Article published In:
Sign Language & LinguisticsVol. 26:2 (2023) ► pp.258–275
Squib
Wh-doubling in German Sign Language
Why not sluicing?
Wh-doubling is a widely attested phenomenon in sign languages. Several analyses are found in the literature assuming, for example, base-generation of one of the doubles or making (heavy) use of remnant movement. Using data from German Sign Language, this article discusses the possibility that the structure might be derived from a relative clause embedded under a wh-question which finally undergoes sluicing. It will be argued that such an account correctly predicts the distribution of the wh-phrases found in German Sign Language doubling constructions.
Keywords:
wh-doubling, focus doubling, sluicing, syntax, German Sign Language
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The data to be accounted for and the basic hypothesis
- 3.Comparable constructions in other languages
- 4.A relative-clause sluicing analysis of wh-doubling in DGS
- 5.Conclusions
- Notes
-
References
References
Abner, Natasha
2011 Wh-words that go bump in the right. In Mary Byram Washburn, Katherine McKinney-Bock, Erika Varis, Ann Sawyer & Barbara Tomaszewicz (eds.), Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 24–32.
Bhatt, Rajesh
2003 Locality in correlatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21(3). 485–541. 
Branchini, Chiara, Anna Cardinaletti, Carlo Cecchetto, Caterina Donati & Carlo Geraci
Bross, Fabian
2020a Encoding different types of topics and foci in German Sign Language: A cartographic approach to sign language syntax. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(1): 108.
2020b The clausal syntax of German Sign Language: A cartographic approach. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Chung, Sandra, William A. Ladusaw & James McCloskey
1995 Sluicing and logical form. Natural Language Semantics 3(3). 239–282.
Cinque, Guglielmo
2016 On the double-headed analysis of “headless” relative clauses. In Ludovico Franco & Paolo Lorusso (eds.), Linguistic variation: Structure and interpretation, 169–196. Boston & Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
2020 The syntax of relative clauses: A unified analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dayal, Veneeta
2012 Locality in wh quantification: Questions and relative clauses in Hindi. Dordrecht: Springer.
Felser, Claudia
2004 Wh-copying, phases, and successive cyclicity. Lingua 114(5). 543–574.
Ginzburg, Jonathan & Ivan Sag
2000 Interrogative investigations. Stanford: CSLI publications.
Groat, Erich
2015 Total transfer, dynamic labeling, and transfer remnants. In Günther Grewendorf (ed.), Remnant movement, 257–320. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Happ, Daniela & Marc-Oliver Vorköper
2014 Deutsche Gebärdensprache: Ein Lehr- und Arbeitsbuch [German Sign Language: A text- and workbook]. Frankfurt am Main: Fachhochschulverlag.
Hartmann, Katharina & Tonjes Veenstra
2013 Introduction. In Katharina Hartmann & Tonjes Veenstra (eds.), Cleft structures, 1–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hedberg, Nancy
1990 Discourse pragmatics and cleft sentences in English. University of Minnesota PhD dissertation.
2000 The referential status of clefts. Language 76(4). 891–920.
Herrmann, Annika, Sina Proske & Elisabeth Volk
2019 Question-answer pairs in sign languages. In Malte Zimmermann, Klaus von Heusinger & Edgar Onea (eds.), Questions in discourse, 96–131. Leiden & Boston: Brill.
Hiraiwa, Ken & Shinichiro Ishihara
2002 Missing links: Cleft, sluicing, and “no da” construction in Japanese. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 431. 35–54.
2012 Syntactic metamorphosis: Clefts, sluicing, and in-situ focus in Japanese. Syntax 15(2). 142–180.
Hoekstra, Jarich
1993 The split CP hypothesis and the Frisian complementizer system. Ms. Frisian Academy.
Höhle, Tilman N.
2000 The w-…w-construction: Appositive or scope indicating? In Ulrich Lutz, Gereon Müller & Armin von Stechow (eds.), Beiträge zur deutschen Grammatik, 249–270. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hole, Daniel
2011 The deconstruction of Chinese sh…de clefts revisited. Lingua 121(11). 1707–1733.
Katz, Jerrold J. & Paul M. Postal
1967 An integrated theory of linguistic description. Synthese 17(1).
Kimmelman, Vadim
2013 Doubling in RSL and NGT: A pragmatic account. In Maria Balbach, Lena Benz, Susanne Genzel, Mira Grubic, Agata Renans, Sören Schalowski, Maja Stegenwallner & Amir Zeldes (eds.), Information structure: Empirical perspectives on theory, 99–118. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
Koulidobrova, Elena
2012 When the quiet surfaces: ‘Transfer’ of argument omission in the speech of ASL-English bilinguals. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut PhD dissertation.
