The authors establish a phenomenological perspective on the temporal constitution of experience and action. Retrospection and projection (i.e. backward as well as forward orientation of everyday action), sequentiality and the sequential organization of activities as well as simultaneity (i.e. participants’ simultaneous coordination) are introduced as key concepts of a temporalized approach to interaction. These concepts are used to capture that every action is produced as an inter-linked step in the succession of adjacent actions, being sensitive to the precise moment where it is produced.
The adoption of a holistic, multimodal and praxeological perspective additionally shows that action in interaction is organized according to several temporal orders simultaneously in operation. Each multimodal resource used in interaction has its own temporal properties.
1996 “On the Prosody and Syntax of Turn-Continuations.” In Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Margret Selting, 57–100. Cambridge: CUP.
Auer, Peter
2000 “Online-Syntax.” Sprache und Literatur 85 (31): 43–56.
Auer, Peter
2005 “Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar.” Text 25 (1): 7–36.
Auer, Peter
2006 “Increments and more. Anmerkungen zur augenblicklichen Diskussion über die Erweiterbarkeit von Turnkonstruktionseinheiten.” In Grammatik und Interaktion. Untersuchungen zum Zusammenhang von grammatischen Strukturen und Gesprächsprozessen, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, Reinhard Fiehler, and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy, 279–304. Radolfzell: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung; [URL].
Auer, Peter
2009 “Online Syntax: Thoughts on the Temporality of Spoken Language.” Language Sciences 31: 1–13.
Auer, Peter and Stefan Pfänder
(eds)2011Constructions: Emergent or Emerging?, 1–21. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M
1986 “The Problem of Speech Genres.” In Speech Genres and other Late Essays, (Transl. by V. McGee) ed. by C. Emerson and M. Holquist, 60–102. Austin, TX: Texas UP.
1985“Flüchtigkeit und methodische Fixierung sozialer Wirklichkeit: Aufzeichnungen als Daten der interpretativen Soziologie.” In Entzauberte Wissenschaft: Zur Relativität und Geltung soziologischer Forschung, ed. by Wolfgang Bonß and Heinz Hartmann, 299–320. Göttingen: Otto Schwartz.
Bergson, Henri
1970 [1889]“Essai sur les données immédiates de la conscience.” In Oeuvres, ed. by Henri Bergson, 1–157. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Bühler, Karl
1982 [1934]Sprachtheorie. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.
Clark, Herbert H
1996Using Language. Cambridge: CUP.
Clark, Herbert H
2012 “Wordless Questions, Wordless Answers.” In Questions: Formal, Functional, and Interactional Perspectives, ed. by Jan P. de Ruiter, 81–102. Cambridge: CUP.
Clark, Herbert H. and Susan A. Brennan
1991 “Grounding in Communication.” In Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, ed. by Lauren B. Resnick, John M. Levine, and Stephanie D. Teasley, 127–149. Washington, D. C.: APA.
2007“Koordination. Zur Begründung eines neuen Forschungsgegenstandes.“ In Koordination. Analysen zur multimodalen Interaktion, ed. by Reinhold Schmitt, 15–54. Tübingen: Narr.
Deppermann, Arnulf, Reinhold Schmitt, and Lorenza Mondada
2010 “Agenda and Emergence: Contingent and Planned Activities in a Meeting.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (6): 1700–1718.
Du Bois, John
2010 “Towards a Dialogic Syntax.” University of California at Santa Barbara: Unpublished manuscript.
Ford, Cecilia
2004 “Contingency and Units in Interaction.” Discourse Studies 6 (1): 27–52.
Ford, Cecilia E. and Sandra A. Thompson
1996Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the projection of turn completion. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, eds., Interaction and grammar, 135–184. Cambridge: CUP.
Ford, Cecilia E., Sandra A. Thompson and Veronika Drake
1981Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic.
Goodwin, Charles
1996 “Transparent Vision.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 370–404. Cambridge: CUP.
Goodwin, Charles
2000 “Action and Embodiment Within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1489–1522.
Goodwin, Charles
2002 “Time in Action.” Current Anthropology 43: 19–35.
Goodwin, Charles
2013 “The Co-Operative, Transformative Organization of Human Action and Knowledge.” Journal of Pragmatics 46 (1): 8–23.
Goodwin, Charles and Marjorie Harness Goodwin
1992 “Assessments and the Construction of Context.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 147–190. Cambridge: CUP.
Gülich, Elisabeth and Thomas Kotschi
1996“Textherstellungsverfahren in mündlicher Kommunikation.“ In Ebenen der Textstruktur, ed. by Wolfgang Motsch, 37–80. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Gumperz, John J
1982Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: CUP.
Günthner, Susanne
2008“Projektorkonstruktionen im Gespräch: Pseudoclefts, die Sache ist-Konstruktionen und Extrapositionen mit es.“Gesprächsforschung 9: 86–114. URL: [URL].
Günthner, Susanne
2011a “Between Emergence and Sedimentation: Projecting Constructions in German Interactions.” In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, ed. by Peter Auer and Stefan Pfänder, 156–185. Berlin: de Gruyter.
2001 “Asymmetries of Repertoires of Communicative Genres.” In Culture in Communication: Analyses of Intercultural Situations, ed. by Aldo Di Luzio, Susanne Günthner and Franca Orletti, 55–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Günthner, Susanne and Paul Hopper
2010“Zeitlichkeit & sprachliche Strukturen: Pseudoclefts im Englischen und Deutschen.“Gesprächsforschung 11: 1–28. URL: [URL].
Günthner, Susanne, Wolfgang Imo and Jörg Bücker
(eds.)2014Grammar and Dialogism: Sequential, Syntactic and Prosodic Patterns between Emergence and Sedimentation. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Gurwitsch, Aron
2010[1957]The Collected Works of Aron Gurwitsch (1901–1973): Volume III: The Field of Consciousness: Theme, Thematic Field, and Margin, ed. by Richard M. Zaner. Dordrecht: Springer.
Haddington, Pentti, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile
2013Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Haddington, Pentti, Maurice Nevile, Tiina Keisanen, and Lorenza Mondada
2008 “The Place of Intention in the Interactional Achievement of Implicature.” In Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, ed. by Istvan Kecskes and Jacob Mey, 45–81. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Heritage, John
1984Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.
Heritage, John and Steven E. Clayman
2010Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Chicester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Heritage, John and Rod Watson
1979 “Formulations as Conversational Objects.” In Everyday Language, ed. by George Psathas, 123–162. New York: Irvington.
Holt, Elizabeth and Rebecca Clift
2006Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction. Cambridge: CUP.
Hopper, Paul
1987 “Emergent Grammar.” Berkeley Linguistic Society 13, 139–157. Berkeley: U Berkeley P.
Hopper, Paul J
1998 “Emergent grammar.” In The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, ed. by Michael Tomasello, 155–175. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hopper, Paul J
2006 “Time and Grammar.” Münster: Paper given at International Conference on “Constructions in Interactions”.
Hopper, Paul
2011 “Emergent Grammar and Temporality in Interactional Linguistics.” In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, ed. by Peter Auer and Stefan Pfänder, 22–44. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Hopper, Paul and J. Elizabeth Closs Traugott
1993Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.
Husserl, Edmund
1928Vorlesungen zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewußtseins. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Jefferson, Gail
1988“Notes on a Possible Metric which Provides for a ‘Standard Maximum’ Silence of Approximately One Second in Conversation. In Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, ed. by Derek Roger and Peter Bull, 166–196. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
1924The Philosophy of Grammar. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Keevallik, Leelo
2013 “The Interdependence of Bodily Demonstrations and Clausal Syntax.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46 (1): 1–21.
Kendon, Adam
1972 “Some Relationships between Body Motion and Speech.” In Studies in Dyadic Communication, ed. by Aron Wolfe Seigman and Benjamin Pope, 177–216. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
Kendon, Adam
1990Conducting Interaction. Cambridge: CUP.
Kotthoff, Helga
1993 “Disagreement and Concession in Disputes. On the Context-Sensitivity of Preference Structures.” Language in Society 22: 193–216.
Lerner, Gene H
1991 “On the Syntax of Sentences-in-Progress.” Language in Society 20: 441–458.
Lerner, Gene H
2004 “The Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: Grammar as Action in Prompting a Speaker to Elaborate.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 37 (2): 151–184.
Levinson, Stephen C
2013 “Action Formation and Ascription.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidney and Tanya Stivers, 103–130. Chichester: Blackwell-Wiley.
Linde, Charlotte
1993Life Stories: The Creation of Coherence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Linell, Per
2009Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: IAP.
Luke, Kang-kwong, Sandra A. Thompson and Tsuyoshi Ono
2012 “Turns and Increments: A Comparative Perspective.” Discourse Processes 49 (3–4): 155–162.
1992Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: UCP.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice
1945Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.
Mondada, Lorenza
2007 “Multimodal Resources for Turn-Taking: Pointing and the Emergence of Possible Next Speakers.” Discourse Studies 9 (2): 195–226.
Mondada, Lorenza
2009 “Emergent Focused Interactions in Public Places: A Systematic Analysis of the Multimodal Achievement of a Common Interactional Space.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1977–1997.
Mondada, Lorenza
2012 “Talking and Driving: Multi-Activity in the Car.” Semiotica 191: 223–256.
Mondada, Lorenza
2013“Embodied and Spatial Resources for Turn-Taking in Institutional Multi-Party Interactions: Participatory Democracy Debates.” Journal of Pragmatics 46 (1): 39–68.
2009Contribution à l’étude systématique de l’organisation des tours de parole: les chevauchements en français et en allemand. Mannheim: Universität. [URL].
