Cover not available
Part of
New Perspectives in Interactional Linguistic Research
Edited by Margret Selting and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 36] 2024
► pp. 334–359

How grammar-for-interaction emerges over time

Evidence from second language talk

| University of Neuchâtel
This paper argues for a broadening of the analytic scope of Interactional Linguistics (IL) to embrace systematic investigation into how grammar grows out of social interaction longitudinally. While IL has amply documented the ways in which grammar structures interaction and emerges locally in real time within and across turns-in-progress, evidence for how social interaction motivates the routinization (or: sedimentation) of grammatical usage patterns over time is scarce due to lack of diachronic interactional data. I review the few existing diachronic and synchronic studies on the issue, and argue that the investigation of second language (L2) interactions opens new avenues for IL research, enabling us to empirically document the over-time emergence of grammar-for-interaction. I then present an analysis of the developmental trajectory of je sais pas ‘I don’t know’ in French L2 interactions across four proficiency levels, showing that the expression progressively routinizes as an interaction-organizational marker in ways that exhibit parallels to diachronic grammaticalization processes. This demonstrates how the study of L2 interactions can provide developmental evidence for how grammatical patterns emerge and sediment over iterative social encounters as resources for social interaction. The investigation of L2 data hence creates new opportunities for IL research in view of a better understanding of grammar as an outcome of peoples’ acting in the social world.
Keywords: grammar-for-interaction, emergence over time, interactional motivations for grammar, second language learning, complement-taking predicate construction, epistemic marker, interactional competence, grammaticalization
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Documenting how languages are shaped by social interaction as a challenge for Interactional Linguistics
  • 2.Research on how grammar-for-interaction emerges and changes over time
    • 2.1Diachronic evidence
    • 2.2Synchronic evidence
    • 2.3Developmental evidence
  • 3.Analysis: The routinization of je sais pas ‘I don’t know’ as an interactional marker in second language talk-in-interaction
    • 3.1Data and analytic focus
    • 3.2A general picture of the developmental trajectory
    • 3.3The emergence and routinization of JSP as an interactional marker
      • i.Hedging
      • ii.(Re)doing an ending: Exiting a turn or sequence
      • iii.Projecting a disaligning response
    • 3.4Summary of findings
  • 4.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (52)
References
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar. 2014. “Dialogism and the emergence of final particles: The case of and.” In Grammar and Dialogism, ed. by Susanne Günthner, Wolfgang Imo, and Jörg Bücker, 335–366. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruxelles, Sylvie, and Véronique Traverso. 2001. La particule ‘ben’ dans deux types d’interactions. Special issue of Cuadernos de Filologia.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2011. “Grammaticalization and Conversation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, ed. by Heiko Narrog, and Bernd Heine, 424–437. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. “Language over Time: some Old and New Uses of OKAY in American English.” Interactional Linguistics 1, 1: 33–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting. 2018. Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Bot, Kees, Wander Lowie, and Marjolijin Verspoor. 2007. “A Dynamic Systems Theory Approach to Second Language Acquisition.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10: 7–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Detges, Ulrich, and Richard Waltereit. 2011. “Turn-taking as a Trigger for Language Change.” In Rahmen des Sprechens. Beiträge zu Valenztheorie, Varietätenlin-guistik, Kreolistik, kognitiver und historischer Semantik, ed. by Sarah Dessí Schmid, Ulrich Detges, Paul Gévaudan, Wiltrud Mihatsch, and Richard Waltereit, 175–189. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 2004. “Retention or Omission of the ne in Advanced French Interlanguage: The Variable Effect of Extralinguistic Factors.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 8, 3: 422–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2011. “Grammaticalization and Language Acquisition.” In Handbook of Grammaticalization, ed. by Bernd Heine and Heiko Norrog, 130–141. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C., and Diane Larsen–Freeman. 2006. “Language Emergence: Implications for Applied Linguistics: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Applied Linguistics 27: 558–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eskildsen, Søren W. 2011. “The L2 Inventory in Action: Conversation Analysis and Usage-based Linguistics in SLA.” In L2 Learning as Social Practice: Conversation-analytic Perspectives, ed. by Gabriele Pallotti and Johannes Wagner, 337–373. University of Hawaii, Manoa: National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
2020. “Creativity and Routinisation in L2 English: Two Usage-based Case-studies.” In Usage-based Dynamics in Second Language Development, ed. by Wander Lowie, Marije Michel, Merel Keijzer, and Rasmus Steinkrauss, 107–129. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia, Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson. 1996. “Practices in the Construction of Turns: The ‘TCU’ Revisited.” Pragmatics 6: 427–454.Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, Anna. 1992. “Grammaticalization Processes in the Area of Temporal and Modal Relations.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14, 3: 293–322.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H., and Charles Goodwin. 1986. “Gesture and Coparticipation in the Activity of Searching for a Word.” Semiotica 62, 1–2: 51–75.Google Scholar
