Cover not available
Part of
Mobilizing Others: Grammar and lexis within larger activities
Edited by Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm, Emma Betz and Peter Golato
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 33] 2020
► pp. 19–46

Chapter 2
Requesting here-and-now actions with two imperative formats in Korean interaction

| California State University, Northridge
| University of Hawaii, Manoa
This chapter analyzes two Korean imperative formats, the -e/a imperative and the imperative formed with the auxiliary verb po‑ ‘see’ (referred to as the plain imperative and the pwa imperative, respectively), focusing on the requests of here-and-now actions. Pwa imperatives are selected when the nominated action is a step that advances the larger course of action in progress and anticipates a next action, although the outcome of the nominated action is only provisionally determined. Plain imperatives, on the other hand, are deployed when no further actions are suggested as part of the nominated action. The paper challenges the previous explanations based on social distance or politeness by showing that the selection of the imperatives hinges on a particular ‘situation design’, that is, whether the nominated action is connected to the larger action trajectory.
Keywords: anticipatory action, auxiliary verb, conversation analysis, imperatives, Korean, politeness, requests, situation design
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Target imperative forms
  • Data
  • Analysis of the two imperative formats in Korean: Plain vs. Pwa imperatives
    • Pwa imperatives
    • Plain imperatives
  • Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 13 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.33.02kim
References (42)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2010. Imperatives and Commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bolden, Galina. 2017. “Requests for Here-And-Now Actions in Russian Conversation.” In Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 175–211. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cho, Young-Mee, Hyo Sang Lee, Carol Schulz, Ho-Min Sohn, and Sung-Ock Sohn. 2010. Integrated Korean: Beginning 2. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Choe, Jeong-soon, Song-hee Kim, Ji-eun Kim, and Hyun-jung Kim. 2005. Sogang Korean: Student Book 1B. Korean Language Education Center, Sogang University. Seoul: Hawoo Press.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2014. “What does grammar tell us about action?” Pragmatics 24 (3): 623–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craven, Alexandra, and Jonathan Potter. 2010. “Directives: Entitlement and Contingency in Action.” Discourse Studies 12 (4): 419–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curl, Traci S., and Paul Drew. 2008. “Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (2): 129–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2014. “Requesting – From Speech Act to Recruitment.” In Requesting in Social Action, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 1–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan M. 1976. “Is Sybil There? The Structure of Some American English Directives.” Language in Society 5: 25–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H. 1990. He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto, and Stephanie H. Kim. 2015. “Turn Formats for Other-Initiated Repair and Their Relation to Trouble Sources: Some Observations from Japanese and Korean Conversations.” Journal of Pragmatics 87: 198–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heinemann, Trine, and Jakob Steensig. 2017. “Three Imperative Formats in Danish Talk-in-InteractionL The Case of Imperative + Modal Particles Bare and Lige .” In Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 139–174. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by John Heritage and Maxwell Atkinson, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kent, Alexandra, and Kobin H. Kendrick. 2016. “Imperative Directives: Orientations to Accountability.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (3): 272–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Mary S. 2018. Imperatives in Ordinary Talk: Turn Designs, Embodied Actions, and Sequences in Korean Interaction. The 26th Japanese/Korean Linguistics Conference. University of California, Los Angeles.
Kim, Mary S., and Stephanie H. Kim. 2014. “Initiating Repair With and Without Particles: Alternative Formats of Other-Initiation of Repair in Korean Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 47 (4): 331–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Stephanie H. 2018. “Two Types of Trouble with Questions: A Comparative Perspective on Turn-Initial Particles in Korean.” In Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-Initial Particles Across Languages, ed. by John Heritage and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 95–114. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Yunjin. 2006. Hankwuke Mwunhyeng Pyohyen 100 [100 Korean sentence patterns]. Seoul: Konkuk University Press.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindström, Ana. 2005. “Language as Social Action: A Study of How Senior Citizens Request Assistance with Practical Tasks in the Swedish Home Help Service.” In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation, ed. by Auli Haukulinen and Margaret Selting, 209–230. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2011. “The Situated Organization of Directives in French: Imperatives and Action Coordination in Video Games.” Nottingham French Studies 50 (2): 19–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nam, Youngshin. 2005. Hankwuke Yongpep Hayntubwuk [Handbook on Korean Language Usage]. Seoul: Momento Press.Google Scholar
Park, Yong-jun. 1994. Myengnyengmwun ui kwukesacek yengwu [A study on Korean imperative constructions]. Seoul: Kwukhak calyowen.Google Scholar
Pearson 1989. “‘Role-ing Out Control’ at Church Business Meetings: Directing and Disagreeing.” Language Sciences 11 (3): 289–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Chase W. 2018. “Bueno-, Pues-, and Bueno-Pues-Prefacing in Spanish.” In Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-Initial Particles Across Languages, ed. by John Heritage and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 59–94. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey. 2013. “Epistemics, Action Formation, and Other-Initiation of Repair: The Case of Partial Questioning Repeats.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Jack Sidnell, Makoto Hayashi, and Geoffrey Raymond, 261–292. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni. 2012. “Bilateral and Unilateral Requests: The Use of Imperatives and mi X? Interrogatives in Italian.” Discourse Processes 49: 426–458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “Secondary and Deviant Uses of the Imperative in Italian.” In Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 103–137. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. “Turn organization: one direction for inquiry into grammar and interaction.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sohh, Ho-Min. 2001. The Korean Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-Min. 2012. “A Grammar of Po- ‘See’ in Korean: A Pan-Chronic Approach.” Language Information 14: 83–117.Google Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2017. Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2015. Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wootton, Anthony J. 1997. Interaction and the Development of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wootton, Anthony. 2005. “Interactional and Sequential Configurations Informing Request Format Selection in Children’s Speech”. In Syntax and Lexis and Conversation, ed. by Aauli Hakulinen, and Margaret Selting, 185–208. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zinken, Jörg. 2013. “Reanimating Responsibility: The Wez-V2 (take-V2) Double Imperative” In Approaches to Slavic Interaction, ed. by Nadine Thielemann and Peter Kosta, 35–61. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Requesting Responsibility: The Morality of Grammar in Polish and English Family Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zinken, Jörg and Eva Ogiermann. 2013. “Responsibility and Action: Object Requests in English and Polish Everyday Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46 (3): 256–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zinken, Jörg, and Arnulf Deppermann. 2017. “A Cline of Visible Commitment in the Situated Design of Imperative Turns.” In Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 27–63. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Twukun twukun hankwuke 2 [Twukun Twukun Korean Language 2]. The National Institute of the Korean Language.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Kim, Mary Shin
2023. Korean imperatives at two different speech levels. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 33:4 ► pp. 559 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.