Cover not available
Article published In:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 5:1 (2015) ► pp.49–83

“Softened” voice quality in poetry reading and listener response

 | The Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University
 | Department of Literature, Tel-Aviv University
In the performance of poetry, some performers occasionally use a certain ‘softened’ voice quality, deviating from that of the context, for emotive expression. We explored how listeners perceive such instances through a combined methodology of eliciting open-ended descriptions and ratings of pre-defined terms on ordinal scales. The collected responses confirm our intuitions that listeners are sensitive to this voice quality, which gives rise to impressions, such as affection, yearning, and contemplation. The chosen methodology allowed us, through variations between verbal and numerical responses, to observe the interaction of this voice quality with other factors, such as semantic content and other salient voice qualities. Finally, the responses highlight the distinction between two delivery styles used by performers — an impassive, grave style, typical of poetry recitals, on the one hand, and a more emotional “theatrical” style, on the other hand.
Keywords: softened voice, vocal performance, voice quality, speech perception, listener response, cognitive poetics, delivery style
Published online: 19 November 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.5.1.03tsu
References (40)
Airas, M., & Alku, P. (2006). Emotions in vowel segments of continuous speech: Analysis of the glottal flow using the normalised amplitude quotient. Phonetica, 63(1), 26–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alterman, N. (1941). Joy of the poor. Tel-Aviv, Israel: Machbarot Lesifrut.Google Scholar
. (1999). Song for the wife of his youth. In Meeting without end — Yossi Banay presents Alterman [Recorded by Y. Banay; CD]. Holon, Israel: Helicon Music.Google Scholar
Babits, M. (1937). Esti kérdés (Evening question). In Összegyüjtött munkái (pp. 66–67). Budapest, Hungary: Athenaeum.Google Scholar
. (2000). “Esti Kérdés” (Evening Question). In Varietas Delectat 3 [Recorded by F. Kállai; CD]. Budapest, Hungary: Hungaroton.Google Scholar
Bartels, C. (1999). The intonation of English statements and questions: A compositional interpretation. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Bullough, E. (1912). “Psychical Distance” as a factor in art and an aesthetic principle. British Journal of Psychology, 51, 87–118.Google Scholar
Cauldwell, R. (1999). Openings, rhythm and relationships. Language and Literature, 8(1), 35–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coleridge, S.T. (1816). Kubla Khan. In Christabel &c. (3rd ed., pp. 55–58). London, United Kingdom: John Murray.Google Scholar
. (1994). Kubla Khan. In Great poets of the romantic age [Recorded by M. Sheen; CD]. Redhill, Surrey, United Kingdom: Naxos AudioBooks.Google Scholar
. (1999). Kubla Khan. In The nations favourite lakeland poems [Recorded by A. Jennings; CD]. BBC Audiobooks.Google Scholar
. (2000). Kubla Khan. In Roger lloyd pack reads samuel taylor coleridge [Recorded by R. Lloyd Pack; audiobook]. London, United Kingdom: Rough Winds Productions.Google Scholar
Elster, C., & Hanauer, D. (2002). Voicing texts, voices around texts: Reading poems in elementary school classrooms. Research in the Teaching of English, 37(1), 89–134.Google Scholar
Fónagy, I. (1961). Communication in poetry. Word — Journal of the International Linguistic Association, 17(2), 194–218.Google Scholar
Gafni, C., & Tsur, R. (In preparation). “Softened” voice quality in poetry reading: an acoustic study.
Glicksohn, J., Tsur, R., & Goodblatt, C. (1991). Absorption and trance-inductive poetry. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 9(2), 115–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gobl, C., & Ní Chasaide, A. (2003). The role of voice quality in communicating emotion, mood and attitude. Speech Communication, 40(1–2), 189–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hepburn, R.W. (1968). Emotions and emotional qualities: Some attempts at analysis. In H. Osborne (Ed.), Aesthetics in the modern world (pp. 81–93). London, United Kingdom: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Holmberg, E.B., Hillman, R.E., & Perkell, J.S. (1988). Glottal airflow and transglottal air pressure measurements for male and female speakers in soft, normal, and loud voice. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84(2), 511–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T.A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–377). New York, NY: The Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Larkin, P. (1958). Mr Bleaney. In Lines on a young lady’s photograph album (and other poems) [Recorded by P. Larkin; audio cassette]. London, United Kingdom: British Council.Google Scholar
. (1963). Mr Bleaney. In The jupiter anthology of twentieth-century english poetry part III [Recorded by P. Larkin; audio cassette]. Chepstow, United Kingdom: Audio-Visual Productions.Google Scholar
. (1965). Mr Bleaney. In Philip larkin reads the whitsun weddings [Recorded by P. Larkin; audio cassette]. London, United Kingdom: Marvell Press.Google Scholar
. (1966). Mr Bleaney. In Wants (and Other Poems) [Recorded by P. Larkin]. London, United Kingdom: British Council.Google Scholar
. (1984). Mr Bleaney. In D. Dunn and P. Larkin Reading their Own Poetry [Recorded by P. Larkin; audio cassette]. London, United Kingdom: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Morton, E.S. (1994). Sound symbolism and its role in non-human vertebrate communication. In Sound symbolism (pp. 348–365). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ohala, J.J. (1994). The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. In Sound symbolism (pp. 325–347). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Osgood, C.E. (1952). The nature and measurement of meaning. Psychological Bulletin, 49(3), 197–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siegel, J.A., & Siegel, W. (1977). Absolute identification of notes and intervals by musicians. Perception & Psychophysics, 21(2), 143–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sulter, A.M., Schutte, H.K., & Miller, D.G. (1995). Differences in phonetogram features between male and female subjects with and without vocal training. Journal of Voice, 9(4), 363–377. 10.1016/S0892-1997(05)80198-5 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tellegen, A. (1981). Practicing the two disciplines for relaxation and enlightenment: Comment on “Role of the feedback signal in electromyograph biofeedback: The relevance of attention” by Qualls and Sheehan. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(2), 217–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1982). Multidimensional personality questionnaire manual. In Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Trask, R.L. (1996). A dictionary of phonetics and phonology. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tsur, R. (2006a). Delivery style and listener response in the rhythmical performance of Shakespeare’s sonnets. College Literature, 33(1), 170–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2012). Playing by ear and the tip of the tongue: Precategorial information in poetry. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsur, R., Glicksohn, J., & Goodblatt, C. (1991). Gestalt qualities in poetry and the reader’s absorption style. Journal of Pragmatics, 16(5), 487–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waaramaa, T., Alku, P., & Laukkanen, A.-M. (2006). The role of F3 in the vocal expression of emotions. Logopedics, Phoniatrics, Vocology, 31(4), 153–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wimsatt, W.K. (1947). The structure of the “concrete universal” in literature. Modern Language Association, 62(1), 262–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, M., & van Peer, W. (2002). The sound of meaning: An empirical study. In S. Csábi & J. Zerkowitz (Eds.), Textual secrets: The message of the medium (pp. 379–383). Budapest, Hungary: Akadémiai Nyomda Martonvásár.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Merrill, Julia & Pauline Larrouy-Maestri
2017. Vocal Features of Song and Speech: Insights from Schoenberg's Pierrot Lunaire. Frontiers in Psychology 8 DOI logo
Kraxenberger, Maria & Winfried Menninghaus
2016. Mimological Reveries? Disconfirming the Hypothesis of Phono-Emotional Iconicity in Poetry. Frontiers in Psychology 7 DOI logo
Montoro, Rocío
2016. The year’s work in stylistics 2015. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 25:4 ► pp. 376 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Sound–Emotion Interaction in Poetry [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 39], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.