Part of
Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-initial particles across languages
Edited by John Heritage and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 31] 2018
► pp. 251286
References (51)
References
Antaki, Charles. 2012. “Affiliative and Disaffiliative Candidate Understandings.” Discourse Studies 14 (5): 531–547. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, Trevor. 2012. “When Problems Pass Us By: Using “You Mean” to Help Locate the Source of Trouble.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 45 (1): 82–109. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, Trevor. 2013. “Signaling Trouble: On the Linguistic Design of Other-Initiation of Repair in English Conversation.” PhD thesis. University of Groningen. [URL]
Bolden, Galina 2010. “’Articulating the Unsaid’ via And-prefaced Formulations of Others’ Talk.” Discourse Studies 12 (1): 5–32. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca. 2001. “Meaning in Interaction: The Case of Actually ”. Language 77 (2): 245–291. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2015. ”Retrospection and Understanding in Interaction.” In Temporality in Interaction, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Susanne Günthner, 57–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark, and N. J. Enfield. 2015. “Other-Initiated Repair across Languages: Towards a Typology of Conversational Structures.” Open Linguistics 1: 96–118. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark, Sean G. Roberts, Julija Baranova, Joe Blythe, Paul Drew, Simeon Floyd, Rosa S. Gisladottir, Kobin H. Kendrick, Stephen C. Levinson, Elizabeth Manrique, Giovanni Rossi, and N. J. Enfield. 2015. “Universal Principles in the Repair of Communication Problems.” PLoS ONE 10: e0136100. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drake, Veronika. 2015. “Indexing Uncertainty: The Case of Turn-Final Or , Research on Language and Social Interaction 48 (3): 301–318. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul. 1997. “Open’ Class of Repair Initiators as Responses to Sequential Sources of Troubles in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 28: 69–101. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul. 2003. ”Comparative Analysis of Talk-in-Interaction in Different Institutional Settings: A Sketch.” In Studies in Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, and Jenny Mandelbaum, 293–308. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Etelämäki, Marja. 2009. “The Finnish Demonstrative Pronouns in Light of Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 25–46. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haakana, Markku, Salla Kurhila, Niina Lilja, and Marjo Savijärvi. 2016. ”Kuka, mitä, häh? Korjausaloitteet suomalaisessa arkikeskustelussa [Other-initiation of repair in Finnish everyday conversation].” Virittäjä 2/2016:255–292.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2015. “Insisting on ‘My Side’: Siis-Prefaced Utterances in Finnish.” Journal of Pragmatics 75: 111–130. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja Riitta Heinonen, and Irja Alho. 2004. Iso suomen kielioppi [The Comprehensive Grammar of Finnish]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Lauri. 1999 [1951]. Luennot suomen kielen partikkeleista [Lectures on Particles in Finnish Language]. ed. by Yrjö Lauranto, and Tapani Lehtinen. Helsinki: Department of Finnish language, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto, and Kaoru Hayano. 2013. “Proffering Insertable Elements: A Study of Other-Initiated Repair in Japanese.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, 293–321. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. “A Change of State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1985. “Analyzing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for an “Overhearing” Audience.”. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol.3, Discourse and Dialogue, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 95–117. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 2012a. “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45: 1–29. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 2012b. “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45: 30–52. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Rod Watson. 1979. “Formulations as Conversational Objects.” In Everyday Language, ed. by George Psathas, 123–162. New York: Irvington Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1984. “Notes on Some Orderliness of Overlap Onset.” In Discourse Analysis and Natural Rhetoric, ed. by V. DʹUrso, and P. Leonardi, 11–38. Padua, Italy: Cleup Editore.Google Scholar
Juvonen, Päivi. 2005. “On the Pragmatics of Indefinite Determiners in Spoken Finnish.” In Minimal Reference. The Use of Pronouns in Finnish and Estonian Discourse, ed. by Ritva Laury, 190–211. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, Celia. 2013. ”Repair.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 229–256. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Koivisto, Aino. 2013. “On the Preference for Remembering: Acknowledging an Answer with Finnish ai nii(n) (“oh thatʹs right”).” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46 (3): 277–297. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koivisto, Aino. 2015. “Dealing with Ambiguities in Informings: Finnish aijaa as a “Neutral” News Receipt.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48 (4): 365–387. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koivisto, Aino. 2016. “Receipting Information as Newsworthy vs. Responding to Redirection: Finnish News Particles aijaa and aha(a) ”. Journal of Pragmatics 104: 163–179.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koivisto, Aino. 2017. “On-line Emergence of Alternative Questions in Finnish with the Conjunction/Particle Vai ‘or’.” In Linking Clauses and Actions in Social Interaction, ed. by Ritva Laury, Marja Etelämäki, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 129–148. Helsinki: Finnish LiteratureSociety.Google Scholar
Koivisto, Aino, Ritva Laury, and Eeva-Leena Seppänen. 2011. “Syntactic and Actional Characteristics of Finnish että-Clauses.” In Subordination in Conversation: A Crosslinguistic Perspective, ed. by Ritva Laury, and Ryoko Suzuki, 69–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koivisto, Aino, and Liisa Voutilainen. 2016. “Responding to What Is Left Implicit: Psychotherapists’ Formulations and Understanding Checks After Clients’ Turn-Final Että (“That/So”).” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (3): 238–257.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
[New Dictionary of Modern Finnish]. 2017. Helsinki: Kotimaisten kielten keskus.Google Scholar
Kunnari, Miia. 2011. Kahdentunut dialogipartikkeli joojoo keskustelussa [Reduplicated dialogue particle joojoo in conversation]. MA thesis in Finnish language. University of Helsinki. [URL]
Kurhila, Salla. 2006. Second Language Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kushida, Shuya. 2011. “Confirming Understanding and Acknowledging Assistance: Managing Trouble Responsibility in Response to Understanding Check in Japanese Talk-in-interaction”. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2716–2739. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laury, Ritva, and Eeva-Leena Seppänen. 2008. “Clause Combining, Interaction, Evidentiality, Participation Structure, and the Conjunction-Particle Continuum: The Finnish Että .” In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining, ed. by Ritva Laury, 153–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laury, Ritva, Karita Suomalainen, and Anna Vatanen. 2017. “The Finnish Projector Phrase Se että in Claims of Intersubjective Sharing.” A paper presented in Conference Intersubjectivity in Action, Helsinki May 11–13, 2017.
Lindström, Anna. 1997. Designing Social Actions: Grammar, Prosody, and Interaction in Swedish Conversation. Doctoral dissertation. Los Angeles: University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Luke, K. K. 1990. Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
NS =  Nykysuomen sanakirja [Dictionary of Moderna Finnish]. 1992 [1951–1961]. 13th edition. Porvoo: Werner Söderström.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1988. Culture and Language Development. Language Acquisition and Language Socialization in a Samoan Village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Volumes I and II. ed. by Gail Jefferson. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2011. “Word Repeats as Unit Ends.” Discourse Studies 13 (3): 367–380. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks. 1977. “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53 (2): 361–382. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
SMS =   Suomen murteiden sanakirja 1997 [Dictionary of Finnish Dialects]. Helsinki: Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskus.Google Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena. 2001. Responding in Conversation. A Study of Response Particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, and Heidi Vepsäläinen. 2016. “The Finnish Particle No .” In NU/NÅ: A Family of Discourse Markers across the Languages of Europe and Beyond, ed. by Yael Maschler, and Peter Auer. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
SSA = Suomen sanojen alkuperä 1995 [ The origin of Finnish words. Etymological dictionary ]. Volumes 1–3 . Helsinki: Research Institute for the Languages of Finland and Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Vepsäläinen, Heidi. In preparation. No-partikkeli kysymys-vastaus-sekvensseissä [The particle no in question-answer sequences]. PhD thesis in Finnish language. University of Helsinki.
Vilkuna, Maria. 1992. Referenssi ja määräisyys suomenkielisten tekstien tulkinnassa [Reference and definiteness in interpretation of texts in Finnish]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Weiste, Elina, and Anssi Peräkylä. 2013. “A Comparative Conversation Analytic Study of Formulations in Psychoanalysis and Cognitive Psychotherapy.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46 (4): 299–321. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Ruskan, Anna
2024. Role of six turn-initial demonstrative and emotive particles in Lithuanian. Open Linguistics 10:1 DOI logo
Salomaa, Elina, Dorien Van De Mieroop & Esa Lehtinen
Schirm, Sam
2024. From doing work on your own talk to doing work on others’ talk. Interactional Linguistics 4:1  pp. 68 ff. DOI logo
Kohonen-Aho, Laura
2023. Transitions Between Interactional Spaces: Working Towards Shared Understanding in a Hybrid Workshop Setting. In Complexity of Interaction,  pp. 457 ff. DOI logo
Persson, Rasmus
2023. Three practices for confirming inferences in French talk-in-interaction. In Responding to Polar Questions across Languages and Contexts [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 35],  pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Salomaa, Elina & Esa Lehtinen
2023. Public note-taking on a digital platform as a workplace practice. Discourse Studies 25:6  pp. 775 ff. DOI logo
Voutilainen, Liisa & Aino Koivisto
2022. ‘Delayed response’ in psychodynamic psychotherapy. Discourse Studies 24:2  pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
Floyd, Simeon
2021. Conversation and Culture. Annual Review of Anthropology 50:1  pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Haakana, Markku, Salla Kurhila, Niina Lilja & Marjo Savijärvi
2021. Extending sequences of other-initiated repair in Finnish conversation. In Intersubjectivity in Action [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 326],  pp. 231 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.