Article published in:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 4:2 (2014) ► pp. 125–149

Do fiction writers have superior perspective taking ability?

| Independent Scholar
| Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Applied Psychology and Human Development
In investigating the relationship between fiction writing and perspective taking, beliefs about the ability of fiction writers to correctly infer the mental states of others were assessed via survey, in comparison to other professions. Next, two groups of fiction writers (established and intermediate) and a control group were compared across different measures of perspective taking. Possible moderating variables such as age, verbal intelligence, depressive symptoms, and fiction reading were measured. Participants provided writing samples, which were scored for quality. Analyses revealed that the general public believes fiction writers demonstrate above-average perspective-taking ability; however, empirical tests revealed no significant between-group differences on the outcome measures, nor any relationship between fiction writing quality and any outcome measures. The results of the suggest that fiction writers are no better than similar individuals who do not write fiction in terms of their ability to infer others’ mental states or take their perspectives.
Keywords: fiction writing, authors, social cognition, perspective taking
Published online: 30 March 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.4.2.01bis
References
Amabile, T.M
(1982) Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997-1013. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Ames, D.R., & Kammrath, L.K
(2004) Mind-reading and metacognition: Narcissism, not actual competence, predicts self-estimated ability. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 28(3), 187–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E., et al.
(1957) Construction and evalutaion of a scale for creative writing (Unpublished master’s thesis). Boston University, Boston, MA.
Andreasen, N.C
(1987) Creativity and mental illness: Prevalence rates in writers and their first degree relatives. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144(10), 1288–1292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Apperly, I.A
(2012) What is ‘theory of mind’? Concepts, cognitive processes and individual differences. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(5), 825–839. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ballon, R
(2003) Breathing life into your characters: How to give your characters emotional and psychological depth. Cincinnati, OH: Writer’s Digest Books.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Jolliffe, T., Mortimore, C., & Robertson, M
(1997) Another advanced test of theory of mind: Evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger Syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(7), 813–822. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, D., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I
(2001) The “Reading the mind in the eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, adults with Asperger’s syndrome or high functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 42(2), 241–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, D
(2000) The stuff of fiction: Advice on craft. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Beck, A.T., Steer, R.A., & Brown, G.K
(1996) Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Boulter, A
(2007) Writing fiction: Creative and critical approaches. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, B
(2006) Fiction and theory of mind. Philosophy and Literature, 30(2), 590–600. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burleson, B.R., & Rowan, K.E
(1985) Are social-cognitive ability and narrative writing skill related? Written Communication, 2(1), 25–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burroway, J., Stukey-French, E., & Stukey-French, N
(2010) Writing fiction: A guide to narrative craft. New York, NY: Longman Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Carlson, R.K
(1968) Sparkling words. Berkeley, CA: Wagner Printing.Google Scholar
Costanzo, M., & Archer, D
(1993) The Interpersonal Perception Task-15 (IPT-15): A guide for researchers and teachers. Unpublished Manual.
Decety, J., Michalska, K.J., Akitsuki, Y. & Lahey, B
(2009) Atypical empathic responses in adolescents with aggressive conduct disorder: A functional MRI investigation. Biological Psychology, 80(2), 203–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J.B
(2006) The bitter-sweet labor of emoting: The linguistic comparison of writers and physicists. Creativity Research Journal, 18(2), 195–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Domes, G., Heinrichs, M., Michel, A., Berger, C., & Herpertz, S.C
(2007) Oxytocin improves “mind-reading” in humans. Biological Psychiatry, 61(6), 731–733. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, C.L
(1998) The writer tells: The creative process in the writing of literary fiction. Creativity Research Journal, 11(1), 29–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drevdahl, J.E., & Cattell, R.B
(1958) Personality and creativity in artists and writers. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 14(2), 107–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R.I.M
(2000) On the origin of the human mind. In P. Carruthers, & A. Chamberlain (Eds.), Evolution and the human mind: Modularity, language, and meta-cognition, pp. 238–253. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) The human story: A new history of mankind’s evolution. London, UK: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
(2005) Why are good writers so rare? An evolutionary perspective on literature. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 3(1), 7–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Editors of Writer’s Digest Books
(2010) The complete handbook of novel writing: Everything you need to know about creating and selling your work. Cincinnati, OH: Writer’s Digest Books.Google Scholar
Esperger, Z. & Bereczkei, T
(2012) Machiavellianism and spontaneous mentalization: One step ahead of others. European Journal of Personality, 26(6), 580–587. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flavell, J.H
(2004) Theory of mind development: Retrospect and prospect. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50(3), 274–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, K.A., Jensen-Campbell, L.A., & Ickes, W
(2009) The role of emphatic accuracy in adolescents’ peer relations and adjustment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 351, 997-1011. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, T.R., & Winner, E
(2009) A new lens on the development of social cognition: The study of acting. In Milbraith, C. & Lightfoot, C. (Eds.), The Arts and Human Development, Jean Piaget Society Book Series (Conference volume of contributions from the invited plenary speakers).
(2012) Enhancing empathy and theory of mind. Journal of Cognitive Development, 13(1), 19–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, T.R., Wu, K., & Winner, E
(2009) Actors are skilled in theory of mind but not empathy. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 29(2), 115–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, C
(1994) The tool you need for assessing: How to evaluate children’s creative work more thoughtfully. Instructor, 521.Google Scholar
Grow, G
(1990) Writing and multiple intelligences. Presentation given at the annual meeting of the Association for Educators in Journalism and Mass Communication. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 406 643. Retrieved August 15, 2012, from http://​www​.longleaf​.net​/ggrow.Google Scholar
Harkness, K.L., Sabbagh, M.A., Jacobson, J.A., Chowdrey, N.K., & Chen, T
(2005) Enhanced accuracy of mental state decoding in dysphoric college students. Cognition and Emotion, 19(7), 999-1025. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hodgins, J
(1993) A passion for narrative: A guide for writing fiction. Toronto, ON: McClelland & Stewart.Google Scholar
Hood, A
(1998) Creating character emotions. Cincinnati, OH: Story Press.Google Scholar
Ickes, W
(Ed (1997) Empathic accuracy. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Everyday mind reading: Understanding what other people think and feel. New York, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Ickes, W., Gesn, P.R., & Graham, T
(2000) Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation? Personal Relationships, 71, 95–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ickes, W., Stinson, L., Bissonette, V., & Garcia, S
(1990) Naturalistic social cognition: Empathic accuracy in mixed sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 730–742. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, S.B., & Kaufman, J.C
(2007) Ten years to expertise, ten more to greatness: An investigation of modern writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 411, 114–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keen, S
(2006) A theory of narrative empathy. Narrative, 14(3), 207–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keysar, B., Lin, S., & Barr, D.J
(2003) Limits on theory of mind use in adults. Cognition, 891, 25–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, D.C. & Castano, E
(2013) Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6165), 377–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kinderman, P., Dunbar, R.I.M., & Bentall, R.P
(1998) Theory of mind deficits and causal attributions. British Journal of Psychology, 89(2), 191–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klein, K.J.K., & Hodges, S.D
(2001) Gender differences, motivation, and empathic accuracy: When it pays to understand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(6), 720–730. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koenig, A.M., & Eagly, A.H
(2005) Stereotype threat in men on a test of social sensitivity. Sex Roles, 52(7–8), 489–496. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kohányi, A
(2005) Turning Inward Versus Turning Outward: A Retrospective Study of the Childhoods of Creative Writers Versus Journalists. Creativity Research Journal, 17(4), 309–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laurent, S.M., & Hodges, S.D
(2009) Gender roles and empathic accuracy: The role of communion in reading minds. Sex Roles, 60(5–6), 387–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, L., Harkness, K.L., Sabbagh, M.A., & Jacobson, J.A
(2005) Mental state decoding abilities in clinical depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 86(2–3), 247–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenberger, E.O., & Kaufman, A.S
(2009) Essentials of WAIS-IV assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Lilienfeld, S.O., Lynn, S.J., Ruscio, J., & Beyerstein, B.L
(2009) 50 great myths of popular psychology: Shattering widespread misconceptions about human behavior. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mar, R.A
(2007) Stories and the simulation of social experience: Neuropsychological evidence and social ramifications (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). York University, Toronto, ON.
Mar, R.A., & Oatley, K
(2008) The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mar, R.A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., de la Paz, J., & Peterson, J.B
(2006) Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 694–712. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mar, R.A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J.B
(2009) Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 34(4), 407–428. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Johnson, F., & Lidstone, J
(2006) Mind-mindedness in children: Individual differences in internal-state talk in middle childhood. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(1), 181–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moslemi, M.H
(1975) The grading of creative writing essays. Research in the Teaching of English, 9(2), 154–161.Google Scholar
Myers, M.W., & Hodges, S.D
(2009) Making it up and making do: Simulation, imagination and empathic accuracy. In K. Markman, W. Klein, & J. Suhr (Eds.), The handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp. 281–293). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Oatley, K
(1999) Why fiction may be twice as true as fact: Fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation. Review of General Psychology, 31, 101–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oatley, K., & Djikic, M
(2008) Writing as thinking. Review of General Psychology, 12(1), 9–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oatley, K., Mar, R.A., & Djikic, M
(2012) The psychology of fiction: Present and future. In I. Jaen & J. Simon (Eds.), Cognitive Literary Studies: Current Themes and New Directions (pp. 235–249). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Paal, T., & Bereczkei, T
(2007) Adult theory of mind, Machiavellianism, and cooperation: The effect of mindreading on social relations. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(3), 541–551. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pennebaker, J.W
(1997a) Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychological Science, 8(3), 162–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997b) Opening up: The healing power of expressing emotions (rev. ed.). Guilford Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Piirto, J
(2009) The personalities of creative writers. In S.B. Kaufman and J.C. Kaufman (Eds.), The psychology of creative writing (pp. 3–22). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Redfield, D.L., Holt, J.L., & Martray, C.R
(1987) The Prose Quantification System for evaluating the creative quality of prose: A construct validation study. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 5(1), 67–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richell, R.A., Mitchell, D.G., Newman, C., Leonard, A., Baron-Cohen, S., & Blair, R.J
(2003) Theory of mind and psychopathy: Can psychopathic individuals read the ‘language of the eyes’? Neuropsychologia, 41(5), 523–526. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, D.L., Piche, G.L., Michlin, M.L., & Johnson, F.L
(1984) Social cognitive ability as a predictor of the quality of fourth-graders’ written narratives. In R. Beach, & L. Bridwell (Eds.), New Directions in Composition Research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, M.D
(2004) The effect of social role on theory of mind reasoning. British Journal of Psychology, 95(1), 91–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sager, C
(1973) Improving the quality of written composition through pupil use of rating scale (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Boston University, Boston, MA.
Stanovich, K.E., & West, R.F
(1989) Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(4), 402–433. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stiller, J., & Dunbar, R.I.M
(2007) Perspective-taking and memory capacity predict social network size. Social Networks, 29(1), 93–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M., Hodges, S.D., & Kohanyi, A
(2002/2003) The illusion of independent agency: Do adult fiction writers experience their characters as having minds of their own? Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 22(4), 361–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, G., & Fletcher, G.J.O
(2003) Mind-reading accuracy in intimate relationships: Assessing the roles of the relationship, the target, and the judge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1079-1094. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uhls, Y.T. et al.
(2014) Five days at outdoor education camp without screens improves preteen skills with nonverbal emotion cues. Computers in Human Behaviour, 391, 387–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D
(2008) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (4th Ed.). Toronto, ON: Pearson/PsychCorp.Google Scholar
Wellman, H.M., & Woolley, J.D
(1990) From simple desires to ordinary beliefs: The early development of everyday psychology. Cognition, 35(3), 245–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zunshine, L
(2003) Theory of mind and experimental representations of fictional consciousness. Narrative, 11(3), 270–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Why we read fiction: Theory of mind and the novel. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
(2007) Why Jane Austen was different, and why we may need cognitive science to see it. Style, 41(3), 273–297.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Mumper, Micah L. & Richard J. Gerrig
2019. How Does Leisure Reading Affect Social Cognitive Abilities?. Poetics Today 40:3 ► pp. 453 ff. Crossref logo
Oatley, Keith & Jennifer M. Jenkins
2021. Art as Expression of Emotion Explored in Anna Karenina . Interdisciplinary Literary Studies 23:2 ► pp. 190 ff. Crossref logo
Shim, Yerin, Louis Tay, Michaela Ward & James O. Pawelski
2019. Arts and Humanities Engagement: An Integrative Conceptual Framework for Psychological Research. Review of General Psychology 23:2 ► pp. 159 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.