Part of
Responding to Polar Questions across Languages and Contexts
Edited by Galina B. Bolden, John Heritage and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 35] 2023
► pp. 301327
Forsberg, Hannele
1994 “Havaintoja kysymystyypistä otat sie ~ [Observations on the question type otat sie ~ sä].” Virittäjä 98: 60–68.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli
2001 “On Some Uses of the Discourse Particle kyl() in Finnish Conversation.” In Studies in Interactional Linguistics, ed. by Margret Selting, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 171–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja Riitta Heinonen, and Irja Alho
2004Iso suomen kielioppi [Comprehensive grammar of Finnish]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
John 6:63, Holy Bible: King James Version
Available online at: [URL] [accessed 2 Aug. 2019]
Karttunen, Lauri
1971 “Implicative Verbs.” Language 47 (2): 340–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koivisto, Aino
2015 “Dealing with Ambiguities in Informings: Finnish Aijaa as a “Neutral” News Receipt.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 48 (4): 365–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “Receipting Information as Newsworthy vs. Responding to Redirection: Finnish News Particles Aijaa and Aha(a).” Journal of Pragmatics 104: 163–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koivisto, Aino, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2021 ”OKAY as a response to informings in Finnish.” In OKAY across languages. Toward a comparative approach to its use in talk-in-interaction, ed. by Emma Betz, Arnulf Deppermann, Lorenza Mondada, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 206–233. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kurhila, Salla, and Inkeri Lehtimaja
2019 “Dealing with Numbers: Nurses Informing Doctors and Patients about Test Results.” Discourse Studies 21 (2): 180–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “The Finnish Verb Repeat Response: Its Emergence and its Nature as a Formulaic Expression.” Journal of Pragmatics 123: 139–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Seung-Hee
2011 “Responding at a Higher Level: Activity Progressivity in Calls for Service.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 904–917. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1981 “Some Pre-Observations on the Modelling of Dialogue.” Discourse Processes 4: 93–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogden, Richard, Auli Hakulinen, and Liisa Tainio
2004 “Indexing ‘No News’ with Stylization in Finnish”. In Sound Patterns in Interaction: Cross-linguistic Studies from Conversation, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Cecilia E. Ford, 299–334. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogden, Richard, and Sara Routarinne
2005 “The Communicative Functions of Final Rises in Finnish Intonation.” Phonetica: International Journal of Phonetic Science 62 (2–4): 160–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1988 “Multiple Interpretations of Context: How Are They Useful?Research on Language and Social Interaction 31 (1): 123–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “Inferring the Purpose of a Prior Query and Responding Accordingly.” In Enabling Human Conduct, ed. by Geoffrey Raymond, Gene H. Lerner, and John Heritage, 61–77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021Asking and Telling in Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, USA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raevaara, Liisa
1993Kysyminen toimintana. Kysymys-vastaus vieruspareista arkikeskustelussa [Asking as action. On question-answer adjacency pairs in everyday conversations]. Licentiate thesis, Finnish language. University of Helsinki.
Raymond, Chase Wesley, Rebecca Clift, and John Heritage
2021 “Reference without anaphora: on agency through grammar.” Linguistics, 59(3): 715–755. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey
2003 “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Type Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review, 68: 939–967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, and Emanuel A. Schegloff
1979 “Two Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons in Conversation and Their Interaction.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 15–21. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1996 “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra Thompson, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena
2001a “Simple Answers to Polar Questions: the Case of Finnish.” In Studies in Interactional Linguistics, ed. by Margret Selting, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 405–431. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa, Auli Hakulinen, and Anna Vatanen
2020 “Prosody and Grammar of Other-repetitions in Finnish: Repair Initiations, registerings and affectivity”. Language in Society 49(4): 553–584. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Makoto Hayashi
2010 “Transformative Answers: One Way to Resist a Question’s Constraints”. Language in Society 39: 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vepsäläinen, Heidi
2019Suomen no-partikkeli ja kysymyksiin vastaaminen keskustelussa [The Finnish particle no and answering questions in conversation]. Doctoral dissertation, Finnish language. University of Helsinki.
Vilkuna, Maria
1997 “Into and out of the standard language: the particle ni in Finnish.” In Taming the Vernacular. From Dialect to Written Standard Language, ed. by Jenny Cheshire, and Dieter Stein, 51–67. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Walker, Traci, Paul Drew, and John Local
2011 “Responding Indirectly.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (9): 2434–2451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar