Cover not available
Part of
New Perspectives in Interactional Linguistic Research
Edited by Margret Selting and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 36] 2024
► pp. 162–186

E anche-prefaced other-expansions in multi-person interaction

On the interrelationship of syntax and mutual gaze

 | KU Leuven | University of Neuchâtel
 | KU Leuven | University of Heidelberg
This chapter investigates a practice used in Italian talk-in-interaction, whereby a speaker self-selects and expands the prior speaker’s talk with a grammatically dependent turn prefaced by e anche ‘and also’. The practice is used either to affiliate or disaffiliate with prior talk, and occurs in different gaze constellations: (1) a speaker may gaze at the prior speaker and subsequently initiate an e anche-prefaced other-expansion, thus receiving the prior speaker’s gaze; (2) speakers may establish mutual gaze before, or precisely at the moment at which the other-expansion is articulated. Such gaze behavior is sensitive to the action speakers accomplish. This chapter offers advances in Interactional Linguistics by examining a previously neglected grammatical resource (e anche) and concomitant gaze-behavior in multi-person interaction.
Keywords: (dis)affiliation, gaze constellation, multi-person interaction, participation, self-selection, other-expansions, Italian, grammar, Interactional Linguistics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Prior research
    • 2.1E anche
    • 2.2Gaze in interaction
    • 2.3Other-expansions
  • 3.Data and methods
  • 4.Displays of (dis)affiliation
    • 4.1Affiliating with an e anche-prefaced other-expansion
    • 4.2Disaffiliating with an e anche-prefaced other-expansion
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 26 August 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.36.06cal
References (45)
References
Atkinson, J. Maxwell, and Paul Drew. 1979. Order in Court. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter. 2015. “The Temporality of Language in Interaction: Projection and Latency.” In Temporality in Interaction, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Susanne Günthner, 27–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. “Turn-allocation and Gaze: A Multimodal Revision of the ‘Current-speaker-selects-next’ Rule of the Turn-taking System of Conversation Analysis.” Discourse Studies 23, 2: 117–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolden, Galina. 2010. “‘Articulating the Unsaid’ via And-prefaced Formulations of Others’ Talk.” Discourse Studies 12, 1: 5–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calabria, Virginia. 2022. “Collaborative Grammar: The Temporality and Emergence of Clause Combination in Italian Talk-in-interaction.” Unpublished PhD thesis, KU Leuven, Leuven.
Calabria, Virginia, and Elwys De Stefani. 2020. “Per una grammatica situata: Aspetti temporali e multimodali dell’incrementazione sintattica.” Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica ed Applicata 49: 571–601.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting. 2018. Interactional Linguistics. Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Tsuyoshi Ono. 2007. “‘Incrementing’ in Conversation. A Comparison of Practices in English, German and Japanese.” Pragmatics 17, 4: 513–552.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul. 1997. “‘Open’ Class Repair Initiators in Response to Sequential Sources of Troubles in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 28, 1: 69–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1961. Encounters. Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Indianapolis, Indiana: The Bobbs-Merrill Company Inc.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1979. “The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 97–121. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
. 1980. “Restarts, Pauses, and the Achievement of a State of Mutual Gaze at Turn-beginning.” Social Inquiry 50, 3–4: 272–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2004. “Shared Syntax: the Grammar of Co-Construction.” Journal of Pragmatics 36, 8: 1315–1336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 1994. “Constituting and Maintaining Activities across Sequences: And-prefacing as a Feature of Question Design.” Language in Society 23, 1: 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, Sally and Elinor Ochs (eds.). 1995. Co-Construction. Special issue of Research on Language and Social Interaction 28, 3.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1990. “List-construction as a Task and Resource.” In Interactional Competence, ed. by George Psathas, 63–92. New York: University Press of America.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis. Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 1967. “Some Functions of Gaze Direction in Social Interaction.” Acta Psychologica 26: 22–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene H. 1991. “On the Syntax of Sentences-in-progress.” Language in Society 20, 3: 441–458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. “On the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-interaction: Grammar as Action in Prompting a Speaker to Elaborate.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 37, 2: 151–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Local, John. 2004. “Getting Back to Prior Talk. And-uh(m) as a Back-connecting Device in British and American English.” In Sound Patterns in Interaction: Cross-linguistic Studies from Conversation, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Cecilia E. Ford, 377–400. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maschler, Yael, Simona Pekarek Doehler, Jan Lindström, and Leelo Keevallik (eds.). 2020. Emergent Syntax for Conversation. Clausal Patterns and the Organization of Action. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazeland, Harrie. 2019. “Position Expansion in Meeting Talk: An Interaction-re-organizing Type of And-prefaced Other-continuation.” In Embodied Activities in Face-to-face and Mediated Settings: Social Encounters in Time and Space, ed. by Elisabeth Reber, and Cornelia Gerhardt, 397–433. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2018. “Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 51, 1: 85–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevile, Maurice. 2006. “Making Sequentiality Salient: And-prefacing in the Talk of Airline Pilots.” Discourse Studies 8, 2: 279–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi, and Sandra A. Thompson. 1996. “Interaction and Syntax in the Structure of Conversational Discourse: Collaboration, Overlap, and Syntactic Dissociation.” In Computational and Conversational Discourse. Burning Issues – An Interdisciplinary Account, ed. by Eduard H. Hovy, and Donia R. Scott, 67–96. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossano, Federico. 2012. Gaze Behavior in Face-to-face Interaction. PhD thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen.
. 2013. “Gaze in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 308–329. Malden, Massachusetts: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rönnqvist, Sara, and Jan Lindström. 2021. “Turn Continuations and Gesture: ‘And-then’-prefacing in Multi-party Conversations.” Frontiers in Communication 6: 670173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation.” Language 50, 4: 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 52–133. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. “Increments.” In Accountability in Social Interaction, ed. by Jefferey D. Robinson, 239–263. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Harvey, Sacks, and Gail Jefferson. 1977. “The Preference for Self-correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53, 2: 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret. 2000. “The Construction of Units in Conversational Talk.” Language in Society 29, 4: 477–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Lists as Embedded Structures and the Prosody of List Construction as an Interactional Resource.” Journal of Pragmatics 39, 3: 483–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serianni, Luca. 2006. Grammatica italiana. Italiano comune e lingua letteraria. Torino: UTET Università.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack. 2012. “Turn-continuation by Self and by Other.” Discourse Processes 49, 3–4: 314–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1908. Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Steensig, Jakob. 2013. “Conversation Analysis and Affiliation and Alignment.” In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ed. by Carol A. Capelle, 944–948. Oxford, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2008. “Stance, Alignment and Affiliation during Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41, 1: 31–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Morality and Question Design: ‘Of course’ as Contesting a Presupposition of Askability.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 82–106. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano. 2010. “Mobilizing Response.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43, 1: 3–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig. 2011. “Knowledge, Morality and Affiliation in Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 3–24. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiß, Clarissa. 2018. “When Gaze-selected Next Speakers do not Take the Turn.” Journal of Pragmatics 133: 28–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar