Introducing the “Parallel European Corpus of Informal Interaction” (PECII)
A novel resource for exploring cross-situational and cross-linguistic variability in social interaction
This article introduces the Parallel European Corpus of Informal Interaction
(PECII), a multi-language video-corpus of social interactions in a range of informal settings and activity-contexts.
After describing the basic motivation for its compilation, the design principles that underlie its composition and the
data it contains, we illustrate PECII’s usefulness for comparative Interactional Linguistic (IL) and Conversation
Analytic (CA) research. We do this by offering an analytic sketch of the practices people use to initiate turns that
interfere with and seek to rectify another’s (problematic) behavior, focusing on their variability across languages
and settings/activity-contexts. By maximizing the comparability of interactional data, PECII not only promotes the enhancement of cross-linguistic research in IL, it also opens up new avenues for
exploring “cross-situational” variability (so-called “situation design”).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The Parallel European Corpus of Informal Interaction (PECII): Conceptual origins, design principles, and composition
- 3.Using PECII: An exemplifying analytic sketch
- 3.1Sketching the analytic domain and locating a target phenomenon: Interventions and intervention-initiation
techniques
- 3.2Cross-situational comparison in a given language
- 3.3Cross-linguistic comparison
- 4.Summary
-
Notes
-
References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (73)
References
Arminen, Ilkka. 2009. “On
Comparative Methodology in Studies of Social
Interaction.” In Talk in Interaction: Comparative
Dimensions, ed. by Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, and Jan Lindström, 48–69. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society (SKS).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Austin, John L. 1957. “I. – A Plea for
Excuses: The Presidential Address.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian
Society 57 (1): 1–30. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baranova, Julija, and Mark Dingemanse. 2016. “Reasons
for Requests.” Discourse
Studies 18 (6): 641–675. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Betz, Emma. 2015. “Indexing
Epistemic Access through Different Confirmation Formats: Uses of Responsive (das) stimmt in
German Interaction.” Journal of
Pragmatics 87: 251–266. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Betz, Emma, Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm, and Peter Golato. 2020. “Mobilizing
Others: An Introduction.” In Mobilizing Others:
Grammar and Lexis within Larger Activities, ed. by Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm, Emma Betz, and Peter Golato, 1–18. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Caillois, Roger. 2001. Man,
Play, and Games. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Eve V. 2009. First Language
Acquisition. 2nd ed. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clayman, Steven E. 2013. “Agency in
Response: The Role of Prefatory Address Terms.” Journal of
Pragmatics 57: 290–302. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clift, Rebecca, and Chase Wesley Raymond. 2018. “Actions
in Practice: On Details in Collections.” Discourse
Studies 20 (1): 90–119. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten. 2011. “A
System for Transcribing Talk-in-Interaction: GAT 2 (Translated and Adapted for
English).” Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen
Interaktion 12: 1–51.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting. 2001. “Introducing
Interactional Linguistics.” In Studies in
Interactional Linguistics, ed. by Margret Selting and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 1–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Marget Selting. 2018. Interactional
Linguistics: Studying Language in Social
Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Craven, Alexandra, and Jonathan Potter. 2010. “Directives:
Entitlement and Contingency in Action.” Discourse
Studies 12 (4): 419–42. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2021. “Social
Actions.” In The Cambridge Handbook of
Sociopragmatics, ed. by Michael Haugh, Dániel Z. Kádár, and Marina Terkourafi, 1st
ed., 69–94. Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dingemanse, Mark, Seán G. Roberts, Julija Baranova, Joe Blythe, Paul Drew, Simeon Floyd, Rosa S. Gisladottir, et al. 2015. “Universal
Principles in the Repair of Communication Problems.” PLOS
ONE 10 (9): e0136100. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Droste, Pepe. 2020. “Alternativen
namentlicher Anrede als Ressourcen sozialen Handelns: Ein Fall für die Interaktionale
Onomastik.” Namenkundliche
Informationen 112: 143–171. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Egbert, Maria. 1997. “Schisming:
The Collaborative Transformation From a Single Conversation to Multiple
Conversations.” Research on Language & Social
Interaction 30 (1): 1–51. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Emerson, Robert M., and Sheldon L. Messinger. 1977. “The
Micro-Politics of Trouble.” Social
Problems 25 (2): 121–134. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Floyd, Simeon. 2021. “Conversation