2017 Elide me bare: Null arguments in American Sign Language. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 35(2). 397–446.
Koulidobrova, Helen & Leyla Zidani-Eroglu
2018 A few arguments for isomorphic sluicing in ASL. Manuscript, online: [URL], received 19 February 2020.
Lobeck, Anne C.
1995 Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing, and identification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McDaniel, Dana
1989 Partial and multiple wh-movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7(4). 565–604.
Meinunger, André
1998 A monoclausal structure for (pseudo-)cleft sentences. In Pius N. Tamanji & Kiyomi Kusumoto (eds.), Proceedings of NELS, vol. 281. 283–298.
Merchant, Jason
2001 The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2019 Ellipsis: A survey of analytical approaches. In Jeroen van Craenenbroek & Tanja Temmermann (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ellipsis, 19–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Murphy, Andrew
2016 What copying (doesn’t) tell us about movement: Remarks on the derivation wh-copying in German. In Katja Barnickel, Matías Guzmán Naranjo, Johannes Hein, Sampson Korsah, Andrew Murphy, Ludger Paschen, Zorica Puškar & Joanna Zaleska (eds.), Replicative processes in grammar, 149–188. Leipzig: Institut für Linguistik, Universität Leipzig.
Neidle, Carol, Judy Anne Kegl & Benjamin Bahan
1994 The architecture of functional categories in American Sign Language. Talk presented at Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Nunes, Jairo & Ronice Müller de Quadros
2005 Duplication of wh-elements in Brazilian Sign Language. In Leah Bateman & Cherlon Ussery (eds.), Proceedings of NELS, vol. 351. 463–477. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Pankau, Andreas
2014 Replacing copies: The syntax of wh-copying in German. Utrecht: University of Utrecht PhD dissertation.
Petronio, Karen
1993 Clause structure in American Sign Language. Washington: University of Washington PhD dissertation.
Petronio, Karen & Diane Lillo-Martin
1997 WH-movement and the position of Spec-CP: Evidence from American Sign Language. Language 731. 18–57.
Pfau, Roland & Heleen Bos
2016 Syntax: Simple sentences. In Anne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde, Roland Pfau & Trude Schermer (eds.), The linguistics of sign languages: An introduction, 117–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
2005 Relative clauses in German Sign Language: Extraposition and reconstruction. In Leah Bateman & Cherlon Ussery (eds.), Proceedings of NELS, vol. 351. 507–521. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Rohdenburg, Günter
2003 Cognitive complexity and horror aequi as factors determining the use of interrogative clause linkers in English. In Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds.), Determinants of grammatical variation in English, 205–250. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Ross, John Robert
1970 On declarative sentences. In Roderick Jacobs & Peter Rosenbaum (eds.), English transformational grammar, 222–272. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Rugna, Giuseppe
2020 German wh-copying: A top-down analysis. Quaderni di Linguistica e Studi Orientali 61. 187–219.
Srivastav, Veneeta
1991 The syntax and semantics of correlatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9(4). 637–686.
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen
2004 Ellipsis in Dutch dialects. Leiden: Leiden University PhD dissertation.
2010a Complex wh-phrases don’t move: On the interaction between the split CP-hypothesis and the syntax of wh-movement. In Phoevos Panagiotidis (ed.), The complementizer phase: Subjects and operators, 236–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2010b Invisible last resort: A note on clefts as the underlying source for sluicing. Lingua 120(7). 1714–1726.
2010c The syntax of ellipsis: Evidence from Dutch dialects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen & Anikó Lipták
2006 The crosslinguistic syntax of sluicing: Evidence from Hungarian relatives. Syntax 9(3). 248–274.
Vincente, Luis
2019 Sluicing and its subtypes. In Jeroen van Craenenbroek & Tanja Temmermann (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ellipsis, 117–143. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilbur, Ronnie
1996 Evidence for the function and structure of wh-clefts in American Sign Language. International Review of Sign Linguistics 221. 209–256.
Zeshan, Ulrike
2004 Interrogative constructions in signed languages: Crosslinguistic perspectives. Language 801. 7–39.