Review published In:
Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 3:2 (2000) ► pp.263267
References
Aronoff, M., I. Meir, C. Padden & W. Sandler
to appear). “Classifier complexes and morphology in two sign languages.” In K. Emmorey ed. Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages Mahwah, New Jersey Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Deuchar, M.
(1984) British Sign Language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Emmorey, K.
ed. to appear Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages Mahwah, New Jersey Lawrence Erlbaum Associates DOI logo
Klima, E. S. & U. Bellugi
(1979) The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Newport, E. & T. Supalla
(2000) “Sign language research at the Millenium”’. In Emmorey, K. & H. Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited, pp. 103–114. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Padden, C.
(1988) Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Sandler, W. & D. Lillo-Martin
(2001) “Natural sign languages”. In M. Aronoff & J. Rees-Miller (eds.), Handbook of Linguistics, pp. 533–362. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Singleton, J. S. & E. L. Newport
(1993) “When learners surpass their model: The acquisition of American Sign Language from impoverished input.” Manuscript.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Kothadiya, Deep R., Chintan M. Bhatt, Tanzila Saba, Amjad Rehman & Saeed Ali Bahaj
2023. SIGNFORMER: DeepVision Transformer for Sign Language Recognition. IEEE Access 11  pp. 4730 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.