Cover not available
Article published In:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 7:2 (2017) ► pp.262–276
Editorial

Becoming an undergraduate scientific researcher of literature

A discussion of inquiry teaching options

| Indiana University of Pennsylvania
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • A brief history of the development of inquiry teaching
  • Pedagogical models of inquiry teaching
  • Inquiry teaching in the scientific study of literature
  • Concluding statements
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 28 June 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.00003.han
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science
(2011) Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
American Association of University Women
(2010) Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Auchincloss, L. C., Laursen, S. L., Branchaw, J. L., Eagan, K., Graham, M., Hanauer, D. I., Lawrie, G., McLinn, C. M., Peleaz, N., Rowland, S., et al.
(2014) Assessment of course-based undergraduate research experiences: a meeting report. CBE Life Sci Educ 131, 29–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gold, M. K.
(2012) Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graham, M., Frederick, J., Byars-Winston, A., Hunter, A. -B., Handelsman, J.
(2013) Increasing persistence of college students in STEM. Science 3411, 1455–1456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanauer, D. I.
(2017) Editorial: Towards a critical mass of accumulated knowledge in the field of scientific literary studies. Scientific Study of Literature, 7 (1), 1–3. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanauer, D. I., Graham, M. J., SEA-PHAGES, Betancur, L., Bobrownicki, A., Cresawn, S. G., Garlena, R. A., Jacobs-Sera, D., Kaufmann, N., Pope, W. H., Russell, D. A., Jacobs, W. R., Sivanathan, V., Asai, D. J., & Hatfull, G. F.
(2017) An inclusive Research Education Community (iREC): Impact of the SEA-PHAGES program on research outcomes and student learning. PNAS, 114 (51), 13531–13536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanauer, D. I., & Dolan, E.
(2014) The Project Ownership Survey: measuring differences in scientific-inquiry experiences. CBE Life Sci Educ 131, 149–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanauer, D. I., Graham, M., Hatfull, G. F.
(2016) A measure of student persistence in the sciences (PITS). CBE Life Sci Educ 15 (4), 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanauer, D. I., Frederick, J., Fotinakes, B., Strobel, S. A.
(2012) Linguistic analysis of project ownership for undergraduate research experiences. CBE Life Sci Educ 111, 378–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanauer, D. I., Jacobs-Sera, D., Pedulla, M. L., Cresawn, S. G., Hendrix, R. W., Hatfull, G. F.
(2006) Teaching scientific inquiry. Science 3141, 1880–1881. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernandez, P. R., Woodcock, A., Estrada, M., Wesley Schultz, P.
(2018) Undergraduate research experiences broaden diversity in the scientific workforce. BioScience, 68 (3), 204–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jachik, S.
(2016) The shrinking Humanities major. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from [URL].
Jacobs, A., Schuster, S., Xue, S., & Ludtke, J.
(2017) What’s in the brain that ink may character – A quantitative narrative analysis of Shakespeare’s 154 sonnets for use in (Neuro) – cognitive poetics. Scientific Study of Literature, 7 (1), 4–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A.
(2018) The Gutenberg English poetry corpus: Exemplary quantitative narrative analyses. Frontiers in Digital Humanities, 51, 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
National Research Council
(2005) America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
(2012) Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.Google Scholar
National Science Teachers Association
(2004) NSTA Position Statement: Transitioning from Scientific Inquiry to Three-Dimensional Teaching and Learning. Retrieved from [URL].
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology
(2012) Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Office of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Rodenbusch, S. E., Hernandez, P. R., Simmons, S. L., & Dolan, E. L.
(2016) Early Engagement in Course-Based Research Increases Graduation Rates and Completion of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Degrees. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(2), 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seymour, E., Hunter, A. -B., Laursen, S. I., & DeAntoni, T.
(2004) Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three year study. Sci Educ 881, 493–534. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spell, R. M., Guinan, J. A., Miller, K. R., & Beck, C. W.
(2014) Redifining authentic research experiences in introductory biology laboratories and barriers to their implementation. CBE Life Sci Educ, 131, 102–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wenning, C.
(2007) Assessing inquiry skills as a component of scientific literacy. J. Phys. Tchr. Online, 4 (2), 1–4.Google Scholar