Chapter published in:
Mobilizing Others: Grammar and lexis within larger activities
Edited by Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm, Emma Betz and Peter Golato
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 33] 2020
► pp. 147–173

Linguistic structures emerging in the synchronization of a Pilates class

| Linköping University
This chapter targets grammar in the interactive process between a Pilates teacher and the exercising students, an activity context in which instruction and compliance can be designed to merge in time. It shows how linguistic structure, such as counts, formula, and phrases, emerges step-by-step sensitively to the others’ currently moving bodies. At the same time, the situation-designed structures direct the students through the partially known moves. In contrast to formal theories that consider grammar as a device for coherent expression of propositions, this study argues that grammatical structure emerges through recurrent use in a specific activity context. The video-recorded data is in Estonian.
Keywords: interactional linguistics, embodiment, instruction, emergent grammar, rhythm, synchronization, Estonian, formula, counting, repetition
Published online: 13 May 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.33.06kee
References

References

Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2011 “Action, Prosody and Emergent Constructions: The Case of ‘and’.” In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, ed. by Peter Auer, and Stefan Pfänder, 264–293. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Betz, Emma, Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm, Veronica Drake, and Andrea Golato
2013 “Third-Position Repeats in German: The Case of Repair- and Request-for-Information Sequences.” Gesprächsforschung 14: 133–166.Google Scholar
Bolden, Galina
2009 “Beyond Answering: Repeat-Prefaced Responses in Conversation.” Communication Monographs 76 (2), 121–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Broth, Mathias, Jakob Cromdal, and Lena Levin
2017 “Starting out as a Driver: Progression in Instructed Pedal work.” In Memory Practices and Learning: Interactional, institutional and sociocultural perspectives, ed. by Åsa Mäkitalo, Per Linell, and Roger Säljö, 115–152. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Broth, Mathias, and Leelo Keevallik
2014 “Getting Ready to Move as a Couple. Accomplishing Mobile Formations in a Dance Class.” Space and Culture 17 (2): 107–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2003 “Cognitive Processes in Grammaticalization.” In The New Psychology of Language, Vol. II, ed. by Michael Tomasello, 145–167. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cekaite, Asta
2010 “Shepherding the Child: Embodied Directive Sequences in Parent-Child Interactions.” Text and Talk 30 (1): 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca
2016 Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting
2018 Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Curl, Traci S., John Local, and Gareth Walker
2006 “Repetition and the Prosody-Pragmatics Interface.” Journal of Pragmatics 38(10): 1721–1751. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf
2018 Changes in Turn-design over Interactional Histories – the Case of Instruction in Driving School Lessons. In Time in Embodied Interaction: Synchronicity and Sequentiality of Multimodal Resources, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Jürgen Streeck, 293–324. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Stefani, Elwys, and Anne-Danièle Gazin
2014 “Instructional Sequences in Driving Lessons: Mobile Participants and the Temporal and Sequential Organization of Actions.” Journal of Pragmatics 65: 63–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
(eds.) 2014 Requesting in Social Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1981 Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
1994 “Constituting and Maintaining Activities across Sequences: And-Prefacing as a Feature of Question Design.” Language in Society 23 (1): 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1998 “Emergent Grammar.” In The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, ed. by Michael Tomasello, 155–175. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1991 “List Construction as a Task and Resource.” In Interactional Competence, ed. by George Psathas, 63–92. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo
2010a “Social Action of Syntactic Reduplication.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (3): 800–824. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010b “Marking Boundaries between Activities: The Particle nii in Estonian. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (2): 157–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Pro-forms as Projective Devices in Interaction.” Discourse Processes 48 (6): 404–431. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Compromising Progressivity: ‘no’-Prefacing in Estonian.” Pragmatics 22 (1): 119–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “Coordinating the Temporalities of Talk and Dance.” In Temporality in Interaction, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Susanne Günthner, 309–336. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Linell, Per
2009 Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2014a “The Surgeon as a Camera Director: Maneuvering Video in the Operating Theatre.” In Video at Work, ed. by Mathias Broth, Eric Laurier, and Lorenza Mondada, 97–132. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2014b “Requesting Immediate Action in the Surgical Operating Room: Time, Embodied Resources and Praxeological Embeddedness.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 269–302. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nevile, Maurice
2015 “The Embodied Turn in Research on Language and Social Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48 (2): 121–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Ellinor, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson
(eds.) 1996 Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50: 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
(eds.) 2001 Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen, Charles Goodwin, and Curtis LeBaron
(eds.) 2011 Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Svennevig, Jan
2004 “Other-Repetition as Display of Hearing, Understanding and Emotional Stance.” Discourse Studies 6 (4): 489–516. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “Trying the Easiest Solution First in Other-Initiated Repair.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (2): 333–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1987 “Repetition in Conversation: Toward a Poetics of Talk.” Language 63 (3): 574–605. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1989 Talking Vocies: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zinken, Jörg, and Arnulf Deppermann
2017 “A Cline of Visible Commitment in the Situated Design of Imperative Turns. Evidence from German and Polish.” In Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 27–63. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Helmer, Henrike
2021. Humorous or occasioned instructions: Learning the “shoulder check” in theoretical and practical driving lessons. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 31:1 ► pp. 109 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.