We use eye tracking to investigate the attention readers pay to
different textual features to determine their significance in the appreciation
of prose fiction. Previous research examined attention allocation to lexical and
punctuation variants, and the impact on reading dynamics for the remainder of
the text, demonstrating that readers notice both kinds of variants but assign
less value to the latter (Carrol, Conklin,
Guy, & Scott, 2016). Here, in two experiments, we examine two
conditions that may affect attention allocation: We investigate the influence of
reader expertise (Experiment 1) and whether performance is influenced by a
task-specific “spot-the-difference” effect (Experiment 2). We found that
expertise plays little role in readers’ greater sensitivity to lexical rather
than punctuation changes, and that the advantage for lexical changes persisted
when the time interval between exposures is increased. These results confirm
earlier findings: that small-scale features may not possess the creative
significance predicated of them by critics and text-editors.
(1998) Transforming non-normal data to normality in statistical process
control. Journal of Quality Technology, 30(2), 133–141.
Conklin, K., Pellicer-Sánchez, A., & Carrol, G.
(2018) An introduction to eye-tracking: A guide for applied linguistics
research. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
(2015) Making a point: The pernickety story of English punctuation. London, United Kingdom: St Martin’s Press.
(1846) The adventures of Oliver Twist. London, United Kingdom: Bradbury and Evans.
(1867) The Charles Dickens edition. The adventures of Oliver Twist. London, United Kingdom: Chapman and Hall.
Filik, R., & Barber, E.
(2011) Inner speech during silent reading reflects the reader’s regional
accent. PloS one, 6(10), e25782.
Goldman, S. R., McCarthy, K. S., & Burkett, C.
(2015) Interpretative inferences in literature. In E. O’Brien, A. Cook & R. Lorch (Eds.), Inferences during reading. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Gómez-Jiménez, E. M.
(2017) Unconventional patterns in the experimental poetry of E. E.
Cummings: A stylistic approach to punctuation marks. Language and Literature, 26(3), 191–212.
Guy, J., Scott, R., Conklin, K., & Carrol, G.
(2016) Challenges in editing late nineteenth- and early
twentieth-century prose fiction: What is “editorial
completeness”?English Literature in Transition, 59(4), 435–55.
Graves, B., & Frederiksen, C. H.
(1991) Literary expertise in the description of fictional
narrative. Poetics, 20(1), 1–26.
Hakemulder, F., & van Peer, W.
(2016) Empirical stylistics. In V. Sotirova (Ed.), The Bloomsbury companion to stylistics. London, United Kingdom: Bloomsbury.
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1967) Notes on transitivity and theme in English, part
2. Journal of Linguistics, 3(2), 199–244.
Hill, R., & Murray, W.
(2000) Commas and spaces: Effects of punctuation on eye movements and
sentence parsing. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 565–590). Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier.
Hirotani, M., Frazier, L., & Rayner, K.
(2006) Punctuation and intonation effects on clause and sentence
wrap-up: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(3), 425–443.
Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., & Westfall, P.
(2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric
models. Biometrical Journal, 50(3), 346–363.
Hyönä, J., & Niemi, P.
(1990) Eye movements during repeated reading of a text. Acta Psychologica, 73(3), 259–280.
(1881) The portrait of a lady. London, United Kingdom: Macmillan.
(1908) The portrait of a lady (Vol. 11). New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons. Vol. III1 of The Novels and Tales of Henry James.
Kaakinen, J. K., & Hyönä, J.
(2010) Task effects on eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 36(6), 1561–1566.
Lee, S., Lee, M., Park, H., Chang, M.-S., & Kwak, H. W.
(2015) Effects of search intent on eye-movement patterns in a change
detection task. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 8(2), 1–10.
Levy, B., Di Persio, R., & Hollingshead, A.
(1992) Fluent rereading: Repetition, automaticity, and
discrepancy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 18(5), 957–71.
(2015) Between you and me: Confessions of a comma queen. London, United Kingdom: W.W. Norton.
(1998) Constructing meaning when reading poetry. An expert-novice
study. Cognition and Instruction, 16(3), 235–263.
R Core Team
(2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from: https://www.R-project.org/
Sanford, A. J., & Filik, R.
(2007) “They” as a gender-unspecified singular pronoun: Eye tracking
reveals a processing cost. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(2), 171–178.
Schotter, E., Bicknell, K., Howard, I., Levy, R., & Rayner, K.
(2014) Task effects reveal cognitive flexibility responding to frequency
and predictability: Evidence from eye movements in reading and
proofreading. Cognition, 131(1), 1–27.
(2007) “Creation from nothing”: A foregrounding study of James Joyce’s
drafts for Ulysses. Language and Literature, 16(2), 183–196.
(2009) E. E. Cummings’ parentheses: Punctuation as poetic
device. Style, 43(2), 215–47.
Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M.
(1994) Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information
in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of memory and language, 331, 285–285.
Vipond, D., & Hunt, R. A.
(1984) Point driven understanding: Pragmatic and cognitive dimensions of
literary reading. Poetics, 13(3), 261–277.
(1991) The influence of parafoveal preprocessing and linguistic context
on the optimal landing position effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 50(1), 58–75.
Ward, P., & Sturt, P.
(2007) Linguistic focus and memory: An eye movement
study. Memory & Cognition, 35(1), 73–86.
Zeitz, C. M.
(1994) Expert-novice differences in memory, abstraction, and reasoning
in the domain of literature. Cognition and Instruction, 12(4), 277–312.
Cited by 1 other publications
Parente, Fabio, Kathy Conklin, Josephine M Guy & Rebekah Scott
2021. The role of empirical methods in investigating readers’ constructions of authorial creativity in literary reading. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 30:1 ► pp. 21 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 february 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.