Chapter published in:
Emergent Syntax for Conversation: Clausal patterns and the organization of action
Edited by Yael Maschler, Simona Pekarek Doehler, Jan Lindström and Leelo Keevallik
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 32] 2020
► pp. 151182
References

References

Biber, D.
(1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D.
(2018) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.43, retrieved 8 September, 2018 from http://​www​.praat​.org/.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2001) Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., and Hopper, J.
(2001)  Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W.
(1994) The Evolution of grammar: Tense,aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J., & Scheibman, J.
(1999) The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The reduction of Don’t in English. Linguistics 37 (4): 575–596. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W.
(1982) Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 35–54). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Coates, J.
(1990) Modal meaning: The semantics – pragmatics interface. Journal of Semantics 7, 53–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Thompson, S. A.
(2008) On assessing situations and events in conversation: Extraposition and its relatives. Discourse Studies 10(4): 443–467. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M.
(2001) The acquisition of finite complements clauses in English: A corpus-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics 12, 97–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J. W.
(2007) The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 139–182). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J. W., Schuetze-Coburn, S., Cumming, S., & Paolino, D. (1993) Outline of discourse transcription. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 45–89). New York/London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Duranti, A.
(2010) Husserl, intersubjectivity and anthropology. Anthropological Theory 10 (1–2), 16–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Endo, T. K.
(2010) Expressing stance in Mandarin conversation: Epistemic and non-epistemic uses of wo juede. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Englebretson, Robert
(Ed.) 2007Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fang, M.
(2000) Ziran kouyu zhong ruohua lianci de huayu biaoji gongneng. [Discourse functions of bleached conjunctions in natural Mandarin conversation]. Zhongguo Yuwen [ Studies of the Chinese Language ], 5, 459–470.Google Scholar
Gillespie, A., & Cornish, F.
(2010) Intersubjectivity: Towards a dialogical analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 40 (1), 19–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C.
(1996) Transparent vision. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 370–404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C. & Goodwin, M. H.
(1992) Assessments and the construction of context. In C. Goodwin and A. Duranti (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 147–190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayashi, M.
(1999) Where grammar and interaction meet: A study of co-participant completion in Japanese conversation. Human Studies 22 (2–4), 475–499. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J.
(2007) Intersubjectivity and progressivity in person (and place) reference. In N. J. Enfield & T. Stivers (Eds.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural and social perspectives (pp. 255–280). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, J.
(1982) Expressing doubt and certainty in English. RELC Journal 13 (2), 9–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1984) Modifying illocutionary force. Journal of Pragmatics 8, 345–365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, S.
(2003) Doubts about complementation: A functionalist analysis. Language and Linguistics 4 (2), 429–455.Google Scholar
Hunston, S., & Sinclair, J.
(2000) A local grammar of evaluation. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 74–101). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G.
(2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam/Philadephia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, E.
(2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation: A description of its interactional functions, with a focus on I think. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) The Role of I guess in conversational stancetaking. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 183–220). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, E. (2012)  I thought it was very interesting: Conversational formats for taking a stance. Journal of Pragmatics 44 (15), 2194–2210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laury, R. H. & Helasvuo, M-L.
2016Disclaiming epistemic access with ‘know’ and ‘remember’ in Finnish. Journal of Pragmatics 106, 80–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, G. H.
(1996) On the ‘semi-permeable’ character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 238–276). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lim, N. E.
(2009) Stance-taking with wo juede in conversational Chinese. In Proceedings of the 21st North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, (pp. 323–340). Columbus: Ohio State University online publications.Google Scholar
(2011) From subjectivity to intersubjectivity: Epistemic marker wo juede in Chinese. In Y. Xiao, L. Tao & H. L. Soh (Eds.), Current issues in Chinese linguistics (pp. 265–300). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar Press.Google Scholar
Lindström, J., Maschler, Y., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
(2016) A cross-linguistic perspective on grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 106, 72–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
, S., Li, L., Liu, J., Fan, J., Shi, Y., Fan, F., Meng, C., Ma, S., Li, Z., Chen, J., Zhan, K., Zheng, H., & Tao, B.
(Eds.). (1980) Xiandai hanyu babaici [Modern Chinese 800 words]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Maschler, Y.
(2012) Emergent projecting constructions: The case of Hebrew yada (‘know’). Studies in Language 36(4): 785–847. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) The emergence of Hebrew loydea/loydat (‘I dunno masc/fem’) from interaction: Blurring the boundaries between discourse marker, pragmatic marker, and modal particle. In A. Sansò and C. Fedriani (Eds.), Pragmatic markers, discourse markers and modal particles: New perspectives (pp. 37–69). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mori, J., & Hayashi, M.
(2006) The achievement of intersubjectivity through embodied completions: A study of interactions between first and second language speakers. Applied Linguistics 27 (2), 195–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, J. & Thompson, S. A.
(2008) The grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In R. Laury (Ed.), Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp. 179–204). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, F. R.
(1986) Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, S.
(2011) Clause-combining and the sequencing of actions: Projector constructions in French talk-in-interaction. In R. Laury & R. Suzuki (Eds.), Subordination in conversation: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 103–148). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, A.
(1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social interaction: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., Svartvik, J., & Crystal, D.
(1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1992) Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology 97 (5), 1295–1345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scheibman, J.
(2000)  I dunno: A usage-based account of the phonological reduction of don’t in American English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 32 (1), 105–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Local patterns of subjectivity in person and verb type in American English conversation. In J. L. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 61–90). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T.
(2008) Stance, alignment, and affiliation during story telling: When nodding is a token of preliminary affiliation. Research on Language in Social Interaction 41 (1):31–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tao, H.
(1996) Units in Mandarin conversation: Prosody, discourse, and grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Discovering the usual with corpora: The case of remember . In R. Simpson & J. Swales (Eds.), Corpus linguistics in North America: Selections from the 1999 symposium (pp. 116–144). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
(2003a) Phonological, grammatical, and discourse evidence for the emergence of zhidao [know] constructions. [in Chinese] Chinese Language 4, 291–302.Google Scholar
(2003b.) A usage-based approach to argument structure: Remember and forget in spoken English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8, 75–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) A corpus-based investigation of absolutely and related phenomena in spoken American English. Journal of English Linguistics 35 (1), 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tao, L.
(2006) Classifier loss and frozen tone in spoken Beijing Mandarin: The yi+ge phonosyntactic conspiracy. Linguistics 44, 91–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, G. & Hunston, S.
(2000) Evaluation: An introduction. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 1–27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. A.
(2002) ‘Object complements’ and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26, 125–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S. A., & Mulac, A.
(1991a) A quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In B. Heine and E. Traugott (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, 313–329. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1991b) The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics 15 (3), 237–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, W.
(2017) Prosody and functions of discourse markers in Mandarin Chinese conversation: The cases of ranhou, wo juede, and meiyou. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Floyd, Simeon
2021. Conversation and Culture. Annual Review of Anthropology 50:1  pp. 219 ff. Crossref logo
XIAO–DESAI, YANG
2021. Stance‐Taking in Heritage Language Writing. The Modern Language Journal 105:3  pp. 679 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.