Article published in:
Temporality in Interaction
Edited by Arnulf Deppermann and Susanne Günthner
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 27] 2015
► pp. 201236
References
Ariel, Mira
1990Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter
2005 “Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar.” Text 25: 7–36.Google Scholar
2009 “Online Syntax: Thoughts on the Temporality of Spoken Language.” Language Sciences 31: 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter and Yael Maschler
2013 “Discourse or Grammar? VS Patterns in Spoken Hebrew and Spoken German Narratives.” Language Sciences 37: 147–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Ruth A.
1978Modern Hebrew Structure. Tel Aviv: University Publishing Projects.Google Scholar
1980 “The Case of an (S)VO Language: Subjectless Constructions in Modern Hebrew.” Language 56: 759–776. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Jill
1984 “Some Problems with the Concept of Basic Word Order.” Linguistics 22: 711–736. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1987 “Cognitive Constraints on Information Flow.” In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, ed. by Russell S. Tomlin, 21–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: UCP.Google Scholar
Downing, Pamela and Michael Noonan
(eds.) 1995Word Order in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
1985 “Competing Motivations.” In: Iconicity in Syntax, ed. by John Haiman, 343–365. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1987 “The Discourse Basis of Ergativity.” Language 63: 805–855. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
forthcoming). Representing Discourse. University of California at Santa Barbara: Linguistics Department, URL: http://​www​.linguistics​.ucsb​.edu​/projects​/transcription​/representing.
Du Bois, John W., Susanna Cumming, Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, et al.
1992Discourse Transcription: Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 4. Santa Barbara, CA: Department of Linguistics, University of California.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Lorraine E. Kumpf, and William J. Ashby
(eds.) 2003Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as Architecture for Function. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Firbas, Jan
1971 “On the Concept of Communicative Dynamism in the Theroy of Functional Sentence Perspective.” 135–144. In Sbornik Praci Filosoficke Fakulty Brnenske University A-19.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. and Robert D. Van Valin
1984Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. and Sandra A. Thompson
1996 “Interactional Units in Conversation: Syntactic, Intonational, and Pragmatic Resources for the Management of Turns.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 134–184. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gesenius, Wilhelm
1910Gesenius’ Hebrew Grammar, Second English Edition, ed. by E. Kautzsch, Revised in Accordance with the 28th German Edition (1909) by A. E. Cowley. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1976 “On the VS Order in Israeli Hebrew: Pragmatics and Typological Change.” In Studies in Modern Hebrew Syntax and Semantics: the Transformational-Generative Approach, ed. by Peter Cole, 153–181. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
1977 “The Drift from VSO to SVO in Biblical Hebrew: the Pragmatics of Tense-Aspect.” In Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, ed. by Charles N. Li, 181–254. Austin, TX: University of Texas.Google Scholar
1983Topic Continuity in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glinert, Lewis
1989The Grammar of Modern Hebrew. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, Gideon
1985 “'al torat hapo'al vehapo'al ha'ivri” (‘On Theories of the Verb and the Hebrew Verb’). Mexkarim Belashon (‘Studies in Language’) 1: 295–348.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph
1966 “Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements.” In Universals of Language, 2nd Edition, ed. by Joseph Greenberg, 73–113. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
Henkin, Roni
1994 “yesh gam 'et ze” (‘There’s also this’). balshanut 'ivrit (‘Hebrew Linguistics’) 38: 41–54.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1971 “The Free Word Order Languages: a Fourth Category in the Greenberg Syntactic Typology?” In Papers of the Fifth Mid-America Linguistics Conference, ed. by F. Ingemann, 115–119. Lawrence, KN: Department of Linguistics, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
1975The Syntax of the Simple Sentence in Proto-Germanic. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul. J.
1979 “Aspect and Foregrounding in Discourse.” In Discourse and Semantics (Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 12), ed. by Talmy Givón, 213–241. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1983 “Ergative, Passive, and Active in Malay Narrative Discourse.” In Discourse Perspectives on Syntax, ed. by Flora Klein-Andrew. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
1986 “Discourse Function and Word Order Shift.” In Language Typology, ed. by Winfred P. Lehmann, 123–140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1987a “Emergent Grammar.” In Berkeley Linguistics Society 13, 139–157.Google Scholar
1987b “Stability and Chance [sic, recte “change”] in VN/NV Alternating Languages: a Study in Pragmatics and Linguistic Typology.” In The Pragmatic Perspective, ed. by Jef Verschueren and Marcella Bertuccelli-Papi, 455–476. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988 “Emergent Grammar and the a priori Grammar Postulate.” In Linguistics in Context: Connecting Observation and Understanding, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 117–134. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
1992 “Times of the Sign: Discourse, Temporality and Recent Linguistics.” Time and Society 1: 223–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 “Grammatical Constructions and Their Discourse Origins: Prototype or Family Resemblance?” In Applied Cognitive Linguistics I: Theory and Language Acquisition, ed. by Martin Pütz, Susanne Niemeier, and René Dirven, 109–129. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Emergent Grammar and Temporality in Interactional Linguistics.” In Constructions – Emerging and Emergent, ed. by Peter Auer and Stefan Pfänder, 22–44. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. and Sandra A. Thompson
2008 “Projectability and Clause Combining in Interaction.” In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: the Multifunctionality of Conjunctions, ed. by Ritva Laury, 99–123. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1924The Philosophy of Grammar. Chicago: CUP.Google Scholar
Kuzar, Ron
1989 “mivne hameser shel hamishpat be'ivrit yisra'elit.” (‘Message Structure of the Sentence in Israeli Hebrew’). Unpublished Ph. D. thesis, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
1993 “haxagam: xelek-dibur 'o 'emda taxbirit?” (‘The xagam: Part-of-Speech or a Syntactic Position?’). Leshonenu (‘Our Language’) 56: 241–248.Google Scholar
2002 “tavnit haxagam hapshuta belashon hameyutseget kimeduberet” (‘The Simple Impersonal Construction in Language Presented as Spoken’). In Te’uda: The Chaim Rosenberg School of Jewish Studies Research Series XVIII: Speaking Hebrew, ed. by S. Izre’el, 329–352. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
2006“tavnit mishpat hakiyum ketoremet lemashma'ut hakiyum” (‘The Existential Construction as Contributor to the Existential Meaning’). mexkarim belashon (‘Language Studies’) 10: 101–112.Google Scholar
2007 “digmey mishpat be'ivrit yisra'elit 'al pi rozen.” (‘Sentence Patterns in Israeli Hebrew According to Rosén). ha'ivrit ve'axyoteha (‘Hebrew and Its Sisters’) 6–7: 269–294.Google Scholar
2012Sentence Patterns in English and Hebrew. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1972Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia, PA: U Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: UCP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laury, Ritva and Ryoko Suzuki
2011Subordination in Conversation: a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marty, Anton
1918Gesammelte Schriften, 2. Band, I. Abteilung: Schriften zur deskriptiven Psychologie und Sprachphilosophie. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Maschler, Yael
2009Metalanguage in Interaction: Hebrew Discourse Markers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “On the Emergence of Adverbial Connectives from Hebrew Relative Clause Constructions.” In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, ed. by Peter Auer and Stephan Pfänder, 293–331. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Emergent Projecting Constructions: The Case of Hebrew yada (‘know’).” Studies in Language 36 (4): 785–847. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Melnik, Nurit
2002 “Verb-initial Constructions in Modern Hebrew.” Berkeley, CA: Unpublished Ph. D. thesis, University of California.
2006 “A Constructional Approach to Verb-Initial Constructions in Modern Hebrew.” Cognitive Linguistics 17: 153–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myhill, John
1985 “Pragmatic and Categorial Correlates of VS Word Order.” Lingua 66: 177–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Netz, Hadar and Ron Kuzar
2011 “Word Order and Discourse Functions in Spoken Hebrew: a Case Study of Possessive Sentences.” Studies in Language 35 (1): 41–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ornan, Ouzi
1972hamishpat hapashut (‘The Simple Sentence’). Jerusalem: Inbal.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew and Frances Syder
1983 “Two Puzzles for Linguistic Theory: Nativelike Selection and Nativelike Fluency.” In Language and Communication, ed. by Jack C. Richards and Richard W. Schmidt, 191–267. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Polak-Yitzhaki, Hilla
2004 “Subject Pronouns: Attached, Overt and Proclitic in Israeli Hebrew Spoken Discourse.” Haifa: Unpublished M. A. Thesis, University of Haifa.
Ravid, Dorit
1977 “mispar heibetim shel be'ayat seder hamarkivim be'ivrit yisra'elit modernit” (‘Several Aspects of the Problem of Element Order in General Israeli Hebrew’). balshanut 'ivrit xofshit (‘Hebrew Computational, Formal, and Applied Linguistics’) 11: 1–45.Google Scholar
1999Hataxbir vehora'to (‘Syntax and its Teaching’). Ramat Aviv: Matach.Google Scholar
Rosén, Haiim
1966'ivrit tova: 'iyunim betaxbir (‘Good Hebrew: Studies in Syntax’). Jerusalem: Kiryat Sefer.Google Scholar
1977Contemporary Hebrew. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks
1977 “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53: 361–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
1987The thetic/categorial distinction revisited. Linguistics 25: 511–580. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
(eds.) 2001Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamin. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur
1997.Clause Structure and Word Order in Hebrew and Arabic. New York: OUP.Google Scholar
Staal, J. F.
1967Word Order in Sanskrit and Universal. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1989Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Taub-Tabib, Hillel
2009 “Multifactorial Analysis of V1 Constructions in Hebrew Intransitive Clauses.” Tel Aviv: Unpublished M. A. Thesis, Tel Aviv University.
Thompson, Sandra A.
1978 “Modern English from a Typological Point of View: Some Implications of the Function of Wort [sic] Order.” Linguistische Berichte 54 (78): 19–35.Google Scholar
Waltke, Bruce K. and Michael O’Connor
1990An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Ziv, Yael
1976 “On the reanalysis of Grammatical Terms in Hebrew Possessive Constructions.” In Studies in Modern Hebrew Syntax and Semantics: The Transformational-Generative Approach, ed. by Pete Cole, 129–152. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Hopper, Paul J.
2021. “You turn your back and there’s somebody moving in”. Interactional Linguistics Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.