and Culture.” Annual Review of
Anthropology 50 (1): 14.1–14.22. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Floyd, Simeon, Giovanni Rossi, and Nick J. Enfield. 2020. Getting
Others to Do Things: A Pragmatic Typology of
Recruitments. Berlin: Language Science Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, Marjorie H., and Charles Goodwin. 2012. “Car
Talk: Integrating Texts, Bodies, and Changing
Landscapes.” Semiotica 191: 257–286. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, Marjorie H., and Asta Cekaite. 2013. “Calibration
in Directive/Response Sequences in Family Interaction.” Journal of
Pragmatics 46 (1): 122–138. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, Marjorie H., and Heather Loyd. 2020. “The
Face of Noncompliance in Family Interaction.” Text &
Talk 40 (5): 573–598. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hepburn, Alexa, and Jonathan Potter. 2011. “Threats:
Power, Family Mealtimes, and Social Influence.” British Journal of Social
Psychology 50 (1): 99–120. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heritage, John. 2013. “Turn-Initial
Position and Some of Its Occupants.” Journal of
Pragmatics 57: 331–337. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoey, Elliott M., and Chase Wesley Raymond. 2022. “Managing
Conversation Analysis Data.” In The Open Handbook of
Linguistic Data Management, ed. by Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker, Bradley McDonnell, Eve Koller, and Lauren B. Collister, 257–266. The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hofstetter, Emily. 2021. “Achieving
Preallocation: Turn Transition Practices in Board Games.” Discourse
Processes 58 (2): 113–133. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jefferson, Gail. 1972. “Side
Sequences.” In Studies in Social
Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow, 294–338. New York: Free Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jefferson, Gail. 1979. “A
Technique for Inviting Laughter and Its Subsequent
Acceptance/Declination.” In Everyday Language:
Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 79–96. New York, London: Irvington.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keel, Sara. 2016. Socialization:
Parent-Child Interaction in Everyday Life. Directions in Ethnomethodology and Conversation
Analysis. London / New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kendrick, Kobin H., and Paul Drew. 2016. “Recruitment:
Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction.” Research
on Language and Social
Interaction 49 (1): 1–19. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kent, Alexandra. 2012. “Compliance,
Resistance and Incipient Compliance When Responding to Directives.” Discourse
Studies 14 (6): 711–730. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kent, Alexandra, and Kobin H. Kendrick. 2016. “Imperative
Directives: Orientations to Accountability.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 49 (3): 272–88. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kidwell, Mardi. 2013. “Availability
as a Trouble Source in Directive-Response
Sequences.” In Conversational Repair and Human
Understanding, ed. by Geoffrey Raymond, Makoto Hayashi, and Jack Sidnell, 234–60. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kornfeld, Laurenz, and Giovanni Rossi. 2023. “Enforcing
Rules During Play: Knowledge, Agency, and the Design of Instructions and
Reminders.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 56 (1): 42–64. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Küttner, Uwe-A., Anna Vatanen, and Jörg Zinken. 2022. “Invoking
Rules in Everyday Family Interactions: A Method for Appealing to Practical
Reason.” Human
Studies 45: 793–823. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lerner, Gene H. 2003. “Selecting next
Speaker: The Context-Sensitive Operation of a Context-Free
Organization.” Language in
Society 32 (2): 177–201. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lerner, Gene H., and Tomoyo Takagi. 1999. “On
the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: A Co-Investigation of English
and Japanese Grammatical Practices.” Journal of
Pragmatics 31 (1): 49–75. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liberman, Kenneth. 2013. More
Studies in Ethnomethodology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary
Anthropology. “Leipzig Glossing Rules,” last
modified May 31,
2015. [URL]
Maynard, Douglas W., and Steven E. Clayman. 2003. “Ethnomethodology
and Conversation Analysis.” In Handbook of Symbolic
Interactionism, ed. by Larry T. Reynolds and Nancy J. Herman-Kinney, 173–202. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mondada, Lorenza. 2009. “The
Methodical Organization of Talking and Eating: Assessments in Dinner
Conversations.” Food Quality and
Preference 20 (8): 558–571. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mondada, Lorenza. 2012. “Talking
and Driving: Multiactivity in the
Car.” Semiotica 191: 223–256. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mondada, Lorenza. 2018. “The
Multimodal Interactional Organization of Tasting: Practices of Tasting Cheese in Gourmet
Shops.” Discourse
Studies 20 (6): 743–769. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mondada, Lorenza. 2019. “Multimodal
Transcription,” last modified November 2019. [URL]
Ninio, Anat, and Catherine E. Snow. 1999. “The
Development of Pragmatics: Learning to Use Language
Appropriately.” In Handbook of Child Language
Acquisition, ed. by William C. Ritchie and Tej K. Bhatia, 347–383. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Potter, Jonathan, and Alexa Hepburn. 2020. “Shaming
Interrogatives: Admonishments, the Social Psychology of Emotion, and Discursive Practices of Behaviour
Modification in Family Mealtimes.” British Journal of Social
Psychology 59 (2): 347–364. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Raymond, Chase Wesley. 2022. “Suffixation
and Sequentiality: Notes on the Study of Morphology in Interaction.” Interactional
Linguistics 2 (1): 1–41.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rossi, Giovanni. 2020. “Other-Repetition
in Conversation across Languages: Bringing Prosody into Pragmatic
Typology.” Language in
Society 49 (4): 495–520. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rossi, Giovanni, Simeon Floyd, and Nick J. Enfield. 2020. “Recruitments
and Pragmatic Typology.” In Getting Others to Do
Things: A Pragmatic Typology of Recruitments, ed. by Simeon Floyd, Giovanni Rossi, Nick J. Enfield, Kobin H. Kendrick, Joe Blythe, Jörg Zinken, Julija Baranova, and Mark Dingemanse, 1–23. Berlin: Language Science Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A
Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for
Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1968. “Sequencing in
Conversational Openings.” American
Anthropologist 70 (6): 1075–1095. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1989. “Reflections on
Language, Development, and the Interactional Character of
Talk-in-Interaction.” In Interaction in Human
Development, ed. by Marc H. Bornstein and Jerome S. Bruner, 139–153. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. “Confirming
Allusions: Toward an Empirical Account of Action.” American Journal of
Sociology 102 (1): 161–216. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2005. “On
Complainability.” Social
Problems 52 (4): 449–476. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence Organization
in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Volume
1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2009. “One Perspective
on Conversation Analysis: Comparative
Perspectives.” In Conversation Analysis:
Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Jack Sidnell, 357–406. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks. 1977. “The
Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in
Conversation.” Language 53 (2): 361–82. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Irene Koshik, Sally Jacoby, and David Olsher. 2002. “Conversation
Analysis and Applied Linguistics.” Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics 22 (March): 3–31. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmidt, Marco F. H., Hannes Rakoczy, and Michael Tomasello. 2019. “Eighteen-Month-Old
Infants Correct Non-Conforming Actions by
Others.” Infancy 24 (4): 613–35. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sidnell, Jack. 2007. “Comparative
Studies in Conversation Analysis.” Annual Review of
Anthropology 36 (1): 229–44. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sidnell, Jack, ed. 2009. Conversation
Analysis: Comparative
Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sterponi, Laura. 2003. “Account
Episodes in Family Discourse: The Making of Morality in Everyday
Interaction.” Discourse
Studies 5 (1): 79–100. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stivers, Tanya, Nick J. Enfield, Penelope Brown, Christina Englert, Makoto Hayashi, Trine Heinemann, Gertie Hoymann, et al.. 2009. “Universals
and Cultural Variation in Turn-Taking in Conversation.” Proceedings of the
National Academy of
Sciences 106 (26): 10587–10592. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thurmair, Maria. 1989. Modalpartikeln
und ihre Kombinationen. Tübingen: M. Niemeyer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vatanen, Anna. 2014. “Responding
in Overlap: Agency, Epistemicity and Social Action in
Conversation.” University of Helsinki. [URL]
Walker, Gareth. 2013. “Young
Children’s Use of Laughter after Transgressions.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 46 (4): 363–382. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Watson, Rodney D. 2008. “Comparative
Sociology, Laic and Analytic: Some Critical Remarks on Comparison in Conversation
Analysis.” Cahiers de
Praxématique 50: 197–238. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wiggins, Sally. 2002. “Talking
with Your Mouth Full: Gustatory Mmms and the Embodiment of
Pleasure.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 35 (3): 311–336. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wootton, Anthony J. 1997. Interaction and the
Development of Mind. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zinken, Jörg. 2016. Requesting
Responsibility: The Morality of Grammar in Polish and English Family
Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zinken, Jörg, and Eva Ogiermann. 2013. “Responsibility
and Action: Invariants and Diversity in Requests for Objects in British English and Polish
Interaction.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 46 (3): 256–276. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)