Linguistic structures or schematic visual representation?
Dorothea Cogill-Koez | School of Languages, Cultures and Linguistics, University of New England, Australia
It is argued that signed communication systems differ from spoken ones in having not one but two structured systems of representation. In addition to the linguistic mode (which is shared with spoken communication, and which appears to be fundamentally identical across spoken and signed modalities), signers also command distinctive, formal systems of schematic visual representation. These are the forms of signing known as classifier predicates.
For the past two decades, signed classifier predicates have been modeled as linguistic. However, the basic formal units of such signing, the combination of these units, and their breakdown, all differ both from patterns seen in other signed forms that have long been recognized as linguistic, and from the classic patterns of language in general. Classifier predicates continue to be modeled as linguistic mostly on the basis of assumptions about alternatives, specifically about the form and acquisition of systems of visual-spatial representation. These assumptions are shown to be incorrect.
Signed classifiers are shown to correspond in many respects not merely to visual representation, but to a particular strategy of depiction known as schematic visual representation. This is the mode of depiction that appears to be most natural for both children and adults to master, and that is commonly seen in drawing.
There is thus strong evidence that in signed language classifiers we have what, from the point of view of traditional (spoken-language based) linguistics, is a qualitatively new communication mode: formal, structured systems of visual representation that exist side-by-side with linguistic modalities, within the total signed communication system.
2022. Show Me What You’ve B/Seen: A Brief History of Depiction. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Cormier, Kearsy, David Quinto-Pozos, Zed Sevcikova & Adam Schembri
2012. Lexicalisation and de-lexicalisation processes in sign languages: Comparing depicting constructions and viewpoint gestures. Language & Communication 32:4 ► pp. 329 ff.
2008. Phonological patterns in a dependency model: Allophonic relations grounded in phonetic and iconic motivation. Lingua 118:8 ► pp. 1109 ff.
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth
2011. Cognitive foundations of topic-comment and foreground-background structures: Evidence from sign languages, cospeech gesture and homesign. cogl 22:4 ► pp. 691 ff.
Hodge, Gabrielle & Trevor Johnston
2014. Points, Depictions, Gestures and Enactment: Partly Lexical and Non-Lexical Signs as Core Elements of Single Clause-Like Units in Auslan (Australian Sign Language). Australian Journal of Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 262 ff.
Hohenberger, Annette
2008. The word in sign language: empirical evidence and theoretical controversies. Linguistics 46:2
Johnston, Trevor
2004. The assessment and achievement of proficiency in a native sign language within a sign bilingual program: The pilot Auslan receptive skills test. Deafness & Education International 6:2 ► pp. 57 ff.
2020. Visuo-spatial construals that aid in understanding activity in visual-centred narrative. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 35:4 ► pp. 440 ff.
Perniss, Pamela M.
2007. Achieving spatial coherence in German Sign Language narratives: The use of classifiers and perspective. Lingua 117:7 ► pp. 1315 ff.
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
2023. Morphology in Sign Languages. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology, ► pp. 1 ff.
Puupponen, Anna, Laura Kanto, Tuija Wainio & Tommi Jantunen
2022. Variation in the use of constructed action according to discourse type and age in Finnish Sign Language. Language & Communication 83 ► pp. 16 ff.
2012. Formal Semantics of Sign Languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 6:11 ► pp. 719 ff.
Zucchi, Sandro
2017. Event Categorization in Sign Languages. In Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science, ► pp. 377 ff.
Zucchi, Sandro
2018. Sign language iconicity and gradient effects. Theoretical Linguistics 44:3-4 ► pp. 283 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.