Cover not available
Article published In:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 10:1 (2020) ► pp.4–34

An experimental study of the effect of close reading versus casual reading of social drama on the stimulation of the cognitive capacity of empathy

ORCID logo | Suez University
 | Alexandria University
The current study investigates whether the mode of reading practice has an effect on the degree of readers’ empathic response to social drama, using Enda Walsh’s Chatroom (2015), tackling contemporary adolescents’ problems, as an experimental example. The experiment conducted in this paper hypothesizes that in contrast with casual reading, the conscious techniques of close reading are more effective in promoting participants’ empathic engagement with the dramatic text and improving their capacity of problem discovery and solution. Accordingly, the close reading of social drama can reinforce social integration and work as an antidote to the ostracism of one social group from their community. Moreover, the L2 students’ stimulated empathic response is translated into a written output which is richer in quantity and quality.
Keywords: close reading, casual reading, empathy, engagement, social drama, lexical richness
Article outline
  • Close reading and casual reading
  • Empathy, fiction and drama
  • Empathy and Walsh’s effective dramatic techniques in Chatroom
    • Empathy and multimedia in the last scene
  • Research design
    • Purpose
    • Measures
    • Hypotheses
  • Method
    • Participants
    • Material
    • Procedures
      • Tasks
      • Data collection
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 9 December 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.19016.kar
References (63)
References
Akbari, E., Naderi, A., Simons, R., & Pilot, A. (2016). Student engagement and foreign language learning through online social networks. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(4). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baars, B., & Gage, N. (2010). Cognition, Brain and Consciousness. 2nd ed. China: Academic Press Elsevier.Google Scholar
Benedek, M., & Jauk, E. (2018). Spontaneous and controlled processes in creative cognition. In K. Christoff & K. Fox (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of spontaneous Thought (pp. 285–296). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Best, S., & Marcus, S. (2009). Surface Reading: An Introduction. Representations, 108 (1), 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bilandzic, H., & Busselle, R. (2017). Beyond metaphors and traditions: Exploring the conceptual boundaries of narrative engagement. In F. Hakemulder, M. Kuijpers, E. Tan, K. Bálint & M. Doicaru (Eds.), Narrative Absorption (pp. 11–27). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bilandzic, H., Sukalla, F., Schnell, C., Hastall, M., & Busselle, R. (2019). The Narrative Engageability Scale. International Journal of Communication, 131, 801–832. [URL]
Brummett, B. (2010). Techniques of Close Reading. USA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cleaver, S. (2015). Every Reader a Close Reader. USA: Rowman.Google Scholar
Cummings, L. (2016). Empathy as Dialogue in Theatre and Performance. USA: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A. (2010). Self Comes to Mind. USA: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Dascalu, M. (2014). Analyzing Discourse and Text Complexity for Learning and Collaborating. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2012). Close Reading in Elementary Schools. The Reading Teacher, 66 (3), 179–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, L. (2010). ENDA WALSH. In M. Middeke & P. Schnierer (Eds.), The Methuen Drama Guide to Contemporary Irish Playwrights (pp. 439–452).UK: Methuen Drama. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freedman, J. (2015). After Close Reading. New Rambler Review. [URL]
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, R. (1993). Writing Science. USA: Routledge.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd edition. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Hanauer, D. (2012). Meaningful literacy: Writing poetry in the language classroom. Language Teaching, 45 (1), 105–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harper, G. (2010). On Creative Writing. Bristol: MLM. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, J. (2015). Connect to Text: Strategies for Close Reading and Writing. Canada: Shell Education.Google Scholar
Hogan, P. (2011). What Literature Teaches Us about Emotions. USA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iacoboni, M. (2009). Mirroring People: The Science of Empathy. USA: Picador.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S. (2012). Lexical Challenges in the Intersection of Applied Linguistics and ANLP. In C. Boonthum-Denecke, P. McCarthy & T. Lamkin (Eds.), Cross-Disciplinary Advances in Applied Natural Language Processing (pp. 50–72). USA: Information Science Reference. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jockers, M. (2013). Macroanalysis. USA: University of Illinois. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juanggo, W. (2018). Investigating lexical diversity and lexical sophistication of productive vocabulary in the written discourse of Indonesian EFL learners. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 38–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karam, K. M. (2020). Conscious application of creativity dynamics as an approach to the formation and appreciation of literary creativity. Neohelicon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keen, S. (2007). Empathy and the Novel. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading Literary Fiction Improves Theory of Mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Failure to replicate methods caused the failure to replicate results. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1121, e1–e4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Reading Literary Fiction Can Improve Theory of Mind. Nature Human Behaviour 21, 604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koopman, E. M., & Hakemulder, F. (2015). Effects of Literature on Empathy and Self-Reflection: A Theoretical-Empirical Framework. Journal of Literary Theory, 91, 79–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuijpers, M., Hakemulder, F., Tan, E., & Doicarub, M. (2014). Exploring absorbing reading experiences. Scientific Study of Literature 4(1), 89–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kyle, K., Crossley, S., & Berger, C. (2018). The tool for the automatic analysis of lexical sophistication (TAALES): version 2.0. Behav Res 501, 1030–1046. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehman, C., & Roberts, K. (2014). Falling in Love with Close Reading. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Leverage, P., Mancing, H., Schweickert, R., & William, J. (Eds.). (2011). Introduction. Theory of mind and literature. (pp. 1–11). West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Lu, X. (2012). The Relationship of Lexical Richness to the Quality of ESL Learners’ Oral Narratives. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 190–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mar, A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, B. (2009). Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy. Communications, 34 (4), 407–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCaw, N. (2011). Close Reading, Writing and Culture. New Writing, 8(1), 25–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McConachie, B. (2008). Engaging Audience: A Cognitive Approach to Spectating in the Theatre. USA: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McConachie, B., & Hart, F. (eds.). (2006). Introduction. Performance and Cognition: (pp. 1–25). USA: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. (2014). Forward. Falling in Love with Close reading (pp. vii–xi). USA: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Moss, B., Lapp, D., Grant, M., & Johnson, K. (2015). A Close Look at Close reading. USA: ASCD.Google Scholar
Moretti, F. (2013). Distant Reading. UK: Verso.Google Scholar
Mumper, L., & Gerrig, J. (2017). Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 109–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neuman, S., & Gambrell, L. (2013). Challenges and Opportunities in the Implementation of Common Core State Standards. In S. Newman & L. Gambrell (Eds.), Quality Reading Instruction in the Age of Common Core State Standards (pp. 1–12). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palfreyman, D., & Karaki, S. (2019). Lexical sophistication across languages: a preliminary study of undergraduate writing in Arabic (L1) and English (L2). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(8), 992–1015, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panero, M. E., Weisberg, D. S., Black, J., Goldstein, T. R., Barnes, J. L., Brownell, H., & Winner, E. (2016). Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1111, e46–e54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 361. 50–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips, N. (2015). Literary Neuroscience and History of Mind: An interdisciplinary fMRI Study of Attention and Jane Austen. In L. Zunshine (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Literary Studies (pp. 55–81). USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pino, M. C., & Mazza, M. (2016). The use of “literary fiction” to promote mentalizing ability. PLoS One, 111, e0160254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richard, I. (1929). Practical Criticism: A Study of Literary Judgment. Great Britain: The Edinburgh Press.Google Scholar
Runco, M., Turkman, B., Acar, S., & Nural, M. (2017). The Idea Density and Creativity of Written Works. Journal of Genius and Eminence, 2(1), 26–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snow, C., & O’Connor, C. (2016). Close Reading and Far-Reaching Classroom Discussion. The Journal of Education, 196(1), 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sofia, G. (2013). The Effect of Theatre Training on Cognitive Functions. In N. Shaughnessy (Ed.), Affective Performance and Cognitive Science (pp. 171–180). India: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stebbins, R. (2012). The Committed Reader: Reading for Utility, Pleasure, and Fulfillment in the Twenty-First Century. UK: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Tabbi, J. (2010). Cognitive Science. In B. Clarck & M. Rossini (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Literature and Science (pp. 77–87). USA: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tausczik, Y., & Pennebaker, J. (2010). The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1):24–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Kuijk, I., Verkoeijen, P., Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. A. (2018). The Effect of Reading a Short Passage of Literary Fiction on Theory of Mind: A Replication of Kidd and Castano (2013). Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walsh, E. (2015). Enda Walsh Plays: One. New York: Nick Hern Books.Google Scholar
Weare, K. (2000). Promoting Mental, Emotional and Social Health: A Whole School Approach. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, G. (1998). Context, community and authentic language. TESOL Quarterly, 32 (4), 705–716. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfreys, J. (2000). Readings: Acts of Close Reading in Literary Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Dahy, Faten Abdelaziz & Khaled Mostafa Karam
2021. Potentials of Empathetic Stimuli in Creative Nonfiction: Zimbardo’sThe Lucifer Effectand Danner’sTorture and Truth. English Studies 102:4 ► pp. 468 ff. DOI logo
Karam, Khaled Mostafa & Helmy Elfiel
2021. An Experimental Appraisal of the Acquisition of Creative Literary Compression versus Descriptive Texts. Creativity Research Journal 33:2 ► pp. 106 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.