exponence by enrichment: Argument encoding in German, Archi, and Timucua. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 131. 253–266.Google Scholar
Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Benjamin J. Bahan & Robert G. Lee
2000 The syntax of American Sign Language: Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland
2008 The grammar of headshake: A typological perspective on German Sign Language negation. Linguistics in Amsterdam 11. 37–74.Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer
2002 V-to-Neg raising and negative concord in three sign languages. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 271. 73–86.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989 Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 201, 365–424.Google Scholar
Poser, William J.
1992 Blocking of phrasal constructions by lexical items. In Ivan Sag & Anna Szabolcsi (eds.), Lexical matters, 111–130. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Quer, Josep
2002 Negative operators in Catalan Sign Language. Manuscript, ICREA & Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy
1999 Cliticization and prosodic words in a sign language. In Tracy Hall & Ursula Kleinhenz (eds.), Studies on the phonological word, 223–255. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siddiqi, Daniel
2006 Minimize exponence: Economy effects on a model of the morphosyntactic component of the grammar. Tuscon, AZ: University of Arizona PhD dissertation.
2021 On the taxonomy of root suppletion. Paper presented at the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL), The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Svenonius, Peter
2012 Spanning. Manuscript, CASTL, University of Tromsø. [URL]
2016 Spans and words. In Daniel Siddiqi & Heidi Harley (eds.), Morphological metatheory, 199–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valli, Clayton & Ceil Lucas
1992 Linguistics of American Sign Language: A resource text for ASL users; instructor’s manual. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Veinberg, Silvana C. & Ronnie B. Wilbur
1990 A linguistic analysis of the negative headshake in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 681. 217–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Volpe, Mark
2009 A Distributed Morphology-based analysis of Japanese verbal honorifics. Manuscript, LingBuzz/000520.Google Scholar
Woodward, James & Susan DeSantis
1977 Negative incorporation in French and American Sign Language. Language in Society 61. 379–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella
1997 Negation and clausal structure. A comparative study of Romance languages. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde
2016 Negation and negative dependencies. Annual Review of Linguistics 21. 233–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike
2004 Hand, head and face: Negative constructions in sign languages. Linguistic Typology 81. 1–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Negative and interrogative constructions in sign languages: A case study in sign language typology. In Ulrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 28–69. Nijmegen: Ishara Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar