Joan Peskin | Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Applied Psychology and Human Development
In investigating the relationship between fiction writing and perspective taking, beliefs about the ability of fiction writers to correctly infer the mental states of others were assessed via survey, in comparison to other professions. Next, two groups of fiction writers (established and intermediate) and a control group were compared across different measures of perspective taking. Possible moderating variables such as age, verbal intelligence, depressive symptoms, and fiction reading were measured. Participants provided writing samples, which were scored for quality. Analyses revealed that the general public believes fiction writers demonstrate above-average perspective-taking ability; however, empirical tests revealed no significant between-group differences on the outcome measures, nor any relationship between fiction writing quality and any outcome measures. The results of the suggest that fiction writers are no better than similar individuals who do not write fiction in terms of their ability to infer others’ mental states or take their perspectives.
Amabile, T.M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997-1013.
Amabile, T.M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Ames, D.R., & Kammrath, L.K. (2004). Mind-reading and metacognition: Narcissism, not actual competence, predicts self-estimated ability. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 28(3), 187–209.
Anderson, E., et al. (1957). Construction and evalutaion of a scale for creative writing (Unpublished master’s thesis). Boston University, Boston, MA.
Andreasen, N.C. (1987). Creativity and mental illness: Prevalence rates in writers and their first degree relatives. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144(10), 1288–1292.
Apperly, I.A. (2012). What is ‘theory of mind’? Concepts, cognitive processes and individual differences. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(5), 825–839.
Ballon, R. (2003). Breathing life into your characters: How to give your characters emotional and psychological depth. Cincinnati, OH: Writer’s Digest Books.
Baron-Cohen, S., Jolliffe, T., Mortimore, C., & Robertson, M. (1997). Another advanced test of theory of mind: Evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger Syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(7), 813–822.
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, D., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the mind in the eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, adults with Asperger’s syndrome or high functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 42(2), 241–251.
Bauer, D. (2000). The stuff of fiction: Advice on craft. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Beck, A.T., Steer, R.A., & Brown, G.K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Boulter, A. (2007). Writing fiction: Creative and critical approaches. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Boyd, B. (2006). Fiction and theory of mind. Philosophy and Literature, 30(2), 590–600.
Burleson, B.R., & Rowan, K.E. (1985). Are social-cognitive ability and narrative writing skill related?Written Communication, 2(1), 25–43.
Burroway, J., Stukey-French, E., & Stukey-French, N. (2010). Writing fiction: A guide to narrative craft. New York, NY: Longman Publishing Group.
Costanzo, M., & Archer, D. (1993). The Interpersonal Perception Task-15 (IPT-15): A guide for researchers and teachers. Unpublished Manual.
Decety, J., Michalska, K.J., Akitsuki, Y. & Lahey, B. (2009). Atypical empathic responses in adolescents with aggressive conduct disorder: A functional MRI investigation. Biological Psychology, 80(2), 203–211.
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J.B. (2006). The bitter-sweet labor of emoting: The linguistic comparison of writers and physicists. Creativity Research Journal, 18(2), 195–201.
Domes, G., Heinrichs, M., Michel, A., Berger, C., & Herpertz, S.C. (2007). Oxytocin improves “mind-reading” in humans. Biological Psychiatry, 61(6), 731–733.
Doyle, C.L. (1998). The writer tells: The creative process in the writing of literary fiction. Creativity Research Journal, 11(1), 29–37.
Drevdahl, J.E., & Cattell, R.B. (1958). Personality and creativity in artists and writers. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 14(2), 107–111.
Dunbar, R.I.M. (2000). On the origin of the human mind. In P. Carruthers, & A. Chamberlain (Eds.), Evolution and the human mind: Modularity, language, and meta-cognition, pp. 238–253. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dunbar, R.I.M. (2004). The human story: A new history of mankind’s evolution. London, UK: Faber and Faber.
Dunbar, R.I.M. (2005). Why are good writers so rare? An evolutionary perspective on literature. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 3(1), 7–21.
Editors of Writer’s Digest Books. (2010). The complete handbook of novel writing: Everything you need to know about creating and selling your work. Cincinnati, OH: Writer’s Digest Books.
Esperger, Z. & Bereczkei, T. (2012). Machiavellianism and spontaneous mentalization: One step ahead of others. European Journal of Personality, 26(6), 580–587.
Flavell, J.H. (2004). Theory of mind development: Retrospect and prospect. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50(3), 274–290.
Gleason, K.A., Jensen-Campbell, L.A., & Ickes, W. (2009). The role of emphatic accuracy in adolescents’ peer relations and adjustment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 351, 997-1011.
Goldstein, T.R., & Winner, E. (2009). A new lens on the development of social cognition: The study of acting. In Milbraith, C. & Lightfoot, C. (Eds.), The Arts and Human Development, Jean Piaget Society Book Series (Conference volume of contributions from the invited plenary speakers).
Goldstein, T.R., & Winner, E. (2012). Enhancing empathy and theory of mind. Journal of Cognitive Development, 13(1), 19–37.
Goldstein, T.R., Wu, K., & Winner, E. (2009). Actors are skilled in theory of mind but not empathy. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 29(2), 115–133.
Gregory, C. (1994). The tool you need for assessing: How to evaluate children’s creative work more thoughtfully. Instructor, 521.
Grow, G. (1990). Writing and multiple intelligences. Presentation given at the annual meeting of the Association for Educators in Journalism and Mass Communication. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 406 643. Retrieved August 15, 2012, from [URL].
Harkness, K.L., Sabbagh, M.A., Jacobson, J.A., Chowdrey, N.K., & Chen, T. (2005). Enhanced accuracy of mental state decoding in dysphoric college students. Cognition and Emotion, 19(7), 999-1025.
Hodgins, J. (1993). A passion for narrative: A guide for writing fiction. Toronto, ON: McClelland & Stewart.
Hood, A. (1998). Creating character emotions. Cincinnati, OH: Story Press.
Ickes, W. (Ed.) (1997). Empathic accuracy. New York: Guilford Press.
Ickes, W. (2003). Everyday mind reading: Understanding what other people think and feel. New York, NY: Prometheus Books.
Ickes, W., Gesn, P.R., & Graham, T. (2000). Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation?Personal Relationships, 71, 95–110.
Ickes, W., Stinson, L., Bissonette, V., & Garcia, S. (1990). Naturalistic social cognition: Empathic accuracy in mixed sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 730–742.
Kaufman, S.B., & Kaufman, J.C. (2007). Ten years to expertise, ten more to greatness: An investigation of modern writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 411, 114–124.
Keen, S. (2006). A theory of narrative empathy. Narrative, 14(3), 207–236.
Keysar, B., Lin, S., & Barr, D.J. (2003). Limits on theory of mind use in adults. Cognition, 891, 25–41.
Kidd, D.C. & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6165), 377–380.
Kinderman, P., Dunbar, R.I.M., & Bentall, R.P. (1998). Theory of mind deficits and causal attributions. British Journal of Psychology, 89(2), 191–205.
Klein, K.J.K., & Hodges, S.D. (2001). Gender differences, motivation, and empathic accuracy: When it pays to understand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(6), 720–730.
Koenig, A.M., & Eagly, A.H. (2005). Stereotype threat in men on a test of social sensitivity. Sex Roles, 52(7–8), 489–496.
Kohányi, A. (2005). Turning Inward Versus Turning Outward: A Retrospective Study of the Childhoods of Creative Writers Versus Journalists. Creativity Research Journal, 17(4), 309–320.
Laurent, S.M., & Hodges, S.D. (2009). Gender roles and empathic accuracy: The role of communion in reading minds. Sex Roles, 60(5–6), 387–398.
Lee, L., Harkness, K.L., Sabbagh, M.A., & Jacobson, J.A. (2005). Mental state decoding abilities in clinical depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 86(2–3), 247–258.
Lichtenberger, E.O., & Kaufman, A.S. (2009). Essentials of WAIS-IV assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Lilienfeld, S.O., Lynn, S.J., Ruscio, J., & Beyerstein, B.L. (2009). 50 great myths of popular psychology: Shattering widespread misconceptions about human behavior. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Mar, R.A. (2007). Stories and the simulation of social experience: Neuropsychological evidence and social ramifications (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). York University, Toronto, ON.
Mar, R.A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192.
Mar, R.A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., de la Paz, J., & Peterson, J.B. (2006). Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 694–712.
Mar, R.A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J.B. (2009). Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 34(4), 407–428.
Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Johnson, F., & Lidstone, J. (2006). Mind-mindedness in children: Individual differences in internal-state talk in middle childhood. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(1), 181–196.
Moslemi, M.H. (1975). The grading of creative writing essays. Research in the Teaching of English, 9(2), 154–161.
Myers, M.W., & Hodges, S.D. (2009). Making it up and making do: Simulation, imagination and empathic accuracy. In K. Markman, W. Klein, & J. Suhr (Eds.), The handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp. 281–293). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Oatley, K. (1999). Why fiction may be twice as true as fact: Fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation. Review of General Psychology, 31, 101–117.
Oatley, K., & Djikic, M. (2008). Writing as thinking. Review of General Psychology, 12(1), 9–27.
Oatley, K., Mar, R.A., & Djikic, M. (2012). The psychology of fiction: Present and future. In I. Jaen & J. Simon (Eds.), Cognitive Literary Studies: Current Themes and New Directions (pp. 235–249). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Paal, T., & Bereczkei, T. (2007). Adult theory of mind, Machiavellianism, and cooperation: The effect of mindreading on social relations. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(3), 541–551.
Pennebaker, J.W. (1997a). Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychological Science, 8(3), 162–166.
Pennebaker, J.W. (1997b). Opening up: The healing power of expressing emotions (rev. ed.). Guilford Press, New York, NY.
Piirto, J. (2009). The personalities of creative writers. In S.B. Kaufman and J.C. Kaufman (Eds.), The psychology of creative writing (pp. 3–22). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Redfield, D.L., Holt, J.L., & Martray, C.R. (1987). The Prose Quantification System for evaluating the creative quality of prose: A construct validation study. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 5(1), 67–75.
Richell, R.A., Mitchell, D.G., Newman, C., Leonard, A., Baron-Cohen, S., & Blair, R.J. (2003). Theory of mind and psychopathy: Can psychopathic individuals read the ‘language of the eyes’?Neuropsychologia, 41(5), 523–526.
Rubin, D.L., Piche, G.L., Michlin, M.L., & Johnson, F.L. (1984). Social cognitive ability as a predictor of the quality of fourth-graders’ written narratives. In R. Beach, & L. Bridwell (Eds.), New Directions in Composition Research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Rutherford, M.D. (2004). The effect of social role on theory of mind reasoning. British Journal of Psychology, 95(1), 91–103.
Sager, C. (1973). Improving the quality of written composition through pupil use of rating scale (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Boston University, Boston, MA.
Stanovich, K.E., & West, R.F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(4), 402–433.
Stiller, J., & Dunbar, R.I.M. (2007). Perspective-taking and memory capacity predict social network size. Social Networks, 29(1), 93–104.
Taylor, M., Hodges, S.D., & Kohanyi, A. (2002/2003). The illusion of independent agency: Do adult fiction writers experience their characters as having minds of their own?Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 22(4), 361–380.
Thomas, G., & Fletcher, G.J.O. (2003). Mind-reading accuracy in intimate relationships: Assessing the roles of the relationship, the target, and the judge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1079-1094.
Uhls, Y.T. et al. (2014). Five days at outdoor education camp without screens improves preteen skills with nonverbal emotion cues. Computers in Human Behaviour, 391, 387–392.
Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (4th Ed.). Toronto, ON: Pearson/PsychCorp.
Wellman, H.M., & Woolley, J.D. (1990). From simple desires to ordinary beliefs: The early development of everyday psychology. Cognition, 35(3), 245–275.
Zunshine, L. (2003). Theory of mind and experimental representations of fictional consciousness. Narrative, 11(3), 270–291.
Zunshine, L. (2006). Why we read fiction: Theory of mind and the novel. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
Zunshine, L. (2007). Why Jane Austen was different, and why we may need cognitive science to see it. Style, 41(3), 273–297.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Nishiguchi, Miho & Takashi Kusumi
2024. Effect of similarity between characters and writers on generating characters in narrative. The Japanese journal of psychology
Oatley, Keith & Jennifer M. Jenkins
2021. Art as Expression of Emotion Explored in Anna Karenina
. Interdisciplinary Literary Studies 23:2 ► pp. 190 ff.
Mumper, Micah L. & Richard J. Gerrig
2019. How Does Leisure Reading Affect Social Cognitive Abilities?. Poetics Today 40:3 ► pp. 453 ff.
Shim, Yerin, Louis Tay, Michaela Ward & James O. Pawelski
2019. Arts and Humanities Engagement: An Integrative Conceptual Framework for Psychological Research. Review of General Psychology 23:2 ► pp. 159 ff.
Oatley, Keith & Maja Djikic
2017. The Creativity of Literary Writing. In The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity across Domains, ► pp. 63 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.