Article published In:
Sign Language & LinguisticsVol. 25:1 (2022) ► pp.1–29
Age of exposure and subject/object asymmetries when wh-movement goes rightward
The case of LIS interrogatives
We report an experiment addressing the comprehension of LIS interrogatives in three adult populations with different times of exposure to sign language: native signers, early signers, and late signers. We investigate whether delayed exposure to language affects comprehension of interrogatives and whether there is an advantage for subject dependencies over object dependencies, as systematically reported for spoken languages. The answer to the first question is positive: there is evidence that natives outperform non-native signers, confirming permanent effects of delayed exposure to sign language even decades after childhood. However, the performance in subject interrogatives was lower than in object interrogatives in all groups of participants. We discuss several possible reasons for this unexpected finding.
Keywords: LIS, interrogatives, age of exposure effects, wh-dependency
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Some background on LIS interrogatives
- 3.Towards the construction of the content interrogative test
- 4.Age of exposure effects
- 5.The experiment
- 5.1Participants
- 5.2Materials
- 5.3Procedure
- 5.4Results
- 6.Discussion
- 7.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References (38)
Alba, Celia. 2016. Wh-questions in Catalan Sign Language. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra PhD dissertation.
Aristodemo, Valentina, Beatrice Giustolisi, Giorgia Zorzi, Doriane Gras, Charlotte Hauser, Rita Sala, Jordina Sánchez Amat, Caterina Donati & Carlo Cecchetto. 2021. On the nature of role shift: insights from a comprehension study in different populations of LIS, LSC and LSF signers, [URL]
Aristodemo, Valentina, Beatrice Giustolisi, Carlo Cecchetto & Caterina Donati. 2020. Comprehension of verb directionality in LIS and LSF. Proceedings of 11th International Conference of Experimental Linguistics. 
Barberà, Gemma & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr. 2017. Backgrounded agents in sign language: passives, middles or impersonals? Language 93(4). 767–798.
Boudreault, Patrick & Rachel I. Mayberry, R. 2006. Grammatical processing in American Sign Language: Age of first-language acquisition effects in relation to syntactic structure. Language and Cognitive Processes 21(5). 608–635.
Branchini, Chiara, Carlo Cecchetto, Anna Cardinaletti, Caterina Donati & Carlo Geraci. 2013. Wh-duplication in Italian Sign Language (LIS). Sign Language & Linguistics 161. 157–188.
Branchini, Chiara. 2020. Syntax: 1.1.1.2. Passive. In Chiara Branchini & Lara Mantovan (eds.). A grammar of Italian Sign Language (LIS). 1st ed. (SIGN-HUB Sign Language Grammar Series). Available at: [URL]. Accessed 30-09-2020.
Branchini, Chiara & Lara Mantovan (eds.). 2020. A grammar of Italian Sign Language (LIS). 1st ed. (SIGN-HUB Sign Language Grammar Series). Available at: [URL]. Accessed 30-09-2020.
Cecchetto, Carlo. 2012. Sentence types. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook (HSK – Handbooks of linguistics and communication science), 292–315. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Cecchetto, Carlo, Carlo Geraci & Sandro Zucchi. 2009. Another way to mark syntactic dependencies: The case for right-peripheral specifiers in sign languages. Language 85(2). 278–320.
Checchetto, Alessandra, Mirko Santoro, Beatrice Giustolisi, Naama Friedmann, Caterina Donati & Carlo Cecchetto. 2019. SYNTCQLIS – Content questions comprehension task in LIS. Handle to be attributed. Available under request at [URL]
Cheng, Qi & Rachel I. Mayberry. 2020. When event knowledge overrides word order in sentence comprehension: Learning a first language after childhood. Developmental Science.
Cheng, Lauretta, Danielle Burgess, Natasha Vernooij, Cecilia Solís-Barroso, Ashley McDermottm & Savithry Namboodiripad. 2021. The problematic concept of “native speaker” in psycholinguistics: replacing vague and harmful terminology with inclusive and accurate measures.
Cormier, Kearsy, Adam Schembri, David Vinson & Eleni Orfanidou. 2012. First language acquisition differs from second language acquisition in prelingually deaf signers: Evidence from sensitivity to grammaticality judgement in British Sign Language Cognition
124(1). 50–65.
Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Position of interrogative phrases in content questions. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at: [URL], Accessed on 2020-09-30).
Emmorey, Karen, Ursula Bellugi, Angela Friederici & Petra Horn. 1995. Effects of age of acquisition on grammatical sensitivity: Evidence from on-line and off-line tasks. Applied Psycholinguistics 16(1). 1–23.
Friedmann, Naama, Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi. 2009. Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies Lingua 119(1). 67–88.
Geraci, Carlo, Robert Bayley, Anna Cardinaletti, Carlo Cecchetto & Caterina Donati. 2015. Variation in Italian Sign Language (LIS): The case of wh-signs. Linguistics 531. 125–151.
