Previous research has established that participants in interaction distinguish between those requests that can be satisfied immediately and those that are to be satisfied at some point in the future. Whereas immediate requests can be granted simply by the recipient carrying out the requested action, the preferred and aligning response to a remote request is a full-clause response with which the recipient commits to carrying out the requested action in the future. This paper investigates the most frequently occurring forms of full-clause, complying responses to remote requests in Danish interactions. We show that those full-clause responses that contain a modal adverb differ in interactionally relevant ways from those full-clause responses that do not contain a modal adverb. Full-clause responses without a modal adverb are treated by participants as indicating that the relevance of carrying out the requested action is a given and as such something that both requester and recipient understand as an appropriate action. Full-clause responses with modal adverbs, by contrast, are employed to indicate that the requested action is not recognizably appropriate to the recipient, but will be carried out specifically because it was requested.
2010Forskellen på fortsættelsesaccept og returvurdering: om ”ikke” og ”vel” som returvurderingsefterlyser på dansk. [The difference between continuation-acceptance and return-assessment: about “not” and “right” as return-assessment-pursuits in Danish.] Unpublished essay, Aarhus University.
1990“Rhythm in Telephone Closings.”Human Studies 13: 361–392.
2014“What Does Grammar Tell Us About Action?”Pragmatics 24 (3): 623–647.
Curl, Traci, and Paul Drew
2008“Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting.”Research on Language and Social Interaction 41: 129–153.
DDO. Den Danske Ordbog. Moderne dansk sprog. [The Danish Dictionary. Modern Danish language
2006““Will You or Can’t You?”: Displaying Entitlement in Interrogative Requests.”Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1081–1104.
2009“Two Answers to Inapposite Inquiries.” In Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Jack Sidnell, 159–186. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heinemann, Trine, Anna Lindström, and Jakob Steensig
2011“Addressing Epistemic Incongruence in Question-answer Sequences Through the Use of Epistemic Adverbs.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 107–130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heinemann, Trine, and Ben Matthews
forth. “Concessions in the Audiology Clinic.” In Restricted Interactional Activities ed. by Fabienne Chevalier, and John Moore xx xx Amsterdam John Benjamins
Heinemann, Trine, and Jakob Steensig
in prep. “Accounting for breaks in progressivity: The Danish turn-initial particle altså in Danish Talk-in-interaction.” To appear in Turn-initial Particles [Working title] ed. by John Heritage, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
Heritage, John, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
1994“Constituting and Maintaining Activities Across Sequences: And-prefacing as a Feature of Question Design.”Language in Society 23: 1–29.
Holmberg, Anders, and Christer Platzack
1995The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
1987Establishing Agreement: An Analysis of Proposal-acceptance Sequences. Doctoral dissertation. Universiteit van Amsterdam. Dordrecht: Foris.
1981“The Abominable 'ne?' An Exploration of Post-response Pursuit of Response.” In Sprache der Gegenwart 54: Dialogforschung, ed. by Peter Schröder, and Hugo Steger, 53–88. Düsseldorf: Pädagogischer Verlag Schwann.
Keisanen, Tiina, and Mirka Rauniomaa
2012“The Organization of Participation and Contingency in Prebeginnings of Request Sequences.”Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (4): 323–351.
Lerner, Gene H.
1991“On the Syntax of Sentences-in-progress.”Language in Society 20: 441–458.
Lerner, Gene H.
1996“On the “Semi-permeable” Character of Grammatical Units in Conversation: Conditional Entry into the Turn Space of Another Speaker.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 238–276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
forth. “Accepting Remote Proposals.” In Enabling Human Conduct: Naturalistic Studies of Talk-in-interaction in Honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff ed. by Geoffrey Raymond, Gene H. Lerner, and John Heritage xx xx Amsterdam John Benjamins
Lindström, Anna, and Trine Heinemann
2009“Good Enough: Low-Grade Assessments in Caregiving Situations.”Research on Language and Social Interaction 42 (4): 309–328.
2012“Bilateral and Unilateral Requests: The Use of Imperatives and Mi X? Interrogatives in Italian.”Discourse Processes 49: 426–456.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1988“Goffman and the Analysis of Conversation.” In Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by Paul Drew, and Anthony Wootton, 89–135. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Stevanovic, Melisa, and Anssi Peräkylä
2012“Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide.”Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (3): 297–321.
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
forth. Grammar and Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Velea, Adina Ioana
2013“Imperatives and Subjunctives in Romanian.”Journal of Pragmatics 51: 92–104.
Cited by 9 other publications
2020. Doing reflecting: Embodied solitary confirmation of instructed enactment. Discourse Studies 22:3 ► pp. 261 ff.
Fox, Barbara & Trine Heinemann
2019. Telescoping responses to requests: Unpacking progressivity. Discourse Studies 21:1 ► pp. 38 ff.
Kendrick, Kobin H. & Paul Drew
2016. Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
2023. Polar answers. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)
Steensig, Jakob, Maria Jørgensen, Nicholas Mikkelsen, Karita Suomalainen & Søren Sandager Sørensen
2023. Toward a Grammar of Danish Talk-in-Interaction: From Action Formation to Grammatical Description. Research on Language and Social Interaction 56:2 ► pp. 116 ff.
Sørensen, Søren Sandager
2021. Affiliating in Second Position: Response Tokens with Rising Pitch in Danish. Research on Language and Social Interaction 54:1 ► pp. 101 ff.
Vatanen, Anna & Pentti Haddington
2023. Multiactivity in adult-child interaction: accounts resolving conflicting courses of action in request sequences. Text & Talk 43:2 ► pp. 263 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.