An experimental study of the effect of close reading versus casual reading of social drama on the stimulation of the cognitive capacity of empathy
The current study investigates whether the mode of reading practice has an effect on the degree of readers’ empathic response to social drama, using Enda Walsh’s
Chatroom (
2015), tackling contemporary adolescents’ problems, as an experimental example. The experiment conducted in this paper hypothesizes that in contrast with casual reading, the conscious techniques of close reading are more effective in promoting participants’ empathic engagement with the dramatic text and improving their capacity of problem discovery and solution. Accordingly, the close reading of social drama can reinforce social integration and work as an antidote to the ostracism of one social group from their community. Moreover, the L2 students’ stimulated empathic response is translated into a written output which is richer in quantity and quality.
Article outline
- Close reading and casual reading
- Empathy, fiction and drama
- Empathy and Walsh’s effective dramatic techniques in Chatroom
- Empathy and multimedia in the last scene
- Research design
- Purpose
- Measures
- Hypotheses
- Method
- Participants
- Material
- Procedures
- Results
- Discussion
- Conclusion
-
References
References (63)
References
Akbari, E., Naderi, A., Simons, R., & Pilot, A. (2016). Student engagement and foreign language learning through online social networks. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(4). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baars, B., & Gage, N. (2010). Cognition, Brain and Consciousness. 2nd ed. China: Academic Press Elsevier.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benedek, M., & Jauk, E. (2018). Spontaneous and controlled processes in creative cognition. In K. Christoff & K. Fox (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of spontaneous Thought (pp. 285–296). New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Best, S., & Marcus, S. (2009). Surface Reading: An Introduction. Representations, 108 (1), 1–21. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bilandzic, H., Sukalla, F., Schnell, C., Hastall, M., & Busselle, R. (2019). The Narrative Engageability Scale. International Journal of Communication, 131, 801–832. [URL]
Brummett, B. (2010). Techniques of Close Reading. USA: Sage Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cleaver, S. (2015). Every Reader a Close Reader. USA: Rowman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cummings, L. (2016). Empathy as Dialogue in Theatre and Performance. USA: Palgrave. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Damasio, A. (2010). Self Comes to Mind. USA: Pantheon Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dascalu, M. (2014). Analyzing Discourse and Text Complexity for Learning and Collaborating. New York: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2012). Close Reading in Elementary Schools. The Reading Teacher, 66 (3), 179–188. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fitzpatrick, L. (2010). ENDA WALSH. In M. Middeke & P. Schnierer (Eds.), The Methuen Drama Guide to Contemporary Irish Playwrights (pp. 439–452).UK: Methuen Drama. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Freedman, J. (2015). After Close Reading. New Rambler Review. [URL]
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, R. (1993). Writing Science. USA: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd edition. London: Hodder Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hanauer, D. (2012). Meaningful literacy: Writing poetry in the language classroom. Language Teaching, 45 (1), 105–115. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harper, G. (2010). On Creative Writing. Bristol: MLM. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hathaway, J. (2015). Connect to Text: Strategies for Close Reading and Writing. Canada: Shell Education.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hogan, P. (2011). What Literature Teaches Us about Emotions. USA: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iacoboni, M. (2009). Mirroring People: The Science of Empathy. USA: Picador.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jarvis, S. (2012). Lexical Challenges in the Intersection of Applied Linguistics and ANLP. In C. Boonthum-Denecke, P. McCarthy & T. Lamkin (Eds.), Cross-Disciplinary Advances in Applied Natural Language Processing (pp. 50–72). USA: Information Science Reference. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jockers, M. (2013). Macroanalysis. USA: University of Illinois. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Juanggo, W. (2018). Investigating lexical diversity and lexical sophistication of productive vocabulary in the written discourse of Indonesian EFL learners. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 38–48. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Karam, K. M. (2020). Conscious application of creativity dynamics as an approach to the formation and appreciation of literary creativity. Neohelicon. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keen, S. (2007). Empathy and the Novel. New York: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading Literary Fiction Improves Theory of Mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2017). Failure to replicate methods caused the failure to replicate results. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1121, e1–e4. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2018). Reading Literary Fiction Can Improve Theory of Mind. Nature Human Behaviour 21, 604. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koopman, E. M., & Hakemulder, F. (2015). Effects of Literature on Empathy and Self-Reflection: A Theoretical-Empirical Framework. Journal of Literary Theory, 91, 79–111. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kyle, K., Crossley, S., & Berger, C. (2018). The tool for the automatic analysis of lexical sophistication (TAALES): version 2.0. Behav Res 501, 1030–1046. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehman, C., & Roberts, K. (2014). Falling in Love with Close Reading. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leverage, P., Mancing, H., Schweickert, R., & William, J. (Eds.). (2011). Introduction. Theory of mind and literature. (pp. 1–11). West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lu, X. (2012). The Relationship of Lexical Richness to the Quality of ESL Learners’ Oral Narratives. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 190–208. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mar, A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, B. (2009). Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy. Communications, 34 (4), 407–428. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCaw, N. (2011). Close Reading, Writing and Culture. New Writing, 8(1), 25–34. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McConachie, B. (2008). Engaging Audience: A Cognitive Approach to Spectating in the Theatre. USA: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McConachie, B., & Hart, F. (eds.). (2006). Introduction. Performance and Cognition: (pp. 1–25). USA: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miller, D. (2014). Forward. Falling in Love with Close reading (pp. vii–xi). USA: Heinemann.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moss, B., Lapp, D., Grant, M., & Johnson, K. (2015). A Close Look at Close reading. USA: ASCD.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moretti, F. (2013). Distant Reading. UK: Verso.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mumper, L., & Gerrig, J. (2017). Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 109–120. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Neuman, S., & Gambrell, L. (2013). Challenges and Opportunities in the Implementation of Common Core State Standards. In S. Newman & L. Gambrell (Eds.), Quality Reading Instruction in the Age of Common Core State Standards (pp. 1–12). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Palfreyman, D., & Karaki, S. (2019). Lexical sophistication across languages: a preliminary study of undergraduate writing in Arabic (L1) and English (L2). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(8), 992–1015, ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Panero, M. E., Weisberg, D. S., Black, J., Goldstein, T. R., Barnes, J. L., Brownell, H., & Winner, E. (2016). Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1111, e46–e54. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 361. 50–72. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Phillips, N. (2015). Literary Neuroscience and History of Mind: An interdisciplinary fMRI Study of Attention and Jane Austen. In L. Zunshine (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Literary Studies (pp. 55–81). USA: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pino, M. C., & Mazza, M. (2016). The use of “literary fiction” to promote mentalizing ability. PLoS One, 111, e0160254. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Richard, I. (1929). Practical Criticism: A Study of Literary Judgment. Great Britain: The Edinburgh Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Runco, M., Turkman, B., Acar, S., & Nural, M. (2017). The Idea Density and Creativity of Written Works. Journal of Genius and Eminence, 2(1), 26–31. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Snow, C., & O’Connor, C. (2016). Close Reading and Far-Reaching Classroom Discussion. The Journal of Education, 196(1), 1–8. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sofia, G. (2013). The Effect of Theatre Training on Cognitive Functions. In N. Shaughnessy (Ed.), Affective Performance and Cognitive Science (pp. 171–180). India: Bloomsbury. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stebbins, R. (2012). The Committed Reader: Reading for Utility, Pleasure, and Fulfillment in the Twenty-First Century. UK: Scarecrow Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tabbi, J. (2010). Cognitive Science. In B. Clarck & M. Rossini (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Literature and Science (pp. 77–87). USA: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tausczik, Y., & Pennebaker, J. (2010). The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1):24–54. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Kuijk, I., Verkoeijen, P., Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. A. (2018). The Effect of Reading a Short Passage of Literary Fiction on Theory of Mind: A Replication of Kidd and Castano (2013). Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 7. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Walsh, E. (2015). Enda Walsh Plays: One. New York: Nick Hern Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weare, K. (2000). Promoting Mental, Emotional and Social Health: A Whole School Approach. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Widdowson, G. (1998). Context, community and authentic language. TESOL Quarterly, 32 (4), 705–716. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolfreys, J. (2000). Readings: Acts of Close Reading in Literary Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Dahy, Faten Abdelaziz & Khaled Mostafa Karam
2021.
Potentials of Empathetic Stimuli in Creative Nonfiction: Zimbardo’sThe Lucifer Effectand Danner’sTorture and Truth.
English Studies 102:4
► pp. 468 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Karam, Khaled Mostafa & Helmy Elfiel
2021.
An Experimental Appraisal of the Acquisition of Creative Literary Compression versus Descriptive Texts.
Creativity Research Journal 33:2
► pp. 106 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.