Cover not available
Part of
Responding to Polar Questions across Languages and Contexts
Edited by Galina B. Bolden, John Heritage and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 35] 2023
► pp. 76–108

Chapter 3
Responding to polar questions in Brazilian Portuguese

É-responses and repeats

| University of Helsinki
| Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul | National Council for Scientific and Technological Development
This paper explores the division of labor between particle and repetitional responses to polar questions in Brazilian Portuguese. We examine a response form that occurs both as a particle and as a verb repeat – the é-response – and compare its uses to repeat responses consisting of elements other than é. Freestanding and expanded responses are analyzed to gather evidence of the participants’ orientations to the epistemic and action commitments that the initial polar responses convey. The analyses indicate that é-responses (both particle and repeat) sufficiently confirm previously established information, for instance, in response to understanding checks. In contrast, when responding to requests for confirmation about a new matter, é responses only weakly confirm the proposition in the question, indicating that it might not be true, or treat it as ancillary. Importantly, é-responses do not affirm genuinely new information but instead suggest a lack of commitment to affirming the proposition. In order to provide a committed confirmation or affirmation, minimal repetitional responses other than é are used. The study thus sheds further light on é-responses in different sequential and action environments and on the role of repetitional responses in Brazilian Portuguese, including a discussion in relation to findings from other languages.
Keywords: affirmation, Brazilian Portuguese, commitment, confirmation, conversation analysis, é-response, expansion, particle, repeat
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Polar questions and responses in Brazilian Portuguese
    • 2.1Question design
    • 2.2Response variants
  • 3.The corpus
  • 4.É-responses
    • 4.1É-particle as a freestanding response: Confirming already addressed matters
    • 4.2É-particle response expanded: Weak commitment
    • 4.3É-particle and moving on: Treating the matter as ancillary
    • 4.4É-repeat
  • 5.Repeats other than é
    • 5.1Minimal repeat as a freestanding response: Affirming new information
    • 5.2Repeat expanded: Committing and specifying
    • 5.3A further look at what repetitional responses convey
  • 6.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 27 November 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.35.03har
References (46)
References
Antaki, Charles. 2012. “Affiliative and Disaffiliative Candidate Understandings.” Discourse Studies 14 (5): 531–547. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, Meghan E. 2008. “Pragmatic Restrictions on Affirmative Response Choice in Brazilian Portuguese.” In Selected Proceedings of the 10th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, ed. by Joyce B. de Garavito and Elena Valenzuela, 288–299. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Bolden, Galina. 2016. “A simple da?: Affirming Responses to Polar Questions in Russian Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 100: 40–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting. 2018. Interactional linguistics. Studying language in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick J., and Jack Sidnell. 2015. “Language Structure and Social Agency: Confirming Polar Questions in Conversation.” Linguistics Vanguard 1 (1): 131–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nick J., Tanya Stivers, Penelope Brown, Christina Englert, Katariina Harjunpää, Makoto Hayashi, Trine Heinemann, Gertie Hoymann, Tiina Keisanen, Tiina, Mirka Rauniomaa, Chase W. Raymond, Federico Rossano, Kyung-Eun Yoon, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2019. “Polar Answers.” Journal of Linguistics 55 (2): 277–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Figueiredo, Giacomo. 2015. “Uma Descrição Sistêmico-Funcional dos Marcadores Discursivos Avaliativos em Português Brasileiro: a Gramática das Partículas Modais.” Alfa: Revista de Linguística 59 (2): 281–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guimarães, Estefania. 2007. Talking About Violence: Women Reporting Abuse in Brazil. Ph.D. thesis, University of York.
Hakulinen, Auli. 2001. “Minimal and non-minimal answers to yes-no questions.” Pragmatics 11 (1): 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 2009. “Designing Utterances for Action: Verb Repeat Responses to Assessments.” In Talk in interaction. Comparative dimensions, ed. by Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, and Jan Lindström, 124–151. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of social action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Questioning in Medicine.” In “Why do you ask?”: The function of questions in institutional discourse, ed. by Alice Freed and Susan Ehrlich, 42–68. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45: 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond. 2012. “Navigating Epistemic Landscapes: Acquiescence, Agency and Resistance in Responses to Polar Questions.” In Questions. Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. by Jan P. de Ruiter, 179–192. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1978. “What’s in a “Nyem”?”, Sociology 12 (1): 135–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1984. “On Stepwise Transition from Talk about a Trouble to Inappropriately Next-Positioned Matters.” In Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 191–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kato, Mary A., Martins, Ana Maria, and Jairo Nunes. 