The use of the imperative for requesting has been mostly explained on the basis of estimations of social distance, relative power, and entitlement. More recent research, however, has identified other selection factors to do with the functional and sequential relation of the action requested to the trajectory of the ongoing interaction. In everyday activities among family and friends, the imperative is typically warranted by an earlier commitment of the requestee to a joint project or shared goal which the action requested contributes to. The chapter argues this to be the primary use of the imperative for requesting in Italian informal interaction, and distinguishes it from other uses of the imperative that do not conform to the predominant pattern. These other uses are of two kinds: (i) secondary, that is, less frequent and formally marked imperatives that still orient to social-interactional conditions supporting an expectation of compliance, and (ii) deviant, where the imperative is selected in deliberate violation of the social-interactional conditions that normally support it, attracting special attention and accomplishing more than just requesting. This study extends prior findings on the functional distribution of imperative requests and makes a point of relating and classifying distinct uses of a same form of action, offering new insights into more general aspects of language use such as markedness and normativity.
Antaki, Charles, and Alexandra Kent. 2012. “Telling People What to Do (and, Sometimes, Why): Contingency, Entitlement and Explanation in Staff Requests to Adults with Intellectual Impairments.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (6–7): 876–889.
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1987. “Indirectness and Politeness in Requests: Same or Different?” Journal of Pragmatics 11 (2): 131–146.
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper (eds). 1989. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, Herbert H.1996. Using Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, Herbert H.2006. “Social Actions, Social Commitments.” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition, and Interaction, ed. by N. J. Enfield, , and Stephen C. Levinson, 126–152. Oxford: Berg.
Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage. 2014. “Benefactors and Beneficiaries. Benefactive Status and Stance in the Management of Offers and Requests.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, Studies in Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 51–82. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Craven, Alexandra, and Jonathan Potter. 2010. “Directives: Entitlement and Contingency in Action.” Discourse Studies 12 (4): 419–442.
Curl, Traci S., and Paul Drew. 2008. “Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (2): 129–153.
De Stefani, Elwys, and Anne-Danièle Gazin. 2014. “Instructional Sequences in Driving Lessons: Mobile Participants and the Temporal and Sequential Organization of Actions.” Journal of Pragmatics 65: 63–79.
Dingemanse, Mark, Seàn G. Roberts, Julija Baranova, Joe Blythe, Paul Drew, Simeon Floyd, Rosa S. Gisladottir, Kobin H. Kendrick, Stephen C. Levinson, Elizabeth Manrique, Giovanni Rossi, and N. J. Enfield. 2015. “Universal Principles in the Repair of Communication Problems.” PLoS ONE 10 (9): e0136100.
Drew, Paul, and Traci S. Walker. 2010. “Requesting Assistance in Calls to the Police.” In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, ed. by Malcom Coulthard, and Alison Johnson, 95–110. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Drew, Paul, Traci S. Walker, and Richard Albert Ogden. 2013. “Self-Repair and Action Construction.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Makoto Hayashi, Geoffry Raymond, and Jack. Sidnell, 71–94. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Enfield, N. J.2007. “Meanings of the Unmarked: How ‘Default’ Person Reference Does More than Just Refer.” In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives, ed. by N. J. Enfield, and Tanya Stivers, 97–120. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Enfield, N. J.2013. “Reference in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 433–454. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Ervin-Tripp, Susan M.1976. “Is Sybil There? The Structure of Some American English Directives.” Language in Society 5: 25–66.
Ervin-Tripp, Susan M., Jiansheng Guo, and Martin Lampert. 1990. “Politeness and Persuasion in Children’s Control Acts.” Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2): 307–331.
Floyd, Simeon, Giovanni Rossi, and N. J. Enfield (eds). Under review. Getting Others to Do Things: A Pragmatic Typology of Recruitments. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Floyd, Simeon, Giovanni Rossi, N. J. Enfield, Julija Baranova, Joe Blythe, Mark Dingemanse, Kobin H. Kendrick, and Jörg Zinken. 2014. “Recruitments across Languages: A Systematic Comparison.” Talk presented at the 4th International Conference on Conversation Analysis [ICCA 2014], University of California, Los Angeles, June 25–29, 2014.
