Chapter published in:
Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-initial particles across languages
Edited by John Heritage and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 31] 2018
► pp. 413444


Auer, Peter, and Yael Maschler
2016 “The Family of NU and NÅ across the Languages and beyond: Structure, Function, and History.” In NU/NÅ: A Family of Discourse Markers Across the Languages of Europe and Beyond, ed. by Peter Auer, and Yael Maschler, 1–47. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter, and Susanne Uhmann
1982 “Aspekte der konversationellen Organisation von Bewertungen [Aspects of the Conversational Organisation of Assessments].” Deutsche Sprache, 10: 1–32.Google Scholar
Barske, Tobias
2009 “Same Token, Different Actions: A Conversation Analytic Study of Social Roles, Embodied Actions, and ‘ok’ in German Business Meetings.” Journal for Business Communication 46 (1):120–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barske, Tobias, and Andrea Golato
2010 “German Turn-Intial ‘so’: Managing Squence and Action.” Text & Talk 30 (3):245–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar
2011 “Double Sayings of German ‘ja’ – More Observations on Their Prosodic-Phonetic Make-up and Alignment Function.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 44 (2):1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beach, Wayne
1993 “Transitional Regularities for ‘Casual’ ‘okay’ Usages.” Journal of Pragmatics 19:45–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolden, Galina
2009 “Implementing Incipient Actions: The Discourse Marker ‘so’ in English Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (5):974–998. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bredel, Ursula
2000 “ ‘Ach so‘ – Eine Rekonstruktion aus funktional-pragmatischer Perspektive [‚Ach so‘ – A Reconstruction from a Functional-Pragmatic Perspective].” Linguistische Berichte 184:401–421.Google Scholar
De Stefani, Elwys, and Anne-Sylvie Horlacher
2008 “Topical and Sequential Backlinking in a French Radio Phone-in Program: Turn Shapes and Sequential Placements.” Pragmatics 18 (3):3381–3406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf
2012 “Turn-Design at Turn-Beginnings: Multimodal Resources to Deal with Tasks of Turn-Construction in German.” Journal of Pragmatics 46:91–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf, and Henrike Helmer
2013 “Zur Grammatik des Verstehens im Gespräch: Inferenzen anzeigen und Handlungskonsequenzen ziehen mit ‚also‘ und ‚dann‘ [On the Grammar of Understanding in Conversation: Indicating Inferences and Deducing Implications for Action with ,also’ and ,dann’]. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 32 (1):1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999Das groβe Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache [The Comprehensive Dictionary of the German Language]. Mannheim/Leipzig/Wien/Zürich: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Durrell, Martin
1992Using German: A Guide to Contemporary Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Franck, Dorothea
1980Grammatik und Konversation [Grammar and Conversation]. Königstein/Ts.: Scriptor.Google Scholar
Golato, Andrea
2005Compliments and Compliment Responses. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “Action and Topic Shifts in Conversation: The Case of 3rd-Position naja in German.” Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the National Communication Association, San Antonio, TX, November 16–19 2006.
2010 “Marking Understanding versus Receipting Information in Talk: Achso and ach in German Interaction.” Discourse Studies 12 (2):147–176. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Appreciatory Sounds and Expressions of Embodied Pleasure Used as Compliments.” In Pragmatics of Society, ed. by Karin Aijmer, and Gisle Anderson, 359–390. Berlin: Mouton-de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Golato, Andrea, and Emma Betz
2008 “German ‘ach’ and ‘achso’ in Repair Uptake: A Resource to Sustain or Remove Epistemic Asymmetry.” Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 27:7–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Golato, Andrea, and Zsuzsanna Fagyal
2008 “Comparing Single and Double Sayings of the German Response Token ‘ja’ and the Role of Prosody – A Conversation Analytic PerspectiveResearch on Language and Social Interaction 41 (3):1–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haakana, Markku
2001 “Laughter as a Patientʹs Resource: Dealing with Delicate Aspects of Medical Interaction.” Text 21 (1):187–219.Google Scholar
Harren, Inga
2001“Ne?” in Alltagsgesprächen – Interaktive Funktionen und Positionierung in Turn und Sequenz [,Ne?‘ in Everyday Conversation – Interactive Functions and Positions in Turn and Sequence]. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg.Google Scholar
Harren, Inga, andMia Raitaniemi
2008 “The Sequential Structure of Closings in Private German Phone Calls.” Gesprächsforschung. Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 9:198–223.Google Scholar
Heinemann, Trine
2009 “Two Answers to Inapposite Inquiries.” In Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Jack Sidnell, 159–186. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heinemann, Trine, Anna Lindström, and Jacob Steensig
2011 “Addressing Epistemic Incongruence in Question-Answer Sequences Through the Use of Epistemic Adverbs.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 107–130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
