Article published In:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 5:1 (2015) ► pp.129135
References
Bruner, J
(1985) Actual minds and possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1990) Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1991) The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cupchik, G.C., & László, J
(Eds.) (1992) Emerging visions of the aesthetic process: Psychology, semiology and philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1994) The landscape of time in literary reception: Character experience and narrative action. Cognition & Emotion, 8(4), 297–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fülöp, M
(2008) Interjú a 60 eves László Jánossal “Interview with János László on the occasion of his 60th birthday.” Magyar Pszichologiai Szemle, 63(2), 365–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E
( 1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
(1981) “The social psychology of everyday life.” In J. László & J. Gondolat (Eds.), A hétköznapi élet szociálpszichológiája. Budapest, Hungary: Társadalomtudomány Könyvtár.Google Scholar
Halász, L
(1987) Literary discourse: Aspects of cognitive and social psychological approaches. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halász, L., László, J., & Pléh, C
(1988) The short story: Cross-cultural studies in reading short stories. Poetics 17(4–5), 287–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen, S.F, & László, J
(1990) Cultural-historical knowledge and personal experience in the appreciation of literature. European Journal of Social Psychology, 201, 425–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
László, J
(1979) Dráma és előadás. Kísérlet Molière Amphytrion című vígjátékának összehasonlító hatás-és befogadás-pszichológiai vizsgálatára. “Drama and its performance. An attempt for a comparative impact and recpetion psychological study of Molière`s comedy Amphytrion.” Budapest, Hungary: Akademiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
(1980) Empirical data on social meaning of persons in dramatic interaction. In D. Kováč, L. Kardos, & C. Pléh (Eds.), Problems of the regulation of activity (pp. 383–403). Budapest, Hungary: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
(1986a)  Scripts for interpersonal situations. Studia Psychologica, 28(2), 125–135.Google Scholar
(1986b) Same story from different point of view. Spiel, 5(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
(1987a) Understanding and enjoying: An information processing approach to literary reception. In L. Halász (Ed.), Literary discourse: Aspects of cognitive and social psychological approaches (pp. 113–124). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1987b) Goals, beliefs and emotions in the interpretation of literary narratives. Proceedings of the First Conference of the IGEL (International Society for Empirical Study of Literature) , Siegen, Germany, 83–85.
(1988a) Vygotsky, structuralism and the psychology of literature. In F. Erős & G. Kiss (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh European CHEIRON Conference (pp. 404–408). Budapest, Hungary.
(1988b) Literary text, literary context and reader expectations. In C. Martindale (Ed.), Psychological approaches to the study of literary narratives (pp. 205–226). Hamburg, Germany: Add publisher here.Google Scholar
(1989) Images of social categories vs. images of literary- and nonliterary objects. Poetics, 61, 1–15.Google Scholar
(1999) Cognition and representation in literature: The psychology of literary narratives. Budapest, Hungary: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
(2003) History, identity and narratives. In J. László & W. Wagner (Eds.), Theories and controversies in societal psychology (pp. 180–192). Budapest, Hungary: New Mandate.Google Scholar
(2004) Narrative psychology’s contribution to the second cognitive revolution. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 2(3–4), 337–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) The science of stories. London, United Kingdom: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Historical Tales and National Identity: An introduction to narrative social psychology. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.Google Scholar
László, J., & Cupchik, G.C
(1995) The role of affective processes in reading time and time experiences during literary reception. Empirical Studies in the Arts, 131, 25–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) Psychology of literary narratives: Studies of identity and conflict. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 21(1), 1–4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
László, J., Vincze, O., Köváriné Somogyvári, I
(2003) Representation of national identity in successful historical novels. Empirical Studies in the Arts 21:(1) 69–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
László, J. & Vincze, O
(2004) Coping with historical tasks. The role of historical movels in transmitting psychological patterns of national identity. Spiel 21:(1), 76–88.Google Scholar
László, J. & Wagner, W
(Eds.) (2003) Theories and controversies in societal psychology. Budapest: Új Mandátum.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S
(1988) Notes towards a description of Social Representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 181, 211–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Péley, B. & László, J
(2010) Character functions as indicators of self states in life stories. ETC Empirical Text and Culture Research 41, 42–49.Google Scholar
Pléh, Cs., László, J., Síklaki, I., & Terestyéni, T
(1983) What’s the point in points without a grammar? (A comment on Wilensky’s paper). Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6:(4), 607–608. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, P
(1992) Oneself as Another. Translated by Kathleen Blamey. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schank, R., & Abelson, R
(1977) Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. New York, NY: Halsted.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L.S
(1925/1971) The psychology of art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar