Cover not available
Article published In:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 11:1 (2021) ► pp.74–107

Absorbing narratives and Motivation to Read

A mode-effect study on young readers

| University of Helsinki
| Aalto University
Digital reading has established its position, and thus research on how reading mode affects reading experience and enjoyment is needed. This study is based on a reading experiment with 89 14–15-year-olds who read or listened to an entire book in four different reading modes: paperbook, ebook, audiobook, and via a commercial subscription service. Using quantitative methods, we examine whether reading mode affects story world absorption as well as seek connections between gender, motivation, absorption and reading mode preferences. Based on the study, reading mode has no statistical impact on narrative absorption experience, measured by the Story World Absorption Scale. Instead, the experience correlates with reading motivation; an adolescent with higher motivation is more likely to feel absorbed while reading, regardless of reading mode. On average, girls experience higher reading motivation and absorption than boys. Less motivated seem to prefer audiobook whereas more motivated choose reading over listening.
Keywords: audiobook, ebook, media effects, narrative absorption, reading motivation, adolescents
Article outline
  • Theoretical background
    • Reading on-screen versus reading in print
    • Reading for pleasure and absorbing reading experiences
  • Methods
    • Participants
    • Reading materials and modes
    • Questionnaires
      • Motivation to Read Profile
      • Story World Absorption Scale
    • Procedures
    • Statistical analyses
  • Results
    • Reading motivation
    • Story World Absorption
    • Is there relationship between motivation to read and story world absorption?
    • Does the reading mode determine the Magnitude of Story World Absorption?
    • Motivation to read, gender and Story World Absorption
    • Motivation to read and chosen reading mode
  • Discussion
    • Main results of the study
    • Motivation correlated to absorption experience
    • No differences between reading modes in terms of absorption experience
    • Gender differences
    • Limitations of the study
    • Main implications of the study
  • References
Published online: 17 December 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.20009.ros
References (87)
References
Aaltonen, L.-S. (2019). ”Miks mä lukisin kirjaa?” Digitaalinen lukeminen nuoren lukumotivaation herättäjänä. Nuorisotutkimus, 37(3/4), 69–83.Google Scholar
(2020). Lukuklaani-tutkimus. Ala- ja yläkoulujen alkukartoitusten koosteet, analyysi ja tiedottaminen. Tutkimusraportti 2017–2019. [URL]
Ackerman, R., & Goldsmith, M. (2011). Metacognitive Regulation of Text Learning: On Screen Versus on Paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(1), 18–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Afflerbach, P., & Harrison, C. (2017). What Is Engagement, How Is It Different From Motivation, and How Can I Promote It? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 61(2), 217–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexander, P. A., & Fox, E. (2011). Adolescents as Readers. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research, volume IV (pp. 157–176). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Alexander, J., & Jarman, R. (2018). The pleasures of reading non-fiction. Literacy, 52(2), 78–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Appleyard, J. A. k. (1990). Becoming a reader: The experience of fiction from childhood to adulthood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baron, N. S. (2013). Redefining reading: The impact of digital communication media. PMLA, 128(1), 193–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Words onscreen: The fate of reading in a digital world. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bilandzic, H., & Busselle, R. (2008). Transportation and transportability in the cultivation of genre-consistent attitudes and estimates. Journal of Communication. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brozo, W. G., Sulkunen, S., Shiel, G., Garbe, C., Pandian, A., & Valtin, R. (2014). Reading, Gender, and Engagement: LESSONS FROM FIVE PISA COUNTRIES. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(7), 584–593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burnett, C., & Merchant, G. (2018). Affective encounters: Enchantment and the possibility of reading for pleasure. Literacy, 52(2), 62–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and Perceived Realism in Experiencing Stories: A Model of Narrative Comprehension and Engagement. Communication Theory, 18(2), 255–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Measuring Narrative Engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheema, J. R. (2018). Adolescents’ enjoyment of reading as a predictor of reading achievement: New evidence from a cross-country survey. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(S1), S149–S162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, C., Osborne, S., & Garland, R. (2008). Young People’s Self-Perceptions as Readers: An Investigation Including Family, Peer and School Influences. National Literacy Trust.Google Scholar
Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, J. (2013). Reading, in a digital archive of one’s own.(Critical essay). PMLA, 128(1), 207–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cremin, T., & Moss, G. (2018). Reading for pleasure: supporting reader engagement. Literacy, 521, 59–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Dalton, B., & Grisham, D. L. (2013). Love That Book: Multimodal Response to Literature. The Reading Teacher, 67(3), 220–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidovitch, N., Yavich, R., & Druckman, E. (2016). Don’t Throw out Paper and Pens Yet: On the Reading Habits of Students. Journal of international education research, 12(4), 129–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 251, 23–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. R. (2007). Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(4), 228–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eccles (Parsons), J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Eds.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Goldman, S. R. (2012). Adolescent Literacy: Learning and Understanding Content. The Future of Children, 22(2), 89–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, M. C., Brock, T. C., & Kaufman, G. F. (2004). Understanding Media Enjoyment: The Role of Transportation Into Narrative Worlds. Communication Theory, 14(4), 311–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, J., & Klauda, S. (2016). Engagement and Motivational Processes in Reading. In P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in reading: reader, text, and context (pp. 41–53). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J. L., & Cox, K. E. (1999). Motivational and Cognitive Predictors of Text Comprehension and Reading Amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 231–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, J., Kuijpers, M. M., Tan, E. S., Bálint, K., & Doicaru, M. M. (2017). Narrative absorption. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hedemark, Å. (2012). A Study of Swedish Children’s Attitudes to Reading and Public Library Activities. New Review of Children’s Literature and Librarianship, 18(2), 116–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, T., & Brown, C. (2011). Reading Engagement: A Comparison between E-Books and Traditional Print Books in an Elementary Classroom. International Journal of Instruction, 4(2), 5–22.Google Scholar
Jose, P. E., & Brewer, W. F. (1984). Development of story liking: Character identification, suspense, and outcome resolution. Developmental Psychology, 20(5), 911–924. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kajander, A. (2020). Kirja ja lukija digitalisoituvassa arjessa. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki]. Helda. [URL]. DOI logo
Keller, J., & Bless, H. (2008). Flow and Regulatory Compatibility: An Experimental Approach to the Flow Model of Intrinsic Motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 196–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koepnick, L. (2013). Reading on the move. PMLA, 128(1), 232–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kucirkova, N., Littleton, K., & Cremin, T. (2017). Young children’s reading for pleasure with digital books: Six key facets of engagement. Cambridge Journal of Education, 47(1), 67–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuijpers, M., Douglas, S., & Kuiken, D. (2019). Personality Traits and Reading Habits That Predict Absorbed Narrative Fiction Reading. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(1), 74–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuijpers, M., Hakemulder, F., Tan, E. S., & Doicaru, M. M. (2014). Exploring absorbing reading experiences: Developing and validating a self-report scale to measure story world absorption. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(1), 89–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakka, L. (in press). Lukutaito ja osallisuus – onko toista ilman toista? In J. Paananen, M. Luodonpää-Manni, M. Lindeman, & C. Lindholm (Eds.), Kieli, hyvinvointi ja sosiaalinen osallisuus. Helsinki: Vastapaino.
Larson, L. (2015). E-books and Audiobooks. Reading Teacher, 69(2), 169–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leino, K., Ahonen, A. K., Hienonen, N., Hiltunen, J., Lintuvuori, M., Lähteinen, S., Lämsä, J., Nissinen, K., Nissinen, V., Puhakka, E., Pulkkinen, J., Rautopuro, J., Siren, M., Vainikainen, M.-P., & Vettenranta, J. (2019). PISA 2018 ensituloksia – Suomi parhaiden joukossa. Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja 2019:40.Google Scholar
Leu, D., Kinzer, C., Coiro, J., & Cammack, D. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the internet and other information and communication technologies. In R. Ruddell & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (pp. 1570–1613). Newark: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Linnakylä, P., Malin, A., & Taube, K. (2004). Factors behind low reading literacy achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48(3), 231–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Vincent, J., Mascheroni, G., & Olafsson, K. (2014). Net children go mobile: The UK report. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
Malloy, J. A., Marinak, B. A., Gambrell, L. B., & Mazzoni, S. A. (2013). Assessing Motivation to Read. Reading Teacher, 67(4), 273–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malloy, J. A., Parsons, A. W., Marinak, B. A., Applegate, A. J., Applegate, M. D., Ray Reutzel, D., & Gambrell, L. B. (2017). Assessing (and Addressing!) Motivation to Read Fiction and Nonfiction. Reading Teacher, 71(3), 309–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mangen, A., & Kuiken, D. (2014). Lost in an iPad: Narrative engagement on paper and tablet. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(2), 150–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mangen, A., Olivier, G., & Velay, J. (2019). Comparing Comprehension of a Long Text Read in Print Book and on Kindle: Where in the Text and When in the Story? Frontiers in psychology, 10(38), 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mangen, A., & Weel, A. (2016). The evolution of reading in the age of digitisation: An integrative framework for reading research. Literacy, 50(3), 116–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58(C), 61–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Margolin, S. J., Driscoll, C., Toland, M. J., & Kegler, J. L. (2013). E-readers, Computer Screens, or Paper: Does Reading Comprehension Change Across Media Platforms? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(4), 512–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marinak, B. A., & Gambrell, L. B. (2008). Intrinsic Motivation and Rewards: What Sustains Young Children’s Engagement with Text? Literacy Research and Instruction, 47(1), 9–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merga, M. K. (2014a). Are Teenagers “Really” Keen Digital Readers? Adolescent Engagement in Ebook Reading and the Relevance of Paper Books Today. English in Australia, 49(1), 27–37.Google Scholar
(2014b). Peer Group and Friend Influences on the Social Acceptability of Adolescent Book Reading. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(6), 472–482. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merga, M. K., & Saiyidi, M. R. (2018). Parents as Social Influences Encouraging Book Reading: Research Directions for Librarians’ Literacy Advocacy. Journal of Library Administration, 58(7), 674–697. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nell, V. (1988). Lost in a book: The psychology of reading for pleasure. New York: Yale University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OECD (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume II): Where All Students Can Succeed, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parsons, A. W., Parsons, S. A., Malloy, J. A., Gambrell, L. B., Marinak, B. A., Reutzel, D. R., & Fawson, P. C. (2018). Upper Elementary Students’ Motivation to Read Fiction and Nonfiction. The Elementary School Journal, 118(3), 505–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pitcher, S. M., Albright, L. K., Delaney, C. J., Walker, N. T., Seunarinesingh, K., Mogge, S., & Dunston, P. J. (2007). Assessing Adolescents’ Motivation to Read. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(5), 378–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prensky, M. (2001a). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001b). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 2: Do They Really Think Differently? On the Horizon, 9(6), 1–6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Our Brains Extended. Educational leadership, 70(6), 22–27.Google Scholar
Rideout, V. (2016). Measuring time spent with media: The Common Sense census of media use by US 8- to 18-year-olds. Journal of Children and Media, 10(1), 138–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruddel, R., & Unrau, N. (2013). Reading as a Motivated Meaning-Construction Process: The Reader, the Text, and the Teacher. In D. Alvermann, R. Ruddel, & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, 6th edition (pp. 1015–1068). Newark: International Reading Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, L., Merga, M. K., & Singleton, A. (2018a). Influences on Australian adolescents’ recreational reading. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 41(1), 44–56.Google Scholar
Rutherford, L., Singleton, A., Derr, L. A., & Merga, M. K. (2018b). Do digital devices enhance teenagers’ recreational reading engagement? Issues for library policy from a recent study in two Australian states. Public Library Quarterly, 37(3), 318–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simukka, S. (2013a). Punainen kuin veri. Helsinki: Tammi.Google Scholar
(2013b). Punainen kuin veri (ebook, ePub 2). Helsinki: Tammi.Google Scholar
(2014). Punainen kuin veri (audiobook). Helsinki: Tammi.Google Scholar
Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017a). Reading on Paper and Digitally: What the Past Decades of Empirical Research Reveal. Review of Educational Research, 87(6), 1007–1041. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017b). Reading Across Mediums: Effects of Reading Digital and Print Texts on Comprehension and Calibration. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(1), 155–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Støle, H., Mangen, A., & Schwippert, K. (2020). Assessing children’s reading comprehension on paper and screen: A mode-effect study. Computers & Education, 1511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stoop, J., Kreutzer, P., & Kircz, J. (2013). Reading and learning from screens versus print: A study in changing habits. New Library World, 114(7/8), 284–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strommen, L. T., & Mates, B. F. (2004). Learning to love reading: Interviews with older children and teens: students in sixth and ninth grades were surveyed to determine attitudes toward reading and identify factors associated with the development of a love of reading. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(3), 188–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sulkunen, S. (2013). Adolescent Literacy in Europe – An Urgent Call for Action. European Journal of Education, 48(4), 528–542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sulkunen, S., Välijärvi, J., Arffman, I., Harju-Luukkainen, H., Kupari, P., Nissinen, K., Puhakka, E., & Reinikainen, P. (2010). Pisa 2009. Ensituloksia. Helsinki: Opetus- ja Kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja 2010:21.Google Scholar
Sullivan, A., & Brown, M. (2015). Reading for pleasure and progress in vocabulary and mathematics. British Educational Research Journal, 41(6), 971–991. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tainio, L., Grünthal, S., Routarinne, S., Satokangas, H., & Hiidenmaa, P. (2019). Primary school pupils’ literary landscapes: What do Finnish- and Swedish-speaking pupils read at school? In H. Höglund, S. Jusslin, M. Ståhl, & A. Westerlund (Eds.), Genom texter och världar (pp. 217–233). Åbo Akademi University Press.Google Scholar
Tainio, L., Aaltonen, L., & Leksis, S. (2021). Harry Potter vai Anna Liisa? Sukupuoli ja opettajien lukusuositukset perusopetuksen äidinkieli ja kirjallisuus -oppiaineessa. In J. Hanska, E. Luukka, A. Palomäki, & L. Pihkala-Posti (Eds.), Ainedidaktiikan ytimessä: Mitä, miksi ja miten opetan? Suomen ainedidaktisen seuran julkaisuja 19.Google Scholar
Tamborini, R., Bowman, N., Eden, A., Grizzard, M., & Organ, A. (2010). Defining media enjoyment as the satisfaction of intrinsic needs. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 758–777. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thissen, B. A. K., Menninghaus, W., & Schlotz, W. (2018). Measuring Optimal Reading Experiences: The Reading Flow Short Scale.(Report). Frontiers in Psychology, 91, 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tveit, Å. K., & Mangen, A. (2014). A joker in the class: Teenage readers’ attitudes and preferences to reading on different devices. Library and Information Science Research, 36(3–4), 179–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vettenranta, J., Välijärvi, J., Ahonen, A., Hautamäki, J., Hiltunen, J., Leino, K., Lähteinen, S., Nissinen, K., Nissinen, V., Puhakka, E., Rautopuro, J., & Vainikainen, M.-P. (2016). PISA 15. Ensituloksia. Huipulla pudotuksesta huolimatta. Helsinki: Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja 2016(41).Google Scholar
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (2002). The Development of Competence Beliefs, Expectancies for Success, and Achievement Values from Childhood through Adolescence. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 9–119). San Diego: Elsevier Science & Technology. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. (1993). Aspects of literary comprehension: A cognitive approach. Amsterdam: Benjamin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Price, Hazel
2022. The year’s work in stylistics 2021. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 31:4 ► pp. 519 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.