Cover not available
Part of
Mobilizing Others: Grammar and lexis within larger activities
Edited by Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm, Emma Betz and Peter Golato
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 33] 2020
► pp. 147–174

Chapter 6
Linguistic structures emerging in the synchronization of a Pilates class

 | Linköping University
This chapter targets grammar in the interactive process between a Pilates teacher and the exercising students, an activity context in which instruction and compliance can be designed to merge in time. It shows how linguistic structure, such as counts, formula, and phrases, emerges step-by-step sensitively to the others’ currently moving bodies. At the same time, the situation-designed structures direct the students through the partially known moves. In contrast to formal theories that consider grammar as a device for coherent expression of propositions, this study argues that grammatical structure emerges through recurrent use in a specific activity context. The video-recorded data is in Estonian.
Keywords: interactional linguistics, embodiment, instruction, emergent grammar, rhythm, synchronization, Estonian, formula, counting, repetition
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • The data
  • Counting and synchronization
  • Formula repetition and synchronization
  • The segment-by-segment emergence of linguistic structure
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Additional transcription and glossing conventions
  • References
Published online: 13 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.33.06kee
References (36)
References
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2011. “Action, Prosody and Emergent Constructions: The Case of ‘and’.” In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, ed. by Peter Auer, and Stefan Pfänder, 264–293. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Betz, Emma, Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm, Veronica Drake, and Andrea Golato. 2013. “Third-Position Repeats in German: The Case of Repair- and Request-for-Information Sequences.” Gesprächsforschung 14: 133–166.Google Scholar
Bolden, Galina. 2009. “Beyond Answering: Repeat-Prefaced Responses in Conversation.” Communication Monographs 76 (2), 121–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broth, Mathias, Jakob Cromdal, and Lena Levin. 2017. “Starting out as a Driver: Progression in Instructed Pedal work.” In Memory Practices and Learning: Interactional, institutional and sociocultural perspectives, ed. by Åsa Mäkitalo, Per Linell, and Roger Säljö, 115–152. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Broth, Mathias, and Leelo Keevallik. 2014. “Getting Ready to Move as a Couple. Accomplishing Mobile Formations in a Dance Class.” Space and Culture 17 (2): 107–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2003. “Cognitive Processes in Grammaticalization.” In The New Psychology of Language, Vol. II, ed. by Michael Tomasello, 145–167. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cekaite, Asta. 2010. “Shepherding the Child: Embodied Directive Sequences in Parent-Child Interactions.” Text and Talk 30 (1): 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca. 2016. Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting. 2018. Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Curl, Traci S., John Local, and Gareth Walker. 2006. “Repetition and the Prosody-Pragmatics Interface.” Journal of Pragmatics 38(10): 1721–1751. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2018. Changes in Turn-design over Interactional Histories – the Case of Instruction in Driving School Lessons. In Time in Embodied Interaction: Synchronicity and Sequentiality of Multimodal Resources, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Jürgen Streeck, 293–324. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Stefani, Elwys, and Anne-Danièle Gazin. 2014. “Instructional Sequences in Driving Lessons: Mobile Participants and the Temporal and Sequential Organization of Actions.” Journal of Pragmatics 65: 63–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds.). 2014. Requesting in Social Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1981. Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 1994. “Constituting and Maintaining Activities across Sequences: And-Prefacing as a Feature of Question Design.” Language in Society 23 (1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1998. “Emergent Grammar.” In The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, ed. by Michael Tomasello, 155–175. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1991. “List Construction as a Task and Resource.” In Interactional Competence, ed. by George Psathas, 63–92. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo. 2010a. “Social Action of Syntactic Reduplication.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (3): 800–824. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010b. “Marking Boundaries between Activities: The Particle nii in Estonian. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (2): 157–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Pro-forms as Projective Devices in Interaction.” Discourse Processes 48 (6): 404–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Compromising Progressivity: ‘no’-Prefacing in Estonian.” Pragmatics 22 (1): 119–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Coordinating the Temporalities of Talk and Dance.” In Temporality in Interaction, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Susanne Günthner, 309–336. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Linell, Per. 2009. Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2014a. “The Surgeon as a Camera Director: Maneuvering Video in the Operating Theatre.” In Video at Work, ed. by Mathias Broth, Eric Laurier, and Lorenza Mondada, 97–132. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2014b. “Requesting Immediate Action in the Surgical Operating Room: Time, Embodied Resources and Praxeological Embeddedness.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 269–302. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nevile, Maurice. 2015. “The Embodied Turn in Research on Language and Social Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48 (2): 121–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Ellinor, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson (eds.). 1996. Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50: 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds.). 2001. Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen, Charles Goodwin, and Curtis LeBaron (eds.). 2011. Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Svennevig, Jan. 2004. “Other-Repetition as Display of Hearing, Understanding and Emotional Stance.” Discourse Studies 6 (4): 489–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Trying the Easiest Solution First in Other-Initiated Repair.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (2): 333–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1987. “Repetition in Conversation: Toward a Poetics of Talk.” Language 63 (3): 574–605. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. Talking Vocies: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zinken, Jörg, and Arnulf Deppermann. 2017. “A Cline of Visible Commitment in the Situated Design of Imperative Turns. Evidence from German and Polish.” In Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 27–63. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Keevallik, Leelo, Emily Hofstetter, Agnes Löfgren & Sally Wiggins
2024. Repetition for real-time coordination of action: Lexical and non-lexical vocalizations in collaborative time management. Discourse Studies 26:3 ► pp. 334 ff. DOI logo
Löfgren, Agnes
2024.  The Interactional Histories of Performance Bodies : From Describing to Depicting Proposed Ideas at Opera Rehearsals . Research on Language and Social Interaction 57:3 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Reed, Beatrice Szczepek
2024. ‘You Don’t Need Me Shouting Here’: When Instructors Observe Learners in Silence. Research on Language and Social Interaction 57:2 ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
2023. ‘Go on keep going’: The instruction of sustained embodied activities. Discourse Studies 25:5 ► pp. 692 ff. DOI logo
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
2024. Escalating prosody. Interactional Linguistics 4:1 ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Yagi, Junichi
2024. “Five” or “ten”: analysing a co-operative correction in Muay Thai coaching. Sports Coaching Review 13:1 ► pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Choe, Ann Tai & Junichi Yagi
2023. Embodied remembering in coordinated performances. Multimodal Communication 12:2 ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Keevallik, Leelo, Emily Hofstetter, Ann Weatherall & Sally Wiggins
2023. Sounding others’ sensations in interaction. Discourse Processes 60:1 ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Simone, Monica & Renata Galatolo
2023. The situated deployment of the Italian presentative (e) hai. . ., ‘(and) you have. . .’ within routinized multimodal Gestalts in route mapping with visually impaired climbers. Discourse Studies 25:1 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Ehmer, Oliver & Geert Brône
2021. Instructing embodied knowledge: multimodal approaches to interactive practices for knowledge constitution. Linguistics Vanguard 7:s4 DOI logo
Helmer, Henrike
2021. Humorous or occasioned instructions: Learning the “shoulder check” in theoretical and practical driving lessons. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 31:1 ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Marrese, Olivia H., Chase Wesley Raymond, Barbara A. Fox, Cecilia E. Ford & Megan Pielke
2021. The Grammar of Obviousness: The Palm-Up Gesture in Argument Sequences. Frontiers in Communication 6 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.