Article published in:
Empirical Studies of Literariness
Edited by Massimo Salgaro and Paul Sopčák
[Scientific Study of Literature 8:1] 2018
► pp. 114134
References

References

Altmann, U., Bohrn, I. C., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A. M.
(2014) Fact vs fiction: How paratextual information shapes our reading processes. SCAN, 9, 22–29.Google Scholar
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H.
(2009) Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edward F. McQuarrie & Barbara J. Phillips
(2005) INDIRECT PERSUASION IN ADVERTISING: How Consumers Process Metaphors Presented in Pictures and Words, Journal of Advertising, 34:2, 7–20.Google Scholar
Erlich, V.
(1981) Russian formalism: History-doctrine (3rd ed.) New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hakemulder, F.
(2000) The moral laboratory: Experiments examining the effects of reading literature on social perception and moral self-concept. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hanauer, D.
(1996) Integration of phonetic and graphic features in poetic text categorization judgments. Poetics, 23, 363–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 132 ]
(1998a) Reading poetry: An empirical investigation of formalist, stylistic and conventionalist claims. Poetics Today 19, 565–580. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998b) The genre-specific hypothesis of reading: Reading poetry and reading encyclopedic items. Poetics 26(2), 63–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Experiencing the Blitz: A poetic representation of a childhood in wartime London. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(5), 584–599. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hanauer, D. I.
(2015) Being in the Second Iraq War: A poetic ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(1), 83–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoorn, J.
(1997) A Renaissance perspective on the empirical study of literature. In D. Schram and G. Steen (Eds.), The psychology and sociology of literature (pp. 67–74). Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M.
(1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A. M.
(2011) Neurokognitive poetik: elemente einesmodells des literarischen lesens (Neurocognitive poetics: Elements of a model of literary reading). In R. Schrottand & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie Wir Unsere Wirklichkeiten Konstruieren (Brain and poetry: How we construct our realities) (pp. 492–520): München, Germany: Carl Hanser Verlag.Google Scholar
(2015a) Towards a neurocognitive poetics model of literary reading. In R. Willems (Ed.), Towards a cognitive neuroscience of natural language use. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015b) Neurocognitive poetics: Methods and modals for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
, Linguistics and Poetics, in: Thomas Sebeok (ed.) Style in Language, New York 1960, 350–377.Google Scholar
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E.
(2013) Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koopman, E. M., & Hakemulder, F.
(2015) Effects of literature on empathy and self-reflection: A theoretical-empirical framework. Journal of Literary Theory, 9(1), 79–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K.
(2008) The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspective on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miall, David/Don Kuiken
, Foregrounding, Defamiliarization, and Affect: Response to Literary Stories, Poetics 22 (1994), 389–407.Google Scholar
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D.
(1999) What is literariness? Three components of literary reading. DiscourseProcesses, 28(2), 121–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan
, On Poetic Language ed. John Burbank/Peter Steiner, Lisse 1976.Google Scholar
Sopčák, P.
(2007) ‘Creation from nothing’: A foregrounding study of James Joyce’s drafts for Ulysses. Language and Literature, 16(2), 183–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Peer, W.
(1986) Stylistics and psychology: Investigations in foregrounding. London, United Kingdom: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A.
(1996) Toward a model of literary comprehension. In B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 241–255). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Nicholes, Justin
2020. Science fiction prototyping’s features and impact on college students’ perceptions of writing. Scientific Study of Literature 10:1  pp. 128 ff. Crossref logo
Postarnak, Svetlana, São Luís Castro & Susana Silva
2020. The role of linguistic prosody in the responses to recited poetry. Scientific Study of Literature 10:2  pp. 228 ff. Crossref logo
Statham, Simon & Rocío Montoro
2019. The year’s work in stylistics 2018. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 28:4  pp. 354 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.