Oloff, Florence
2013 “Embodied Withdrawal after Overlap Resolution.” Journal of Pragmatics 46 (1): 139–156.
Pekarek Doehler, Simona
2011 “Emergent grammar for all practical purposes: The on-line formatting of left and right dislocations in French conversation.” In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, ed. by Peter Auer and Stefan Pfänder, 45–87. Berlin/ Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
Psathas, George
1995Conversation Analysis. London: Sage.
Psathas, George and Francis Chaput Waksler
1973 “Essential Features of Face-to-Face Interaction.” In Phenomenological Sociology: Issues and Applications, ed. by George Psathas, 59–83. New York: Wiley.
Pomerantz, Anita
1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by John M. Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: CUP.
Keisanen, Tiina and Mirka Rauniomaa
2012 “Two Multimodal Formats for Responding to Requests.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (6–7): 829–842.
Raymond, Geoffrey
2003 “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review 68 (6): 939–967.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50: 696–735.
Schegloff, Emanuel A
1968 “Sequencing in Conversational Openings.” American Anthropologist 70: 1075–1095.
Schegloff, Emanuel A
1984 “On some Gestures’ Relation to Talk.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by John M. Atkinson and John Heritage, 266–298. Cambridge: CUP.
Schegloff, Emanuel A
1992a “In another context.” In Rethinking context. Language as an interpretative phenomenon, ed. by Charles Goodwin and Alessandro Duranti, 191–228. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A
1992b “Repair after Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation.” American Journal of Sociology 97 (5): 1295–1345.
Schegloff, Emanuel A
1996 “Turn Organization: One Intersection between Grammar and Interaction.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 52–133. Cambridge: CUP.
Schegloff, Emanuel A
1998Body torque. Social Research, 65, 535–586.
Schegloff, Emanuel A
2000 “Overlapping talk and the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language in Society 29 (1): 1–63.
Schegloff, Emanuel A
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: CUP.
Schegloff, Emanuel, Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks
1977 “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53 (2): 361–382.
Schmitt, Reinhold
2005“Zur multimodalen Struktur von turn-taking. Gesprächsforschung.“Onlinezeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 6, 17–61. URL: [URL].
Schmitt, Reinhold and Arnulf Deppermann
2010“Die Transition von Interaktionsräumen als Eröffnung einer neuen Situation.“ In Situationseröffnungen. Zur multimodalen Herstellung fokussierter Interaktion, ed. by Lorenza Mondada and Reinhold Schmitt, 335–386. Tübingen: Narr.
Schütz, Alfred
1974[1932]Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Schütz, Alfred and Thomas Luckmann
1979Strukturen der Lebenswelt. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
2007“Beendigung(en) als interaktive Leistung.” In: Sprache als Prozeß, ed. by Heiko Hausendorf, 307–338. Tübingen: Narr.
Silverstein, Michael
1984 “On the pragmatic poetry of prose: parallelism, repetition, and cohesive structure in the course of dyadic conversation.” In Meaning, Forms and Use in Context, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, 181–199. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
2021. Early Responses: An Introduction. Discourse Processes 58:4 ► pp. 293 ff.
GREER, TIM & ZACHARY NANBU
2022. Visualizing Emergent Turn Construction: Seeing Writing While Speaking. The Modern Language Journal 106:S1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Günthner, Susanne
2021. WIR im interaktionalen Gebrauch: Zur Verwendung des Pronomens der 1. Person Plural in der institutionellen Kommunikation – am Beispiel onkologischer Aufklärungsgespräche. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 49:2 ► pp. 292 ff.
Heath, Christian & Paul Luff
2021. Embodied Action, Projection, and Institutional Action: The Exchange of Tools and Implements During Surgical Procedures. Discourse Processes 58:3 ► pp. 233 ff.
2022. I was gonna say…. In Sprachreflexive Praktiken [LiLi: Studien zu Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 4], ► pp. 51 ff.
MAJLESI, ALI REZA
2018. Instructed Vision: Navigating Grammatical Rules by Using Landmarks for Linguistic Structures in Corrective Feedback Sequences. The Modern Language Journal 102:S1 ► pp. 11 ff.
Monteiro, David, Oriana Rainho Brás & Michel Binet
2024. Time-oriented decisions in Palliative Care team meetings. Discourse Studies
Pauletto, Franco & Biagio Ursi
2021. ”Eh ciò, Sergio el xe stà anca sfortunà”. Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 28 ► pp. 131 ff.
PEKAREK DOEHLER, SIMONA & SØREN W. ESKILDSEN
2022. Emergent L2 Grammars in and for Social Interaction: Introduction to the Special Issue. The Modern Language Journal 106:S1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Tuncer, Sylvaine, Oskar Lindwall & Barry Brown
2021. Making Time: Pausing to Coordinate Video Instructions and Practical Tasks. Symbolic Interaction 44:3 ► pp. 603 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.