Cover not available
Part of
New Perspectives in Interactional Linguistic Research
Edited by Margret Selting and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 36] 2024
► pp. 220–244

Managing progressivity and solidarity with nage shenme ‘that what’ in Mandarin interaction

| University of Alberta
Nage shenme ‘that what’ is a fixed pronoun phrase commonly used as a “filler” in Mandarin. This study examines the interactional functions of nage shenmes (NSs) in face-to-face Mandarin interaction. An examination of the data shows that NSs appear in a variety of turn positions. This study focuses on the usages of TCU-medial and turn-final NSs. I argue that TCU-medial NSs are used as placeholders to deal with problems of progressivity of the TCU- and action-in-progress. Turn-final NSs in disagreement talk serve as mitigation markers to mitigate the force of discordant actions. They are employed by the speaker to seek reconciliation with coparticipants and to promote social solidarity.
Keywords: nage shenme (NS) ‘that what’, fillers, placeholders, mitigation markers, Mandarin interaction, progressivity, solidarity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous research
  • 3.Data and method
  • 4.Interactional functions of NSs
    • 4.1TCU-medial NSs as placeholders to manage progressivity
    • 4.2Turn-final NSs as mitigation markers to promote solidarity
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (61)
References
Chevalier, Fabienne, and Rebecca Clift. 2008. “Unfinished Turns in French Conversation: Projectability, Syntax and Action.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (8): 1737–1752. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Jean E. Fox Tree. 2002. “Using Uh and Um in Spontaneous Speaking.” Cognition 84: 73–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. 2002. “Sequence and solidarity.” In Group Cohesion, Trust and Solidarity, ed. by Shane R. Thye, and Edward J. Lawler, 229–253. Bingley: Emerald Group. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corley, Martin, and Oliver W. Stewart. 2008. “Hesitation Disfluencies in Spontaneous Speech: The Meaning of Um.” Language and Linguistics Compass 2 (4): 589–602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten. 2011. “A System for Transcribing Talk-in-Interaction: GAT 2.” English translation and adaptation of Selting, Margret et al. (2009) Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 12: 1–51. [URL]
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Margret Selting. 2001. “Introducing Interactional Linguistics.” In Studies in Interactional Linguistics, ed. by Margret Selting, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2011. “The Study of Formulations as Key to an Interactional Semantics.” Human Studies 34 (2): 115–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eklund, Robert. 2004. Disfluency in Swedish Human-Human and Human-Machine Travel Booking Dialogues. PhD Dissertation, University of Linköping.
Enfield, Nick J. 2003. “The Definition of What-d’you-call-it: Semantics and Pragmatics of Recognitional Deixis.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 101–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fang, Mei. 2002. “Zhishi Ci ‘Zhe’ he ‘Na’ zai Beijinghua zhong de Yufahua [The Grammaticalization of Demonstratives ‘This’ and ‘That’ in Beijing Mandarin.” Zhongguo Yuwen 2002 (4): 343–356.Google Scholar
Ferreira, Fernanda. 1993. “The Creation of Prosody during Sentence Processing.” Psychological Review 100: 233–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara. 2010. “Introduction.” In Fillers, Pauses and Placeholders, ed. by Nino Amiridze, Boyd Davis, and Margret Maclagan, 1–9. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1980. “Restarts, Pauses, and the Achievement of a State of Mutual Gaze at Turn-Beginning.” Sociological Inquiry 50: 272–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. “Transparent Vision”, In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 370–404. London: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 2017. “Haptic Sociality: The Embodied Interactive Construction of Intimacy Through Touch”, In Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction, ed. by Christian Meyer, Jürgen Streeck, and Scott J. Jordan, 73–102. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness, and Charles Goodwin. 1986. “Gesture and Coparticipation in the Activity of Searching for a Word.” Semiotica 62: 51–75.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto. 2003. “Language and the Body as Resources for Collaborative Action: A Study of Word Searches in Japanese Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 36 (2): 109–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto, and Kyung-eun Yoon. 2006. “A Cross-Linguistic Exploration of Demonstratives in Interaction: with Particular Reference to the Context of Word-Formulation Trouble.” Studies in Language 30 (3): 485–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 1996. “Demonstratives in Narrative Discourse: A Taxonomy of Universal Uses.” In Studies in Anaphora, ed. by Barbara Fox, 205–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holt, Liz. 2012. “Using Laugh Responses to Defuse Complaints.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (4): 430–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1974. “Error Correction as an Interactional Resource.” Language in Society 2: 181–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail, Harvey Sacks, and Emanuel A. Schegloff. 1987. “Notes on Laughter in the Pursuit of Intimacy.” In Talk and Social Organization, ed. by Graham Button and John R. E. Lee, 152–205. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kern, Friederike, and Margret Selting. 2006. “Konstruktionen mit Nachstellungen im Türkendeutschen.” In Grammatik und Interaktion: Untersuchungen zum Zusammenhang von grammatischen Strukturen und Gesprächsprozessen, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, Reinhard Fiehler, and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy, 319–347. Radolfzell: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun, and Kyung-Hee Suh. 2002. “Demonstratives as Prospective Indexicals: Ku and Ce in Korean Conversation.” In Japanese/ Korean Linguistics Vol. 10, ed. by Noriko Akatsuka, and Susan Strauss, 192–205. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene H. 2013. “On the Place of Hesitating in Delicate Formulations: A Turn Constructional Infrastructure for Collaborative Indiscretion.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, 95–134. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles, and Sandra A. Thompson 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Xianju. 2008. Beijing Kouyu Changyong Huayu Biaoji Yanjiu [A Study of Commonly Used Discourse Markers in Beijing Mandarin]. PhD Dissertation. Beijing Language and Culture University.