Gibson, Edward. 2000. The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Alec Marantz, Yasuchi Miyashita & Wayne O’Neil (eds.), Image, language, brain: Papers from the first mind articulation project symposium, 94–126. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Grillo, Nino. 2009. Generalized Minimality: Feature impoverishment and comprehension deficits in agrammatism Lingua 119(10). 1426–1443.
Grodzinsky, Yosef. 2000. The neurology of syntax: Language use without broca’s area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 231. 1–21.
Guasti, Maria Teresa. 2004. Language acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hall, Wyatte C., Leonard L. Levin & Melissa L. Anderson. 2017. Language deprivation syndrome: a possible neurodevelopmental disorder with sociocultural origins. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 521. 761–776.
Hauser, Charlotte, Giorgia Zorzi, Valentina Aristodemo, Beatrice Giustolisi, Doriane Gras, Rita Sala, Jordina Sánchez Amat, Carlo Cecchetto & Caterina Donati. 2021. Asymmetries in relative clause comprehension in three European sign languages. Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics 6(1). 721. 1–36.
Jäger, Lena, Zhong Chen, Qiang Li, Chien-jer Charles Lin & Shravan Vasishth. 2015. The subject-relative advantage in Chinese: Evidence for expectation-based processing. Journal of Memory and Language 79/801. 97–120.
Kegl, Judy. 1990. Predicate argument structure and verb-class organization in the ASL lexicon. In Ceil Lucas (ed.), Sign language research: theoretical issues, 149–175. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Kelepir, Meltem. 2021. Content interrogatives – theoretical and experimental perspectives. In Josep Quer, Roland Pfau & Annika Herrmann (eds.), The Routledge handbook of theoretical and experimental sign language research, 232–265. Oxford: Routledge.
Levy, Hagar & Naama Friedmann. 2009. Treatment of syntactic movement in syntactic SLI: A case study. First Language 291. 15–49.
Mayberry, Rachel I. 1993. First-language acquisition after childhood differs from second-language acquisition: The case of American Sign Language. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 36(6). 1258–1270.
Mitchell, Rose E. & Michael A. Karchmer, M. 2004. Chasing the mythical ten percent: Parental hearing status of deaf and hard of hearing students in the United States. Sign Language Studies 4(2). 138–163.
Reinhart, Tanja. 1976. The syntactic domain of anaphora. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD dissertation.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
. 2018. Intervention effects in grammar and language acquisition. Probus 30(2). 339–367.
Sheppard, Shannon M., Matthew Walenski, Tracy Love & Lewis P. Shapiro. 2015. The auditory comprehension of wh-questions in aphasia: Support for the intervener hypothesis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 581. 781–797.
Van Der Lely, Heather & Jackie Battell. 2003. Wh-movement in children with grammatical SLI: A test of the RDDR hypothesis. Language 79(1). 153–181.
Van Gompel, Roger P. G. 2013. Sentence processing. Hove: Psychology Press.
Zeshan, Ulrike. 2004. Interrogative constructions in sign languages – Cross-linguistic perspectives. Language 80(1). 7–39.
Giorgia Zorzi, Valentina Aristodemo, Carlo Cecchetto, Beatrice Giustolisi, Charlotte Hauser, Josep Quer, Jordina Sanchez Amat & Caterina Donati. 2021. On the reliability of the notion of native signer and its risks. Manuscript available at [URL]
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Aristodemo, Valentina, Beatrice Giustolisi, Giorgia Zorzi, Doriane Gras, Charlotte Hauser, Rita Sala, Jordina Sánchez Amat, Caterina Donati & Carlo Cecchetto
2023. On the nature of role shift. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 41:2 ► pp. 459 ff. 
Hauser, Charlotte, Valentina Aristodemo & Caterina Donati
2023. A subject advantage in covert dependencies: The case ofwh‐question comprehension in French Sign Language. Syntax 26:3 ► pp. 280 ff.
Volpato, Francesca
2023. Valutazione della competenza linguistica e intervento
Osservazioni sulle modalità e sugli strumenti disponibili
. In Valutazione linguistica in italiano e nella LIS e strategie di intervento
,
Zorzi, Giorgia, Valentina Aristodemo, Beatrice Giustolisi, Charlotte Hauser, Caterina Donati & Carlo Cecchetto
2023. Assessing Lexical and Syntactic Comprehension in Deaf Signing Adults. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 28:4 ► pp. 373 ff.
Zorzi, Giorgia, Beatrice Giustolisi, Valentina Aristodemo, Carlo Cecchetto, Charlotte Hauser, Josep Quer, Jordina Sánchez Amat & Caterina Donati
2022. On the Reliability of the Notion of Native Signer and Its Risks. Frontiers in Psychology 13
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.