Article published in:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 5:2 (2015) ► pp. 139170
References

References

Altmann, U., Bohrn, I.C., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A.M.
(2012) The power of emotional valence–from cognitive to affective processes in reading. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Fact vs fiction–how paratextual information shapes our reading processes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 22–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andringa, E.
(1990)  Verbal data on literary understanding: A proposal for protocol analysis on two levels. Poetics, 19, 231–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Appel, M., Gnambs, T., Richter, T., & Green, M.C.
(2015) The Transportation Scale—Short Form (TS–SF). Media Psychology, 18(2), 243–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aryani, A., Jacobs, A.M., & Conrad, M.
(2013) Extracting salient sublexical units from written texts: “Emophon,” a corpus-based approach to phonological iconicity. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aryani, A., Kraxenberger, M., Ullrich, S., Jacobs, A.M., & Conrad, M.
(2016) Measuring the basic affective tone of poems via phonological saliency and iconicity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10, 191–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auracher, J.
(2007) wie auf den allmächtigen Schlag einer magischen Rute – Psychophysiologische Messungen zur Textwirkung (Psychophysiological measurement of textual effects on readers). Baden-Baden, Deutschland: Deutscher Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
Bailey, H., & Zacks, J.M.
(2011) Literature and event understanding. Scientific Study of Literature, 1, 72–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bartoshuk, L.
(2014) The measurement of pleasure and pain. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 91–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bohrn, I.C., Altmann, U., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A.M.
(2012) Old proverbs in new skins–an FMRI study on defamiliarization. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) When we like what we know - A parametric fMRI analysis of beauty and familiarity. Brain and Language, 124(1), 1–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bortolussi, M., & Dixon, P.
(2003) Psychonarratology: Foundations for the empirical study of literary response. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burke, M.
(2011) Literary reading, cognition and emotion: An exploration of the Oceanic mind. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2015) The neuroaesthetics of prose fiction: Pitfalls, parameters and prospects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J.T., Berntson, G.G., Lorig, T.S., Norris, C.J., Ricket, E., & Nusbaum, H.
(2003) Just because you are imaging the brain doesn’t mean you can stop using your head: A primer and first set of principles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,85, 650–661. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chesterton, G.K.
(1994) The logic of Elfland. In M. Gardner (Ed.), Great essays in science (pp. 73–94). New York, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Cupchik, G.C.
(1994) Emotion in aesthetics: reactive and reflective models. Poetics, 23, 177–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, P., Bortolussi, M., Twilley, L.C., & Leung, A.
(1993) Literary processing and interpretation: Towards empirical foundations. Poetics, 22, 5–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dowker, A.
(1989) Rhyme and alliteration in poems elicited from young children. Journal of Child Language, 16, 181–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elster, C., & Hanauer, D.
(2002) Voicing texts, voices around texts: “Reading poems in elementary school classrooms.” Research in the Teaching of English, 37, 89–134.Google Scholar
Fechner, G.T.
(1876) Vorschule der Ästhetik (Preschool of aesthetics). Hildesheim, Deutschland: Olms.Google Scholar
Fraiberg, S.H.
(1959) The magic years: Understanding and handling the problems of early childhood. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Freud, S.
(1905/1960) Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Fritsch, N., & Kuchinke, L.
(2013) Acquired affective associations induce emotion effects in word recognition: An ERP study. Brain and Language, 124, 75–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gebauer, G., & Edler, M.
(2014) Sprachen der emotion (languages of emotion). Frankfurt, Deutschland: Campus.Google Scholar
Graesser, A.C., Millis, K.K., & Zwaan, R.A.
(1997) Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 163–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A.M.
(1996) Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518–565. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Green, M.C., & Brock, T.C.
(2000) The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, F.
(2013) Travel experiences: A typology of transportation and other absorption states in relation to types of aesthetic responses. In J. Luedke et al. (Eds.), Wie gebannt: Aesthetische Verfahren der affektiven Bildung von Aufmerksamkeit (pp. 163–182). Berlin, Deutschland: Freie Universitaet.Google Scholar
Harker, W.J.
(2014) Plain sense and poetic significance: tenth-grade readers reading two poems, Poetics, 22, 199–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hernadi, P., & Steen, F.
(1999) The tropical landscapes of proverbia: A crossdisciplinary travelogue. Style, 33(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Hofmann, M.J., & Jacobs, A.M.
(2014) Interactive activation and competition models and semantic context: from behavioral to brain data. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 46, 85–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoffstaedter, P.
(1987) Poetic text processing and its empirical investigation. Poetics, 16, 75–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, C.-T., Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A.M.
(2014) Fiction feelings in Harry Potter: Haemodynamic response in the mid-cingulate cortex correlates with immersive reading experience. Neuroreport 25, 1356–1361. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hutzler, F.
(2014) Reverse inference is not a fallacy per se: Cognitive processes can be inferred from functional imaging data. NeuroImage, 84, 1061–1069. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Inkelas, S.
(2003) J’s rhymes: A longitudinal case study of language play. Journal of Child Language, 30, 557–581. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iser, W.
(1976) Der Akt des Lesens: Theorie ästhetischer Wirkung. München, Deutschland: Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A.M.
(2001) The cognitive psychology of literacy. In N.J. Smelser & P.B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 8971–8975). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Messung der Hirnaktivität (Measurement of brain activity). In J. Funke & P. Frensch (Eds.), Handbuch der Allgemeinen Psychologie, Kognition (Handbook of Experimental Psychology) (pp. 697–704). Göttingen, Deutschland: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
(2011) Neurokognitive Poetik: Elemente eines Modells des literarischen Lesens (Neurocognitive poetics: Elements of a model of literary reading). In R. Schrott & A.M. Jacobs (Eds.), Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren (Brain and Poetry: How We Construct Our Realities) (pp. 492–520). München, Deutschland: Carl Hanser Verlag.Google Scholar
(2014) Affektive und ästhetische Prozesse beim Lesen: Anfänge einer neurokognitiven Poetik (Affective and aesthetic processes in reading: towards a neurocognitive poetics.). In G. Gebauer & M. Edler (Eds.), Sprachen der emotion (Languages of emotion) (pp. 134–154). Frankfurt, Deutschland: Campus.Google Scholar
(2015a) Towards a neurocognitive poetics model of literary reading. In R. Willems (Ed.), Towards a cognitive neuroscience of natural language use (pp. 135–159). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015b) Neurocognitive poetics: Methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
. (in press 2016) Affective and aesthetic processes in literary reading: A neurocognitive poetics perspective. In M. Burke & E. Troscianko (Eds.), Dialogues between literature and cognition.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A.M., & Grainger, J.
(1994) Models of visual word recognition: Sampling the state of the art. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1311–1334. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A.M., & Hofmann, M.J.
(2013) Neurokognitive Modellierung (Neurocognitive Modeling). In E. Schröger & S. Kölsch (Hg.), Enzyklopädie der psychologie. Affektive und kognitive neurowissenschaft (pp. 431–447). Göttingen, Deutschland: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A.M., Lüdtke, J., & Meyer-Sickendiek, B.
(2013) Bausteine einer neurokognitiven Poetik: Foregrounding/backgrounding, lyrische stimmung und ästhetisches gefallen (Elements of a neurocognitive poetics: Foregrounding/backgrounding, typical mood, and aesthetic pleasure). In B. Meyer-Sickendiek & F. Reents (Eds.), Stimmung und Methode (Mood and Method) (pp. 63–94). Tübingen, Deutschland: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A.M., & Kinder, A.
(2015) Worte als Worte erfahren: wie erarbeitet das Gehirn Gedichte (Experience words as words: how the brain constructs poems). In A. Pompe (Ed.), Kind und Gedicht (Child and Poem) (pp. 57–76). Berlin, Deutschland: Rombach.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A.M., & Lüdtke, J.
. (in press 2016) Immersion into narrative and poetic worlds: A neurocognitive poetics perspective. In F. Hakemulder, M.M. Kuijpers, E.S.H. Tan, K. Balint, & M.M. Doicaru (Eds.), The handbook of narrative absorption.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A.M., Lüdtke, J., Aryani, A., Meyer-Sickendiek, B., & Conrad, M.
(2016) Mood-empathic and/or aesthetic responses in poetry reception: A model-guided, multilevel, multimethod approach. SSOL, in press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A.M., & Schrott, R.
(2015) Gefesselt im Kopfkino: Von Kippschaltern, Madeleine Effekten und Don Quichote Syndromen bei der Immersion in Textwelten (Captivated in the mind’s cinema: Of trigger-switches, Don Quichote syndromes, and immersion in text worlds). Retrieved from http://​fiktion​.cc/
Jacobs, A.M., & Ziegler, J.C.
(1997) Has Glenberg forgotten his nurse? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 26–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Visual word recognition, neurocognitive psychology of. In J.D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 214–219). Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A.M., , M.L.-H., Briesemeister, B.B., Conrad, M., Hofmann M.J., Kuchinke L., Lüdtke, J., & Braun, M.
(2015) 10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: What are the echoes? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 714. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
(1987) Consciousness and the computational mind. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R.
(1944) Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala. (Nachdruck: 1969 Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
(1960) Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T.A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, T., Buchta, K., Köhler, M., & Schröger, E.
(2004) The primacy of beauty in judging the aesthetics of objects. Psychological Reports, 94(3), 1253–1260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kamberelis, G.
(1999) Genre development and learning: Children writing stories, science reports, and poems. Research in the Teaching of English, 33, 403–460.Google Scholar
Keidel, J.L., Davis, P.M., Gonzalez-Diaz, V., Martin, C.D., & Thierry, G.
(2013) How Shakespeare tempests the brain: Neuroimaging insights. Cortex, 49(4), 913–919. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, D.C., & Castano, E.
(2013) Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342, 377–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koestler, A.
(1964) The act of creation. New York, NY: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Kuchinke, L., Trapp, S., Jacobs, A.M., & Leder, H.
(2009) Pupillary responses in art appreciation: Effects of aesthetic emotions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(3), 156–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D.
(2011) The symptoms of science in studies of literature: An uneasy prognosis. Scientific Study of Literature, 1(1), 182–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., & Miall, D.S.
(2001) Numerically aided phenomenology: Procedures for investigating categories of experience. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1). Retrieved from http://​qualitative​-research​.net​/fqs​/fqs​-eng​.htmGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., & Douglas, S.
in press). Identifying forms of absorption that facilitate aesthetic response. In F. Hakemulder, M.M. Kuijpers, E.S.H. Tan, K. Balint, & M.M. Doicaru (Eds.) The handbook of narrative absorption
Kuiken, D., Campbell, P., & Sopčák, P.
(2012) The experiencing questionnaire: Locating exceptional reading moments. Scientific Study of Literature, 2, 243–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leder, H.
(2013) Next steps in neuroaesthetics: Which processes and processing stages to study? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(1), 27–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehne, M., Engel, P., Menninghaus, W., Jacobs, A.M., & Koelsch, S.
(2015) Reading a suspenseful literary text activates brain areas related to social cognition and predictive inference. PLOS One, 10(5). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Limbach, J.
(2004) Das schönste deutsche Wort (The most beautiful German Word). Freiburg, Deutschland: Verlag Herder.Google Scholar
Lüdtke, J., Meyer-Sickendiek, B., & Jacobs, A.M.
(2014) Immersing in the stillness of an early morning: Testing the mood empathy hypothesis of poetry reception. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(3), 363–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manguel, A.
(1996) A history of reading. London, United Kingdom: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
McCabe, A., & Peterson, C.
(1991) Developing narrative structure. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Menninghaus, W., Bohrn, I.C., Knoop, C.A., Kotz, S.A., Schlotz, W., & Jacobs, A.M.
(2015) Rhetorical features facilitate prosodic processing while handicapping ease of semantic comprehension. Cognition, 143, 48–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyer-Sickendiek, B.
(2011) Lyrisches Gespür: Vom geheimen Sensorium moderner Poesie (The lyrical sense of feeling. About the secret sensorium of modern poetry). Paderborn, Deutschland: Fink.Google Scholar
Miall, D.S.
(2011) Science in the perspective of literariness. Scientific Study of Literature, 1, 7–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miall, D.S., & Kuiken, D.
(1994) Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 22, 389–407. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 37–58.Google Scholar
(1998) The form of reading: Empirical studies of literariness. Poetics, 25, 327–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mieder, W.
(2004) Proverbs: A handbook. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Mol, S.E., & Bus, A.G.
(2011) To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 267–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montant, M., Nazir, T.A., & Poncet, M.
(1998): Pure alexia and the viewing position effect in printed words. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 93–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nell, V.
(1988) The psychology of reading for pleasure: Needs and gratifications. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(1), 6–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nicklas, P., & Jacobs, A.M.
. (in press 2016) Rhetorics, neurocognitive poetics and the aesthetics of adaptation. Poetics Today.Google Scholar
Oatley, K.
(1994) A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics, 23, 53–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panksepp, J.
(1998) Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pompe, A.
(Ed.) (2015) Kind und Gedicht (Child and Poem). Berlin, Deutschland: Rombach.Google Scholar
Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N.
(1998) Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reber, R., Schwartz, N., & Winkielman, P.
(2004) Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schlochtermeier, L.H., Pehrs, C., Kuchinke, L., Kappelhoff, H., & Jacobs, A.M.
(2015) Emotion processing in different media types: Realism, complexity, and immersion. Journal of Systems and Integrative Neuroscience, 1, 41–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schrott, R., & Jacobs, A.M.
(2011) Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren (Brain and Poetry: How We Construct Our Realities). München, Deutschland: Hanser.Google Scholar
Stenneken, P., Hofmann, M., & Jacobs, A.
(2005) Patterns of phoneme and syllable frequency in jargon aphasia. Brain and Language, 95, 221–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, S.
(1969) The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. In W.G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II, Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315.Google Scholar
Sun, R., Coward, L.A., & Zenzen, M.J.
(2005) On levels of cognitive modeling. Philosophical Psychology, 18(5), 613–637. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thoma, P., & Daum, I.
(2006) Neurocognitive mechanisms of figurative language processing: Evidence from clinical dysfunctions. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(8), 1182–1205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ullrich, S., Aryani, A., Kraxenberger, M., Jacobs, A.M., & Conrad, M.
(2016) Textual features as basis of the general affective meaning: Exploring the interplay of lexical affective features, dynamic inter-lexical shifts, and the basic affective tone in poetry. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Valery, P.
(1957) Oeuvres I. Paris, France: Variété.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T.
(1979) Advice on theoretical poetics. Poetics, 8, 569–608. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Peer, W.
(1986) Stylistics and psychology: Investigations of foregrounding. London, United Kingdom: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
van Peer, W., Hakemulder, J., & Zyngier, S.
(2007) Lines on feeling: Foregrounding, aesthetics and meaning. Language and Literature, 16, 197–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wallentin, M., Nielsen, A.H., Vuust, P., Dohn, A., Roepstorff, A., & Lund, T.E.
(2011) Amygdala and heart rate variability responses from listening to emotionally intense parts of a story. NeuroImage, 58(3), 963–973. Crossref.Google Scholar
Wallentin, M., Simonsen, A., & Højlund Nielsen, A.
(2013) Action speaks louder than words: Empathy mainly modulates emotions from theory of mind-laden parts of a story. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 137–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willems, R., & Jacobs, A.M.
2016). Caring about Dostoyevsky: The untapped potential of studying literature. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 243–245. Crossref
Cited by

Cited by 28 other publications

Bruhn, Mark J.
2018. Citation analysis. Scientific Study of Literature 8:1  pp. 77 ff. Crossref logo
Dixon, Peter & Marisa Bortolussi
2015. Measuring literary experience. Scientific Study of Literature 5:2  pp. 178 ff. Crossref logo
Froehlich, Eva, Johanna Liebig, Johannes C. Ziegler, Mario Braun, Ulman Lindenberger, Hauke R. Heekeren & Arthur M. Jacobs
2016. Drifting through Basic Subprocesses of Reading: A Hierarchical Diffusion Model Analysis of Age Effects on Visual Word Recognition. Frontiers in Psychology 7 Crossref logo
Guy, Josephine M, Kathy Conklin & Jennifer Sanchez-Davies
2018. Literary stylistics, authorial intention and the scientific study of literature: A critical overview. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 27:3  pp. 196 ff. Crossref logo
Hugentobler, Katharina Gloria & Jana Lüdtke
2021. Micropoetry Meets Neurocognitive Poetics: Influence of Associations on the Reception of Poetry. Frontiers in Psychology 12 Crossref logo
Jacobs, Arthur, Markus J. Hofmann & Annette Kinder
2016. On Elementary Affective Decisions: To Like Or Not to Like, That Is the Question. Frontiers in Psychology 7 Crossref logo
Jacobs, Arthur M.
2016. The scientific study of literary experience and neuro-behavioral responses to literature. Scientific Study of Literature 6:1  pp. 164 ff. Crossref logo
Jacobs, Arthur M.
2017. Quantifying the Beauty of Words: A Neurocognitive Poetics Perspective. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11 Crossref logo
Jacobs, Arthur M.
2018. (Neuro-)Cognitive poetics and computational stylistics. Scientific Study of Literature 8:1  pp. 165 ff. Crossref logo
Jacobs, Arthur M.
2018. The Gutenberg English Poetry Corpus: Exemplary Quantitative Narrative Analyses. Frontiers in Digital Humanities 5 Crossref logo
Jacobs, Arthur M.
2019. Sentiment Analysis for Words and Fiction Characters From the Perspective of Computational (Neuro-)Poetics. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 6 Crossref logo
Jacobs, Arthur M., Berenike Herrmann, Gerhard Lauer, Jana Lüdtke & Sascha Schroeder
2020. Sentiment Analysis of Children and Youth Literature: Is There a Pollyanna Effect?. Frontiers in Psychology 11 Crossref logo
Jacobs, Arthur M. & Annette Kinder
2017. “The Brain Is the Prisoner of Thought”: A Machine-Learning Assisted Quantitative Narrative Analysis of Literary Metaphors for Use in Neurocognitive Poetics. Metaphor and Symbol 32:3  pp. 139 ff. Crossref logo
Jacobs, Arthur M. & Annette Kinder
2018. What makes a metaphor literary? Answers from two computational studies. Metaphor and Symbol 33:2  pp. 85 ff. Crossref logo
Jacobs, Arthur M. & Jana Lüdtke
2017.  In Narrative Absorption [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 27],  pp. 69 ff. Crossref logo
Jacobs, Arthur M., Jana Lüdtke, Arash Aryani, Burkhard Meyer-Sickendieck & Markus Conrad
2016. Mood-empathic and aesthetic responses in poetry reception. Scientific Study of Literature 6:1  pp. 87 ff. Crossref logo
Jacobs, Arthur M., Sarah Schuster, Shuwei Xue & Jana Lüdtke
2017. What’s in the brain that ink may character ….. Scientific Study of Literature 7:1  pp. 4 ff. Crossref logo
Jacobs, Arthur M. & Roel M. Willems
2018. The Fictive Brain: Neurocognitive Correlates of Engagement in Literature. Review of General Psychology 22:2  pp. 147 ff. Crossref logo
Kuijpers, Moniek M.
2021.  In Style and Reader Response [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 36],  pp. 217 ff. Crossref logo
Kuiken, Don
2015. The implicit erasure of “literary experience” in empirical studies of literature. Scientific Study of Literature 5:2  pp. 171 ff. Crossref logo
Lüdtke, Jana, Eva Froehlich, Arthur M. Jacobs & Florian Hutzler
2019. The SLS-Berlin: Validation of a German Computer-Based Screening Test to Measure Reading Proficiency in Early and Late Adulthood. Frontiers in Psychology 10 Crossref logo
Mangen, Anne, Anne Charlotte Begnum, Anežka Kuzmičová, Kersti Nilsson, Mette Steenberg & Hildegunn Støle
2018. Empathy and literary style. Orbis Litterarum 73:6  pp. 471 ff. Crossref logo
Mangen, Anne, Gérard Olivier & Jean-Luc Velay
2019. Comparing Comprehension of a Long Text Read in Print Book and on Kindle: Where in the Text and When in the Story?. Frontiers in Psychology 10 Crossref logo
Nenadić, Filip, Dušan Vejnović & Slobodan Marković
2019. Subjective experience of poetry: Latent structure and differences between experts and non-experts. Poetics 73  pp. 100 ff. Crossref logo
Sylvester, Teresa, Mario Braun, David Schmidtke & Arthur M. Jacobs
2016. The Berlin Affective Word List for Children (kidBAWL): Exploring Processing of Affective Lexical Semantics in the Visual and Auditory Modalities. Frontiers in Psychology 7 Crossref logo
Tiede, Kevin E. & Markus Appel
2020. Reviews, expectations, and the experience of stories. Media Psychology 23:3  pp. 365 ff. Crossref logo
van Krieken, Kobie, Hans Hoeken & José Sanders
2017. Evoking and Measuring Identification with Narrative Characters – A Linguistic Cues Framework. Frontiers in Psychology 8 Crossref logo
Xue, Shuwei, Arthur M. Jacobs & Jana Lüdtke
2020. What Is the Difference? Rereading Shakespeare’s Sonnets —An Eye Tracking Study. Frontiers in Psychology 11 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.