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Goffman, Erving. 1963. Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: The Free Press.
Goodwin, Charles, and Goodwin, Marjorie H.1990. “Interstitial Argument.” In Conflict Talk, ed. by Allen D. Grimshaw, 85–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Heinemann, Trine. 2006. “‘Will You or Can’t You?’: Displaying Entitlement in Interrogative Requests.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (7): 1081–1104.
Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press/Blackwell.
Heritage, John, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 1994. “Constituting and Maintaining Activities across Sequences: And-Prefacing as a Feature of Question Design.” Language in Society 23 (1): 1–29.
Leech, Geoffrey N.1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Lerner, Gene H.1995. “Turn Design and the Organization of Participation in Instructional Activities.” Discourse Processes 19 (1): 111–131.
Lerner, Gene H.1998. “Completable Projects and Winnable Games: Notes on the Organization of Activity.” Paper presented at the 4th annual Conference on Language, Interaction, and Culture, University of California, Los Angeles.
Levinson, Stephen C.2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levinson, Stephen C.2013. “Action Formation and Ascription.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 103–130. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Michael, John, Natalie Sebanz, and Günther Knoblich. 2016. “The Sense of Commitment: A Minimal Approach.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1968.
Mondada, Lorenza. 2014a. “Instructions in the Operating Room: How the Surgeon Directs Their Assistant’s Hands.” Discourse Studies 16 (2): 131–161.
Mondada, Lorenza. 2014b. “Requesting Immediate Action in the Surgical Operating Room: Time, Embodied Resources and Praxeological Embeddedness.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, Studies in Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 267–300. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ogiermann, Eva. 2009. “Politeness and in-Directness across Cultures: A Comparison of English, German, Polish and Russian Requests.” Journal of Politeness Research 5 (2): 189–216.
Parry, Ruth. 2013. “Giving Reasons for Doing Something Now or at Some Other Time.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46 (2): 105–124.
Pufahl Bax, Ingrid. 1986. “How to Assign Work in an Office: A Comparison of Spoken and Written Directives in American English.” Journal of Pragmatics 10 (6): 673–692.
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/no Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review 68 (6): 939–967.
Roberts, Felicia, and Jeffrey D. Robinson. 2004. “Interobserver Agreement on First-Stage Conversation Analytic Transcription.” Human Communication Research 30 (3): 376–410.
Robinson, Jeffrey D.2013. “Overall Structural Organization.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 257–280. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Rossano, Federico. 2012. “Gaze Behavior in Face-to-Face Interaction.” Ph.D. dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Rossi, Giovanni. 2012. “Bilateral and Unilateral Requests: The Use of Imperatives and Mi X? Interrogatives in Italian.” Discourse Processes 49 (5): 426–58.
Rossi, Giovanni. 2014. “When Do People Not Use Language to Make Requests?” In Requesting in social interaction, Studies in language and social interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 303–334. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Rossi, Giovanni. 2015. “The Request System in Italian Interaction.” Ph.D. dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation, volume 2, ed. by Gail Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sadock, Jerrold M., and Arnold Zwicky. 1985. “Speech Act Distinctions in Syntax.” In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, ed. by Timothy Shopen, 155–196. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schieffelin, Bambi B.1990. The Give and Take of Everyday Life: Language Socialization of Kaluli Children. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, John R.1975. “Indirect Speech Acts.” In Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 59–82. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Stivers, Tanya. 2007. “Alternative Recognitionals in Initial References to Persons.” In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives, ed. by N. J. Enfield, and Tanya Stivers, 73–96. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Stivers, Tanya, N. J. Enfield, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2007. “Person Reference in Interaction.” In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, ed. by N. J. Enfield, and Tanya Stivers, 1–20. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Zinken, Jörg and Eva Ogiermann. 2013. “Responsibility and Action: Invariants and Diversity in Requests for Objects in British English and Polish Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46 (3): 256–276.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Chalfoun, Andrew, Giovanni Rossi & Tanya Stivers
2024. The Magic Word? Face-Work and the Functions of Please in Everyday Requests. Social Psychology Quarterly
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.