Article published In:
Scientific Study of LiteratureVol. 7:2 (2017) ► pp.203–231
A sixth sense
Narrative experiences of stories with twist endings
Stories with twist endings are popular, but little research has examined how readers experience them. To begin developing such an account, we examined the affective responses that emerge during stories with twist endings. In Experiment 1, 28 Japanese participants read a story with a twist ending. Greater empathy and stronger expectations were associated with slower reading times during participants’ first reading of the story. However, on participants’ second reading, greater empathy and stronger expectations were associated with faster reading times. In Experiment 2, we tested the generality of these effects by asking 36 English-speaking participants to read four stories with twist endings. The results were similar to Experiment 1. Readers’ initial and recurring responses to stories with twist endings reflect changes in surprise and empathy. These feelings underlie engagement with and interest in unexpected and often incoherent contents, which are characteristics of stories with twist endings.
Keywords: discourse comprehension, narrative comprehension, empathy, emotion, rereading, twist endings
Article outline
- Reading and rereading
- Readers’ responses
- The current study
- Experiment 1
- Method
- Participants
- Materials
- Procedure
- Results and discussion
- First reading
- Second reading
- Residual reading times
- Readers’ emotions
- Method
- Experiment 2
- Method
- Participants
- Materials
- Procedure
- Results and discussion
- First reading
- Second reading
- Residual reading times
- Readers’ emotions
- Method
- General discussion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (65)
Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 191, 10611–070.
Allbritton, D. W., & Gerrig, R. J. (1991). Participatory responses in text understanding. Journal of Memory & Language, 301, 603–626. 
Bohn-Gettler, C. M., & Rapp, D. N. (2011). Depending on my mood: Mood-driven influences on text comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1031, 562–577.
(2014). Emotions in reading and writing. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 437–457). New York, NY: Routledge.
Brewer, W. F. (1996). The nature of narrative suspense and the problem of rereading. In P. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff, & M. Friedrichsen (Eds.), Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp. 107–127). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brewer, W. F., & Lichtenstein, E. H. (1982). Stories are to entertain: A structural-affect theory of stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 61, 473–486.
Carretti, B., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Romanò, M. (2005). Updating in working memory: A comparison of good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 911, 45–66.
Cupchik, G. C., Leonard, G., Axelrad, E., & Kalin, J. D. (1998). The landscape of emotion in literary encounters. Cognition and Emotion, 121, 825–847.
Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2005). Why does rereading improve metacomprehension accuracy? Evaluating the levels-of-disruption hypothesis for the rereading effect. Discourse Processes, 401, 37–55.
Egidi, G., & Gerrig, R. J. (2009). How valence affects language processing: Negativity bias and mood congruence in narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 371, 547–555.
Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Gerrig, R. J., Bagelmann, K. A., & Mumper, M. L. (2016). On the origins of readers’ outcome preferences. Discourse Processes, 531, 603–631.
Gillioz, C., Gygax, P., & Tapiero, I. (2012). Individual differences and emotional inferences during reading comprehension. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 661, 239–250.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 791, 701–721.
Gygax, P., Tapiero, I., & Carruzzo, E. (2007). Emotion inferences during reading comprehension: What evidence can the self-pace reading paradigm provide? Discourse Processes, 441, 33–50.
Horton, W. S., & Rapp, D. N. (2003). Out of sight, out of mind: Occlusion and the accessibility of information in narrative comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 101, 104–110.
Hoshi, S. (1985). “The cost of kindness” and other fabulous tales. Philadelphia, PA: C and P Press.
Ishikawa, T. (1992). Aibiki. Kodansha. Tokyo. (in Japanese)
Jacovina, M. E., Hinze, S. R., & Rapp, D. N. (2014). Fool me twice: The consequences of reading (and rereading) inaccurate information. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 281, 558–568
Kintsch, W., & Keenan, J. M. (1973). Reading rate as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 257–274.
Kintsch, W., Kozminsky, E., Streby, W. J., McKoon, G., & Keenan, J. M. (1975). Comprehension and recall oftext as a function of content variables. Journal ofVerbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 141, 196–214.
Komeda, H., Kawasaki, M., Tsunemi, K., & Kusumi, T. (2009). Differences between estimating protagonists’ emotions and evaluating readers’ emotions in narrative comprehension. Cognition and Emotion, 231, 135–151.
Komeda, H., & Kusumi, T. (2006). The effect of a protagonist’s emotional shift on situation model construction. Memory & Cognition, 341, 1548–1556.
Komeda, H., Tsunemi, K., Inohara, K., Kusumi, T., & Rapp, D. N. (2013). Beyond disposition: The processing consequences of explicit and implicit invocations of empathy. Acta Psychologica, 1421, 349–355.
Komeda, H., Nihei, Y., & Kusumi, T. (2005). The roles of readers’ feelings in understanding narratives: Forefeel, empathy, and a sense of strangeness. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 751, 479–486. (In Japanese with English abstract).
Lorch, R. F., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 161, 149–157.
Magliano, J. P., Skowronski, J. J., Britt, M. A., Guss, C. D., & Forsythe, C. (2008). What do you want? How perceivers use cues to make goal inferences about others. Cognition, 1061, 594–632.
Magliano, J. P., Taylor, H. A., & Kim, H. J. (2005). When goals collide: Monitoring the goals of multiple characters. Memory & Cognition, 331, 1357–1367.
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 31, 173–192.
McCrudden, M. T., Schraw, G., & Kambe, G. (2005). The effect of relevance instructions on reading time and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 971, 88–102.
McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 221, 247–288.
Mensink, M. C., & Rapp, D. N. (2011). Evil geniuses: Inferences derived from evidence and preferences. Memory & Cognition, 391, 1103–1116.
Miall, D. S. (1989). Beyond the schema given: Affective comprehension of literary narratives. Cognition and Emotion, 31, 55–78.
(2002). Literary discourse. In Graesser, A., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Goldman, S. R. (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 321–355.
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1995). Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English, 291, 37–58.
(2001). Shifting perspectives: Readers’ feelings and literary response. In van Peer, W. & Chatman, S. (Eds.), New perspectives on narrative perspective (pp. 289–301). Albany: State University of New York Press.
(2002). A feeling for fiction: Becoming what we behold. Poetics, 301, 221–241.
Millis, K. K., Simon, S., & tenBroek, N. S. (1998). Resource allocation during the rereading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 261, 232–246.
Oatley, K. (1994). A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics, 231, 53–74.
(2002). Emotions and the story worlds of fiction. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact (pp. 39–69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1987). Towards a cognitive theory of emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 11, 29–50.
O’Brien, E. J., Rizzella, M. L., Albrecht, J. E., & Halleran, J. G. (1998). Updating a situation model: A memory-based text processing view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 241, 1200–1210.
Ortony, A., & Turner, T. J. (1990). What’s basic about basic emotions? Psychological Review, 971, 315–331.
Peshkam, A., Mensink, M. C., Putnam, A. L., & Rapp, D. N. (2011). Warning readers to avoid irrelevant information: When being vague might be valuable. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 361, 219–231.
Pettijohn, K. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (2016). Narrative event boundaries, reading times, and expectation. Memory & Cognition, 441, 1064–1075.
Polichak, J. W., & Gerrig, R. J. (2002). “Get up and win!”: Participatory responses to narrative. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 71–95). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Radvansky, G. A., Zwaan, R. A., Curiel, J. M., & Copeland, D. E. (2001). Situation models and aging. Psychology and Aging, 161, 145–160.
Raney, G. E., Therriault, D., & Minkoff, S. (2000). Repetition effects from paraphrased text: Evidence for an integrated representation model of text representation. Discourse Processes, 291, 61–81.
Rapp, D. N. (2008). How do readers handle incorrect information during reading? Memory & Cognition, 361, 688–701.
Rapp, D. N., & Gerrig, R. J. (2002). Readers’ reality-driven and plot-driven analyses in narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 301, 779–788.
(2006). Predilections for narrative outcomes: The impact of story contexts and reader preferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 541, 54–67.
Rapp, D. N., Gerrig, R. J., & Prentice, D. A. (2001). Readers’ trait-based models of characters in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 451, 737–750.
Rapp, D. N., Komeda, H., & Hinze, S. R. (2011). Vivifications of literary investigation. The Scientific Study of Literature, 11, 123–135.
Scrimin, S., & Mason, L. (2015). Does mood influence text processing and comprehension? Evidence from an eye-movement study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 851, 387–406.
van den Broek, P., & Kendeou, P. (in press). The development of language comprehension skills: Change and continuity in the ability to build coherence. In K. Cain & D. Compton (Eds.), Theories of reading development, a 20 year celebration of scientific studies of reading. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
van den Broek, P., Young, M., Yuhtsuen, T., & Linderholm, T. (1999). The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of memory representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 71–98). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
VandenBos, G. R. (Ed.). (2007). APA dictionary of psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Wallot, S., Hollis, G., & van Rooij, M. (2013). Connected text reading anddifferences in text reading fluency in adult readers. PLoS One, 81:e71914.
Zillmann, D. (1994). Mechanisms of emotional involvement with drama. Poetics, 231, 33–51.
Zwaan, R. A. (1999a). Five dimensions of narrative comprehension: The event-indexing model. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 93–110). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1999b). Embodied cognition, perceptual symbols, and situation models. Discourse Processes, 281, 81–88.
Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 211, 386–397.
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situational models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 1231, 162–185.
Zwaan, R. A., Radvansky, G. A., Hilliard, A. E., & Curiel, J. M. (1998). Constructing multidimensional situation models during reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21, 199–220.
Zwaan, R. A., & Rapp, D. N. (2006). Discourse comprehension. In M. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 725–764). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.