Li, Xiaoting. 2014. Multimodality, Interaction, and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “Some Interactional Uses of Syntactically Incomplete Turns in Mandarin Conversation.” Chinese Language and Discourse 7 (2): 237–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liang, Jingmei. 2002. “Zhe” “Na” de Yuyong yu Huayu Gongneng Yanjiu [A Study of the Pragmatic and Discourse Functions of “Zhe” and “Na”]. PhD Dissertation. Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.
Lickley, Robin J. 2015. “Fluency and Disfluency.” In The Handbook of Speech Production, ed. by Melissa A. Redford, 445–469. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per. 2009. Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Liu, Liyan. 2009. “Zuowei Huayu Biaoji de ‘Zhege’ he ‘Nage’ [‘Zhege’ and ‘Nage’ as Discourse Markers].” Yuyan Jiaoxue Yu Yanjiu 2009 (1): 89–96.Google Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang. 1980. Xiandai Hanyu Babai Ci [800 Words in Modern Chinese]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
McRae, Susan. 2009. “It’s a Blokes Thing: Gender, Occupational Roles and Talk in the Workplace.” In Gender and Spoken Interaction, ed. by Pia Pichler, and Eva M. Eppler, 163–185. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morita, Emi, and Tomoyo Takagi. 2020. “Interjectional Use of Demonstratives: Anoo and Sonoo as Resources for Interaction in Japanese Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 169: 120–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Cornelia. 2009. “Gesture and Language.” In The Routledge Linguistics Encyclopedia, ed. by Kirsten Malmkjaer, 510–518. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Park, Innhwa, and Jacob Kline. 2020. “Incomplete Utterances as Critical Assessments.” Discourse Studies 22 (4): 441–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi, and David Silverman. 1991. “Owning Experience: Describing the Experience of Other Persons.” Text 11 (3): 441–480.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by Maxwell J. Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raclaw, Joshua, and Cecilia E. Ford. 2017. “Laughter and the Management of Divergent Positions in Peer Review Interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics 113: 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1980. “Preliminaries to Preliminaries: ‘Can I ask you a question?’” Sociological Inquiry 50: 104–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. “The Surfacing of the Suppressed.” In Studies in Language and Social Interaction: A Festschrift in Honor of Robert Hopper, ed. by Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, and Jenny S. Mandelbaum, 241–262. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. London: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. “Some other ‘uh(m)’s.” Discourse Processes 47 (2): 130–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret. 2013. “Verbal, Vocal, and Visual Practices in Conversational Interaction.” In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction, ed. by Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill, and Sedinha Tessendorf, 589–609. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shao, Jingmin, and Xiufeng Zhao. 1989. “‘Shenme’ Feiyiwen Yongfa Yanjiu [A Study of the Non-Interrogative Uses of ‘Shenme’].” Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu 1989 (1): 26–40.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Jack Sidnell. 2005. “Introduction: Multimodal Interaction.” Semiotica 156: 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen, Charles Goodwin, and Curtis LeBaron (eds.). 2011. Embodied interaction: Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tao, Hongyin. 1999. “The Grammar of Demonstratives in Mandarin Conversational Discourse: A Case Study.” Journal of Chinese Linguistics 27 (1): 69–103.Google Scholar
Tao, Liang. 1995. “Repair in Natural Conversation of Beijing Mandarin.” Yue Ren Society Treasury of Chinese Dialect Data 1: 55–67.Google Scholar
Wang, Haifeng, and Tieli Wang. 2003. “Ziran Kouyu zhong ‘shenme’ de Huayu Fenxi [A Discourse Analysis of ‘Shenme’ in Naturalistic Spoken Mandarin.” Hanyu Xuexi 2003 (2): 21–29.Google Scholar
Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina. 1997. “Transforming Participation Frameworks in Multi-Party Mandarin Conversation: The Use of Discourse Particles and Body Behavior”. Issues in Applied Linguistics 8 (2): 97–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiandai Hanyu Cidian [Modern Chinese Dictionary] 5th Edition. 2005. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Xu, Jiajin. 2008. “Hanyu Ziran Huihua zhong Huayu Biaoji ‘Na(ge)’ de Gongneng Fenxi [Functions of the Discourse Marker ‘Na(ge)’ in Natural Mandarin Conversation.” Yuyan Kexue 2008 (1): 49–57.Google Scholar
Yin, Shulin. 2009. “Huayu Biaoji ‘Zhege’ ‘Nage’ de Yufahua he Shiyong de Yingxiang Yinsu [The Grammaticalization of Discoruse Markers ‘Zhege’ and ‘Nage’ and Factors Influencing Their Usages].” Waiyu Xuekan 2009 (4): 92–96.Google Scholar
Yue, Yao. 2020. “Zhishi yu Fei Zhishi: Hanyu Yantan Jiaoji zhong ‘Nage’ de Yongfa” [Referential v.s. Non-Referential: The Uses of ‘Nage’ in Chinese Talk-in-Interaction.” Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu 2020 (1): 48–61.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Don, and Deirdre Boden. 1991. “Structure in Action” In Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, ed. by Deirdre Boden, and Don H. Zimmerman, 3–21. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar