Chapter published in:
Imperative Turns at Talk: The design of directives in action
Edited by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 30] 2017
► pp. 1–24

Imperative turns at talk

An introduction

| University of Helsinki
| University of Helsinki
| University of Helsinki
Published online: 18 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.30.01sor
References

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2010 Imperatives and Commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper
(eds) 1989 Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Craven, Alexandra, and Jonathan Potter
2010 “Directives: Entitlement and Contingency in Action.” Discourse Studies 12 (4): 419–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2014 “Requesting – From Speech Act to Recruitment”. In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 1–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A.
2007 “Principles Shaping Grammatical Practices: An Exploration.” Discourse Studies 9 (3): 299–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fukushima, Saeko
2000 Requests and Culture. Politeness in British English and Japanese. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1979 “Footing.” Semiotica 25: 1–29. Reprinted in Forms of Talk (1981), by Erving Goffman, 124–159. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
2007 “Interactive Footing”. In Reporting talk. Reported Speech in Interaction, ed. by Elizabeth Holt, and Rebecca Clift, 16–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness
2000 “Participation”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 9 (1–2): 177–181.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Harness Goodwin
2004 “Participation”. In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, 222–244. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
1984 Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hickey, Leo, and Miranda Stewart
2005 Politeness in Europe. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Jary, Mark, and Mikhail Kissine
2014 Imperatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, Kobin H., and Paul Drew
2016 “Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (1): 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kent, Alexandra, and Kobin H. Kendrick
2016 “Imperative Directives: Orientations to Accountability.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (3): 272–288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise, and Tiina Keisanen
2012 “Linguistic and Embodied Formats for Making (Concrete) Offers.” Discourse Studies 14 (5): 587–611. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffry N.
1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
2014 The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Márquez Reiter, Rosina
2000 Linguistic Politeness in Britain and Uruguay. A Contrastive Study of Requests and Apologies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2011 “The Situated Organization of Directives in French: Imperatives and Action Coordination in Video Games.” Nottingham French Studies 50 (2): 19–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ogiermann, Eva
2009 “Politeness and Indirectness Across Cultures. A Comparison of English, German, Polish and Russian Requests.” Journal of Politeness Research 5 (2): 189–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni
2012 “Bilateral and Unilateral Requests: The Use of Imperatives and Mi X? Interrogatives in Italian.” Discourse Processes 49 (5): 426–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salgado, Elizabeth Flores
2011 The Pragmatics of Requests and Apologies: Developmental Patterns of Mexican Students. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John
1975 “Indirect Speech Acts”. In Syntax and Semantics Vol. 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and J. L. Morgan, 59–82. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in Pragmatics: A Reader, ed. by S. Davis (1991), 265–277. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sifianou, Maria
1992 Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa
2011 “Participants’ Deontic Rights and Action Formation: The Case of Declarative Requests for Action.” Interaction and Linguistic Structures 52. (http://​www​.inlist​.uni​-bayreuth​.de/)
Stevanovic, Melisa, and Anssi Peräkylä
2012 “Deontic Authority in Interaction. The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (3): 297–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, and Ludo Lejeune (with Umarani Pappuswamy, Valentin Goussev
) 2013a “The Morphological Imperative”. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. by Matthew S. Dryer, and Martin Haspelmath. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/70, Accessed on 2016-05-01.)
van der Auwera, Johan, and Ludo Lejeune (with Valentin Goussev
) 2013b “The Prohibitive”. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. by Matthew S. Dryer, and Martin Haspelmath. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/71, Accessed on 2016-05-01.)
van der Auwera, Johan, Nina Dobrushina, and Valentin Goussev
2013 “Imperative-Hortative Systems”. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. by Matthew S. Dryer, and Martin Haspelmath. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/72, Accessed on 2016-05-01.)
Vine, Bernadette
2004 Getting Things Done at Work: The Discourse of Power in Workplace Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J.
2003 Politeness. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1985 “Different Cultures, Different Languages, Different Speech Acts: Polish vs. English.” Journal of Pragmatics 9: 145–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 Cross Cultural Pragmatics. The Semantics of Human Interaction. Second edition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xrakovskij, Victor S.
(ed) 2001 Typology of Imperative Constructions. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Zinken, Jörg
2016 Requesting Responsibility. The Morality of Grammar in Polish and English Family Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zinken, Jörg, and Eva Ogiermann
2013 “Responsibility and Action: Invariants and Diversity in Requests for Objects in British English and Polish Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46 (3): 256–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Betz, Emma, Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm & Peter Golato
2020.  In Mobilizing Others [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 33], ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Bodnaruk, Elena, Larisa Reznichenko, S. Cindori, O. Larouk, E.Yu. Malushko, L.N. Rebrina & N.L. Shamne
2019. Paradigmatics, semantics and pragmatics of the imperative in German. SHS Web of Conferences 69 ► pp. 00023 ff. Crossref logo
Muntigl, Peter, Adam O. Horvath, Lynda Chubak & Lynne Angus
2020. Getting to “Yes”: Overcoming Client Reluctance to Engage in Chair Work. Frontiers in Psychology 11 Crossref logo
Stevanovic, Melisa
2020.  In Mobilizing Others [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 33], ► pp. 115 ff. Crossref logo
Taleghani-Nikazm, Carmen, Veronika Drake, Andrea Golato & Emma Betz
2020.  In Mobilizing Others [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 33], ► pp. 47 ff. Crossref logo
Thompson, Sandra A. & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2020.  In Fixed Expressions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 315], ► pp. 99 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.