Greimas, Algirdas J., and Teresa M. Keane. 2001. Dictionnaire du Moyen Français. Larousse.Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 1994. “Ritualization and the Development of Language.” In Perspectives on Grammaticalization, ed. by William Pagliuca, 3–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helmer, Henrike, Silke Reineke, and Arnulf Deppermann. 2016. “A Range of Uses of Negative Epistemic Constructions in German: ICH WEIß NICHT as a Resource for Dispreferred Actions.” Journal of Pragmatics 106: 97–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo. 2011. “The Terms of Not Knowing.” In: The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 184–206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Sangki. 2019. “‘We limit under twenty centu charge okay?’: Routinization of an Idiosyncratic Multi-word Expression.” In Conversation Analytic Research on Learning-in-action: The Complex Ecology of Second Language Interaction ‘in the Wild’, ed. by John Hellermann, Søren W. Eskildsen, Simona Pekarek Doehler, and Arja Piirainen–Marsh, 25–49. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1985. Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20: 303–318.Google Scholar
Lustigman, Lyle. 2021. “Early Collaborations: Adult-child and Child-adult Co-construction of ‘but’ Clauses.” Interactional Linguistics 1, 2: 216–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maschler, Yael. 2017. “The Emergence of Hebrew loydea/loydat (‘I dunno masc/fem’) from Interaction: Blurring the Boundaries between Discourse Marker, Pragmatic Marker, and Modal Particle.” In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: New Perspectives, ed. by Andrea Sansò, and Chiara Fedriani, 37–69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maschler, Yael, Simona Pekarek Doehler, Jan Lindström, and Leelo Keevallik (eds.). 2020. Emergent Syntax for Conversation: Clausal Patterns and the Organization of Actions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W. 2003. Bad News, Good News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko, and Bernd Heine (eds.). 2011. The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, Eleanor, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson (eds.). 1996. Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona. 2016. More than an epistemic hedge: French je sais pas ‘I don’t know’ as a resource for the sequential organization of turns and actions. Journal of Pragmatics 106: 148–162.Google Scholar
. 2018. “Elaborations on L2 Interactional Competence: the Development of L2 Grammar-for-interaction.” Classroom Discourse 9: 3–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. At the interface of grammar and the body. Chais pas (‘dunno’) as a resource for dealing with lack of recipient response. Research on Language and Social Interaction 52(4): 1–23.Google Scholar
. 2021. “How Grammar Grows out of Social Interaction: From Multi-unit to Single unit Question.” Open Linguistics 7: 837–864. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. “Multimodal Action Formats for Managing Preference: chais pas ‘dunno’ Plus Gaze Conduct in Dispreferred Responses to Questions.” Journal of Pragmatics 197: 81–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, and Uffuk Balaman. 2021. “The Routinization of Grammar as a Social Action Format: A Longitudinal Study of Video-mediated Interactions.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 54: 183–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, and Søren Eskildsen. 2022. “Emergent L2 Grammars in and for Social Interaction. Introduction to the Special Issue.” Modern Language Journal 106, 1: 3–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, Hilla Polak-Yitzhaki, Xioating Li, Ioana Stoenica, Martin Havlík, and Leelo Keevallik. 2021. “Multimodal Assemblies for Prefacing a Dispreferred Response: A Cross-linguistic Analysis.” Frontiers in Psychology 12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, and Klara Skogmyr-Marian. 2022. “Functional Diversification and Progressive Routinization of a Multi-word Expression in and for Social Interaction: A Longitudinal L2 Study.” The Modern Language Journal 106, 1: 23–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, and Britta Thörle. To appear. “Discourse markers and second language acquisition.” In Manual of Discourse Markers in Romance, ed. by Maj-Britt Mosegaard-Hansen, and Jacqueline Visconti. Berlin etc.: De Gruyter.
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Type Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review 68, 6: 939–967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reber, Elisabeth. 2021. Quoting in Parliamentary Question Time. Exploring Recent Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Elinor Ochs, and Sandra A. Thompson. 1996. “Introduction.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 1–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheibman, Joanne. 2000. “I dunno: a Usage-based Account of the Phonological Reduction of don’t in American English Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 105–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2001. Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skogmyr Marian, Klara, and Simona Pekarek Doehler. 2022. “Multimodal Word-Search Trajectories in L2 Interaction: The Use of Gesture and how it Changes over Time.” Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality 5, 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1994. “Talking Perfectly. Discourse Origins of the Present Perfect.” In Perspective on Grammaticalization, ed. by William Pagliuca, 119–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., and Antony Mulac. 1991. “A Quantitative Perspective on the Grammaticization of Epistemic Parentheticals in English.” In Approaches to Grammaticalization. Volume 2, ed. by Elizabeth C. Traugott, and Bernd Heine, 313–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2008. “‘All that he endeavoured to prove was …’: On the Emergence of Grammatical Constructions in Dialogal and Dialogic Contexts”. In Language in Flux: Dialogue Coordination, Language Variation, Change and Evolution, ed. by Robin Cooper, and Ruth Kempson, 143–177. London: Kings College Publications.Google Scholar
Weatherall, Ann. 2011. I don’t know as a Prepositioned Epistemic Hedge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 44, 4: 317–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar