Article published In:
Scientific Study of LiteratureVol. 4:1 (2014) ► pp.3–24
Look before you leap
How enjambment affects the processing of poetry
This study describes two eye tracking experiments investigating the processing of poetry with and without enjambments. In Experiment 1, poetic fragments with authentic prospective (syntactically incomplete) or retrospective (syntactically complete) enjambments were investigated; in Experiment 2, enjambments were created — for the purpose of the experiment — from poetry that did not originally contain enjambments. We hypothesized that the layout of the text in poetic fragments would affect the degree to which integrative processes take place: in case of prospective enjambments, the syntactic incompleteness may preclude integration at the end of the line (before going to the next line), whereas retrospective enjambments may cause considerable re-interpretation at the next line. We indeed found significant differences in reading patterns between prose and poetry, poetry with and without enjambment, and poetry with prospective and retrospective enjambment. We interpret these results as favoring a dynamic model of language processing, where the amount and type of integration is determined by syntactic (in)completeness, semantic (in)completeness, but also the physical layout of the text.
Keywords: reading, eye tracking, enjambment, poetry, prose
References
Brouwer, H., Fitz, H., & Hoeks, J.C.J
(2012) Getting Real about Semantic Illusions: Rethinking the Functional Role of the P600 in Language Comprehension. Brain Research, 14461, 127–43. 
Engelberts, L
(2008) Echte slechte mensen. Amsterdam: De Harmonie.
Fisher, M.H., Carminati, M.N., Stabler, J., & Roberts, A
(2003) Eye movements during poetry and prose reading. 13th European Conference on Eye Movements (Dundee, Scotland; 20-24 August).
Golomb, H
(1979) Enjambment in poetry: Language and verse in interaction. Tel Aviv: The Porter Institue for Poetics and Semiotics.
Hanauer, D
(1996). Integration of phonetic and graphic features in poetic text categorization judgments. Poetics, 231, 363–380.
(1998) Reading poetry: An empirical investigation of Formalist, Stylistic and Conventionalist claims. Poetics Today, 191, 565–580.
(2001) What we know about reading poetry. Theoretical positions and empirical research. In D. Schram & G. Steen (Eds.), The psychology and sociology of literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 107–128.
Hartman, C.O
(1980) Free verse. An essay on prosody. Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Hoeks, J.C.J., & Brouwer, H
(2014) Electrophysiological Research on Conversation and Discourse Processing. In: Holtgraves, T. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Language and Social Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. 365–386.
Hoeks, J.C.J., Hendriks, P., Vonk, W., Brown, C.M., & Hagoort, P
(2006) Processing the NP- versus S-coordination ambiguity. Thematic information does not completely eliminate processing difficulty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59 (9), 1581–1599.
Hoffstaedter, P
(1987) Poetic Text Processing and its empirical investigation. Poetics, 161, 75–91.
Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A
(1980) A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 871, 329–354.
Komrij, G
(2010) De 21ste eeuw in 185 gedichten. Amsterdam: De Bezige Bij.
Koops van ’t Jagt, R
(2011) Een lege plek om te blijven. Een eyetrackingonderzoek naar de online verwerking van regelverdeling en enjambement in poëzie [An empty place to stay. An eye tracking investigation into the on-line processing of lineation and enjambment in poetry]. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of Groningen.
Peer, W. van
(1986) Stylistics and psychology: Investigations of foregrounding. London: Croom Helm.
Rayner, K
(1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124 (3), 372–422.
Reuven, T
(1998) Poetic rhythm: structure and performance; an empirical study in cognitive poetics. Berne: Lang.
Steinhauer, K. & Friederici, A.D
(2001) Prosodic boundaries, comma rules, and brain responses: the closure positive shift in ERPs as a universal marker for prosodic phrasing in listeners and readers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30 (3), 267–295.
Zwaan, R.A
(1991) Some parameters of literary and news comprehension. Poetics, 201, 139–156.
(1994) Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 201, 930–933.
Cited by
Cited by 11 other publications
Blohm, Stefan, Stefano Versace, Sanja Methner, Valentin Wagner, Matthias Schlesewsky & Winfried Menninghaus
2022. Reading Poetry and Prose: Eye Movements and Acoustic Evidence. Discourse Processes 59:3 ► pp. 159 ff. 
Bruhn, Mark J.
Carrol, Gareth, Kathy Conklin, Josephine Guy & Rebekah Scott
2015. Processing punctuation and word changes in different editions of prose fiction. Scientific Study of Literature 5:2 ► pp. 200 ff.
Castiglione, Davide
2017. Difficult poetry processing: Reading times and the narrativity hypothesis. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:2 ► pp. 99 ff.
Castiglione, Davide
2019. Processing Baseline: The Easy Poem. In Difficulty in Poetry, ► pp. 197 ff.
Castiglione, Davide
2019. Transient Difficulty: Utterances Towards Obscurity. In Difficulty in Poetry, ► pp. 223 ff.
Hilberink-Schulpen, Béryl, Ulrike Nederstigt, Frank van Meurs & Emmie van Alem
2016. Does the use of a foreign language influence attention and genre-specific viewing patterns for job advertisements? An eye-tracking study. Information Processing & Management 52:6 ► pp. 1018 ff.
Klimek-Jankowska, Dorota, Anna Czypionka, Wojciech Witkowski & Joanna Błaszczak
2018. The time course of processing perfective and imperfective aspect in Polish. Acta Linguistica Academica 65:2-3 ► pp. 293 ff.
Montoro, Rocío
2015. The Year’s Work in stylistics 2014. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 24:4 ► pp. 355 ff.
Nishihara, Takayuki
2016. Chapter 8. Of learning and poetics. In Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 24], ► pp. 151 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.