Cover not available
Article published In:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 9:2 (2019) ► pp.163–194

Virtual reality as a tool for promoting reading via enhanced narrative absorption and empathy

ORCID logo | University of Milan-Bicocca | Sogang University
ORCID logo | Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
 | Tilburg University
Reading fiction is beneficial for various social skills, although reading has become less and less popular with younger generations. This study investigated whether reading a chapter of a fictional story in virtual reality (VR) can make the reading experience more appealing and increase intention to read the story further. A between-subject experiment (N = 83) was conducted to compare the effect of a printed book and a VR reading environment on narrative absorption, empathy with fictional characters, and intention to read. The results show that VR enhances intention to read, via a serial mediation of transportation into the story world and affective empathy. These findings indicate that VR can be effectively exploited for promoting reading.
Keywords: reading, virtual reality, narrative absorption, empathy, transportation, fiction
Article outline
  • Literature and virtual reality
  • Narrative absorption
    • Attentional focus
    • Transportation
    • Emotional engagement
    • Mental imagery
  • Empathy
  • Intention to read
  • Individual differences
  • Methods
    • Design
    • Participants
    • Research stimuli
    • Procedure
    • Measures
      • Narrative absorption
      • State empathy
      • Intention to read further
      • Controls
  • Results
    • Preliminary checks
    • Correlation analysis
    • Hypotheses testing
      • Effect of VR on SWA (H1), Empathy (H2) and Intention (H3)
      • Effect of VR on SWA subscales, Empathy subscales, and Intention to read
      • Mediation analysis (RQ3)
        • Three mediators (Mediation Model 1)
        • Two mediators with covariates (Mediation Model 2)
  • Discussion
    • Outlook and future research
    • Limitations
  • Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 30 June 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.19013.pia
References (101)
References
Allington, D. (2011). ‘It actually painted a picture of the village and the sea and the bottom of the sea’: Reading groups, cultural legitimacy, and description in narrative (with particular reference to John Steinbeck’s The Pearl). Language and Literature, 20(4), 317–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andromedum. (2016). Imbanova Entertainment. [URL]
Annisette, L. E., & Lafreniere, K. D. (2017). Social media, texting, and personality: A test of the shallowing hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 1151, 154–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aphiddd. (2019). Dreaming Methods. [URL]
Archer, D., & Finger, K. (2018, March 15). Walking in another’s virtual shoes: Do 360-degree video news stories generate empathy in viewers? Columbia Journalism Review. [URL]
Bailenson, J. N. (2018). Experience on Demand. What Virtual Reality is, How it works, and What it can do. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Baker, L., & Scher, D. (2002). Beginning Readers’ Motivation for Reading in Relation to Parental Beliefs and Home Reading Experiences. Reading Psychology, 23(4), 239–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bálint, K., Kuijpers, M., & Doicaru, M. (2017). The effect of suspense structure on felt suspense and narrative absorption in literature and film. In F. Hakemulder, M. M. Kuijpers, E. S. Tan, K. Bálint, & M. M. Doicaru (Eds.), Narrative Absorption (pp. 177–197). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baños, R. M., Botella, C., Alcañiz, M., Liaño, V., Guerrero, B., & Rey, B. (2004). Immersion and Emotion: Their Impact on the Sense of Presence. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(6), 734–741. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Batson, C. D. (2009). These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 3–15). MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, A., Ensslin, A., Ciccoricco, D., Rustad, H., & Laccetti, J. M. (2010). A [S]creed for Digital Fiction. Electronic Book Review. [URL]
Bell, A., Ensslin, A., van der Bom, I., & Smith, J. (2018). Immersion in Digital Fiction: A Cognitive, Empirical Approach. International Journal of Literary Linguistics, 7(1), 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burke, M. (2011). Literary Reading, Cognition and Emotion: An Exploration of the Oceanic Mind. Routledge.Google Scholar
Burke, M., & Bon, E. V. (2018). The Locations and Means of Literary Reading (Vol. 11). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burke, M., Kuzmičová, A., Mangen, A., & Schilhab, T. (2016). Empathy at the confluence of neuroscience and empirical literary studies. Scientific Study of Literature, 6(1), 6–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Beyond metaphors and traditions. Exploring the conceptual boundaries of narrative engagement. In F. Hakemulder, M. M. Kuijpers, E. S. Tan, K. Bálint, & M. M. Doicaru (Eds.), Narrative Absorption (pp. 11–27). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Caracciolo, M. (2014). The Experientiality of Narrative: An Enactivist Approach. de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, L. (1865). Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland. Macmillan.Google Scholar
(1947). De avonturen van Alice (A. Kossmann, Trans.). Ad Donker.Google Scholar
Cheng, K.-H. (2017). Reading an augmented reality book: An exploration of learners’ cognitive load, motivation, and attitudes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 53–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chin Ee, L., & Baoqi, S. (2018). Report on the Reading Habits of Singapore Teenagers 2017. National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University.Google Scholar
Cho, B.-H., Ku, J., Jang, D. P., Kim, S., Lee, Y. H., Kim, I. Y., Lee, J. H., & Kim, S. I. (2002). The effect of virtual reality cognitive training for attention enhancement. Cyberpsychology & Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society, 5(2), 129–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cho, B.-H., Lee, J. M., Ku, J., Jang, D. P., Kim, J. S., Kim, I. Y., Lee, J. H., & Kim, S. I. (2002). Attention Enhancement System using virtual reality and EEG biofeedback. Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2002, 156–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, C., & Teravainen, A. (2017). Children’s and Young People’s Reading in 2016. Findings from our Annual Literacy Survey 2016. National Literacy Trust.Google Scholar
Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (2001). Defining Identification: A Theoretical Look at the Identification of Audiences With Media Characters. Mass Communication and Society, 4(3), 245–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cox, K. E., & Guthrie, J. T. (2001). Motivational and Cognitive Contributions to Students’ Amount of Reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 116–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cummings, J. J., & Bailenson, J. N. (2016). How Immersive Is Enough? A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Immersive Technology on User Presence. Media Psychology, 19(2), 272–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dal Cin, S., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2004). Narrative persuasion and overcoming resistance. In E. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and Persuasion (pp. 175–191). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 251, 23–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diemer, J., Alpers, G. W., Peperkorn, H. M., Shiban, Y., & Mühlberger, A. (2015). The impact of perception and presence on emotional reactions: A review of research in virtual reality. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(26). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dodell-Feder, D., & Tamir, D. I. (2018). Fiction reading has a small positive impact on social cognition: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(11), 1713–1727. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feierabend, S., Rathgeb, T., & Reutter, T. (2018). JIM-Studie 2018. Jugend, Information, Medien. Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest.Google Scholar
Fialho, O., Zyngier, S., & Miall, D. (2011). Interpretation and experience: Two pedagogical interventions observed. English in Education, 45(3), 236–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fong, K., Mullin, J. B., & Mar, R. A. (2013). What You Read Matters: The Role of Fiction Genre in Predicting Interpersonal Sensitivity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 370–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gorini, A., Capideville, C. S., De Leo, G., Mantovani, F., & Riva, G. (2011). The Role of Immersion and Narrative in Mediated Presence: The Virtual Hospital Experience. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(3), 99–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, M. C., Brock, T. C., & Kaufman, G. F. (2004). Understanding Media Enjoyment: The Role of Transportation Into Narrative Worlds. Communication Theory, 14(4), 311–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, M. C., Kass, S., Carrey, J., Herzig, B., Feeney, R., & Sabini, J. (2008). Transportation Across Media: Repeated Exposure to Print and Film. Media Psychology, 11(4), 512–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, T., Wirth, W., Schramm, H., Klimmt, C., Vorderer, P., Gysbers, A., Böcking, S., Ravaja, N., Laarni, J., Saari, T., Gouveia, F., & Maria Sacau, A. (2016). The Spatial Presence Experience Scale (SPES): A Short Self-Report Measure for Diverse Media Settings. Journal of Media Psychology, 28(1), 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (Second edition). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. K. (2008). Electronic literature: New Horizons for the Literary. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Herrera, F., Bailenson, J., Weisz, E., Ogle, E., & Zaki, J. (2018). Building long-term empathy: A large-scale comparison of traditional and virtual reality perspective-taking. PLoS ONE, 13(10), e0204494. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. K., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (2015). Spoiler Alert: Consequences of Narrative Spoilers for Dimensions of Enjoyment, Appreciation, and Transportation. Communication Research, 42(8), 1068–1088. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. R. (2012). Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 150–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnsson-Smaragdi, U., & Jönsson, A. (2006). Book Reading in Leisure Time: Long-Term changes in young peoples’ book reading habits. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(5), 519–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kidd, D., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading Literary Fiction Improves Theory of Mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Reading Literary Fiction and Theory of Mind: Three Preregistered Replications and Extensions of Kidd and Castano (2013). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(4), 522–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krakowiak, K. M., & Oliver, M. B. (2012). When Good Characters Do Bad Things: Examining the Effect of Moral Ambiguity on Enjoyment. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 117–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, G. R. (2003). Literacy in the New Media Age. Routledge.Google Scholar
Kuijpers, M. M., Hakemulder, F., Bálint, K., Doicaru, M. M., & Tan, E. S. (2017). Towards a new understanding of absorbing reading experiences. In F. Hakemulder, M. M. Kuijpers, E. S. Tan, K. Bálint, & M. M. Doicaru (Eds.), Narrative Absorption (pp. 29–48). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuijpers, M. M., Hakemulder, F., Tan, E. S., & Doicaru, M. M. (2014). Exploring absorbing reading experiences: Developing and validating a self-report scale to measure story world absorption. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(1), 89–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuzmičová, A. (2014). Literary Narrative and Mental Imagery: A View from Embodied Cognition. Style, 48(3), 275–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Does it Matter Where You Read? Situating Narrative in Physical Environment. Communication Theory, 26(3), 290–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuzmičová, A., Mangen, A., Støle, H., & Begnum, A. C. (2017). Literature and readers’ empathy: A qualitative text manipulation study. Language and Literature, 26(2), 137–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lessiter, J., Freeman, J., Keogh, E., & Davidoff, J. (2001). A Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10(3), 282–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lissa, C. J. van, Caracciolo, M., Duuren, T. van, & Leuveren, B. van. (2016). Difficult Empathy. The Effect of Narrative Perspective on Readers’ Engagement with a First-Person Narrator. Diegesis, 5(1), 43–63.Google Scholar
Lombard, M., Biocca, F., Freeman, J., Ijsselsteijn, W., & Schaevitz, R. J. (Eds.). (2015). Immersed in Media: Telepresence Theory, Measurement & Technology. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lombard, M., Ditton, T. B., & Weinstein, L. (2009). Measuring Presence: The Temple Presence Inventory. [URL]
Mangen, A., & Kuiken, D. (2014). Lost in an iPad: Narrative engagement on paper and tablet. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(2), 150–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mangen, A., Olivier, G., & Velay, J.-L. (2019). Comparing Comprehension of a Long Text Read in Print Book and on Kindle: Where in the Text and When in the Story? Frontiers in Psychology, 101, 38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The Function of Fiction is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Djikic, M., & Mullin, J. (2011). Emotion and narrative fiction: Interactive influences before, during, and after reading. Cognition & Emotion, 25(5), 818–833. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B. (2009). Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 341, 407–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marcos, D., Ngo, K., & Goberna, D. (2017). A-Frame (Version 0.8.0) [Computer software]. [URL]
(2018). Supermedium. [URL]
Martignano, A. J., Herrera, F., Castano, E., & Konrath, S. (2019). Virtual Reality Can Increase Empathy: A preregistered Meta-Analysis. 31st Annual Convention for the Association for Psychological Science, Washington DC.
Mazzocco, P. J., Green, M. C., Sasota, J. A., & Jones, N. W. (2010). This Story Is Not for Everyone: Transportability and Narrative Persuasion. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11, 361–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mumper, M. L., & Gerrig, R. J. (2017). Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 109–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neumann, D., & Moffitt, R. (2018). Affective and Attentional States When Running in a Virtual Reality Environment. Sports, 6(3), 71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oliver, M. B., Dillard, J. P., Bae, K., & Tamul, D. J. (2012). The effect of narrative news format on empathy for stigmatized groups. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(2), 205–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pasieka, T. (2017). The Raven VR. [URL]
Peters, S., & van Strien, S. (2018). Boekenbranche meting 44. 1e themameting van 2018 naar het kopen, lezen en lenen van boeken onder jongeren tussen 12 en 25 jaar. GfK.Google Scholar
Pianzola, F. (2018). AliceVR. [URL]
Pianzola, Federico, Weller, Jessica, & Bálint, Katalin. (2019). Experimental data for “Virtual Reality as a Tool for Promoting Reading via Enhanced Narrative Absorption and Empathy” [Data set]. Zenodo. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potthoff, R. F. (1964). On the Johnson-Neyman technique and some extensions thereof. Psychometrika, 29(3), 241–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 1471, 103778. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riva, G., Mantovani, F., Capideville, C. S., Preziosa, A., Morganti, F., Villani, D., Gaggioli, A., Botella, C., & Alcañiz, M. (2007). Affective Interactions Using Virtual Reality: The Link between Presence and Emotions. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(1), 45–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riva, G., Mantovani, F., Waterworth, E. L., & Waterworth, J. A. (2015). Intention, Action, Self and Other: An Evolutionary Model of Presence. In M. Lombard, F. Biocca, J. Freeman, W. IJsselsteijn, & R. J. Schaevitz (Eds.), Immersed in Media (pp. 73–99). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rooney, B., Burke, C., Balint, K., O’Leary, T., Parsons, T., Lee, C. T., & Mantei, C. (2017). Virtual reality, presence and social cognition: The effect of eye-gaze and narrativity on character engagement. 2017 23rd International Conference on Virtual System & Multimedia (VSMM), 1–6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M.-L. (2015). Narrative as virtual reality 2: Revisiting immersion and interactivity in literature and electronic media (Second edition). Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, S., Ehrenbrink, P., Weiss, B., Voigt-Antons, J.-N., Kojic, T., Johnston, A., & Moller, S. (2018). Impact of Virtual Environments on Motivation and Engagement During Exergames. 2018 Tenth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), 1–6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schutte, N. S., & Stilinović, E. J. (2017). Facilitating empathy through virtual reality. Motivation and Emotion, 41(6), 708–712. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, L. (2010). On a scale of state empathy during message processing. Western Journal of Communication, 74(5), 504–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skarbez, R., Brooks, Jr., F. P., & Whitton, M. C. (2017). A Survey of Presence and Related Concepts. ACM Computing Surveys, 50(6), 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speer, N. K., Reynolds, J. R., Swallow, K. M., & Zacks, J. M. (2009). Reading Stories Activates Neural Representations of Visual and Motor Experiences. Psychological Science, 20(8), 989–999. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sukalla, F., Bilandzic, H., Bolls, P. D., & Busselle, R. (2016). Embodiment of Narrative Engagement: Connecting Self-Reported Narrative Engagement to Psychophysiological Measures. Journal of Media Psychology, 28(4), 175–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tal-Or, N., & Cohen, J. (2010). Understanding audience involvement: Conceptualizing and manipulating identification and transportation. Poetics, 38(4), 402–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Touré-Tillery, M., & Fishbach, A. (2014). How to Measure Motivation: A Guide for the Experimental Social Psychologist. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(7), 328–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Loon, A., Bailenson, J., Zaki, J., Bostick, J., & Willer, R. (2018). Virtual reality perspective-taking increases cognitive empathy for specific others. PLoS ONE, 13(8), e0202442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vorderer, P., Wirth, W., Gouveia, F. R., Biocca, F., Saari, T., Jäncke, L., Böcking, S., Schramm, H., Gysbers, A., Hartmann, T., Klimmt, C., Ravaja, N., Sacau, A., Baumgartner, T., & Jäncke, P. (2004). MEC Spatial Presence Questionnaire (MEC- SPQ): Short Documentation and Instructions for Application (p. 14). Project Presence: MEC (IST-2001-37661). [URL]
Wales, N. (2016). The Raven. Space Pen Studios. [URL]
Wei, W., Qi, R., & Zhang, L. (2019). Effects of virtual reality on theme park visitors’ experience and behaviors: A presence perspective. Tourism Management, 711, 282–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wennekers, A., Haan, J. de, & Huysmans, F. (2016). Media: Tijd in kaart. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
Whalen, Z. N. (2008). The videogame text: Typography and textuality [University of Florida]. [URL]
Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3), 225–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, C.-L., & Chou, T.-L. (2018). A Dual Route Model of Empathy: A Neurobiological Prospective. Frontiers in Psychology, 91, 2012. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Hameed, Asim, Sebastian Möller & Andrew Perkis
2024. A holistic quality taxonomy for virtual reality experiences. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 5 DOI logo
Titus, Alex, Ton Dijkstra, Roel M. Willems & David Peeters
2024. Beyond the tried and true: How virtual reality, dialog setups, and a focus on multimodality can take bilingual language production research forward. Neuropsychologia 193 ► pp. 108764 ff. DOI logo
Cheng, Kun-Hung
2023. An epistemic curiosity-evoking model for immersive virtual reality narrative reading: User experience and the interaction among epistemic curiosity, transportation, and attitudinal learning. Computers & Education 201 ► pp. 104814 ff. DOI logo
Kunzova, Nikola & Daniel Echeverri
2023. Bookwander: From Printed Fiction to Virtual Reality—Four Design Approaches for Enhanced VR Reading Experiences. In Interactive Storytelling [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14383], ► pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Ma, Zexin, Rong Ma, Meng Chen & Nathan Walter
2023. Present, empathetic, and persuaded: a meta-analytic comparison of storytelling in high versus low immersive mediated environments. Human Communication Research 50:1 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Geonsun, Jennifer Healey & Dinesh Manocha
2022. 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), ► pp. 787 ff. DOI logo
Wei, Tian, Yongkang Xing, Yushuo Wu, Ho Yan Kwan & Lianhui Li
2022. Virtual Reality Design in Reading User Experience: 3D Data Visualization with Interaction in Digital Publication Figures. Scientific Programming 2022 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Pianzola, Federico & Luca Deriu
2021. StoryVR: A Virtual Reality App for Enhancing Reading. In Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 10th International Conference. Workshops [Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1236], ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Pianzola, Federico, Giuseppe Riva, Karin Kukkonen & Fabrizia Mantovani
2021. Presence, flow, and narrative absorption: an interdisciplinary theoretical exploration with a new spatiotemporal integrated model based on predictive processing. Open Research Europe 1 ► pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
Pianzola, Federico, Giuseppe Riva, Karin Kukkonen & Fabrizia Mantovani
2021. Presence, flow, and narrative absorption: an interdisciplinary theoretical exploration with a new spatiotemporal integrated model based on predictive processing. Open Research Europe 1 ► pp. 28 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.