2023. The Syntax of Portuguese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo. 2010. “Minimal Answers to yes/no Questions in the Service of Sequence Organization.” Discourse Studies 12 (3): 283–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, and David Fanshel. 1977. Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Laury, Ritva. 2018. “The Finnish Verb Repeat Response: Its Emergence and Its Nature as a Formulaic Expression.” Journal of Pragmatics 123: 139–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 2012. “Interrogative Intimations: On a Possible Social Economics of Interrogatives.” In Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives, ed. by Jan P. De Ruiter, 11–32. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindström, Anna. 2017. “Accepting Remote Proposals.” In Enabling Human Conduct: Studies of talk-in-interaction in honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff, ed. by Geoffrey Raymond, Gene H. Lerner and John Heritage, 125–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moraes, João Antônio de. 1999. “Intonation in Brazilian Portuguese.” In Intonation Systems. A Survey of Twenty Languages, ed. by Daniel Hirst and Albert Di Cristo, 179–194. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oloff, Florence. 2014. “L’évaluation des complétions collaboratives: analyse séquentielle et multimodale de tours de parole co-construits.” SHS Web of Conferences 8, 4e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, 2125–2145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ostermann, Ana Cristina, and Camila de Almeida Teixeira. 2017. “Small Things that Matter a Lot’: the Deontic Nature of ‘né.” Presentation at 18th AILA Congress. Rio de Janeiro.
Pomerantz, Anita. 1980. “Telling My Side: “Limited Access” as a “Fishing” Device.” In Language and social interaction. Sociological Inquiry 50 (3/4): 186–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review 68 (6): 939–967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010a. “Prosodic variation in responses: the case of type-conforming responses to yes/no interrogatives.” In Prosody in Interaction, ed. by Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber & Margrit Selting, 109–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010b. “Grammar and Social Relations. Alternative Forms of Yes/No–Type Initiating Actions in Health Visitor Interactions.” In “Why do you ask?”: The function of questions in institutional discourse, ed. by Alice Freed and Susan Ehrlich, 87–107. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “At the Intersection of Turn and Sequence Organization. On the Relevance of “Slots” in Type-Conforming Responses to Polar Interrogatives.” In Units of Talk – Units of Action, ed. by Beatrice Szczepek Reed and Geoffrey Raymond, 69–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosemeyer, Malte, and Scott A. Schwenter. 2019. “Echoic and non-echoic confirming affirmative responses in spoken Brazilian Portuguese.” Journal of Pragmatics 141, 80–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on conversation (vols. 1 & 2). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Santos, Ana Lúcia. 2003. “The Acquisition of Answers to yes/no Questions in European Portuguese: Syntactic, Discourse and Pragmatic Factors.” Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 2: 61–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. “Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action.” American Journal of Sociology 102 (1): 161–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret. 1996. “Prosody as an Activity-Type Distinctive Cue in Conversation: the Case of So-called “Astonished” Questions in Repair Initiation.” In Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Margret Selting, 231–270. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seuren, Lucas M., and Mike Huiskes. 2017. “Confirmation or Elaboration: What Do Yes/No Declaratives Want?” Research on Language and Social Interaction 50 (2): 188–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena. 2001a. Responding in Conversation: A Study of Response Particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001b. “Simple answers to polar questions: The case of Finnish.” In Studies in interactional linguistics, ed. by Margret Selting and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 405–429. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, and Auli Hakulinen. 2009. “Alternative responses to assessments.” In Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives, ed. by Jack Sidnell, 281–303. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steensig, Jakob, and Trine Heinemann. 2013. “When ‘yes’ is not enough as an answer to a yes/no question.” In Units of Talk – Units of Action, ed. by Beatrice Szczepek Reed and Geoffrey Raymond, 207–241. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2005. “Modified repeats. One Method for Asserting Primary Rights From Second Position.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 38 (2): 131–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. “How We Manage Social Relationships Through Answers to Questions: The Case of Interjections.” Discourse Processes 56 (3): 191–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Makoto Hayashi. 2010. “Transformative answers: One way to resist a question’s constraints.” Language in Society 39 (1): 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2015. Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Urbano, Hudinilson, Leonor Fávero, Maria Lúcia Andrade, and Zilda Aquino. 1993. “Perguntas e respostas na conversação (‘Questions and responses in conversation’).” In Gramática do português falado. Vol. III, ed. by Atalíbio Teixeira de Castilho, 75–97. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar