Cover not available
Article published In:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 4:2 (2014) ► pp.211–232

In the eye of the recipient

Pupillary responses to suspense in literary classics

 | Courant Research Centre ‘Text Structures’, University of Göttingen
 | Department of German Philology, University of Göttingen
Plot suspense is one of the most important components of narrative fiction that motivate recipients to follow fictional characters through their worlds. The present study investigates the dynamic development of narrative suspense in excerpts of literary classics from the 19th century in a multi-methodological approach. For two texts, differing in suspense as judged by a large independent sample, we collected (a) data from questionnaires, indicating different affective and cognitive dimensions of receptive engagement, (b) continuous ratings of suspense during text reception from both experts and lay recipients, and (c) registration of pupil diameter as a physiological indicator of changes in emotional arousal and attention during reception. Data analyses confirmed differences between the two texts at different dimensions of receptive engagement and, importantly, revealed significant correlations of pupil diameter and the course of suspense over time. Our findings demonstrate that changes of the pupil diameter provide a reliable ‘online’ indicator of suspense.
Keywords: literature reception, suspense, pupillary responses, emotional engagement, attention, emotional arousal
Published online: 30 March 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.4.2.05rie
References (61)
Anz, T. (2003). Spannung. In K. Weimar, H. Fricke, & Müller Jan Dirk (Eds.), Reallexikon der deutschen Literaturwissenschaft (pp. 464–467). Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Altmann, U., Bohrn, I.C., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A.M. (2012). Fact vs fiction-how paratextual information shapes our reading processes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 22–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Appel, M., Koch, E., Schreier, M., & Groeben, N. (2002). Aspekte des Leseerlebens: Skalenentwicklung. [Aspects of reading engagement. Scale development]. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 14(4), 149–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auracher, J. (2007). “… wie auf den allmächtigen Schlag einer magischen Rute.”: Psychophysiologische Messungen zur Textwirkung. [Psychophysiological measurements of textual effects]. Baden-Baden: Deutscher Wissenschaftsverlag (DWV).Google Scholar
Bar-Haim, Y., Fox, N.A., VanMeenen, K.M., & Marshall, P.J. (2004). Children’s narratives and patterns of cardiac reactivity. Developmental Psychobiology, 44(4), 238–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, M. & Schacht, A. (2014). Event-related brain responses to emotional words, pictures and faces — A cross-domain comparison. Frontiers in Psychology, 51, 1106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, M., Sommer, W., & Schacht, A. (2011). Emotional words impact the mind but not the body: Evidence from pupillary responses. Psychophysiology, 48(11), 1554–1562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2012). Font Size Matters — Emotion and Attention in Cortical Responses to Written Words. PLoS ONE, 7(5), e36042. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berridge, C.W. & Waterhouse, B.D. (2003). The locus coeruleus–noradrenergic system: modulation of behavioral state and state-dependent cognitive processes. Brain Research Reviews, 42(1), 33–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradley, M.M., Miccoli, L., Escrig, M.A., & Lang, P.J. (2008). The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology, 45(4), 602–607. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, V.D., Lang, P.J., Sabatinelli, D., Versace, F., & Bradley, M.M. (2010). Emotional imagery: Assessing pleasure and arousal in the brain’s reward circuitry. Human Brain Mapping, 311, 1446–1457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cupchik, G.C., Oatley, K., & Vorderer, P. (1998). Emotional effects of reading excerpts from short stories by James Joyce. Poetics, 25(6), 363–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Wied, M.A. (1991). The Role of Time Structures in the Experience of Film Suspense and Duration: A Study on the Effects of Anticipation Time Upon Suspense and Temporal Variations on Duration Experience and Suspense. Amsterdam: U. van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Dixon, P. & Bortolussi, M. (2011). The scientific study of literature: What can, has, and should be done. Scientific Study of Literature, 1(1), 59–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Moldoveanu, M.C. (2013). Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 28–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Einhäuser, W., Stout, J., Koch, C., & Carter, O. (2008) Pupil dilation reflects perceptual selection and predicts subsequent stability in perceptual rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 1051, 1704–1709. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frijda, N.H. (1986). The emotions. Studies in emotion and social interaction. Cambridge, New York, Paris: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gerrig, R.J. (1996). The Resiliency of Suspense. In P. Vorderer, H.J. Wulff, & M. Friedrichsen (Eds.), Suspense. Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp. 93–105). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gilzenrat, M.S., Nieuwenhuis, S., Jepma, M., & Cohen, J.D. (2010). Pupil diameter tracks changes in control state predicted by the adaptive gain theory of locus coeruleus function. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10(2), 252–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grandjean, D. & Scherer, K.R. (2008). Unpacking the cognitive architecture of emotion processes. Emotion, 8(3), 341–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, M.C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 247–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, M.C. & Brock, T.C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, M.C., Brock, T.C., & Kaufman, G.F. (2004). Understanding Media Enjoyment: The Role of Transportation Into Narrative Worlds. Communication Theory, 14(4), 311–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hess, E.H. & Polt, J.M. (1960). Pupil Size as Related to Interest Value of Visual Stimuli. Science, 132(3423), 349–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1964). Pupil Size in Relation to Mental Activity during Simple Problem-Solving. Science, 143(3611), 1190–1192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoeks, B. & Ellenbroek, B.A. (1993). A neural basis for a quantitative pupillary model. Journal of Psychophysiology, 71, 315–324.Google Scholar
Hsu, C.-T., Jacobs, A.M., & Conrad, M. (2015). Can Harry Potter still put a spell on us in a second language? An fMRI study on reading emotion-laden literature in late bilinguals. Cortex, 631, 282–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kang, O.E., Huffer, K.E., & Wheatley, T.P. (2014). Pupil Dilation Dynamics Track Attention to High-Level Information. PLoS ONE, 9(8), e102463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klimmt, C., Rizzo, A., Vorderer, P., Koch, J., & Fischer, T. (2009). Experimental Evidence for Suspense as Determinant of Video Game Enjoyment. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(1), 29–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knobloch, S. (2003). Suspense and Mystery. In J. Bryant, D. Roskos-Ewoldsen, & J. Cantor (eds.). Communication and Emotion (pp. 379–396). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lang, P.J. (1984). Cognition in emotion: Concepts and action. In C.E. Izard, J. Kagan, & R.B. Zajonc (Eds.), Emotions, cognition, and behavior (pp. 192–226). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lauer, G. & Schacht, A. (2014). Why should we feel suspense by the fate of Hauke Haien? Paper presented at the IGEL conference 2014 in Torino.
Lehne, M. & Koelsch, S. (in press). Tension-resolution patterns as a key element of aesthetic experience: Psychological principles and underlying brain mechanisms. In M. Nadal, J.P. Huston, L. Agnati, F. Mora, C.J. Cela-Conde (Eds.), Art, Aesthetics, and the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logo
Mar, R.A., Oatley, K., Djikic, M., & Mullin, J. (2011). Emotion and narrative fiction: Interactive influences before, during, and after reading. Cognition & Emotion, 25(5), 818–833. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McTeague, L.M., Lang, P.J., Laplante, M.-C., Cuthbert, B.N., Strauss, C.C., & Bradley, M.M. (2009). Fearful Imagery in Social Phobia: Generalization, Comorbidity, and Physiological Reactivity. Biological Psychiatry, 65(5), 374–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mellmann, K. (2007). Vorschlag zu einer emotionspsychologischen Bestimmung von ‘Spannung’. [Proposition of a definition of ‚suspense’ in emotion psychology.] In K. Eibl, K. Mellmann, & R. Zymner (Eds.), Im Rücken der Kulturen (pp. 241–268). Paderborn: Mentis.Google Scholar
. (2010). Objects of ‘empathy’: Characters (and other such things) as psycho-poetic effects. In J. Eder, F. Jannidis, & R. Schneider (Eds.), Characters in fictional worlds. Understanding imaginary beings in literature, film, and other media (pp. 416–441). Berlin, New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nell, V. (1988). Lost in a book: The psychology of reading for pleasure. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuthmann, A. & van der Meer, E. (2005). Time’s arrow and pupillary response. Psychophysiology, 42(3), 306–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oatley, K. (1995). A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics, 23(1–2), 53–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Odağ, Ö. (2011). Reading engagement. Scientific Study of Literature, 1(2), 292–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oldfield, R.C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partala, T. & Surakka, V. (2003). Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(1–2), 185–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radford, C. (1975). How can we be moved by the fate of Anna Karenina? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplement Vol. 491, pp. 67–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schacht, A., Pollmann, K., & Bayer, M. (2013). Lese-Erleben im Labor?: Zu Potential und Limitationen psycho(physio)logischer Methoden in der empirischen Literaturwissenschaft. [Reading engagement in the lab? Potential and limitations of psycho(physio)logical methods in the empirical study of literature.] In P. Ajouri, K. Mellmann, & C. Rauen (Eds.), Empirie in der Literaturwissenschaft (pp. 431–444). Paderborn: Mentis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schacht, A. & Sommer, W. (2009a). Time course and task dependence of emotion effects in word processing. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 91, 28–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2009b). Emotions in word and face processing: Early and late cortical responses. Brain and Cognition, 69(3), 538–550. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scherer, K.R. (2001). Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. In K.R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 92–120). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smallwood, J., Brown, K.S., Tipper, C., Giesbrecht, B., Franklin, M.S., Mrazek, M.D., Schooler, J.W. (2011). Pupillometric Evidence for the Decoupling of Attention from Perceptual Input during Offline Thought. PLoS ONE, 6(3), e18298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanners, R.F., Coulter, M., Sweet, A.W., & Murphy, P. (1979). The pupillary response as an indicator of arousal and cognition. Motivation and Emotion, 3(4), 319–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinhauer, S.R., Boller, F., Zubin, J., & Pearlman, S. (1983). Pupillary dilation to emotional visual stimuli revisited. Psychophysiology, 201, 472–472.Google Scholar
Van der Meer, E., Beyer, R., Horn, J., Foth, M., Bornemann, B., Ries, J., Wartenburger, I. (2010). Resource allocation and fluid intelligence: Insights from pupillometry. Psychophysiology, 47(1), 158–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verney, S.P., Granholm, E., & Dionisio, D.P. (2001). Pupillary responses and processing resources on the visual backward masking task. Psychophysiology, 38(1), 76–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Võ, M.L.-H., Jacobs, A.M., Kuchinke, L., Hofmann, M., Conrad, M., Schacht, A., & Hutzler, F. (2008). The coupling of emotion and cognition in the eye: Introducing the pupil old/new effect. Psychophysiology, 45(1), 130–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vorderer, P. (1996). Toward a psychological theory of suspense. In P. Vorderer, H.J. Wulff, & M. Friedrichsen (Eds.), Suspense. Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp. 233–253). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vrana, S.R., Cuthbert, B.N., & Lang, P.J. (1986). Fear Imagery and Text Processing. Psychophysiology, 23(3), 247–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallentin, M., Nielsen, A.H., Vuust, P., Dohn, A., Roepstorff, A., & Lund, T.E. (2011). Amygdala and heart rate variability responses from listening to emotionally intense parts of a story. NeuroImage, 58(3), 963–973. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallentin, M., Simonsen, A., & Nielsen, A.H. (2013). Action speaks louder than words: Empathy mainly modulates emotions from theory of mind-laden parts of a story. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 137–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zillmann, D. (1996). The psychology of suspense in dramatic exposition. In P. Vorderer, H.J. Wulff, & M. Friedrichsen (Eds.), Suspense. Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp. 199–231). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R.A., Langston, M.C., & Graesser, A.C. (1995). The Construction of Situation Models in Narrative Comprehension: An Event-Indexing Model. Psychological Science, 6(5), 292–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Bentz, Maria, Maya Cortez Espinoza, Vesela Simeonova, Tilmann Köppe & Edgar Onea
2024. Measuring Suspense in Real Time: A New Experimental Methodology. Scientific Study of Literature 13:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Grassi, Francesco, Louisa Kulke, Alex Lepauvre & Anne Schacht
2024. Relevance acquisition through motivational incentives: Modeling the time-course of associative learning and the role of visual features. Imaging Neuroscience 2 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Jürgens, Rebecca, Julia Fischer & Annekathrin Schacht
2018. Hot Speech and Exploding Bombs: Autonomic Arousal During Emotion Classification of Prosodic Utterances and Affective Sounds. Frontiers in Psychology 9 DOI logo
Jacobs, Arthur M., Jana Lüdtke, Arash Aryani, Burkhard Meyer-Sickendieck & Markus Conrad
2016. Mood-empathic and aesthetic responses in poetry reception. Scientific Study of Literature 6:1 ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Carrol, Gareth, Kathy Conklin, Josephine Guy & Rebekah Scott
2015. Processing punctuation and word changes in different editions of prose fiction. Scientific Study of Literature 5:2 ► pp. 200 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.