Cover not available
Part of
Responding to Polar Questions across Languages and Contexts
Edited by Galina B. Bolden, John Heritage and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 35] 2023
► pp. 239–271

Chapter 8
Code-switching, agency, and the answer possibility space of Spanish-English bilinguals

| University of Colorado Boulder
The present study addresses the implicit monolingual bias in our understanding of polar question-answer sequences by examining them in bilingual conversation. Drawing upon a corpus of naturally-occurring conversational data amongst native Spanish-English bilinguals in the southwestern United States, I target and explore the ‘fit’ between polar questions and answers in this community of practice. In this report, I focus specifically on the dimension of language (non-)concordance between particle answers and the questions they address. Evidence is offered that speakers produce response particles that are concordant with the language of the question as the pragmatically unmarked answer format, whereas response particles that are non-concordant with the language of the question (i.e., ‘code-switched’) are marked, produced agentively and for cause, routinely indexing an emergent stance that is at variance with the terms established by the question. Some possible avenues for future comparative work on the expression of agency in question-answer sequences are explored in the Conclusion.
Keywords: code-switching, bilingualism, agency, polar questions, answers, conversation analysis, English, Spanish (in the U.S.), heritage speakers
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data & methods
  • 3.The bilingual answer possibility space
    • 3.1Language concordance vs. non-concordance
    • 3.2Language-concordant particles
    • 3.3Language-non-concordant particles
  • 4.Discussion and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 27 November 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.35.08ray
References (92)
References
Atkinson, J. Maxwell, and John Heritage (eds). 1984. Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter. 1984. Bilingual Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. “The Pragmatics of Code-Switching: A Sequential Approach.” In One Speaker, Two Languages: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Code-Switching, ed. by Lesley Milroy, and Pieter Muysken, 115–135. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “The Monolingual Bias in Bilingualism Research, or: Why Bilingual Talk is (Still) a Challenge for Linguists.” In Bilingualism: A Social Approach, ed. by Monica S. Heller, 319–339. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolden, Galina B. 2009. “Implementing Incipient Actions: The Discourse Marker ‘so’ in English Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (5): 974–998. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolden, Galina B. 2018. “Speaking ‘Out of Turn’: Epistemics in Action in Other-Initiated Repair.” Discourse Studies 20 (1): 142–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1978. “Yes-No Questions are Not Alternative Questions.” In Questions, ed. by Henry Hiż, 87–105. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cashman, Holly R. 2005. “Identities at Play: Language Preference and Group Membership in Bilingual Talk in Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 37 (3): 301–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. “Conversation and Interactional Analysis.” The Blackwell Guide to Research Methods in Bilingualism and Multilingualism, ed. by Li Wei and Melissa G. Moyer, 275–295. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cashman, Holly R., and Chase Wesley Raymond. 2014. “Doing Gender in Soccer (Football) and Beyond: Making Gender Relevant in Spanish-Language Broadcast Discourse.” Gender & Language 8 (3): 311–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E., and Virginia Teas Gill. 2004. “Conversation Analysis.” In Handbook of Data Analysis, ed. by Alan Byman and Melissa Hardy, 589–606. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca. 2016. Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clift, Rebecca, and Chase Wesley Raymond. 2018. “Actions in Practice: On Details in Collections.” Discourse Studies 20 (1): 90–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting. 2018. Interactional Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul. 2009. “‘Quit Talking While I’m Interrupting:’ (A Comparison between) Positions of Overlap Onset in Conversation.” In Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions, ed. by Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, and Jan Lindström, 70–93. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Turn Design.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 131–49. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2018. “Epistemics in Social Interaction.” Discourse Studies 20 (1): 163–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J., Stivers, T., Brown, P., Englert, C., Harjunpää, K., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, G., Keisanen, T., Rauniomaa, M., Raymond, C. W., Rossano, F., Yoon, K.-E., Zwitserlood, I., & Levinson, S. C. 2019. “Polar answers.” Journal of Linguistics 55 (2): 277–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gafaranga, Joseph. 2005. “Demythologising Language Alternation Studies: Conversational Structure vs. Social Structure in Bilingual Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 37: 281–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gafaranga, Joseph, and Maria-Carme Torras. 2002. “Interactional Otherness: Towards a Redefinition of Codeswitching.” International Journal of Bilingualism 6 (1): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granados, Daniel. 2021. “Atenuación y expansión de ahorita en la Ciudad de México, un cambio analizado desde el tiempo aparente [Reduction and expansion of ahorita ‘now.DIM’ in Mexico City, an apparent-time study].” Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México 8: e202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, François. 1998. “Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1: 131–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gubina, Alexandra. 2021. “Functions and operational levels of the response particle ‘doch’ in spoken German.” Talk given at Arbeitstagung zur Gesprächsforschung, March 24–26.
Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli. 2001. “Minimal and Non-minimal Answers to Yes-no Questions.” Pragmatics 11: 1–16.Google Scholar
Hänggi, Philipp. 2022. “Language Choice and the Multilingual Soundscape: Overhearing as a Resource for Recipient-Design in Impromptu First-Time Encounters.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 55 (4): 299–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayano, Kaoru. 2013. “Question Design in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 395–414. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heinemann, Trine. 2009. “Two Answers to Inapposite Inquiries.” In Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, edited by Jack Sidnell, 159–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heller, Monica S. 1982. “Negotiations of Language Choice in Montreal.” In Language and Social Identity, edited by John J. Gumperz, 108–18. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984a. “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1984b. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
. 1998. “Oh-Prefaced Responses to Inquiry.” Language in Society 27 (3): 291–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Questioning in Medicine.” In “Why Do You Ask?”: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse, ed. by Alice F. Freed and Susan Ehrlich, 42–68. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Chase Wesley Raymond. 2021. “Preference and Polarity: Epistemic Stance in Question Design.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 54 (1): 39–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond. 2012. “Navigating Epistemic Landscapes: Acquiescence, Agency and Resistance in Responses to Polar Questions.” In Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. by J. P. De Ruiter, 179–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth. 1996. “Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 29 (3): 219–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1981. “The abominable ‘ne?’: A working paper exploring the phenomenon of post-response pursuit of response.” Occasional Paper No. 6, Sociology, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
. 1984a. “Notes on Some Orderlinesses of Overlap Onset.” In Discourse Analysis and Natural Rhetoric, ed. by V. D’Urso and P. Leonardi, 11–38. Padua: Cleup Editore.Google Scholar
. 1984b. “On Stepwise Transition From Talk About a Trouble to Inappropriately Next-Positioned Matters.” In Structures of Social Action, edited by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 191–221. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1984c. “On the Organization of Laughter in Talk About Troubles.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 346–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by G. H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo. 2010. “Minimal Answers to Yes/No Questions in the Service of Sequence Organization.” Discourse Studies 12 (3):283–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koivisto, Aino. 2013. “On the Preference for Remembering: Acknowledging an Answer with Finnish ai nii(n) (“Oh that’s right”).” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46: 277–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Küttner, Uwe-A. 2018. “Investigating inferences in sequences of action: The case of claiming ‘just-now’ recollection with Oh that’s right.” Open Linguistics 4: 101–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Küttner, Uwe-A., and Chase Wesley Raymond. 2022. “I was gonna say…: On the Doubly Reflexive Character of a Meta-Communicative Practice.” In Sprachreflexive Praktiken: Empirische Perspektiven auf Metakommunikation, ed. by Florian Busch, Pepe Droste, and Elisa Wessels, 51–73. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2006. “On the Human ‘Interactional Engine.’” In Roots of Human Sociality: Cognition, Culture, and Interaction, ed. by N. J. Enfield and Stephen C. Levinson, 39–69. London: Berg.Google Scholar
Malaver, Irania. 2017. “Ahorita: Lexicalización y cambio lingüístico en la comunidad de habla caraqueña [Ahorita (now.DIM): Lexicalization and Lingusitic Change in the Speech Community of Caracas].” Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica LXV (1): 27–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Lesley, and Li Wei. 1995. “A Social Network Approach to Code-Switching: The Example of a Bilingual Community in Britain.” In One Speaker, Two Languages: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Code-Switching, ed. by P. Muysken and L. Milroy, 136–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2018. “Greetings as a Device to Find Out and Establish the Language of Service Encounters in Multilingual Settings.” Journal of Pragmatics 126: 10–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Innhwa. 2010. “Marking an Impasse: The Use of anyway as a Sequence-Closing Device.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 3283–3299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita M., and John Heritage. 2013. “Preference.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 210–28. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Raymond, Chase Wesley. 2014. On the Sequential Negotiation of Identity in Spanish-Language Discourse: Mobilizing Linguistic Resources in the Service of Social Action. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
. 2015. “Questions and Responses in Spanish Monolingual and Spanish-English Bilingual Conversation.” Language & Communication 42: 50–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “Indexing a Contrast: The Do-construction in English Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 118: 22–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “On the Relevance and Accountability of Dialect: Conversation Analysis and Contact Linguistics.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 22 (2): 161–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. “Intersubjectivity, Normativity, and Grammar.” Social Psychology Quarterly 82 (2): 182–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. “Negotiating Language on the Radio in Los Angeles.” In Spanish in the Global City, edited by Andrew Lynch, 406–29. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2022. “Suffixation and Sequentiality: Notes on the Study of Morphology in Interaction.” Interactional Linguistics 2 (1): 1–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Chase Wesley, Holly R. Cashman. 2021. “Institutional Roles as Interactional Achievements: The Epistemics of Sports Commentary.” In Contexts of Co-Constructed Discourse: Interaction, Pragmatics, and Second Language Applications (Festschrift in Honor of Dale Koike, ed. by Lori Czerwionka, Rachel Showstack, and Judith Liskin-Gasparro, 23–45. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Chase Wesley, Rebecca Clift, and John Heritage. 2021. “Reference without Anaphora: On Agency through Grammar.” Linguistics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences 59 (3): 715–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Chase Wesley, and John Heritage. 2021. “Probability and Valence: Two Preferences in the Design of Polar Questions and Their Management.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 54 (1): 60–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Chase Wesley, and Luis Manuel Olguín. 2022. Análisis de La Conversación: Fundamentos, Metodología y Alcances. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Chase Wesley, Jeffrey D. Robinson, Barbara A. Fox, Sandra A. Thompson, and Kristella Montiegl. 2021. “Modulating Action through Minimization: Syntax in the Service of Offering and Requesting.” Language in Society 50: 53–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Chase Wesley, and Tanya Stivers. 2016. “The Omnirelevance of Accountability: Off-Record Account Solicitations.” In Accountability in Social Interaction, ed. by Jeffrey D. Robinson, 321–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Chase Wesley, and Anne Elizabeth Clark White. 2022. “On the Recognitionality of References to Time in Social Interaction.” Language & Communication 83: 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. “Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding.” American Sociological Review 68: 939–967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey D. 2013. “Epistemics, Action Formation, and Other-Initiation of Repair: The Case of Partial Questioning Repeats.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, 261–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2020. One type of polar, information-seeking question and its stance of probability: Implications for the preference for agreement. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(4):425–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1984. “Notes on Methodology.” In Structures of Social Action, edited by J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, 21–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1987 [1973]. “On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button and John R. E. Lee, 54–69. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1993. “Reflections on Quantification in the Study of Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26: 99–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. “Confirming Allusions: Toward an Empirical Account of Action.” American Journal of Sociology 102 (1): 161–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks. 1977. “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53: 361–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret. 1996. “Prosody as an Activity-Type Distinctive Cue in Conversation: The Case of So-Called ‘Astonished’ Questions in Repair Initiation.” In Prosody in Conversation, ed. by E. Couper-Kuhlen and M. Selting, 231–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seuren, Lucas M., Mike Huiskes, and Tom Koole. 2016. “Remembering and Understanding with Oh-Prefaced Yes/No Declaratives in Dutch.” Journal of Pragmatics 104: 180–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, Jack, and Tanya Stivers. 2013. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena. 2001. “Simple Answers to Polar Questions: The Case of Finnish.” In Studies in Interactional Linguistics, edited by Margret Selting and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 405–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2010. “An Overview of the Question-Response System in American English.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (10): 2772–2781. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Morality and Question Design: ‘Of Course’ as Contesting a Presupposition of Askability.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, edited by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 82–106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. The Book of Answers: Alignment, Autonomy, and Affiliation in Social Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and N. J. Enfield. 2010. “A Coding Scheme for Question-Response Sequences in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (10): 2620–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Nicholas J. Enfield, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2010. “Question-Response Sequences in Conversation across Ten Languages.” Journal of Pragmatics (Special Issue: October 2010) 42: 2615–2860.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Makoto Hayashi. 2010. “Transformative Answers: One Way to Resist a Question’s Constraints.” Language in Society 39: 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2015. Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wei, Li. 1994. Three Generations, Two Languages, One Family: Language Choice and Language Shift in a Chinese Community in Britain. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
. 1998. “The ‘Why’ and ‘How’ Questions in the Analysis of Conversational Code-Switching.” In Code-Switching in Conversation: Language, Interaction and Identity, ed. by Peter Auer, 156–76. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
. 2002. “‘What Do You Want Me to Say?’ On the Conversation Analysis Approach to Bilingual Interaction.” Language in Society 31 (2): 159–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wei, Li, and Lesley Milroy. 1995. “Conversational Code-Switching in a Chinese Community in Britain: A Sequential Analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics 23: 281–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, Sue, and Celia Kitzinger. 2006. “Surprise as an Interactional Achievement: Reaction Tokens in Conversation.” Social Psychology Quarterly 69: 150–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar