Article published in:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 7:2 (2017) ► pp. 203231
Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J.
(1993) Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 191, 10611–070.Google Scholar
Allbritton, D. W., & Gerrig, R. J.
(1991) Participatory responses in text understanding. Journal of Memory & Language, 301, 603–626. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bohn-Gettler, C. M., & Rapp, D. N.
(2011) Depending on my mood: Mood-driven influences on text comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1031, 562–577. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Emotions in reading and writing. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 437–457). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brewer, W. F.
(1996) The nature of narrative suspense and the problem of rereading. In P. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff, & M. Friedrichsen (Eds.), Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp. 107–127). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brewer, W. F., & Lichtenstein, E. H.
(1982) Stories are to entertain: A structural-affect theory of stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 61, 473–486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carretti, B., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Romanò, M.
(2005) Updating in working memory: A comparison of good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 911, 45–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cupchik, G. C., Leonard, G., Axelrad, E., & Kalin, J. D.
(1998) The landscape of emotion in literary encounters. Cognition and Emotion, 121, 825–847. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A.
(2005) Why does rereading improve metacomprehension accuracy? Evaluating the levels-of-disruption hypothesis for the rereading effect. Discourse Processes, 401, 37–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Egidi, G., & Gerrig, R. J.
(2009) How valence affects language processing: Negativity bias and mood congruence in narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 371, 547–555. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, R. J.
(1993) Experiencing narrative worlds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gerrig, R. J., Bagelmann, K. A., & Mumper, M. L.
(2016) On the origins of readers’ outcome preferences. Discourse Processes, 531, 603–631. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gillioz, C., Gygax, P., & Tapiero, I.
(2012) Individual differences and emotional inferences during reading comprehension. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 661, 239–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C.
(2000) The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 791, 701–721. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gygax, P., Tapiero, I., & Carruzzo, E.
(2007) Emotion inferences during reading comprehension: What evidence can the self-pace reading paradigm provide? Discourse Processes, 441, 33–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horton, W. S., & Rapp, D. N.
(2003) Out of sight, out of mind: Occlusion and the accessibility of information in narrative comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 101, 104–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoshi, S.
(1985) “The cost of kindness” and other fabulous tales. Philadelphia, PA: C and P Press.Google Scholar
Ishikawa, T.
(1992) Aibiki. Kodansha. Tokyo. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
Jacovina, M. E., Hinze, S. R., & Rapp, D. N.
(2014) Fool me twice: The consequences of reading (and rereading) inaccurate information. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 281, 558–568 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W., & Keenan, J. M.
(1973) Reading rate as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 257–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W., Kozminsky, E., Streby, W. J., McKoon, G., & Keenan, J. M.
(1975) Comprehension and recall oftext as a function of content variables. Journal ofVerbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 141, 196–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Komeda, H., Kawasaki, M., Tsunemi, K., & Kusumi, T.
(2009) Differences between estimating protagonists’ emotions and evaluating readers’ emotions in narrative comprehension. Cognition and Emotion, 231, 135–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Komeda, H., & Kusumi, T.
(2006) The effect of a protagonist’s emotional shift on situation model construction. Memory & Cognition, 341, 1548–1556. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Komeda, H., Tsunemi, K., Inohara, K., Kusumi, T., & Rapp, D. N.
(2013) Beyond disposition: The processing consequences of explicit and implicit invocations of empathy. Acta Psychologica, 1421, 349–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Komeda, H., Nihei, Y., & Kusumi, T.
(2005) The roles of readers’ feelings in understanding narratives: Forefeel, empathy, and a sense of strangeness. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 751, 479–486. (In Japanese with English abstract). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorch, R. F., & Myers, J. L.
(1990) Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 161, 149–157.Google Scholar
Magliano, J. P., Skowronski, J. J., Britt, M. A., Guss, C. D., & Forsythe, C.
(2008) What do you want? How perceivers use cues to make goal inferences about others. Cognition, 1061, 594–632. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Magliano, J. P., Taylor, H. A., & Kim, H. J.
(2005) When goals collide: Monitoring the goals of multiple characters. Memory & Cognition, 331, 1357–1367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K.
(2008) The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 31, 173–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCrudden, M. T., Schraw, G., & Kambe, G.
(2005) The effect of relevance instructions on reading time and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 971, 88–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W.
(1996) Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 221, 247–288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mensink, M. C., & Rapp, D. N.
(2011) Evil geniuses: Inferences derived from evidence and preferences. Memory & Cognition, 391, 1103–1116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miall, D. S.
(1989) Beyond the schema given: Affective comprehension of literary narratives. Cognition and Emotion, 31, 55–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Literary discourse. In Graesser, A., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Goldman, S. R. (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 321–355.Google Scholar
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D.
(1995) Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English, 291, 37–58.Google Scholar
(2001) Shifting perspectives: Readers’ feelings and literary response. In van Peer, W. & Chatman, S. (Eds.), New perspectives on narrative perspective (pp. 289–301). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
(2002) A feeling for fiction: Becoming what we behold. Poetics, 301, 221–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Millis, K. K., Simon, S., & tenBroek, N. S.
(1998) Resource allocation during the rereading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 261, 232–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oatley, K.
(1994) A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics, 231, 53–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Emotions and the story worlds of fiction. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact (pp. 39–69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N.
(1987) Towards a cognitive theory of emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 11, 29–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, E. J., Rizzella, M. L., Albrecht, J. E., & Halleran, J. G.
(1998) Updating a situation model: A memory-based text processing view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 241, 1200–1210.Google Scholar
Ortony, A., & Turner, T. J.
(1990) What’s basic about basic emotions? Psychological Review, 971, 315–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peshkam, A., Mensink, M. C., Putnam, A. L., & Rapp, D. N.
(2011) Warning readers to avoid irrelevant information: When being vague might be valuable. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 361, 219–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pettijohn, K. A., & Radvansky, G. A.
(2016) Narrative event boundaries, reading times, and expectation. Memory & Cognition, 441, 1064–1075. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polichak, J. W., & Gerrig, R. J.
(2002) “Get up and win!”: Participatory responses to narrative. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 71–95). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Radvansky, G. A., Zwaan, R. A., Curiel, J. M., & Copeland, D. E.
(2001) Situation models and aging. Psychology and Aging, 161, 145–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raney, G. E., Therriault, D., & Minkoff, S.
(2000) Repetition effects from paraphrased text: Evidence for an integrated representation model of text representation. Discourse Processes, 291, 61–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, D. N.
(2008) How do readers handle incorrect information during reading? Memory & Cognition, 361, 688–701. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, D. N., & Gerrig, R. J.
(2002) Readers’ reality-driven and plot-driven analyses in narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 301, 779–788. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Predilections for narrative outcomes: The impact of story contexts and reader preferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 541, 54–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, D. N., Gerrig, R. J., & Prentice, D. A.
(2001) Readers’ trait-based models of characters in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 451, 737–750. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, D. N., Komeda, H., & Hinze, S. R.
(2011) Vivifications of literary investigation. The Scientific Study of Literature, 11, 123–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scrimin, S., & Mason, L.
(2015) Does mood influence text processing and comprehension? Evidence from an eye-movement study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 851, 387–406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van den Broek, P., & Kendeou, P.
in press). The development of language comprehension skills: Change and continuity in the ability to build coherence. In K. Cain & D. Compton Eds. Theories of reading development, a 20 year celebration of scientific studies of reading Amsterdam, Netherlands John Benjamins
van den Broek, P., Young, M., Yuhtsuen, T., & Linderholm, T.
(1999) The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of memory representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 71–98). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
VandenBos, G. R.
(Ed.) (2007) APA dictionary of psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Wallot, S., Hollis, G., & van Rooij, M.
(2013) Connected text reading anddifferences in text reading fluency in adult readers. PLoS One, 81:e71914. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zillmann, D.
(1994) Mechanisms of emotional involvement with drama. Poetics, 231, 33–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. A.
(1999a) Five dimensions of narrative comprehension: The event-indexing model. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 93–110). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(1999b) Embodied cognition, perceptual symbols, and situation models. Discourse Processes, 281, 81–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C.
(1995) Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 211, 386–397.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A.
(1998) Situational models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 1231, 162–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., Radvansky, G. A., Hilliard, A. E., & Curiel, J. M.
(1998) Constructing multidimensional situation models during reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21, 199–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., & Rapp, D. N.
(2006) Discourse comprehension. In M. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 725–764). San Diego, CA: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar