Cover not available
Article published In:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 11:2 (2021) ► pp.148–195

Openness to experience, absorption-like states, and the aesthetic, explanatory, and pragmatic effects of literary reading

| University of Alberta
| University of Alberta
| University of Basel
Although several measures of reading engagement (e.g., absorption, immersion) have been developed in recent years, the possibility that they reflect different constructs has not been systematically examined. The present study investigated two factorially independent forms of reading engagement measured by the Absorption-Like States Questionnaire (ASQ; Kuiken & Douglas, 2017, 2018). We examined whether (a) expressive enactment (ASQ-EE) and integrative comprehension (ASQ-IC) differentially predict aesthetic, explanatory, and pragmatic reading outcomes; (b) whether the components and outcomes of ASQ-EE and ASQ-IC differ from those of another measure of reading engagement (the Story World Absorption Scale, SWAS; Kuijpers et al., 2014), and (c) whether ASQ-EE and ASQ-IC are differentially related to two measures of trait openness to experience: the Tellegen Absorption Scale (Tellegen & Atkinson, 1974) and the Big Five Aspects Scale for Openness/Intellect; DeYoung et al., 2007).
Keywords: absorption-like states, openness to experience, narrative curiosity, sublime feeling
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Comparing modes of reading engagement
    • Thematizing global linguistic structures
    • Theme-transforming interaction
    • Modes of reading engagement
    • Two reflective and creative modes of reading engagement
    • Expressive enactment, inexpressible realizations, and sublime feeling
    • Integrative comprehension, plot assembly, and narrative curiosity
    • Revisiting the single underlying construct hypothesis
      • Empathy components
      • Imagery components
      • Attention components
    • The cognitive fulcrum between creative absorption-like states
    • Objectives summary
  • Methods
    • Participants
    • Procedures
    • Materials
      • Absorption-Like States Questionnaire (ASQ)
      • Story World Absorption Scale (SWAS)
      • Tellegen Absorption Scale (TAS)
      • Openness to experience (Big Five Aspects Scale; BFAS)
      • Need for cognition
      • Emotional coping
      • Insight oriented reading
      • Socially desirable responding
      • Aesthetic outcomes
        • Sublime feeling
        • Evocative imagery
        • Being moved
      • Explanatory outcomes
      • Pragmatic outcomes
      • Reading habits
  • Results and discussion
    • Assessing the ASQ model
      • Aesthetic outcomes
      • Explanatory outcomes
      • Pragmatic outcomes
    • Comparing absorption-like states
      • Comparing components
        • Empathy-like components
        • Imagery-like components
        • Attentional components
      • Comparing outcomes
    • Relations with trait measures of openness to experience
    • Related asymmetries
  • General discussion
    • Creatively epistemic absorption-like states
  • Notes
  • Choosing your most memorable reading experience
  • Absorption-Like States Questionnaire (ASQ)
  • Attention subscales
    • Sustained attention
    • Flexibly receptive attention (Temporal Attunement)
  • Narrative engagement subscales
    • Expressive enactment
    • Integrative comprehension
  • Outcomes questionnaire
    • Aesthetic outcomes
    • Explanatory outcomes
    • Pragmatic outcomes
  • References
Published online: 2 March 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.21007.kui
References (101)
References
Berlina, A. (Ed.). (2017). Viktor Shklovsky: A reader. Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Bezdek, M. A., Foy, J. E., & Gerrig, R. J. (2013). “Run for it!”: Viewers’ participatory responses to film narratives. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7 (4), 409–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blain, S. D., Longenecker, J. M., Grazioplene, R. G., Klimes-Dougan, B., & DeYoung, C. G. (2020). Apophenia as the disposition to false positives: A unifying framework for openness and psychoticism. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 129 (3), 279–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohrn, I. C., Altmann, U., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012). Old proverbs in new skins – An fMRI study on defamiliarization. Frontiers in Psychology, 3 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruhn, M. J. (2011). Harmonious madness: The poetics of analogy at the limits of blending theory. Poetics Today, 32 (4), 619–662. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12 (4), 321–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42 (1), 116–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chernavin, G., & Yampolskaya, A. (2019). ‘Estrangement’ in aesthetics and beyond: Russian formalism and phenomenological method. Continental Philosophy Review, 52 (1), 91–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications in marketing and related fields (pp. 655–690). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coventry, K. R., Griffiths, D., & Hamilton, C. J. (2014). Spatial demonstratives and perceptual space: Describing and remembering object location. Cognitive Psychology, 69 1, 46–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B. (2019). Proximal and distal deictics and the construal of narrative time. Cognitive Linguistics, 30 (2), 399–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deligiorgi, K. (2014). The pleasures of contra-purposiveness: Kant, the sublime, and being human. Journal of Aesthetics & Art Criticism, 72 (1), 25–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Openness/Intellect: A dimension of personality reflecting cognitive exploration. In P. R. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, M. L. Cooper, & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Personality processes and individual differences (Vol. 41, pp. 369–399). American Psychological Association. [URL]. DOI logo
DeYoung, C. G., Grazioplene, R. G., & Peterson, J. B. (2012). From madness to genius: The Openness/Intellect trait domain as a paradoxical simplex. Journal of Research in Personality, 46 (1), 63–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93 (5), 880–896. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Douglas, S. (2019). Narrating Identity: The Impact of Literary Reading on Storied Autobiographical Memory Development. Ph.D. dissertation. Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta.
Eco, U. (1983). Horns, hooves, insteps: Some hypotheses on three types of abduction. In U. Eco & T. A. Sebeok (Eds.), The sign of three (pp. 198–220). Indiana UP.Google Scholar
Emmott, C. (2002). Responding to style: Cohesion, foregrounding, and thematic interpretation. In M. Louwerse & W. van Peer (Eds.), Thematics: Interdisciplinary Studies (pp. 92–117). Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fialho, O. (2007). Foregrounding and refamiliarization: Understanding readers’ response to literary texts. Language and Literature, 16 (2), 105–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Self-Modifying Experiences in Literary Reading: A Model for Reader Response. Ph.D. dissertation. Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta.
Fletcher, A., & Monterosso, J. (2016). The science of free-indirect discourse: An alternate cognitive effect. Narrative, 24 (1), 82–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gendlin, E. T. (1997). Experiencing and the creation of meaning: A philosophical and psychological approach to the subjective. Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading, Yale UP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, R. J., & Jacovina, M. E. (2009). Chapter 7 Reader Participation in the Experience of Narrative. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 511, pp. 223–254). Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (5), 701–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, J. F. (2004). Foregrounding and its effect on readers’ perception. Discourse Processes, 38 (2), 193–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, F. (2020). Finding meaning through literature. Anglistik, 31 (1), 91–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, F., Kuijpers, M. M., Tan, E. S. H., Bálint, K., & Doicaru, M. M., Eds. (2017). Narrative Absorption. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, F., & van Peer, W. (2016). Empirical stylistics (Chapter 12). In V. Sotirova (Ed.), The Bloomsbury companion to stylistics (pp. 189–207). Bloomsbury Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Healey, M. L., & Grossman, M. (2018). Cognitive and affective perspective-taking: Evidence for shared and dissociable anatomical substrates. Frontiers in Neurology, 9 1, 491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Husserl, E. (1973). Experience and judgment: Investigations in a genealogy of logic. (L. Landgrebe, Trans.). Northwestern UP.Google Scholar
(1989). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy (second book) (R. Rojcewicz & A. Schuwer, Trans.). Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ihde, D. (2007). Listening and voice: Phenomenologies of sound (2nd ed). State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Towards a neurocognitive poetics model of literary reading. In R. M. Willems (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of natural language use (pp. 135–159). Cambridge UP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A. M., & Lüdtke, J. (2017). Immersion into narrative and poetic worlds. In F. Hakemulder, M. M. Kuijpers, E. S. H. Tan, K. Bálint, & M. M. Doicaru (Eds.), Narrative absorption (pp. 69–96). Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–377). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1987). Critique of judgment (W. S. Pluhar, Trans.). Hackett Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Kaufman, G. F., & Libby, L. K. (2012). Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103 (1), 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, S. B. (2013). Opening up openness to experience: A four-factor model and relations to creative achievement in the arts and sciences. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47 (4), 233–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., Peterson, J. B., & DeYoung, C. G. (2016). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences: Openness, intellect, and creativity. Journal of Personality, n/a-n/a. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kreitz, C., Schnuerch, R., Gibbons, H., & Memmert, D. (2015). Some see it, some don’t: Exploring the relation between inattentional blindness and personality factors. PLOS ONE, 10 (5), e0128158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuijpers, M., Douglas, S., & Kuiken, D. (2019). Personality traits and reading habits that predict absorbed narrative fiction reading. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13 (1), 74–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuijpers, M. M., Douglas, S., & Bálint, K. (2021). Narrative absorption: An overview. In D. Kuiken & A. Jacobs (Eds.), Handbook of empirical studies of literature (pp. 279–304). DeGruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuijpers, M. M., Douglas, S., & Kuiken, D. (2020). Capturing the ways we read. Anglistik, 31 (1), 53–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuijpers, M. M., & Hakemulder, F. (2018). Understanding and appreciating literary texts through rereading. Discourse Processes, 55 (7), 619–641. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuijpers, M. M., Hakemulder, F., Tan, E. S., & Doicaru, M. M. (2014). Exploring absorbing reading experiences: Developing and validating a self-report scale to measure story world absorption. Scientific Study of Literature, 4 (1), 89–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D. (2022). Expressive challenge and the metaphoricity of literary reading. In S. Willemsen & M. Kiss (Eds.), Puzzling Stories: The aesthetic appeal of cognitive challenge in literature, film & television. Berhahn.Google Scholar
Kuiken, D., Campbell, P., & Sopčák, P. (2012). The Experiencing Questionnaire: Locating exceptional reading moments. Scientific Study of Literature, 2 (2), 243–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., Carey, R., & Nielsen, T. (1987). Moments of affective insight: Their phenomenology and relations to selected individual differences. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 6 (4), 341–364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., & Douglas, S. (2017). Forms of absorption that facilitate the aesthetic and explanatory effects of literary reading (Chapter 11). In F. Hakemulder, M. M. Kuijpers, E. S. Tan, K. Bálint, & M. M. Doicaru (Eds.), Narrative absorption (Vol. 271, pp. 217–249). Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Living metaphor as the site of bidirectional literary engagement. Scientific Study of Literature, 8 (1), 47–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., Phillips, L., Gregus, M., Miall, D. S., Verbitsky, M., & Tonkonogy, A. (2004). Locating self-modifying feelings within literary reading. Discourse Processes, 38 (2), 267–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., & Sharma, R. (2013). Effects of loss and trauma on sublime disquietude during literary reading. Scientific Study of Literature, 3 (2), 240–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., & Sikora, S. (1993). The impact of dreams on waking thoughts and feelings. In A. Moffitt, M. Kramer, & R. Hoffmann (Eds.), The Functions of dreaming (pp. 419–476). State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Kuiken, D., & Sopčák, P. (2021). Openness, reflective engagement, and self-altering literary reading. In D. Kuiken & A. Jacobs (Eds.), Handbook of empirical studies of literature (pp. 305–341). DeGruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuzmičová, A. (2014). Literary narrative and mental Imagery: A view from embodied cognition. Style, 48 (3), 275–293.Google Scholar
Leech, G. N., & Short, M. (2007). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose (2nd ed). Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Lishner, D. A., Batson, C. D., & Huss, E. (2011). Tenderness and sympathy: Distinct empathic emotions elicited by different forms of need. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37 (5), 614–625. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mangan, B. (2008). Representation, rightness and the fringe. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 15 (9), 75–82.Google Scholar
Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Hanich, J., Wassiliwizky, E., Kuehnast, M., & Jacobsen, T. (2015). Towards a psychological construct of being moved. PloS One, 10 (6), e0128451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Wassiliwizky, E., Schindler, I., Hanich, J., Jacobsen, T., & Koelsch, S. (2019). What are aesthetic emotions? Psychological Review, 126 (2), 171–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 22 (5), 389–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miall, D., & Kuiken, D. (1995). Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English, 29 (1), 37–58. [URL]
Nell, V. (1988). Lost in a book: The psychology of reading for pleasure, Yale UP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikiforidou, K. (2012). The constructional underpinnings of viewpoint blends. In B. Dancygier & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Viewpoint in Language (pp. 177–197). Cambridge UP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, N. C., Nordahl, R., & Serafin, S. (2016). Immersion revisited: A review of existing definitions of immersion and their relation to different theories of presence. Human Technology, 12 (2), 108–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nummenmaa, L., Hirvonen, J., Parkkola, R., & Hietanen, J. K. (2008). Is emotional contagion special? An fMRI study on neural systems for affective and cognitive empathy. NeuroImage, 43 (3), 571–580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). The fragility of goodness: Luck and ethics in Greek tragedy and philosophy (Rev. ed). Cambridge, U.K.; New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oh, J., Lim, H. S., & Hwang, A. H.-C. (2020). How interactive storytelling persuades: The mediating role of website contingency and narrative transportation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 64 (5), 714–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oleynick, V. C., DeYoung, C. G., Hyde, E., Kaufman, S. B., Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2017). Openness/Intellect: The core of the creative personality. In G. J. Feist, R. Reiter-Palmon, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity and Personality Research (pp. 9–27). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oliver, M. B., Raney, A. A., Slater, M. D., Appel, M., Hartmann, T., Bartsch, A., Schneider, F. M., Janicke-Bowles, S. H., Krämer, N., Mares, M.-L., Vorderer, P., Rieger, D., Dale, K. R., & Das, E. (2018). Self-transcendent media experiences: Taking meaningful media to a higher level. Journal of Communication, 68 (2), 380–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perrone-Bertolotti, M., Kujala, J., Vidal, J. R., Hamame, C. M., Ossandon, T., Bertrand, O., Minotti, L., Kahane, P., Jerbi, K., & Lachaux, J.-P. (2012). How silent is silent reading? Intracerebral evidence for top-down activation of temporal voice areas during reading. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 32 (49), 17554–17562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petersen, S. E., & Posner, M. I. (2012). The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 35 (1), 73–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quinlan, J. A., & Mar, R. A. (2020). How imagination supports narrative experiences for textual, audiovisual, and interactive narratives. In A. Abraham (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination (1st ed., pp. 466–478). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38 (1), 119–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanders, J., & van Krieken, K. (2019). Traveling through narrative time: How tense and temporal deixis guide the representation of time and viewpoint in news narratives. Cognitive Linguistics, 30 (2), 281–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanford, A. J., & Emmott, C. (2012). Mind, brain and narrative. Cambridge UP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, M., & Engbers, C. (Eds.). (2014). Poetry and dialogism: Hearing over. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schindler, I., Hosoya, G., Menninghaus, W., Beermann, U., Wagner, V., Eid, M., & Scherer, K. R. (2017). Measuring aesthetic emotions: A review of the literature and a new assessment tool. PLOS ONE, 12 (6), e0178899. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schurz, G. (2008). Patterns of abduction. Synthese, 164 (2), 201–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sikora, S., Kuiken, D., & Miall, D. S. (2011). Expressive reading: A phenomenological study of readers’ experience of Coleridge’s ‘The rime of the ancient mariner.’ Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5 (3), 258–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slaney, K. (2017). Validating psychological constructs: Historical, philosophical, and practical dimensions. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sopčák, P., Kuiken, D., & Douglas, S. (2021). Literary reading and morality: Two distinct pathways towards two distinct forms of moral judgment. Paper presented at the Conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature, Liverpool.
Sopčák, P., Kuiken, D., & Miall, D. S. (2020). The effects of free indirect style in George Eliot’s ‘Middlemarch’: A reader response study. Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies, 31 (1), 15–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spunt, R. P., & Adolphs, R. (2014). Validating the why/how contrast for functional MRI studies of Theory of Mind. NeuroImage, 99 1, 301–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanton, A. L., Kirk, S. B., Cameron, C. L., & Danoff-Burg, S. (2000). Coping through emotional approach: Scale construction and validation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78 (6), 1150–1169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stephane, M., Dzemidzic, M., & Yoon, G. (2021). Keeping the inner voice inside the head, a pilot fMRI study. Brain and Behavior, 11 (4). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, M. (2012). Mimesis and motivation: The two faces of fictional coherence. Poetics Today, 33 (3–4), 329–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of abnormal psychology 83 (3), 268–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thissen, B. A. K., Menninghaus, W., & Schlotz, W. (2020). The pleasures of reading fiction explained by flow, presence, identification, suspense, and cognitive involvement. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toolan, M. (2001). Narrative: A critical linguistic introduction (2nd Edition). Routledge.Google Scholar
van Krieken, K., Sanders, J., & Hoeken, H. (2016). Blended viewpoints, mediated witnesses: A cognitive linguistic approach to news narratives. In B. Dancygier, W. Lu, & A. Verhagen (Eds.), Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning. DeGruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Krieken, K., Hoeken, H., & Sanders, J. (2017). Evoking and measuring identification with narrative characters – A linguistic cues framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 8 1, 1190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Laer, T., de Ruyter, K., Visconti, L. M., & Wetzels, M. (2014). The extended transportation-imagery model: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of consumers’ narrative transportation. Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (5), 797–817. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walter, N., Bilandzic, H., Schwarz, N., & Brooks, J. J. (2020). Metacognitive approach to narrative persuasion: The desirable and undesirable consequences of narrative disfluency. Media Psychology. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zabelina, D. L. (2018). Attention and creativity. In R. E. Jung & O. Vartanian (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Neuroscience of Creativity (1st ed., pp. 161–179). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zabelina, D. L., Friedman, N. P., & Andrews-Hanna, J. (2019). Unity and diversity of executive functions in creativity. Consciousness and Cognition, 68 1, 47–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zabelina, D., Saporta, A., & Beeman, M. (2016). Flexible or leaky attention in creative people? Distinct patterns of attention for different types of creative thinking. Memory & Cognition, 44 (3), 488–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zunshine, L. (2006). Why we read fiction: Theory of mind and the novel. Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., & Rapp, D. N. (2006). Discourse comprehension. In M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed, pp. 725–764). Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Schubert, Emery & Maja Vukadinovic
2024. Liking music with and without sadness: Testing the direct effect hypothesis of pleasurable negative emotion. PLOS ONE 19:4 ► pp. e0299115 ff. DOI logo
Kuzmičová, Anežka, Markéta Supa & Martin Nekola
2022. Children’s perspectives on being absorbed when reading fiction: A Q methodology study. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Price, Hazel
2022. The year’s work in stylistics 2021. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 31:4 ► pp. 519 ff. DOI logo
Sopcak, Paul, Don Kuiken & Shawn Douglas
2022. Existential reflection and morality. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.