Article published in:
Requesting in Social Interaction
Edited by Paul Drew and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 26] 2014
► pp. 5586
References

References

Austin, John Langshaw
1962How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy
2007 [1789]An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Mineola, NY: Dover.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage
2002The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2014“What Does Grammar Tell Us About Action?” Pragmatics 24 (3): 623–647.Google Scholar
Curl, Traci S.
2006“Offers of Assistance: Constraints on Syntactic Design.” Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1257–1280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curl, Traci S., and Paul Drew
2008“Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (2): 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Judy
1984 “Subsequent Versions of Invitations, Offers, Requests, and Proposals Dealing With Potential or Actual Rejection." In Stuctures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 102–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drake, Anna V.
2013Turn-final or in English: A Conversation Analytic Perspective. Department of English. Madison WI, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Drew, Paul
1978“Accusations: The Use of Members' Knowledge of 'Religious Geography' in Describing Events.” Sociology 12: 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1984“Speakers' Reportings in Invitation Sequences.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 152–164. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1992 “Contested Evidence in Courtroom Cross-Examination: The Case of a Trial for Rape.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 470–520. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2006 “Misalignments Between Caller and Doctor in ‘After-Hours’ Telephone Calls to a British GP's Practice: A Study in Telephone Medicine.” In Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients, 416–444. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Traci Walker
2010“Requesting Assistance in Calls to the Police.” In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, ed. by M. Coulthard, and A. Johnson, 95–110. London: Rouledge.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan
1981“How to Make and Understand a Request.” In Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics, ed. by H. Parret, M. Sbisa, and J. Verschueren, 195–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara A.
2007“Principles Shaping Grammatical Practices: An Exploration.” Discourse Studies 9: 299–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1979“The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation." In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by G. Psathas, 97-121. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
1984“Notes on Story Structure and the Organization of Participation.” In Structures of Social Action, ed by J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, 225–246. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1986 “Gesture As a Resource for the Organization of Mutual Orientation.Semiotica 62(1/2): 29–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 “Action and Embodiment Within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1489–1522. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “Things and Their Embodied Environments”. In The Cognitive Life of Things: Recasting the Boundaries of the Mind, ed. by L. Malafouris and C. Renfrew, 103–120. Cambridge, McDonald Institute Monographs (David Brown Book Co).Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Goodwin
1987 “Concurrent Operations on Talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 1: 1–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, David, and George Lakoff
1975“Conversational Postulates.” In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, ed. by P. Cole, and J. Morgan, 83–106. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heinemann, Trine
2006“‘Will You or Can't You?’: Displaying Entitlement in Interrogative Requests.” Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1081–1104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
1984Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
2002“The Limits of Questioning: Negative Interrogatives and Hostile Question Content.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (10–11): 1427–1446. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012“The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1): 30–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, and David Fanshel
1977Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1979“Activity Types and Language.” Linguistics 17: 365–399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1981“The Essential Inadequacies of Speech Act Models of Dialogue.” In Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics, ed. by H. Parret, M. Sbisa, and J. Verschueren, 473–492. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013“Action Formation and Ascription.” In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 103–130. Boston: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lindström, Anna
1997Designing Social Actions: Grammar, Prosody and Interaction in Swedish Conversation, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Californa Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita M.
1978“Attributions of Responsibility: Blamings.” Sociology 12: 115–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1984“Giving a Source or Basis: The Practice in Conversation of Telling ‘What I Know’.” Journal of Pragmatics 8 (4): 607–625. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988“Offering a Candidate Answer: An Information Seeking Strategy.” Communication Monographs 55: 360–373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni
2012“Bilateral and Unilateral Requests: The Use of Imperatives and Mi X? In Italian.” Discourse Processes 49: 426–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1980“Preliminaries to Preliminaries: ‘Can I Ask You A Question’. Sociological Inquiry 50: 104–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1984On Some Questions and Ambiguities in Conversation. In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 28–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1988“Pre-Sequences and Indirection: Applying Speech Act Theory to Ordinary Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 12: 55–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992“Repair After Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided for Place for the Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation.” American Journal of Sociology 95 (5): 1295–1345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Vol. 1. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1975“Indirect Speech Acts.” In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 59–82. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J.R.
(1979) Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge, Cambrdige University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
Eds. (2001) Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam, Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa
2012“Establishing Joint Decisions in a Dyad.” Discourse Studies 14 (6): 779–803. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa, and Anssi Perakyla
2012“Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 45 (3): 297–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2005“The Clause as a Locus of Grammar and Interaction.” Discourse Studies 7: 481–505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
Forthcoming. Grammar and Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref
Wootton, Anthony
1981aChildren's Use of Address Terms. In Adult-Child Conversations, ed. by P. French, and M. MacLure, 42–58. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
1981b“Two Request Forms for Four Year Olds.” Journal of Pragmatics 5: 511–523. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 28 other publications

Anderson, Rebecca J, Patrick C Stone, Joseph T S Low & Steven Bloch
2020. Managing uncertainty and references to time in prognostic conversations with family members at the end of life: A conversation analytic study. Palliative Medicine 34:7  pp. 896 ff. Crossref logo
Baranova, Julija & Mark Dingemanse
2016. Reasons for requests. Discourse Studies 18:6  pp. 641 ff. Crossref logo
Clayman, Steven E. & Laura Loeb
2018. Polar Questions, Response Preference, and the Tasks of Political Positioning in Journalism. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51:2  pp. 127 ff. Crossref logo
Heritage, John
2016. The Recruitment Matrix. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:1  pp. 27 ff. Crossref logo
Heritage, John & Chase Wesley Raymond
2021. Preference and Polarity: Epistemic Stance in Question Design. Research on Language and Social Interaction 54:1  pp. 39 ff. Crossref logo
Hofstetter, Emily & Elizabeth Stokoe
2015. Offers of assistance in politician–constituent interaction. Discourse Studies 17:6  pp. 724 ff. Crossref logo
Humă, Bogdana, Elizabeth Stokoe & Rein Ove Sikveland
2020. Putting persuasion (back) in its interactional context. Qualitative Research in Psychology 17:3  pp. 357 ff. Crossref logo
Kendrick, Kobin H. & Paul Drew
2016. Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Kent, Alexandra & Kobin H. Kendrick
2016. Imperative Directives: Orientations to Accountability. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:3  pp. 272 ff. Crossref logo
Lindwall, Oskar, Gustav Lymer & Jonas Ivarsson
2016. Epistemic status and the recognizability of social actions. Discourse Studies 18:5  pp. 500 ff. Crossref logo
Lynch, Michael & Jean Wong
2016. Reverting to a hidden interactional order: Epistemics, informationism, and conversation analysis. Discourse Studies 18:5  pp. 526 ff. Crossref logo
Magnusson, Simon
2020. Constructing young citizens’ deontic authority in participatory democracy meetings. Discourse & Communication 14:6  pp. 600 ff. Crossref logo
Muntigl, Peter, Adam O. Horvath, Lynda Chubak & Lynne Angus
2020. Getting to “Yes”: Overcoming Client Reluctance to Engage in Chair Work. Frontiers in Psychology 11 Crossref logo
Nissi, Riikka
2016. Spelling out consequences: Conditional constructions as a means to resist proposals in organisational planning process. Discourse Studies 18:3  pp. 311 ff. Crossref logo
Nissi, Riikka & Kati Dlaske
2020. Empowerment as an affective-discursive technology in contemporary capitalism: insights from a play. Critical Discourse Studies 17:4  pp. 447 ff. Crossref logo
Nissi, Riikka & Heidi Hirsto
2021. Policing language in the world of new work: the commodification of workplace communication in organizational consulting. Applied Linguistics Review 0:0 Crossref logo
Rae, John P. & Monica Ramey
2020. Correction and repair: a comparative analysis of a boy with ASD interacting with a parent and with an ABA trainer. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 34:10-11  pp. 1018 ff. Crossref logo
Raymond, Chase Wesley & Anne Elizabeth Clark White
2017. Time Reference in the Service of Social Action. Social Psychology Quarterly 80:2  pp. 109 ff. Crossref logo
Raymond, Geoffrey & Don H Zimmerman
2016. Closing matters: Alignment and misalignment in sequence and call closings in institutional interaction. Discourse Studies 18:6  pp. 716 ff. Crossref logo
Stivers, Tanya, John Heritage, Rebecca K. Barnes, Rose McCabe, Laura Thompson & Merran Toerien
2018. Treatment Recommendations as Actions. Health Communication 33:11  pp. 1335 ff. Crossref logo
Stivers, Tanya & Jack Sidnell
2016. Proposals for Activity Collaboration. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:2  pp. 148 ff. Crossref logo
Sørensen, Søren Sandager
2021. Affiliating in Second Position: Response Tokens with Rising Pitch in Danish. Research on Language and Social Interaction 54:1  pp. 101 ff. Crossref logo
Tennent, Emma
2021. ‘I’m calling in regard to my son’: Entitlement, obligation, and opportunity to seek help for others. British Journal of Social Psychology 60:3  pp. 870 ff. Crossref logo
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox & Chase Wesley Raymond
2021. The grammar of proposals for joint activities. Interactional Linguistics 1:1  pp. 123 ff. Crossref logo
Thunman, Elin, Mats Ekström & Anders Bruhn
2020. Dealing With Questions of Responsiveness in a Low-Discretion Context: Offers of Assistance in Standardized Public Service Encounters. Administration & Society 52:9  pp. 1333 ff. Crossref logo
Weatherall, Ann
2020. Constituting agency in the delivery of telephone-mediated victim support. Qualitative Research in Psychology 17:3  pp. 396 ff. Crossref logo
Wåhlin-Jacobsen, Christian Dyrlund & Johan Simonsen Abildgaard
2020. Only the wearer knows where the shoe pinches? Deontics and epistemics in discussions of health and well-being in participatory workplace settings. Discourse & Communication 14:1  pp. 44 ff. Crossref logo
Zinken, Jörg & Giovanni Rossi
2016. Assistance and Other Forms of Cooperative Engagement. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:1  pp. 20 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.