Cover not available
Part of
Requesting in Social Interaction
Edited by Paul Drew and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 26] 2014
► pp. 35–54

Human agency and the infrastructure for requests

| The University of Sydney & Max Planck Institute Nijmegen
This chapter discusses some of the elements of human sociality that serve as the social and cognitive infrastructure or preconditions for the use of requests and other kinds of recruitments in interaction. The notion of an agent with goals is a canonical starting point, though importantly agency tends not to be wholly located in individuals, but rather is socially distributed. This is well illustrated in the case of requests, in which the person or group that has a certain goal is not necessarily the one who carries out the behavior towards that goal. The chapter focuses on the role of semiotic (mostly linguistic) resources in negotiating the distribution of agency with request-like actions, with examples from video-recorded interaction in Lao, a language spoken in Laos and nearby countries. The examples illustrate five hallmarks of requesting in human interaction, which show some ways in which our ‘manipulation’ of other people is quite unlike our manipulation of tools: (1) that even though B is being manipulated, B wants to help, (2) that while A is manipulating B now, A may be manipulated in return later; (3) that the goal of the behavior may be shared between A and B, (4) that B may not comply, or may comply differently than requested, due to actual or potential contingencies, and (5) that A and B are accountable to one another; reasons may be asked for, and/or given, for the request. These hallmarks of requesting are grounded in a prosocial framework of human agency.
Published online: 17 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.26.02enf
References (33)
References
Ahearn, Laura M. 2001. “Language and Agency.” Annual Review of Anthropology 30: 109–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Clark, Andy. 2008. Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Social Actions, Social Commitments.” InRoots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition, and Interaction, ed. by N.J. Enfield, and Stephen C. Levinson, 126–152. London: Berg.Google Scholar
Curl, Traci, and Paul Drew. 2008. “Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41: 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1963. “Actions, Reasons, and Causes.” The Journal of Philosophy 60 (23): 685–700. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro. 1990. “Politics and Grammar: Agency in Samoan Political Discourse.” American Ethnologist 17 (4): 646–666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. "Agency in Language." In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, 451–473. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Enfield, N.J. 2007. A Grammar of Lao. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. The Anatomy of Meaning: Speech, Gesture, and Composite Utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Relationship Thinking: Agency, Enchrony, and Human Sociality. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N.J and Stephen C. Levinson, eds. 2006. Roots of Human Sociality. Culture, Cognition and Interaction. Oxford, UK: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
Enfield, N.J., and Jack Sidnell. 2014. “Language Presupposes an Enchronic Infrastructure for Social Interaction.” In The Social Origins of Language: Studies in the Evolution of Language, ed. by Daniel Dor, Chris Knight, and Jerome Lewis, 92–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gell, Alfred. 1998. Art and Agency. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 2006. “Human Sociality as Mutual Orientation in a Rich Interactive Environment: Multimodal Utterances and Pointing in Aphasia.” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition, and Interaction, ed. by N.J Enfield, and Stephen C. Levinson, 97–125. London: Berg.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack. 1977. The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchins, Edwin. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. “The Distributed Cognition Perspective on Human Interaction.” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, ed. by N.J. Enfield, and Stephen C. Levinson, 375–398. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
James, William. 1890. The Principles of Psychology. New York: H. Holt and Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kockelman, Paul. 2007. “Agency.” Current Anthropology 48 (3): 375–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Agent, Person, Subject, Self. A Theory of Ontology, Interaction, and Infrastructure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lave, Jean. 1988. Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.. 2006. “On the human ‘interaction engine’.” Roots of Human Sociality. Culture, Cognition and Interaction, edited by N.J Enfield and Stephen C. Levinson, 36–69. Oxford, UK: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
McNeill, David. 2005. Gesture and Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norman, Donald A. 1988. The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pagel, Mark. 2012. Wired for Culture: Origins of the Human Social Mind. New York: W.W.Norton.Google Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni. 2012. “Bilateral and Unilateral Requests: The Use of Imperatives and Mi X? Interrogatives in Italian.” Discourse Processes 49 (5): 426–458. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack, and N.J. Enfield. 2014. “The Ontology of Action, in Interaction.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by N.J. Enfield, P. Kockelman, and J. Sidnell, 411–433. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suchman, Lucy A. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2008. Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zipf, George Kingsley. 1949. Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Ruytenbeek, Nicolas
2023. Directives (with a special emphasis on requests). In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Duranti, Alessandro & Nicco A. La Mattina
2022. The Semiotics of Cooperation. Annual Review of Anthropology 51:1 ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Hansen, Jessica Pedersen Belisle
2022. Recruiting repair: Making sense of interpreters’ embodied actions in a video-mediated environment. Discourse Studies 24:6 ► pp. 719 ff. DOI logo
Råman, Joonas
2022. Multimodal Negotiation for the Right to Access Digital Devices Among Elderly Users and Teachers. In Shaping the North Through Multimodal and Intermedial Interaction [Arctic Encounters, ], ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Laakso, Minna
2021. Learning to request in interaction. In Intersubjectivity in Action [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 326], ► pp. 349 ff. DOI logo
Heritage, John
2016. The Recruitment Matrix. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:1 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Kendrick, Kobin H. & Paul Drew
2016. Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.