Article published In:
Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 26:1 (2023) ► pp.136
References
Açan, Zeynep
2001A study on sign languages and Turkish Sign Language. Ankara: Hacettepe University, MA thesis.
Allan, Keith
1977Classifiers. Language 53(2). 285–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arık, Engin
2003Spatial representations in Turkish Sign Language. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam MA thesis.
2013Introduction: Previous and current research on Turkish Sign Language. In Engin Arık (ed.), Current directions in Turkish Sign Language research, 1–17. UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Wendy Sandler
2003Classifier constructions and morphology in two sign languages. In Karen Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages, 52–84. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker
2015Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bel, Aurora, Marta Ortells & Gary Morgan
2015Reference control in the narratives of adult sign language learners. International Journal of Bilingualism 19(5). 608–624. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benedicto, Elena & Diane Brentari
2004Where did all the arguments go?: Argument- changing properties of classifiers in asl. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22(4). 743–810. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, Ruth. A., Dan. I. Slobin, Ayhan A. Aksu-Koç, Michael Bamberg, Lisa Dasinger, Virginia Marchman, Yonni Neeman, Philip C. Rodkin & Eugina Sebastián
1994Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Boudreault, Patrick & Rachel I. Mayberry
2006Grammatical processing in American Sign Language: Age of first-language acquisition effects in relation to syntactic structure. Language and Cognitive Processes 21(5). 608–635. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brentari, Diane, Marie Coppola, Ashley Jung & Susan Goldin-Meadow
2013Acquiring word class distinctions in American Sign Language: Evidence from handshape. Language Learning and Development 9(2). 130–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bürkner, Paul-Christian
2017brms: An r package for Bayesian multilevel models using stan. Journal of Statistical Software 80(1). 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cormier, Kearsy, Sandra Smith & Zed Sevcikova-Sehyr
2015Rethinking constructed action. Sign Language & Linguistics 18(2). 167–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crasborn, Onno
2007How to recognize a sentence when you see one. Sign Language & Linguistics 10(2). 103–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crasborn, Onno, Richard Bank, Inge Zwitserlood, Else van der Kooij, Anne de Meijer & Anna Sáfár
2015Annotation conventions for the corpus NGT, Version 3.Google Scholar
Crasborn, Onno & Han Sloetjes
2008Enhanced elan functionality for sign language corpora. In Proceedings of LREC 2008, Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. Marrakech, Morocco.Google Scholar
de Lint, Vanja
2018NGT classifier constructions: An inventory of arguments. Sign Language & Linguistics 21(1). 3–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drapeau, Lynn & Renée Lambert-Brétière
2011Verbal classifiers in Innu. Anthropological Linguistics 53(4). 293–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emmorey, Karen
2001Language, cognition, and the brain: Insights from sign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth
1993Space in Danish Sign Language: The semantics and morphosyntax of the use of space in a visual language. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Glück, Susanne & Roland Pfau
1998On classifying classification as a class of inflection in German Sign Language. In Tina Cambier-Langeveld, Aniko Lipták & Michael Redford (eds.), Proceedings of ConSole 6 1, 59–74.Google Scholar
Gökgöz, Kadir
Under review. Verbal classifiers from a crosslinguistic and cross-modal point of view.
Gökgöz, Kadir & Hande Sevgi
2020Aspects of clause structure and morphology in Turkish Sign Language. In Aslı Gürer, Dilek Uygun-Gökmen & Balkız Öztürk (eds.), Morphological complexity within and across boundaries: In Honour of Aslı Göksel, 315–351. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grose, Donovan, Ronnie B. Wilbur & Katharina Schalber
2007Events and telicity in classifier predicates: A reanalysis of body part classifier predicates in ASL. Lingua 117(7). 1258–1284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, Francois & Harlan Lane
1977Pauses and syntax in American Sign Language. Cognition 51. 101–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gür, Cansu
2018The effects of late language acquisition on the development of narrative skills: Insights from Turkish Sign Language (Türk İşaret Dili). Erzurum, Türkiye: Atatürk University PhD dissertation.
Hakgüder, Emre & Diane Brentari
2020Predictive typology of sign language instrumentals. Paper presented at Formal and Experimental Advances in Sign Language Theory, Paris, France.
Humphries, Tom, Poorna Kushalnagar, Gaurav Mathur, Donna Jo Napoli, Carol Padden, Christian Rathmann & Scott Smith
2016Avoiding linguistic neglect of deaf children. Social Service Review 90(4). 589–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Discourses of prejudice in the professions: The case of sign languages. Journal of Medical Ethics 43(9). 648–652. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
İlkbaşaran, Deniz
2015Literacies, mobilities and agencies of deaf youth in Turkey: Constraints and opportunities in the 21st century. San Diego, CA: University of California PhD dissertation.
Kantor, Rebecca
1980The acquisition of classifiers in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 281. 193–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karadöller, Dilay Z., Beyza Sümer & Aslı Özyürek
2017Effects of delayed language exposure on spatial language acquisition by signing children and adults. In Glenn Gunzelmann, Andrew Howes, Thora Tenbrink & Eddy Davelaar (eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2372–2376. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
2021Effects and non-effects of late language exposure on spatial language development: Evidence from deaf adults and children. Language Learning and Development 17(1). 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karadöller, Dilay Z., Beyza Sümer, Ecrenur Ünal & Aslı Özyürek
2022Late sign language exposure does not modulate the relation between spatial language and spatial memory in deaf children and adults. Memory & Cognition. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayabaşı, Demet
2020The causative-inchoative alternation in Turkish Sign Language and the age-of-acquisition effects on complex clauses. İstanbul: Boğaziçi University MA thesis.
Kayabaşı, Demet & Kadir Gökgöz
2022The causative-inchoative alternation and age-of-acquisition effects on multi-predicate constructions in Turkish Sign Language. Language Learning and Development, 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keleş, Onur, Furkan Atmaca & Kadir Gökgöz
2022Effects of age of acquisition and category size on signed verbal fluency. Language Acquisition 361–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimmelman, Vadim, Vanja de Lint, Connie de Vos, Marloes Oomen, Roland Pfau, Lianne Vink & Enoch O. Aboh
2019Argument structure of classifier predicates: Canonical and non-canonical mappings in four sign languages. Open Linguistics 5(1). 332–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimmelman, Vadim, Roland Pfau & Enoch O. Aboh
2020Argument structure of classifier predicates in Russian Sign Language. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 38(2). 539–579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kubus, Okan
2008An analysis of Turkish Sign Language: Phonology and morphology. Ankara: Middle East Technical University MA thesis.
Lenneberg, Eric H.
1967The biological foundations of language. Hospital Practice 2(12). 59–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane & Ronice M. de Quadros
2011Acquisition of the syntax-discourse interface: The expression of point of view. Lingua 121(4). 623–636. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane & Jonathan Henner
2021Acquisition of sign languages. Annual Review of Linguistics 7(1). 395–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayberry, Rachel I.
1998The critical period for language acquisition and the deaf child’s language comprehension: A psycholinguistic approach. Bulletin d’audiophonologie, Université de Franche-Comte.Google Scholar
Mayberry, Rachel I., Tristan Davenport, Austin Roth & Eric Halgren
2018Neurolinguistic processing when the brain matures without language. Cortex 991. 390–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayberry, Rachel I. & Ellen B. Eichen
1991The long-lasting advantage of learning sign language in childhood: Another look at the critical period for language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 30(4). 486–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayberry, Rachel I. & Robert Kluender
2018Rethinking the critical period for language: New insights into an old question from American Sign Language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21(5). 938–944. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Rose & Michael Karchmer
2004Chasing the mythical ten percent: Parental hearing status of deaf and hard of hearing students in the United States. Sign Language Studies 41. 138–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Wendy Sandler
1999Prosody in Israeli Sign Language. Language and Speech 421. 143–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newport, Elissa L.
1990Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science 14(1). 11–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newport, Elissa. L. & Richard P. Meier
1985The acquisition of American Sign Language. In Dan I. Slobin (ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 11, 881–938. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Nyst, Victoria
2007A descriptive analysis of Adamorobe Sign Language (Ghana). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam PhD dissertation. Utrecht: LOT.
Özdemir, Semra
2021Expression of arguments and age of acquisition effects in Turkish Sign Language. İstanbul: Boğaziçi University MA thesis.
Özkul, Aslı
2013A phonological and morphological analysis of noun-verb pairs in Turkish Sign Language. İstanbul: Boğaziçi University MA thesis.
Özyürek, Aslı & Pamela Perniss
2011Event representations in signed languages. In Jürgen Bohnemeyer & Eric Pederson (eds.), Event representations in language and cognition, 84–107. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penfield, Wilder & Lamar Roberts
1959Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Perniss, Pamela & Aslı Özyürek
2008Representations of action, motion, and location in sign space: A comparison of German and Turkish Sign Language narratives. In Josep Quer (ed.), Signs of the time: Selected papers from TISLR 8 1, 352–378. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
R Core Team
2020R: A language and environment for statistical computing. [URL]
Reynolds, Wanette
2018Young bimodal bilingual development of referent tracking in signed narratives: Further justification of heritage signer status. Sign Language Studies 18(3). 328–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, Françoise
2019From classifiers to applicatives in Mojeño Trinitario: A new source for applicative markers. Linguistic Typology 23(3). 435–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santiesteban, Idalmis, Sarah White, Jennifer Cook, Sam Gilbert, Cecilia Heyes & Geoffrey Bird
2012Training social cognition: from imitation to theory of mind. Cognition 122(2). 228–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schick, Brenda S.
1990The effects of morphological complexity on phonological simplification in ASL. Sign Language Studies 66(1). 25–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schick, Brenda S., Marc Marschark & Patricia Elizabeth Spencer
2006Advances in the sign language development of deaf children. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sevgi, Hande
2019The impact of age of acquisition on structure: A study on alignment in Turkish Sign Language. İstanbul: Boğaziçi University MA thesis.
Singleton, Jenny L. & Elissa L. Newport
2004When learners surpass their models: The acquisition of American Sign Language from inconsistent input. Cognitive Psychology 49(4). 370–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan. I., Nini Hoiting, Marlon Kuntze, Reyna Lindert, Amy Weinberg, Jennie Pyers, Michelle Anthony, Yael Biederman & Helen Thumann
2003A cognitive/functional perspective on the acquisition of ‘classifiers’. In Karen Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages, 271–298. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Supalla, Ted
1982Structure and acquisition of verbs of motion and location in American Sign Language. San Diego, CA: University of California PhD dissertation.
1986The classifier system in American Sign Language. In Colette Craig (ed.), Noun classes and categorization, 181–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2003The key is social cognition. In Dedre Gentner & Susan Goldin-Meadow (eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought, 47–57. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Trovato, Sara
2013A stronger reason for the right to sign languages. Sign Language Studies 13(3). 401–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie
1987American Sign Language: Linguistic and applied dimensions. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co.Google Scholar
1994Eyeblinks and ASL phrase structure. Sign Language Studies 841. 221–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwitserlood, Inge
2003Classifying hand configurations in Nederlandse Gebarentaal (Sign Language of the Netherlands). Leiden: University of Leiden PhD dissertation. Utrecht: LOT.
2012Classifiers. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 158–186. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar