Article published in:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 4:2 (2014) ► pp. 150177


Ackerman, R., & Goldsmith, M.
(2011) Metacognitive regulation of text learning: On screen versus on paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(1), 18–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Altmann, U., Bohrn, I.C., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A.M.
(2012) Fact versus fiction: How paratextual information shapes our reading processes. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience (Advance Access published September 29, 2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Appel, M., & Malečkar, B.
(2012) The influence of paratext on narrative persuasion: Fact, fiction, or fake? Human Communication Research, 38(4), 459–484. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baccino, T.
(2004) La lecture electronique. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar
Baccino, T., & Pynte, J.
(1994) Spatial coding and discourse models during text reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 143–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bal, P.M., & Veltkamp, M.
(2013) How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PloS one, 8(1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benedetto, S., Drai-Zerbib, V., Pedrotti, M., Tissier, G., & Baccino, T.
(2013) E-readers and visual fatigue. PloS one, 8(12), e83676. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, S., & Maton, K.
(2010) Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 321–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L.
(2008) The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, J.W.
(2012) A case study examining the reading and study habits of gifted readers in the context of deep reading. Doctoral thesis, Kennesaw State University, GA, USA. Retrieved from http://​digitalcommons​.kennesaw​.edu​/etd​/510
Braun, I.K., & Cupchik, G.
(2001) Phenomenological and quantitative analyses of absorption in literary passages. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 19(1), 85–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H.
(2008) Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18(2), 255–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cataldo, M.G., & Oakhill, J.
(2000) Why are poor comprehenders inefficient searchers? An investigation into the effects of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 791–799. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cipielewski, J., & Stanovich, K.E.
(1992) Predicting growth in reading ability from children’s exposure to print. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54(1), 74–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Derntl, B., Finkelmeyer, A., Eickhoff, S., Kellermann, T., Falkenberg, D.I., Schneider, F., & Habel, U.
(2010) Multidimensional assessment of empathic abilities: Neural correlates and gender differences. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35(1), 67–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., Zoeterman, S., & Peterson, J.B.
(2009) On being moved by art: How reading fiction transforms the self. Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 24–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dyson, M.C., & Haselgrove, M.
(2000) The effects of reading speed and reading patterns on the understanding of text read from screen. Journal of Research in Reading, 23(2), 210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eklundh, K.S.
(1992) Problems in achieving a global perspective of the text in computer-based writing. Instructional Science, 21(1), 73–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eveland, W.P., Jr., & Dunwoody, S.
(2002) An investigation of elaboration and selective scanning as mediators of learning from the Web versus print. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(1), 34–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feagin, S.L.
(1996) Reading with feeling: The aesthetics of appreciation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Garner, R.
(1987) Metacognition and reading comprehension. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Gerlach, J., & Buxmann, P.
(2011) Investigating the acceptance of electronic books: The impact of haptic dissonance on innovation adoption. European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS).Google Scholar
Gerrig, R.J.
(1993) Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Green, M.C., & Brock, T.C.
(2000) The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) In the mind’s eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In M.C. Green, J.J. Strange, & T.C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 315–341). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Haas, C.
(1996) Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, J.F.
(2004) Foregrounding and its effect on readers’ perception. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 193–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Helsper, E.J., & Eynon, R.
(2010) Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holland, N.N.
(2009) Literature and the brain. Cambridge, Mass.: PsyArt Foundation.Google Scholar
Jeong, H.
(2012) A comparison of the influence of electronic books and paper books on reading comprehension, eye fatigue, and perception. The Electronic Library, 30, 390–408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D.R.
(2012) Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 150–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S., & Healing, G.
(2010) Net generation or digital natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers & Education, 54(3), 722–732. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kamil, M.L., Pearson, P.D., Moje, E.B. & Afflerbach, P.P.
(Eds.) (2011) Handbook of Reading Research. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keen, S.
(2007) Empathy and the novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, D.C., & Castano, E.
(2013) Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H. & Kim, J.
(2013) Reading from an LCD monitor versus paper: Teenagers’ reading performance. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology (IJRSET), 2, 1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W.
(1998) Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, F., Pleimling, D., Hosemann, J., Füssel, S., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M.
(2013) Subjective impressions do not mirror online reading effort: Concurrent EEG-eyetracking evidence from the reading of books and digital media. PloS one, 8(2), e56178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., Campbell, P., & Sopčák, P.
(2012) The experiencing questionnaire: Locating exceptional reading moments. Scientific Study of Literature, 2(2), 243–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., & Oliver, M.B.
(2013) Aesthetic engagement during moments of suffering. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(2), 294–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z.
(2005) Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of Documentation, 61(6), 700–712. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Digital reading: An overview. Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science Vol. 5(1).Google Scholar
Livingstone, S.
(2012) Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education. Oxford review of education, 38(1), 9–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Digital learning and participation among youth: Critical reflections on future research priorities. International Journal of Learning, 2(2–3), 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mangen, A.
(2006) New narrative pleasures? A cognitive-phenomenological study of the experience of reading digital narrative fictions. Doctoral thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology [NTNU], Trondheim, Norway. Retrieved from http://​urn​.kb​.se​/resolve​?urn​=urn:nbn:no:ntnu:diva​-1833
(2008) Hypertext fiction reading: Haptics and immersion. Journal of research in reading, 31(4), 404–419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mangen, A., Robinet, P., Olivier, G., & Velay, J.-L.
in prep.). Where in the book and when in the story? Comparing comprehension when reading a mystery story in print and on Kindle.
Mangen, A., Walgermo, B.R., & Brønnick, K.
(2013) Reading linear texts on paper vs. computer screens: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manguel, A.
(1996) A history of reading. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Mar, R.A., & Oatley, K.
(2008) The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mar, R.A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J.B.
(2006) Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 694–712. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mar, R.A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J.B.
(2009) Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 34, 407–428. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G.
(2011) Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56(2), 429–440. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Margolin, S.J., Driscoll, C., Toland, M.J., & Kegler, J.L.
(2013) E‐readers, computer screens, or paper: Does reading comprehension change across media platforms? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 512–519. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mason, R.A., & Just, M.A.
(2009) The role of the Theory-of-Mind cortical network in the comprehension of narratives. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 157–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miall, D.S., & Kuiken, D.
(1994) Beyond text theory: Understanding literary response. Discourse Processes, 17(3), 337–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) What is literariness? Three components of literary reading. Discourse Processes, 28(2), 121–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mol, S.E., & Bus, A.G.
(2011) To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nell, V.
(1988) Lost in a book: The psychology of reading for pleasure. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nuland, S.B.
(1994) How we die: Reflections of life’s final chapter. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
O’Regan, J.K., & Noë, A.
(2001) A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 939–973. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oatley, K.
(2011a) Fiction and its study as gateways to the mind. Scientific Study of Literature, 1(1), 153–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011b) Such stuff as dreams. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oatley, K., Mar, R.A., & Djikic, M.
(2012) The Psychology of fiction: Present and future. In I. Jaén & J.J. Simon (Eds.), Cognitive literary studies: Current themes and new directions. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Paris, S.G., Wasik, B.A., & Turner, J.C.
(1991) The development of strategic readers. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research Vol. II (pp. 609–640). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Pattuelli, M.C., & Rabina, D.
(2010) Forms, effects, function: LIS students’ attitudes towards portable e-book readers. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 62(3), 228–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piolat, A., Roussey, J.-Y., & Thunin, O.
(1997) Effects of screen presentation on text reading and revising. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47(4), 565–589. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prensky, M.
(2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9, 1–6. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reniers, R.L.E.P., Corcoran, R., Drake, R., Shryane, N.M., & Völlm, B.A.
(2011) The QCAE: A questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(1), 84–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rose, E.
2011The phenomenology of on-screen reading: University students’ lived experience of digitised text. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 515–526. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothkopf, E.
(1971) Incidental memory for location of information in text. Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior, 10, 608–613. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scarry, E.
(2001) Dreaming by the book. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sellen, A.J., & Harper, R.H.
(2003) The myth of the paperless office. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Siegenthaler, E., Wurtz, P., Bergamin, P. & Groner, R.
(2011) Comparing reading processes on e-ink displays and print. Displays, 32(5), 268–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siegenthaler, E., Schmid, L., Wyss, M., & Wurtz, P.
(2012) LCD vs. e-ink: An analysis of the reading behaviour. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 5(5), 1–7.Google Scholar
Spunt, R.P., & Lieberman, M.D.
(2011) An integrative model of the neural systems supporting the comprehension of observed emotional behavior. Neuroimage, 59, 3050–3059. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K.E.
(1993) Does reading make you smarter? Literacy and the development of verbal intelligence. In W.R. Hayne (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 24) (pp. 133–180): JAI. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, M.
(2007) Proust and the squid: The story and science of the reading brain. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Wolf, M., & Barzillai, M.
(2009) The importance of deep reading. Educational Leadership, 66(6), 32–37.Google Scholar
Wolf, M., Ullman-Shade, C., & Gottwald, S.
(2012) The emerging, evolving reading brain in a digital culture: Implications for new readers, children with reading difficulties, and children without schools. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 11(3), 230–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wästlund, E.
(2007) Experimental studies of human-computer interaction: Working memory and mental workload in complex cognition. Doctoral thesis, Department of Psychology, Gothenburg University, Sweden. Retrieved from https://​gupea​.ub​.gu​.se​/handle​/2077​/4693
Wästlund, E, Reinikka, H, Norlander, T, & Archer, T.
(2005) Effects of VDT and paper presentation on consumption and production of information: Psychological and physiological factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 377–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zechmeister, E.B., & McKillip, J.
(1972) Recall of place on the page. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(5), 446–453. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zillmann, D.
(1991) Empathy: Affect from bearing witness to the emotions of others. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 135–167.Google Scholar
Zunshine, L.
(2006) Why we read fiction: Theory of mind and the novel. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R.A.
(1993) Aspects of literary comprehension: A cognitive approach. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: J. Benjamins Pub. Co. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R.A., & Radvansky, G.A.
(1998) Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological bulletin, 123(2), 162–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 49 other publications

Avramova, Yana R., Patrick De Pelsmacker & Nathalie Dens
2018. How reading in a foreign versus native language moderates the impact of repetition-induced brand placement prominence on placement responses. Journal of Brand Management 25:6  pp. 500 ff. Crossref logo
Bailey, Gavin
2019. Bridging the Gap Between the Digital and Print Reading Experience. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction 11:4  pp. 16 ff. Crossref logo
Bailey, Gavin, Deepak Sahoo & Matt Jones
2017.  In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces,  pp. 446 ff. Crossref logo
Bailey, Gavin, Deepak Ranjan Sahoo & Matt Jones
2020.  In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference,  pp. 885 ff. Crossref logo
Baron, Naomi S., Rachelle M. Calixte & Mazneen Havewala
2017. The persistence of print among university students: An exploratory study. Telematics and Informatics 34:5  pp. 590 ff. Crossref logo
Beelders, Tanya R. & Jean-Pierre L. du Plessis
2018.  In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists,  pp. 205 ff. Crossref logo
Burke, Michael, Anezka Kuzmicova, Anne Mangen & Theresa Schilhab
2016. Empathy at the confluence of neuroscience and empirical literary studies. Scientific Study of Literature 6:1  pp. 6 ff. Crossref logo
Cavalli, Eddy, Pascale Colé, Hélène Brèthes, Elise Lefevre, Samuel Lascombe & Jean-Luc Velay
2019. E-book reading hinders aspects of long-text comprehension for adults with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia 69:2  pp. 243 ff. Crossref logo
Chesnokova, Anna
2016.  In Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 24],  pp. 105 ff. Crossref logo
Clinton, Virginia
2019. Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Research in Reading 42:2  pp. 288 ff. Crossref logo
Delgado, Pablo, Cristina Vargas, Rakefet Ackerman & Ladislao Salmerón
2018. Don't throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review 25  pp. 23 ff. Crossref logo
Fabry, Regina E. & Karin Kukkonen
2019. Reconsidering the Mind-Wandering Reader: Predictive Processing, Probability Designs, and Enculturation. Frontiers in Psychology 9 Crossref logo
Flynn, Simon & Mark Hardman
2019. The Use of Interactive Fiction to Promote Conceptual Change in Science. Science & Education 28:1-2  pp. 127 ff. Crossref logo
Fortunati, Leopoldina & John O’Sullivan
2019. Reading and writing news: Why consumption and production modes matter. Journalism  pp. 146488491987004 ff. Crossref logo
Goodman, Sara G., Travis L. Seymour & Barrett R. Anderson
2016. Achieving the performance benefits of hands-on experience when using digital devices: A representational approach. Computers in Human Behavior 59  pp. 58 ff. Crossref logo
Guerberof-Arenas, Ana & Antonio Toral
2020. The impact of post-editing and machine translation on creativity and reading experience. Translation Spaces 9:2  pp. 255 ff. Crossref logo
Haddock, Geoffrey, Colin Foad, Victoria Saul, Will Brown & Rose Thompson
2020. The medium can influence the message: Print‐based versus digital reading influences how people process different types of written information. British Journal of Psychology 111:3  pp. 443 ff. Crossref logo
Halim, Ferdinand S. S. & Ari Widyanti
2018.  In 2018 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI),  pp. 154 ff. Crossref logo
Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten & Mark B. Houston
2019.  In Entertainment Science,  pp. 313 ff. Crossref logo
Hermena, Ehab W., Mercedes Sheen, Maryam AlJassmi, Khulood AlFalasi, Maha AlMatroushi & Timothy R. Jordan
2017. Reading Rate and Comprehension for Text Presented on Tablet and Paper: Evidence from Arabic. Frontiers in Psychology 8 Crossref logo
Hou, Jinghui, Justin Rashid & Kwan Min Lee
2017. Cognitive map or medium materiality? Reading on paper and screen. Computers in Human Behavior 67  pp. 84 ff. Crossref logo
Jacobs, Arthur M. & Jana Lüdtke
2017.  In Narrative Absorption [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 27],  pp. 69 ff. Crossref logo
Kaakinen, Johanna K., Orsolya Papp-Zipernovszky, Egon Werlen, Nuria Castells, Per Bergamin, Thierry Baccino & Arthur M. Jacobs
2018.  In Learning to Read in a Digital World [Studies in Written Language and Literacy, 17],  pp. 141 ff. Crossref logo
Koopman, Eva Maria (Emy)
2018. Does Originality Evoke Understanding? The Relation between Literary Reading and Empathy. Review of General Psychology 22:2  pp. 169 ff. Crossref logo
Kucirkova, Natalia
2019. How Could Children’s Storybooks Promote Empathy? A Conceptual Framework Based on Developmental Psychology and Literary Theory. Frontiers in Psychology 10 Crossref logo
Kuiken, Don & Shawn Douglas
2017.  In Narrative Absorption [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 27],  pp. 217 ff. Crossref logo
Kuzmičová, Anežka, Patrícia Dias, Ana Vogrinčič Čepič, Anne-Mette Bech Albrechtslund, André Casado, Marina Kotrla Topić, Xavier Mínguez López, Skans Kersti Nilsson & Inês Teixeira-Botelho
2018. Reading and company: embodiment and social space in silent reading practices. Literacy 52:2  pp. 70 ff. Crossref logo
Kuzmičová, Anežka, Theresa Schilhab & Michael Burke
2020. m-Reading: Fiction reading from mobile phones. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 26:2  pp. 333 ff. Crossref logo
Mangen, Anne
2016. The Digitization of Literary Reading. Orbis Litterarum 71:3  pp. 240 ff. Crossref logo
Mangen, Anne, Gérard Olivier & Jean-Luc Velay
2019. Comparing Comprehension of a Long Text Read in Print Book and on Kindle: Where in the Text and When in the Story?. Frontiers in Psychology 10 Crossref logo
Mangen, Anne & Adriaan Weel
2016. The evolution of reading in the age of digitisation: an integrative framework for reading research. Literacy 50:3  pp. 116 ff. Crossref logo
Matheson, Heath E. & Lawrence W. Barsalou
2018.  In Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
McKay, Dana & George Buchanan
2016.  In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval,  pp. 203 ff. Crossref logo
McKay, Dana, Wally Smith & Shanton Chang
2015.  In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction,  pp. 517 ff. Crossref logo
Mizrachi, Diane
2016. Buy, borrow, or access online?. Reference Services Review 44:4  pp. 583 ff. Crossref logo
Obaid, Mohammad, Ilgιm Veryeri Alaca, Paweł W. Woźniak, Lars Lischke & Mark Billinghurst
2016.  In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Pianzola, Federico, Katalin Bálint & Jessica Weller
2019. Virtual reality as a tool for promoting reading via enhanced narrative absorption and empathy. Scientific Study of Literature 9:2  pp. 163 ff. Crossref logo
Rutherford, Leonie, Lisa Waller, Margaret Merga, Michelle McRae, Elizabeth Bullen & Katya Johanson
2017. Contours of Teenagers’ Reading in the Digital Era: Scoping the Research. New Review of Children's Literature and Librarianship 23:1  pp. 27 ff. Crossref logo
Schilhab, Theresa
2017. Adaptive Smart Technology Use: The Need for Meta-Self-Regulation. Frontiers in Psychology 8 Crossref logo
Schugar, Jordan & Heather Schugar
2018. eTexts and Teacher Education. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning 10:2  pp. 78 ff. Crossref logo
Schwabe, Annika, Lukas Brandl, Hajo G. Boomgaarden & Günther Stocker
2020. Literatur am Bildschirm. Orbis Litterarum 75:5  pp. 213 ff. Crossref logo
Schwabe, Annika, Lukas Brandl, Hajo G. Boomgaarden & Günther Stocker
2021. Experiencing literature on the e‐reader: the effects of reading narrative texts on screen. Journal of Research in Reading 44:2  pp. 319 ff. Crossref logo
Soto-Sanfiel, María-Teresa & Ariadna Angulo-Brunet
2020. How European adolescents get engaged with films?: Psychometric properties of the narrative engagement scale. El profesional de la información Crossref logo
Thurman, Neil
2018. Newspaper Consumption in the Mobile Age. Journalism Studies 19:10  pp. 1409 ff. Crossref logo
Turner, Rose & Fatima M. Felisberti
2018. Relationships between fiction media, genre, and empathic abilities. Scientific Study of Literature 8:2  pp. 261 ff. Crossref logo
Tveit, Åse Kristine & Anne Mangen
2014. A joker in the class: Teenage readers' attitudes and preferences to reading on different devices. Library & Information Science Research 36:3-4  pp. 179 ff. Crossref logo
Vanhees, Claudio, Mathea Simons & Vanessa Joosen
2020.  In Recent Tools for Computer- and Mobile-Assisted Foreign Language Learning [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ],  pp. 79 ff. Crossref logo
Xu, Ying, Joanna C. Yau & Stephanie M. Reich
2019.  In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children,  pp. 432 ff. Crossref logo
Yuill, Nicola & Alex F. Martin
2016. Curling Up With a Good E-Book: Mother-Child Shared Story Reading on Screen or Paper Affects Embodied Interaction and Warmth. Frontiers in Psychology 7 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.