1984 “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1998 “ Oh-Prefaced Responses to Inquiry.” Language in Society 27:291–334. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 “ Oh-Prefaced Responses to Assessments: A Method of Modifying Agreement/Disagreement.” In The Language of Turn and Sequence, ed. by Cecilia Ford, Barbara Fox, and Sandra Thompson, 196–224. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2013 “Turn-Initial Position and Some of Its Occupants.” Journal of Pragmatics 57:331–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “ Well-Prefaced Turns in English Conversation: A Conversation Analytic Perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics 88:88–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1972 “Side Sequences.” In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow, 294–338. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
1981aCaveat Speaker a Preliminary Exploration of Shift Implicative Articulation of Topic. Final report to the British SSRC.Google Scholar
1981bThe Abominable ‘Ne?’: A Working Paper Exploring the Phenomenon of Post-Response Pursuit of Response. Occasional Paper No.6, Department of Sociology, University of Manchester, Manchester, England.Google Scholar
1984 “On Stepwise Transition from Talk about a Trouble to Inappropriately Next-Positioned Matters.” In Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 191–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2002Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache [Etymological Dictionary of the German Language].(24th ed. ed.). Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Koivisto, Aino
2015 “Displaying Now-Understanding: The Finnish Change-of-State Token aa .” Discourse Processes 5(2):111–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Local, John
2004 “Getting Back to Prior Talk: ‘And-uh(m)’as a Back-Connecting Device in British and American English.” In Sound Patterns in Interaction, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Cecilia Ford, 377–400. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lütten, Jutta
1979 “Die Rolle der Partikeln ‚doch‘, ‚eben‘, und ‚ja‘ als Konsens-Konstitutiva in gesprochener Sprache [The Role of the Particles ,doch‘, ,eben‘, and ,ja‘ as consensus constituents in Spoken Language].” In Die Partikeln der deutschen Sprache, ed. by Harald Weydt, 30–38. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mazeland, Harrie
2007 “Parenthetical Sequences’.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (10):1816–1869. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mazeland, Harrie, and Mike Huiskes
2001 “Dutch ’but’ as a Sequential Conjunction: Its Use as a Resumption Marker.” In Studies in Interactional Linguistics, ed. by Margret Selting, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 141–170. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Möllering, Martina
2001 “Teaching German Modal Particles: A Corpus-Based Approach.” Language Learning & Technology 5 (3):130–151.Google Scholar
Mori, Junko
2006 “The Workings of the Japanese Token hee in Informing Sequences: An Analysis of Sequential Context, Turn Shape, and Prosody.” Journal of Pragmatics 38:1175–1205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1986 “Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims.” Human Studies 9 (2–4):210–229.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1987 “Recycled Turn Beginnings: A Precise Repair Mechanism in Conversationʹs Turn-Taking Organisation.” In Talk and Social Organization, ed. byGraham Button, and John R. E. Lee, 70–85. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena
2001Responding in Conversation: A Study of Response Particles in Finnish (Vol. 70). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, and Heidi Vepsäläinen
2016 “The Finnish Particle No .” In NU/NÅ: A Family of Discourse Markers Across the Languages of Europe and Beyond, ed. by Peter Auer, and Yael Maschler, 243–280. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya
2004 “’No no no’ and Other Types of Multiple Sayings in Social Interaction.” Human Communication Research 30 (2):260–293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation during Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(1):31–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sutinen, Marika
2014 “Negotiating Favourable Conditions for Resuming Suspended Activities.” In Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking, ed. by Pentti Haddington, Tina Keisamen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 137–166. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Thurmair, Maria
1989Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen [Modal Particles and their Combinations]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wahrig-Burfeind, Renate
(ed.) 2000Wahrig Deutsches Wörterbuch [Wahrig German Dictionary]. (7th ed.). Gütersloh/München: Bertelsmann Lexikon Institut.Google Scholar
Willkop, Eva-Maria
1988Gliederungspartikeln im Dialog [Structuring Particles in Spoken Language]. München: Iudicium.Google Scholar
Zifonun, Gisela, Ludger Hoffmann, and Bruno Strecker
1997Grammatik der deutschen Sprache [Grammar of the German Language]. (vol. 3) Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Taleghani-Nikazm, Carmen, Veronika Drake, Andrea Golato & Emma Betz
2020.  In Mobilizing Others [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 33],  pp. 47 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.